Computer-aided quantitative analysis of banded karyotypes, exemplified in C-banded Hyacinthoides italica s.l. (Hyacinthaceae)

REFERENCES

• Armostrong K.C., Craig I.L. and Merritt C., 1987.—Hordeum chilense (2n = 14) computer-assisted Giemsa karyotypes. Genome, 29: 683–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumberger H., 1970.—Chromosomenzahlbestimmungen und Karyotypanalysen bei den Gattungen Anemone, Hepatica und Pulsatilla. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges., 80: 17–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert I., 1993.—Systematische Karyologie und Embryologie von Prospero Salisb. und Barnardia Lindl. (Hyacinthaceae). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert I., Greilhuber J. and Speta F., 1996.—Chromosome banding and genome size differentiation in Prospero (Hyacinthaceae): diploids. Pl. Syst. Evol., 203: 143–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errico A., Conicella C. and Venora G., 1991.—Karyotype studies on Pisum fulvum and Pisum sativum, using a chromosome image analysis system. Genome, 34: 105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K., 1985.—Identification of plant chromosomes by image analysis method. Cell (Tokyo), 17: 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fukui K., 1986.—Standardization of karyotyping plant chromosomes by a newly developed chromosome image analyzing system (CHIAS). Theor. Appl. Genet., 72: 27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K., 1995.—Quantitative chromosome maps as a basis of biosciences. In: «Kew Chromosome Conference IV», P.E. Brandham and M.D. Bennett (eds.), pp. 201–213, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
   Google Scholar
• Fukui K. and Kakeda K., 1990.—Quantitative karyotyping of barley chromosomes by image analysis methods. Genome, 33: 450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K. and Kamisugi Y, 1995.—Mapping of C-banded Crepis chromosomes by imaging methods. Chromos. Research, 3: 79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K., and Mukai Y., 1988.—Condensation patterns as a new image parameter for identification of small chromosomes in plants. Jpn. J. Genet., 63: 359–366.
   Google Scholar
• Fukui K., Tsujimoto H. and Noda K., 1988.—Imaging techniques for wheat karyotyping. Proceed. 7th Wheat Genet. Symp., 1: 275–280.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert C.W., 1966.—A computer programme for the analysis of human chromosomes. Nature, 5069: 1437–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D.M., Bogart J.P., Anthony E.H. and Genner D.L., 1980.—An interactive microcomputer based karyotype analysis system for phylogenetic cytotaxonomy. Comput. Biol. Med., 10: 219–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D.M., Myers P.Z. and Reyna D.L., 1984.—CHROMPAC III: an improved package for microcomputer-assisted analysis of karyotypes. J. Heredity, 75: 143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., 1975.—Heterogeneity of heterochromatin in plants: comparison of Hy- and C-bands in Vicia faba. Pl. Syst. Evol., 124: 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., 1982.—Trends in der Chromosomenevolution von Scilla (Liliaceae). Stapfia, 10: 11–51.
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., 1984.—Chromosomal evidence in taxonomy. In: «Current concepts in plant taxonomy», V.H. Heywood and D.M. Moore (eds.), pp. 157–180, Academic Press, London and Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. and Speta F., 1976.—C-banded karyotypes in the Scilla hohenackeri group, S. persica, and Puschkinia (Liliaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol., 126: 149–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. and Speta F., 1978.—Quantitative analyses of C-banded karyotypes, and systematics in the cultivated species of the Scilla siberica group (Liliaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol., 129: 63–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. and Speta F., 1989.—A Giemsa C-banding and DNA content study in Scilla cilicica and S. morrisii, two little known sibling species of the S. siberica alliance (Hyacinthaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 165: 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttenberger H. and Müller M., 1996.—Quantitative karyotyping of Norway spruce root meristems by image analysis methods and pattern recognition. Phyton (Austria), 36: 127–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauschteck-Jungen E. and Meili R., 1967.—Vergleich der Chromosomensätze von Steinwild (Capra ibex) und Hausziege (Capra hircus). Chromosoma, 21: 198–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen J. and Linde-Laursen I., 1992.—Statistical evaluation of length measurements on barley chromosomes with a proposal for a new nomenclature for symbols and positions of cytological markers. Hereditas, 117: 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamisugi Y. and Fukui K., 1990.—Automatic karyotyping of plant chromosomes by imaging techniques. BioTechniques, 8: 290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch I.J. and Heslop-Harrison J.S., 1993.—Physical mapping of four sites of 5S rDNA sequences and one site of the a-amylase-2 gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome, 36: 517–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loidl J., 1983.—Some features of heterochromatin in wild Allium species. Pl. Syst. Evol., 143: 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama S. and Fukui K., 1995.—Detection of sister chromatid exchange sites by sequential staining and imaging methods. Jpn. J. Genet., 70: 267–271.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmido N. and Fukui K., 1995.—Cytological studies of African cultivated rice, Oryza glaberrima. Theor. Appl. Genet., 91: 212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oud J.L., Kakes P., and De Jong J.H., 1987.—Computerized analysis of chromosomal parameters in karyotype studies. Theor. Appl. Genet., 73: 630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen C., Giese H. and Linde-Laursen I., 1995.—Towards an integration of the physical and the genetic chromosome maps of barley by in situ hybridization. Hereditas, 123: 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher T., Ambros P. and Schweizer D., 1980.—Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Pl. Syst. Evol., 134: 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venora G., Conicella C., Errico A. and Saccardo F., 1991.—Karyotyping in plants by an image analysis system. J. Genet. & Breed., 45: 233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Voss W.-R., Büch K. and Sauer W., 1994.—Computergestützte Karyotyp-Analyse mittels des PC- Programmes «CHROMEX». Phyton (Austria), 33: 279–288.
   Google Scholar
• Wei J.-Z., Campbell W.F. and Wang R.R.-C., 1995.—Standard Giemsa C-banded karyotype of Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea) and its use in identification of a deletion-translocation heterozygote. Genome, 38: 1262–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetschnig W., 1992.—CHROM, ein neues Computerprogramm zur Darstellung chromosomenmorphologischer Daten. Phyton (Austria), 31: 251–256.
   Google Scholar