Nuclear genome size and karyotype analysis in Mammillaria species (Cactaceae)

REFERENCES

• Bennett M.D., Bhandol P. and Leitch I.J., 2000—Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 27: 227–274.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., Parmjit B. and Leitch I.J., 2000—Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses-807 new estimates. Annals of Botany 86: 859–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D. and Leitch I. J., 2005—Plant DNA C-values Database (release 4.0 October 2005). http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/homepage.html
   Google Scholar
• Bravo-Hollis H., 1978—Las Cactáceas de México. Vol. I. UNAM, México. 755 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo-Hollis H. y Sánchez-Mejorada H., 1991—Las Cactáceas de México. Vol III. UNAM México. 643 p.
   Google Scholar
• Briones S.F., Palomino G. and García A., 2004—Chromosome analysis of Mammillaria supertexta, M. crucigera and M. haageana and their comparison with M. san-angelensis (Cactaceae). Caryologia 3: 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen R. and Rees H., 1972—Nuclear variation within Avenae. Chromosoma 39: 93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebolla A., Vinardell J., Kiss E., Oláh B., Roudier F., Kondorosi A. and Kondorosi E., 1999—The mitotic inhibitor ccs52 is required for endoreduplication and ploidy-dependent cell enlargement in plants. The European Molecular Biology Organization 18: 4476–4484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cid R. and Palomino G., 1996—Cytotypes and meiotic behavior in mexican populations of Myrtillocactus geometrizans var. geometrizans (Cactaceae). Cytologie 61: 343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Cites., 2005—Apéndices I, II y III de la CITES. Convención sobre el Comercio Internacional de especies Amenazadas de Flora y Fauna Silvestres (CITES). http://www.cites.org/esp/app/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Conger A.D. and Fairchild L.M., 1953—A quick-freeze method for making smear slides permanent. Stain Technology 28: 281–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cota J. H. and Wallace R. S., 1996—La citología y la sistemática molecular en la familia Cactaceae. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas 2: 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman J. C., 2001—Crassulacean acid metabolism. A plastic photosynthetic adaptation to arid environments. Plant Physiology 127: 1439–1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1984—Role of polyploidy in reproductive organs and tissues. In B.M. Johri, (Eds). “Embryology of Angiosperms”, p. 519–566. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Das A.B., Mohanty S. and Das P., 1998a—Interspecific variation of nuclear DNA and structural changes in meiotic and mitotic chromosome in some species of Mammillaria (Cactaceae). Caryologia 3–4: 289–301.
   Google Scholar
• Das A. B., Mohanty S. and Das P., 1998b—Variation in karyotype and 4C DNA content in six species of Melocactus of the family Cactaceae. Cytologia 63: 239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Das A. B., Mohanty S. and Das P., 1999a—Studies on chiasma frequency and nuclear 4C DNA amount in seven species of Mammillaria (Cactaceae). Cytobios 97: 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Das A. B., Mohanty S. and Das P., 1999b—Karyotype diversity in thirteen species of Mammillaria in the family Cactaceae. Cytobios 97: 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A. B. Mohanty S., Marrs R. and Das P., 1999c—Somatic chromosome number and karyotype diversity in fifteen species of Mammillaria of the family Cactaeae. Cytobios 97: 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Das A. B., Mohanty S. and Das P., 1999d—4C DNA variation and karyotype diversity in nine species of Ferocactus. Cytologia 64: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• De Rocher E. J., Harkins K., Galbraith D. and Bohnert H., 1990—Developmentally regulated systemic endopolyploidy in succulents with small genomes. Science 250: 99–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezel J., Sgorbati S. and Lucretti S., 1992—Comparison of three fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 85: 625–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezel J. and Göhde W., 1995—Sex determination in dioecious plants Melandrium album and M. rubrum using high-resolution flow-cytometry. Cytometry 19: 103–106.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezel J., 1995—Flow cytometry principles and applications in mutation breeding. In Fourteenth IAEA/FAO (Eds), “Interregional training course on advances in plant mutation techniques”, p. 1–25. Vienna, Austria (C7-INT-5.135).
   Google Scholar
• Dolezel J., Greilhuber J., Lucretti S., Meister A., Lysak M.A., Nardi L. and Obermayers R., 1998—Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: Inter-laboratory comparison. Annals of Botany (Suppl A) 82: 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezel J. and Bartos J., 2005—Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Annals of Botany 95: 99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellue P., Boscaiu M., Vicente O., Moreno V. and Rossello J.A., 2002—Intra and interspecific variation in DNA content in Cistus (Cistaceae). Annals of Botany 90: 345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith D.W., Lambert G.M., Macas J. and Dolezel J., 1998—Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy in higher plants. In: J.P. Robinson, Z. Darzynkiewicz, P.N. Dean, L.G. Dressier, A. Orfao, P.S. Rabinovitch, C.C. Stewart, H.J. Tanke, L.L. Wheeless (Eds.), “Current protocols in cytometry“. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 7.6.1–7.6.22.
   Google Scholar
• García V.A., 1990—Técnicas y procedimientos de citogenética vegetal. Colegio de Posgraduados, México. 144 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson C.A. and Nobel P.S., 1986—The cactus primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 286 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gill B.S. and Goyal V., 1984—Cytology of some members of Cactaceae. Cell Chromosome Review 7: 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., Dolezel J., Lysak M. and Bennett M., 2005—The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R. and Gupta P.K., 1978—Karyotypic studies in the genus Crotalaria Linn. Cytologia 43: 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández M. H. y Godínez A. H., 1994—Contribución al conocimiento de las cactáceas mexicanas amenazadas. Acta Botánica Mexicana 26: 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt D., 1987—A new review of Mammillaria. Bradleya 5: 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Joubes J. and Chevalier C., 2000—Endoreduplication in higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology 43: 735–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo N. and Kimura Y., 2001—Flow cytometric evidence for endopolyploidization in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) flowers. Sex Plant Reproduction 13: 279–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch I.J., Chase M. and Bennett M.D., 1998—Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany (Suppl A) 82: 85–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levan A., Fredga K. and Sandberg A., 1964—Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosome. Hereditas 52: 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthy J., 1995—Taxonomische Untersuchung der gattung Mammillaria Haw. (Cactaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Markova M., 1975—Karyosystematische Untersuchungen an den Cistaceae Bulgariens. Plant Systematics and Evolution 123: 283–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty S., Das A.B. and Das P., 1996—Analysis of chiasma frequency and nuclear DNA variation in some species of Mammillaria. Cytobios 88: 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty S., Das A.B. and Das P., 1997a—Studies on nuclear DNA and meiotic chromosome in 8 species on Mammillaria. Cytologia 62: 331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty S., Das A.B. and Das P., 1997b—Estimation of 4C DNA content and determination of chiasma frequency in eigth species of Mammillaria. Cytobios 91: 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ohri D. and Khoshoo T., 1987—Nuclear DNA contents in the genus Ficus (Moraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 156: 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohri D., 1998—Genome size variation and plant systematics. Annals of Botany 82: 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto F., 1990—DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Z. Darzynkiewicz and H. A. Crissman (Eds), “Methods in Cell Biology” Vol. 33, p. 110–115. Academic Press Inc., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Palomino G., Zuleta S. and Scheinvar L., 1988—Estudios citogenéticos de dos especies y una variedad del género Nyctocereus (Cactaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 48: 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Palomino G., Dolezel J., Cid R., Brunner I., Méndez I. and Rubluo A., 1999—Nuclear genome stability of Mammillaria san-angelensis (Cactaceae) regenerants induced by auxins in long term in vitro culture. Plant Science 141: 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomino G. and Sousa M., 2000—Variation of nuclear DNA content in biflorus species of Lonchocarpus (Leguminosae). Annals of Botany 85: 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remski M.F., 1954—Cytological investigations in Mammillaria and some associated genera. Botanical Gazette 116: 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez F. and Cardoso H., 1978—Citogenética básica y biología de los cromosomas. OEA. Whashington, D.C. 117 p.
   Google Scholar
• Semarnat., 2001—Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial. México.
   Google Scholar