Genome size variation and evolution in the family Asteraceae

References

• Albach DC, Greilhuber J. 2004. Genome size variation and evolution in Veronica. Ann Bot. 94 (6): 897–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrožová K, Mandáková T, Bureš P, Neumann P, Leitch IJ, Koblížková A, Macas J, Lysak MA. 2011. Diverse retrotransposon families and an AT-rich satellite DNA revealed in giant genomes of Fritillaria lilies. Ann Bot. 107 (2): 255–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderberg AA, Eldenäs P, Bayer RJ, Englund M. 2005. Evolutionary relationships in the Asteraceae tribe Inuleae (incl. Plucheeae) evidenced by DNA sequences of ndhF; with notes on the systematic positions of some aberrant genera. Org Divers Evol. 5 (2): 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baetcke KP, Sparrow AH, Nauman CH, Schwemmer SS. 1967. The relationship of DNA content to nuclear and chromosome volumes and to radiosensitivity (LD50). Botany. 58 (2): 533–540.
   Google Scholar
• Bancheva S, Greilhuber J. 2006. Genome size in Bulgarian Centaurea s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 257 : 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD. 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc B. 181 (1–2): 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD. 1976. DNA amount, latitude and crop plant distribution. Environ Exp Bot. 16 (2–3): 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD. 1998. Plant genome values: how much do we know? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95 (5): 2011–2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005a. Plant genome size research: a field in focus. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005b. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 45–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005c. Genome size evolution in plants. In: Gregory TR, ed. The evolution of the genome. San Diego (CA): Elsevier, 89–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2010, Dec. Plant DNA C-values database [database release 5.0]. http://data.kew.org/cvalues/.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2012, Dec. Plant DNA C-values database [database release 6.0]. http://data.kew.org/cvalues/.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Hanson L. 1998. DNA amounts in two samples of angiosperms weeds. Ann Bot. 82 (Suppl. 1): 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetzen JL, Ma JX, Devos KM. 2005. Mechanism of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 422 (6930): 433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Q, Zhang D, Liu ZL, Wang XR. 2006. Chromosomal localization of 5S and 18S rDNA in five species of subgenus Strobus and their implications for genome evolution of Pinus. Ann Bot. 97 (1): 715–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligari PDS, Hind DJN, D.J.N. Hind (Editor-in-Chief). 1996. Compositae: Biology & utilization. In: Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
   Google Scholar
• Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS, Carlson JE, Arumuganathan K, Barakat A, Albert V, Ma H, dePamphilis CW. 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16 (6): 738–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova D, Greilhuber J. 2000. Karyotype and DNA-content evolution in ten species of Crepis (Asteraceae) distributed in Bulgaria. Bot J Linn Soc. 132 (3): 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. 2007. Flow cytometry with plant cells: analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes. London: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Enke N. 2008. Phylogeny and character evolution in the genus Crepis L. (Cichorieae, Compositae) [dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) eingereicht im Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie]. [Berlin]: Freien Universität. 129 p.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco-Ortega J, Park SJ, Santos-Guerra A, Benabid A, Jansen K. 2001. Origin and evolution of the endemic Macaronesian Inuleae (Asteraceae): evidence from the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Bot J Linn Soc. 72 (1): 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk VA, Bayer RJ, Keeley S, Chan R, Watson L, Gemeinholzer B, Schilling E, Panero JL, Baldwin BG, Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Jansen RK. 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. In: Friis I and Balslev H, editors. Biologiske Skrifter. 55 : 343–373.
   Google Scholar
• Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, editors. 2009. Systematics, evolution and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy.
   Google Scholar
• Gall JG. 1981. Chromosome structure and the C-value paradox. J Cell Biol. 91 (3): 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Canela MÁ, Garnatje T, McArthur ED, Sanderson SC, Vallès J. 2008. Evolutionary and ecological implications of genome size in the North American endemic sagebrushes and allies (Artemisia, Asteraceae). Biol J Linn Soc. 94 (3): 631–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Garnatje T, Kovarik A. 2012. Plant rDNA database: ribosomal DNA loci information goes online. Chromosoma. doi:10.1007/s00412-012-0368-7. 121(4):389–394.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Garnatje T, Pellicer J, McArthur ED, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vallès J. 2009. Ribosomal DNA, heterochromatin and correlation with genome size in diploid and polyploid North American endemic sagebrushes (Artemisia, Asteraceae). Genome. 52 (12): 1012–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Garnatje T, Twibell JD, Vallès J. 2006. Genome size variation in the Artemisia arborescens complex (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) and its cultivars. Genome. 49 (3): 244–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Inceer H, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2005. Genome size variation in some representatives of the genus Tripleurospermum. Biol Plantarum. 49 (3): 381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Lim KY, Chester M, Garnatje T, Pellicer J, Vallès J, Leitch AR, Kovarik A. 2009. Linkage of 35S and 5S rRNA genes in Artemisia (family Asteraceae): first evidence from angiosperms. Chromosoma. 118 (1): 85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, McArthur ED, Pellicer J, Sanderson SC, Vallès J, Garnatje T. 2011. A molecular phylogenetic approach to Western North America endemic Artemisia and allies (Asteraceae): untangling the sagebrushes. Am J Bot. 98 (4): 638–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Panero JL, Siroky J, Kovarik A. 2010. Repeated reunions and splits feature the highly dynamic evolution of 5S and 35S ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) in the Asteraceae family. BMC Plant Biol. 10 : 176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Sanz M, Garnatje T, Kreitschitz A, McArthur ED, Vallès J. 2004. Variation of DNA amount in 47 populations of the subtribe Artemisiinae and related taxa (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): karyological, ecological, and systematic implications. Genome. 47 (6): 1004–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Garnatje T, Vilatersana R. 2001. Generic delimitation and phylogeny of the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae): a combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Bot. 87 (4): 503–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Jacas N, Uysal T, Romaschenko K, Suárez-Santiago VN, Ertuğrul K, Susanna A. 2006. Centaurea revisited: a molecular survey of the Jacea group. Ann Bot. 98 (4): 741–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Canela MÁ, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vitales D, Vallès J. 2010. GSAD: a database on genome size of the family Asteraceae [database]; [cited 2010 Sep 30]. Available from http://www.etnobiofic.cat/gsad/.
   Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Canela MÁ, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vitales D, Vallès J. 2011. GSAD: a genome size in the Asteraceae database. Cytom Part A. 79A (6): 401–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Garcia S, Canela MA. 2007. Genome size variation from a phylogenetic perspective in the genus Cheirolophus Cass. (Asteraceae): biogeographic implications. Plant Syst Evol. 264 (1–2): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Vallès J. 2009. Cheirolophus intybaceus (Asteraceae, Centaureinae) o la constància del valor 2C. Collect Bot (Barcelona). 28 : 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Vallès J. 2007. Genome size in the Asteraceae: state-of-art and perspectives. Nucleus. 50 (3): 427–438.
   Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Garcia S, Vilatersana R, Vallès J. 2006. Genome size variation in the genus Carthamus L. (Asteraceae, Cardueae): systematic implications and additive changes during allopolyploidization in hybrid taxa. Ann Bot. 97 (3): 461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Hidalgo O, Vitales D, Pellicer J, Vallès J, Robin O, Garcia S, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2012. Swarm of terminal 35S in Cheirolophus (Asteraceae, Centaureinae). Genome. 55 (7): 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnatje T, Vallès J, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Sanz M, Canela MA, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2004. Genome size in Echinops L. and related genera (Asteraceae, Cardueae): karyological, ecological and phylogenetic implications. Biol Cell. 96 (2): 117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geleta M, Bekele E, Dagne K, Bryngelsson T. 2010. Phylogenetics and taxonomic delimitation of the genus Guizotia (Asteraceae) based on sequences derived from various chloroplast DNA regions. Plant Syst Evol. 289 (1–2): 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory TR. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol Rev. 76 (1): 65–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory TR, editor, 2005. The evolution of the genome. Amsterdam: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. 2005. Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: Identifying its existence. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins JS, Grover CE, Wendel JF. 2008. Repeated big bangs and the expanding universe: Directionality in plant genome size evolution. Plant Sci. 174 (6): 557–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T. 2011. Organization of the plant genome in chromosomes. Plant J. 66 (1): 18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, 2 vols Heywood VH Harborne JB Turner BL Academic Press London 1977
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O. 2006. El grupo Rhaponticum (Asteracae, Cardueae, Centaureinae): delimitación y filogenia [PhD thesis]. [Catalonia (Spain)]: University of Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Garcia-Jacas N, Garnatje T, Romashchenko K, Susanna A, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2008. Extreme environmental conditions and phylogenetic inheritance: systematics of Myopordon and Oligochaeta (Asteraceae, Cardueae-Centaureineae). Taxon. 57 (3): 769–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Garcia-Jacas N, Garnatje T, Susanna A. 2006. Phylogeny of Rhaponticum (Asteraceae, Cardueae-Centaureinae) and related genera inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data: taxonomic and biogeographic implications. Ann Bot. 97 (5): 705–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Garcia-Jacas N, Garnatje T, Susanna A, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2007. Karyological evolution in Rhaponticum Vaill. (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and related genera. Bot J Linn Soc. 153 (2): 193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Vallès J. 2012. First record of a natural hexaploid population for Valeriana officinalis: genome size is confirmed to be a suitable indicator of ploidy level in the species. Caryologia. 3 (3): 243–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hind DJN, Beentje HJ, D.J.N. Hind (Editor-in-Chief). 1996. Compositae: Systematics. In: Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
   Google Scholar
• Hind DJN, Jeffrey C, Pope GV, editors. 1995. Advances in Compositae systematics. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
   Google Scholar
• Jones WE, Kuehnle AR, Arumuganathan K. 1998. Nuclear DNA content of 26 Orchid (Orchidaceae) genera with emphasis on Dendrobium. Ann Bot. 82 (2): 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalendar R, Tanskanen J, Chang W, Antonius K, Sela H, Peleg O, Schulman AH. 2008. Cassandra retrotransposons carry independently transcribed 5S RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105 (15): 5833–5838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell MG. 2002. Transposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes. Genetica. 115 (1): 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball RT, Crawford DJ. 2004. Phylogeny of Coreopsideae (Asteraceae) using ITS sequences suggests lability in reproductive characters. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 33 (1): 127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA. 2005. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology, and phenotype. Ann Bot. 95 (1): 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubitzki K. 2007. The families and genera of vascular plants. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, editors. Flowering plants volume VIII. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Press. p. 639.
   Google Scholar
• Lamppa GK, Honda S, Bendich AJ. 1984. The relationship between ribosomal repeat length and genome size in Vicia. Chromosoma. 89 (1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia GI, Fernández A. 2008. Genome size in wild and cultivated peanut germplasm. Plant Syst Evol. 272 (1–4): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence ME. 1985. Senecio L. (Asteraceae) in Australia: nuclear DNA amounts. Aust J Bot. 33 (2): 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Baldwin BG, Gottlieb LD. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among the primarily North American genera of Cichorieae (Compositae) based on analysis of 18S–26S nuclear rDNA ITS and ETS sequences. Syst Bot. 28 (3): 616–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Chase MW, Leitch AR, Fay MF. 2010. Genome size dynamics and evolution in monocots. J Bot. vol. 2010, article ID 862516, 18 pages, doi:10.1155/2010/862516. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jb/2010/862516/
   Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Cheung K, Hanson L, Lysak M, Fay MF. 2007. Punctuated genome size evolution in Liliaceae. J Evol Biol. 20 (6): 2296–2308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 82 (4): 651–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch I, Chase MW, Bennett MD. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 82(Suppl. A):85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Lim KY, Kovařík A, Chase MW, Clarkson JJ, Leitch AR. 2008. The ups and downs of genome size evolution in polyploid species of Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Ann Bot. 101 (6): 805–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2008. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science. 320 : 481–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti RM, Oppolzer S, Oberprieler C. 2010. A molecular phylogeny and a revised classification of the Mediterranean genus Anthemis s.l. (Compositae, Anthemideae) based on three molecular markers and micromorphological characters. Taxon. 59 (5): 1441–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR [Internet]. 2011. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org. 30 September 2011, CIPRES Project, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Maher EP, Fox DP. 1973. Multiplicity of ribosomal RNA genes in Vicia species with different nuclear DNA contents. Nature-New Biol. 245 (145): 170–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meng Y, Nie Z-L, Sun H, Yang Y-P. 2012. Chromosome numbers and polyploidy in Leontopodium (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of S.W. China. Caryologia. 65 (2): 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray BG. 2005. When does intraspecific C-value variation become taxonomically significant? Ann Bot. 95 (1): 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagl W, Ehrendorfer F. 1974. DNA content, heterochromatin, mitotic index, and growth in perennial and annual Anthemideae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 123 (1): 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberprieler C, Himmelreich S, Vogt R. 2007. A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae). Willdenowia. 37 : 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicer J, Garcia S, Canela MÁ, Garnatje T, Korobkov AA, Twibell JD, Vallès J. 2010. Genome size dynamics in Artemisia L. (Asteraceae): following the track of polyploidy. Plant Biol. 12 (5): 820–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer J, Garcia S, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2009. Changes in genome size in a fragmented distribution area: the case of Artemisia crithmifolia L. (Asteraceae, Anthemideae). Caryologia. 62 (2): 152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer J, Garnatje T, Molero J, Pustahija F, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vallès J. 2010. Origin and evolution of the South American endemic Artemisia species (Asteraceae): Evidence from molecular phylogeny, ribosomal DNA and genome size data. Aust J Bot. 58 (7): 605–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelser PB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE. 2007. An ITS phylogeny of tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio. Taxon. 56 (4): 1077–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires JC, Lim KY, Kovařík A, Matyásek R, Boyd A, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2004. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of recently evolved Tragopogon (Asteraceae) allopolyploids reveal a karyotype that is additive of the diploid progenitors. Am J Bot. 91 (7): 1022–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price HJ, Chambers KL, Bachmann K. 1981. Genome size variation in diploid Microseris bigelovii (Asteraceae). Bot Gaz. 142 (1): 156–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokopowich C, Gregory T, Crease T. 2003. The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome. 46 (1): 48–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees H, Jones GH. 1967. Chromosome evolution in Lolium. Heredity. 22 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzaglia KS, Rasch EM, Pike LM. 1995. Estimates of nuclear DNA content in bryophyte sperm cells: phylogenetic considerations. Am J Bot. 82 (1): 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers SO, Bendich AJ. 1987. Ribosomal RNA genes in plants: variability in copy number and in the intergenic spacer. Plant Mol Biol. 9 (5): 509–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romo A, Hidalgo O, Boratyński A, Sobierajska K, Jasińska AK, Vallès J, Garnatje T. 2013. Genome size and ploidy levels in highly fragmented habitats: the case of western Mediterranean Juniperus (Cupressaceae) with special emphasis on J. Juniperus L. Tree Gen Genomes. doi:10.1007/s11295-012-0581-9. 9(2):587–599
   Google Scholar
• Samuel R, Gutermann W, Stuessy TF, Ruas CF, Lack HW, Tremetsberger K, Talavera S, Hermanowski B, Ehrendorfer F. 2006. Molecular phylogenetics reveals Leontodon (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) to be diphyletic. Am J Bot. 93 (8): 1193–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel R, Stuessy TF, Tremetsberger K, Baeza CM, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) based on ITS, plastid trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, and matK sequences. Am J Bot. 90 : 496–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Jiménez I, Lazkov GA, Hidalgo O, Garnatje T. 2010. Molecular systematics of Echinops L. (Asteraceae, Cynareae): A phylogeny based on ITS and trnL-trnF sequences with emphasis on sectional delimitation. Taxon. 59 (3): 698–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz M, Vilatersana R, Hidalgo O, Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Schneeweiss GM, Vallès J. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of floral characters of Artemisia and allies (Anthemideae, Asteraceae): Evidence from nrDNA ETS and ITS sequences. Taxon. 57 (1): 66–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple JC, Watanabe K. 2009. A review of chromosome numbers in Asteraceae with hypotheses on chromosomal base number evolution. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, evolution and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson BB. 2009. Economic importance of Compositae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, evolution and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Siroky J, Lysák M, Doležel J, Kejnovský E, Vyskot B. 2001. Heterogeneity of rDNA distribution and genome size in Silene spp. Chromosome Res. 9 (5): 387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. Am J Bot. 90 (11): 1596–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuessy TF, Urtubey E, Gruendstaeudl M. 2009. Barnadesieae (Barnadesioideae). In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, evolution and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Rosenbaumová R, Peckert T, Krahulec F. 2007. Genome size variation and species relationships in Hieracium sub-genus Pilosella (Asteraceae) as inferred by flow cytometry. Ann Bot. 100 (6): 1323–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiová R. 2003. Nuclear DNA amount in Macaronesian angiosperms. Ann Bot. 92 (1): 153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda J, Kyncl T, Jarolímová V. 2005. Genome size variation in Macaronesian angiosperms: forty percent of the Canarian endemic flora completed. Plant Syst Evol. 252 (3–4): 215–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N, Hidalgo O, Vilatersana R, Garnatje T. 2006. The Cardueae (Compositae) revisited: insights from ITS, trnL-trnF and matK nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 93 (1): 150–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift H. 1950. The constancy of deoxiribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 36 (11): 643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl CH. 1978. Chromosomes of Mexican Sedum, II. Section Pachysedum. Rhodora. 80 (824): 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrell M, Vallès J. 2001. Genome size in 21 Artemisia L. species (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications. Genome. 44 (2): 231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallès J, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Martín J, Pellicer J, Sanz M, Garnatje T. 2011. Biology, genome evolution, biotechnological issues and research including applied perspectives in Artemisia (Asteraceae). In: Kader JC, Delseny M, eds. Advances in Botanical Research. Burlington, VT: Academic Press, 349–419.
   Google Scholar
• Vallès J, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Hidalgo O, Vitales D, Garcia S, Martín J, Garnatje T. 2012. Polyploidy and other changes at chromosomal level and in genome size. Its role in systematics and evolution exemplified by some genera of Anthemideae and Cardueae (Asteraceae). Taxon. 61 (4): 841–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’T Hof J. 1965. Relationships between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp Cell Res. 39 (1): 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’T Hof J, Sparrow AH. 1963. A relationship between DNA content, nuclear volume, and minimum mitotic cycle time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 49 (6): 897–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov AE. 2001. Mirrored genome size distributions in monocot and dicot plants. Acta Biotheor. 49 (1): 43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov AE. 2003. Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant red list. Trends Genet. 19 (11): 609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 290 (5499): 2114–2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitte C, Panaud O. 2005. LTR retrotransposons and flowering plant genome size: emergence of the increase/decrease model. Cytogenet Genome Res. 110 (1–4): 91–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar