Karyotype studies on eight populations of Plantago albicans L. from Algeria

References

• Acherkouk M, Maatougui A, El Houmaiz MA. 2011. Communautés végétales et faciès pastoraux dans la zone de Taourirt-Tafoughalt du Maroc oriental: Ecologie et inventaire floristique. Acta Bot Malacit. 36:125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phyllogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 161:105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr A. 1980. Chromosome counts of six Egyptian plants. UAR J Bot. 23:127–129.
   Google Scholar
• Badr A, El-Kholy MA. 1987. Chromosomal studies in the Egyptian flora. 2. Karyotype studies in the genus Plantago L. Cytologia. 52(4):725–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr A, Labani R, Elkington TT. 1987. Nuclear DNA variation in relation to cytological features of some species in the genus Plantago L. Cytologia. 52(4):733–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala S, Gupta RC. 2011. Chromosomal diversity in some species of Plantago (Plantaginaceae). Int J Bot. 7(1):82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baquar SR, Abid Askari SH.1970. Chromosome numbers in some flowering plants of West Pakistan. Genetica Iberica. 22:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolo G, Brullo S, Pavone P. 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 484–493. Inform Bot Ital. 10(2):267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolo G, Brullo S, Pavone P, Terrasi MC. 1980. Contributo alla cariologia del genere Plantago in Sicilia e Calabria meridionale. G Bot Ital. 114(3–4):100.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher TW, Larsen K, Rahn K. 1953. Experimental and cytological studies on plant species I. Kohlrauschia prolifera and Plantago coronopus. Hereditas. 39(1–2):289–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böcher W, Larsen K, Rahn K. 1955. Experimental and cytological studies on plant species III. Plantago coronopus and allied species. Hereditas. 41(3–4):423–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Alsos IG, Borgen L, Grundt HH, Scheen AC, Elven R. 2004. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 82(4):521–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brullo S, Pavone P, Terrasi MC. 1985. Considerazioni cariologiche sul genere Plantago in Sicilia. Candollea. 40(1):217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Coste Abbé H. 1937. Flore descriptive et illustrée de la France, de la Corse et des contrées limitrophes. Paris. Librairie des Sciences et des Arts. 3:141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar MK, Koul AK. 1994. Genetic diversity among Plantagos XXVI. Ring chromosome aneuploids of Plantago lagopus L. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. B60(2):143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar MK, Koul AK. 1995. A new trisomic in Plantago lagopus L. Chromosome Inf Serv. 58:31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Djebaili S. 1984. Steppe algérienne, phytosociologie et écologie. Alger: Office des Publications Universitaires. 177 p.
   Google Scholar
• El-Nahrawy MA. 2011. Egypt: Country pasture/forage resources profile. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fahmy TY. 1955. La cytologie du Plantago albicans en Tunisie. Recl. trav. lab. bot. géol. zool. Fac sci Univ Montpel., Sér Bot. 7(1):115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Casas J. 1977. Recuentos cromosmicos en plantas vasculares españolas. Saussurea. 8:33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes A, Frana F. 1972. Contribution la connaissance cytotaxinomique des spermatophyta du Portugal. VI. Plantaginaceae. Bol. Soc. Brot. 46(2a sèrie):465–501.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez F, Silvestre S. 1980. Numeros cromosmicos para la flora española, 141–149. Lagascalia. 9(2):261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflot R. 1985. Niveaux et diversité des variations intra-individuelles. Bull Soc Bot France. Actualités Botaniques. 132(2):7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorenflot R, Marcotte JL.1970. Polyploidisation naturelle dans le complexe du Plantago maritima L. C. r. hebd. séances Acad. sci. 270:1911–1914.
   Google Scholar
• Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greuter WR, Burdet HM, Long G. 1989. Med-Checklist. Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques.
   Google Scholar
• Groves BE, Hair JB. 1971. Contributions to a chromosome Atlas of the New Zealand Flora. 15 miscellaneous families, New Zeal J Bot. 9(4):569–575.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries CJ, Murray BG, Bocquet G, Vasudevan K. 1978. Chromosome numbers of phanerogams from Morocco and Algeria. Botaniska Notiser. 131(4):391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahier J, Chevre AM, Delourme R, Eber F, Tangay AM. 1992. Techniques de cytogénétique végétale. Paris: Editions de l’INRA; p. 184.
   Google Scholar
• Jones K. 1970. Chromosome changes in plant evolution. Taxon. 19(2):172–179.
   Google Scholar
• Laane MM. 1969. Meiosis and structural hybridity in some Norwegian plant species. Blyttia. 27(3):141–173.
   Google Scholar
• Le Houérou HN. 1995. Bioclimatologie et biogéographie des steppes arides du Nord de l’Afrique. Diversité biologique, développement durable et désertisation. Options Méd Série B. 10:1–396.
   Google Scholar
• Le Houérou HN, Ionesco T. 1973. L’appétibilité des espèces de la Tunisie steppique. Rome: Division Production et Protection des Plantes, FAO; p. 68.
   Google Scholar
• Le Houérou HN, Claudin J, Pouget M. 1977. Etude bioclimatique des steppes algériennes (Avec une carte bioclimatique à 1/1.000.000ème). Bull Soc Hist Nat Afr Nord. 3(3):33–74.
   Google Scholar
• Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. 226 p.
   Google Scholar
• Levin DA, Wilson AC. 1976. Rates of evolution in seed plants: net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 73(6):2086–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Andreu A. 1951. Cromosomas de plantas de la estepa de Aragon, III., A. Anales Estac. Exp. Aula Dei. 2(2):195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lumaret R, Guillerm JL, Maillet J, Verlaque R. 1997. Plant species diversity and polyploidy in islands of natural vegetation isolated in extensive cultivated lands. Biodivers Conserv. 6(4):591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh D. 1934. Chromosomes and chromosome morphology in Plantaginaceae I. Genetica. 16(1–2):1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsenzadeh S, Nazeri V, Mirtadzadini SM. 2008. Chromosome numbers of fifteen species of Plantago L. (Plantaginaceae) From Iran. Iran J Bot. 14(1):47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Munshi A, Langer A, Koul AK.1994. A novel aneuploid in Plantago lanceolata L. Nucleus (Calcutta). 37(1, 2):23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Munshi A, Sareen S, Langer A, Koul AK.1995. Cytogenetic studies on primary trisomics of Plantago lanceolata L. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad B. 61(4):339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Otto S, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 34:401–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozenda P. 2004. Flore et végétation du Sahara. Paris: Centre National de Recherche Scientifique Editions; p. 566.
   Google Scholar
• Paszko B. 2006. A critical review and a new proposal of karyotypes asymmetry indices. Plant Syst Evol. 258(1–2):39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrol J. 2009. Plantago L. In: Benedi C, Rico E, Güemes J, Herrero A, editors. Flora Iberica. vol XIII. CSIC: Real Jardín Botánico, Madrid; p. 4–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Cesca G. 2002. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants from Calabria, S Italy. Willdenowia. 32(2):33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Petit C, Thompson JD. 1999. Species diversity and ecological range in relation to ploidy level in the flora of the Pyrenees. Evol Ecol. 13(1):45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignatti S. 1982. Flora d'Italia. Bologna: Edagricole.
   Google Scholar
• Pontanier R, Diouf M, Zaafouri MS. 2003. Ecologie et régime hydrique de deux formations à Acacia raddiana au nord et au sud du Sahara (Tunisie, Sénégal) In: Grouzis M, Le Floc’h E, editors. Un arbre au désert: Acacia raddiana. Paris: Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD). p. 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pouget M. 1980. Les relations sol-végétation dans les steppes Sud algéroises [Thèse Doctorat d’Etat]. Paris: ORSTOM; p. 555.
   Google Scholar
• Pramanik S, Sen Raychaudhuri S. 1997. DNA content, chromosome composition, and isozyme patterns in Plantago L. Bot Rev. 63(2):124–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puech S. 1987. Fertilité, aptitudes germinatives et caryotype dans deux populations de Plantago albicans L. (Plantaginaceae) en Tunisie. Bull Soc Bot France. Lettres Bot. 134(2):145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Puech S. 1988. Graines, aptitudes germinatives et caryotype de populations de Plantago albicans L. (Plantaginaceae) de Tunisie. Bull Soc Bot France. Lettres Bot. 135(4/5):353–359.
   Google Scholar
• Puech S. 1992. Productions inflorescentielles, aptitudes germinatives et garnitures chromosomiques de populations de Plantago albicans L. (Plantaginaceae) du Maroc, Bull Soc Bot France. Lettres Bot. 139(2):155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Puech S, Rascol JP, Michel V, Andary C. 1998. Cytogenetics and adaptation to increasingly arid environments: the example of Plantago albicans L. (Plantaginaceae). Biochem Syst Ecol. 26(3):267–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quézel P, Santa S. 1963. Nouvelle flore de l’Algérie et des régions désertiques méridionales. CNRS. 2:861–866.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33:589–639.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Zarco C. 1986. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 35(3):526–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønsted N, Chase MW, Albach DC, Bello MA. 2002. Phylogenetic relationship within Plantago (Plantaginaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid trnl-F sequence data. Bot J Linn Soc. 139(4):323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runemark H. 1967. Studies in the Aegean flora X. Cytologic and morphologic notes on Plantago. Botaniska Notiser. 120(1):9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen S, Koul AK, Langer A. 1994. A novel trisomic in Plantago lanceolata L. New Bot. 21(1–4):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz-Schaeffer J. 1980. Cytogenetics. Plants, animals, humans. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag. 446 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Koul AK. 1995. Reproductive strategies in weeds Plantago major, P. lanceolata and their cultivated ally P. ovata. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad B. 61(6):471–478.
   Google Scholar
• Skalinska M, Piotrowicz M, Sokolowska-Kulczycka A, Kalita J, Jaworska H, Czapik R, Czapska D, Gacek E, Banach-Pogan E, Wcislo H. 1961. Further additions to chromosome numbers of Polish Angiosperms. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 30(3):463–489.
   Google Scholar
• Soekarjo R. 1992. General morphology in Plantago. In: Kuiper PJC, Bos M, editors. Plantago: a multidisciplinary study. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stack SM, Brown WV.1969. Somatic and premeiotic pairing of homologues in Plantago ovata. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 96(2):143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1966. Chromosomal variation and evolution. Science. 152(3728):1463–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1984. Polyploidy and the distribution of the arctic-alpine flora: new evidence and a new approach. Bot Helv. 94:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutel B, Kandemir I, Kus S, Kence A. 2005. Classification of Turkish Plantago L. species using numerical taxonomy. Turk J Bot. 29(1):51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Vamosi JC, Goring SJ, Kennedy BF, Mayberry RJ, Moray CM, Neame LA, Tunbridge ND, Elle E. 2007. Pollination, floral display, and the ecological correlates of polyploidy. Funct Ecosyst Commun. 1(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk P, Van Delden W. 1990. Evidence for autotetraploidy in Plantago media and comparisons between natural and artificial cytotypes concerning cell size and fertility. Heredity. 65(3):349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk P, Hartog MV, Van Delden W. 1992. Single cytotype areas in autopolyploid Plantago media L. Biol J Linn Soc. 46(4):315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga-Barbosa L, Pérez-García F. 2014. Germination of mucilaginous seeds of Plantago albicans (Plantaginaceae): effects of temperature, light, pre-sowing treatments, osmotic stress and salinity. Aust J Bot. 62(2):141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernet A. 1958. Climates and vegetation. Arid Zone Research, Climatology, Review of Research, 75–101, Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt R, Oberprieler C. 2009. Chromosome numbers of North African Phanerogams. IX. In: Marhold K, editor. IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 8. Taxon. 58:1282–1283. E3–E9.
   Google Scholar