Cytotaxonomic study of Quercus L. species from Section Quercus in Turkey

References

• Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution. 50:900–908.10.2307/2410861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borazan A, Babaç MT. 2003. Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu. Turkey Ann Bot Fenn. 40:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgardt SJ, Pigg Kathleen B. 1999. Anatomical and developmental study of petrified Quercus (Fagaceae) fruits from the middle Miocene, Yakima Canyon, Washington. USA Am J Bot. 86(3):307–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokchaichamnankit P, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Chulalaksananukul W. 2008. Chromosomal mapping of 18S-25S and 5S ribosomal genes on 15 species of fagaceae from Northern Thailand. Silvae Genet. 57(1):5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’emerico S, Bianco P, Medagli P, Schirone B. 1995. Karyotype Analysis in Quercus ssp. (Fagaceae). Silvae Genet. 44:66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’emerico S, Paciolla C, Tommasi F. 2000. Contribution to the karyomorphology of some species of the genus Quercus. Silvae Genet. 49(6):243–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grimm GW. 2010. The oaks of western Eurasia: traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers. Taxon. 59(2):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan Y, Baslar S, Kanisanli M. 2000. Bati Anadolu’da Yayiliş Gösteren Quercus ithaburensis Decne supsp. macrolepsis (Kotschy) Hedge Et Yalt. (Fagaceae) (Palamut Meşesi) Üzerinde Bir Araştirma [An investigation on Quercus ithaburensis Decne supsp. macrolepsis (Kotschy) Hedge Et Yalt. (Fagaceae) (Palamut Meşesi) distribution in Western Anatolia]. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi. 9(35): 22–25.10.5053/ekoloji
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts R, Frodin DG. 1998. World checklist and bibliography of Fagales (Betulaceae, Corylaceae, Fagaceae and Ticodenraceae). Great Britain: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer A, Petit RJ. 1993. Gene diversity in natural populations of oak species. Annales des sciences forestieres. 50(Supplement 1):186s–202s.10.1051/forest:19930717
   Google Scholar
• Kurokawa Y, Yonezawa Y. 2004. Karyotype analysis of fifteen species of Quercus L. (Fagaceae) in Japan. Chromosome Sci. 8(4):209.
   Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandbdberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52:201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Doyle JJ, Nixon KC. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus Subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 12:333–349.10.1006/mpev.1999.0614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryam A, Fatima R, Abbas S. 2012. Genetic variation among Iranian oaks (Quercus ssp.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 11(45):10291–10296.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra PN, Hans AS, Sareen TS. 1972. Cytomorphology of Himalayan Fagaceae. Silvae Genet. 21(3–4):102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon KC. 2002. The Oak (Quercus) biodiversity of California and adjacent regions. USDA forest service gen. Tech Rep. PSW-GTR-184. San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Ohri D, Ahuja MR. 1990. Giemsa C-banded Karyotype in Quercus L. (Oak). Silvae Genet. 39:216–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfat AM, Pourtahmasi K. 2010. Anatomical characters in three Oaks species (Q. libani, Q. brantii and Q. infectoria) from Iranian Zagros Mountains. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 4(8):3230–3237.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro T, Loureiro J, Santos C, Morais-Cecílio L. 2011. Evolution of rDNA FISH patterns in the Fagaceae. Tree Genet Genomes. 7(6):1113–1122.10.1007/s11295-011-0399-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeone MC, Piredda R, Papini A, Vessella F, Schirone B. 2013. Application of plastid and nuclear markers to DNA barcoding of Euro-Mediterranean oaks (Quercus, Fagaceae): problems, prospects and phylogenetic implications. Bot J Linn Soc. 172(4):478–499.10.1111/boj.2013.172.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Yaltirik F. 1984. Türkiye meşeleri teşhis kilavuzu [Diagnostic guide of Turkish oaks]. İstanbul: Yenilik Basimevi.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Uslu E, Babaç MT. 2008. Karyological studies on four Quercus L. Species in Turkey Caryologia. 61(4):397–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Uslu E, Babaç MT. 2011. Cytogenetic studies on Quercus L. (Fagaceae) species belonging to Ilex and Cerris sections in Turkey. Caryologia. 64(3):297–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarco CR. 1986. A new method for estimating Karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 35(3):526–530.10.2307/1221906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoldos V, Papes D, Brown SC, Panaud O, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1998. Genome size and base composition of seven Quercus species: inter- and intra- population variation. Genome. 41(2):162–168.10.1139/gen-41-2-162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar