Karyotype, rDNA localization and meiotic behavior of Hovenia dulcis Thunb. (Rhamnaceae)

References

• Alexander MP. 1980. A versatile stain for pollen fungi, yeast and bacteria. Stain Technol. 55:13–18. 10.3109/10520298009067890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardello LM, Stiefkens LB, Piovano MA. 1990. Números cromosómicos en dicotiledóneas Argentinas. Bol Soc Argent Bot. 26:149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Carr GD. 1978. Chromosome numbers of Hawaiian flowering plants and the significance of cytology in selected taxa. American Journal of Botany. 65:236–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester M, Leitch AR, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2010. Review of the application of modern cytogenetic methods (FISH/GISH) to the study of reticulation (polyploidy/hybridization). Genes. 1:166–192. 10.3390/genes1020166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadella TW, Kliphuis E, Lindeman JC, Mennega EA. 1969. Chromosome numbers and seedling morphology of some Angiospermae collected in Brazil. Acta Bot Neerl. 18:74–83. 10.1111/plb.1969.18.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Gan Y, Liu F, Chen D, Wu Q, Qin Q, Wang C, Li Shaohui. 2013. Chromosomal locations of 5S and 45S rDNA in Gossypium genus and its phylogenetic implications revealed by FISH. PLoS ONE. 8(6):e68207. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR. 1979. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 7:1869–1885. 10.1093/nar/7.7.1869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli MM, Galati BG, Zarlavsky G, Medan D. 2015. Pollen and microsporangium development in Hovenia dulcis (Rhamnaceae): a different type of tapetal cell ultrastructure. Protoplasma. 253:1125–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra M. 2000. Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genet Mol Biol. 23:1029–1041. 10.1590/S1415-47572000000400049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra M. 2016. Agmatoploidy and symploidy: a critical review. Genet Mol Biol. 39(4):492–496. 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Meng Y, Zhao Y, Hu Y, Ren D, Yang X. 2015. Myricetin derived from Hovenia dulcis Thunb. ameliorates vascular endothelial dysfunction and liver injury in high choline-fed mice. Food Funct. 6:1620–1634. 10.1039/C4FO01073F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huziwara Y. 1962. Karyotype analysis in some genera of Compositae. VIII. further studies on the chromosomes of Aster. Am J Bot. 49:116–119. 10.2307/2439026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilnicki T. 2014. Plant biosystematics with the help of cytology and cytogenetics. Caryologia. 67:199–208. 10.1080/00087114.2014.931642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatoon S, Ali S. 1993. Chromosome atlas of the angiosperms of Pakistan. University of Karachi: Department of Botany, BCC&T Press; p. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence GJ, Appels R. 1986. Mapping the nucleolus organizer region, seed protein loci and isozyme loci on chromosome 1R in rye. Theor Appl Genet. 71(5):742–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52:201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginuma K, Gu Z, Yue Z, Kondo K. 1994. Chromosomes of some woody plants native to Yunnan, China. Kromosomo. 73:2491–2497.
   Google Scholar
• Pendas AM, Morán P, Garcia-Vázquez E. 1993. Ribosomal genes are interspersed throughout a heterochromatic arm in Atlantic salmon. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 63:128–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves A, Tear J. 2000. MicroMeasure for Windows, version 3.3. Free program distributed by the authors over the Internet from https://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Biology/MicroMeasure.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson JE, Fay MF, Cronk QCB, Chase MW. 2000a. A revision of the tribal classification of Rhamnaceae. Kew Bulletin. 55:311–340.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson JE, Fay MF, Cronk QC, Bowman D, Chase MW. 2000b. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany. 87(9):1309–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato M, Moreno-Saiz JC, Galián JA, Rosselló JA. 2015. Evolutionary site-number changes of ribosomal DNA loci during speciation: complex scenarios of ancestral and more recent polyploid events. AoB Plants. 7: plv135.10.1093/aobpla/plv135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu PS, Mann SK. 1988. SOCGI plant chromosome number reports VII. J Cytol Genet. 23:219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert I. 2007. Chromosome evolution. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10:109–115. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer D. 1976. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma. 58:307–324. 10.1007/BF00292840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza VF, Pagliarini MS, Valle CB, Bione NCP, Menon MU, Mendes-Bonato AB. 2015. Meiotic behavior of Brachiaria decumbens hybrids. Genet Mol Res. 14:12855–12865. 10.4238/2015.October.21.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia-Pastrana F, Mercado-Ruaro P, López S, Gómez A. 2002. Estudio citogenético en Karwinskia humboldtiana (Rhamnaceae) del Valle de Actopan, Hidalgo, México. Ann. Inst. Biol. Ser Bot. 73:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tapia-Pastrana F, Mercado-Ruaro P, Acevedo S, Nava R. 2004. Estudio cromosómico en tres especies de Karwinskia (Rhamnaceae) endémicas de México. Ann. Inst. Biol. Ser Bot. 75:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yagi K, Pawelkowicz M, Osipowski P, Siedlecka E, Przybecki Z, Tagashira N, Hoshi Yoshikazu. 2015. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Cucumis wild species distributed in southern Africa: physical mapping of 5S and 45S rDNA with DAPI. Cytogenet Genome Res. 146:80–87. 10.1159/000433572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wu S, Li C. 2013. High efficiency secondary somatic embryogenesis in Hovenia dulcis Thunb. through solid and liquid cultures. Sci World J. 2013:6. Article ID 718754.
   Google Scholar