Karyomorphology of some Quercus L. species from section Quercus and Cerris in Turkey

References

• Atalay İ 2005. Kuvarterner’deki İklim Değişmelerinin Türkiye Doğal Ortamı Üzerindeki Etkileri. Türkiye Kuvaterner Sempozyumu. İTÜ Avrasya Yer Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Jun 2–5; İstanbul. pp. 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Aykut Y, Uslu E, Babaç MT. 2008. Karyological Studies on Four Quercus L. Species in Turkey. Caryologia. 61(4):397–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykut Y, Uslu E, Babaç MT. 2011. Cytogenetic studies on Quercus L. (Fagaceae) species belonging to Ilex and Cerris section in Turkey. Caryologia. 64(3):297–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution. 50:900–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borazan A, Babaç MT. 2003. Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Ann Bot Fenn. 40:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butorina AK. 1993. Cytogenetic study of diploid and spontaneous triploid oaks, Quercus robur L. Species in Turkey. Annales des Sciences Forestieres. 50:144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Çıplak B, Demirsoy A, Bozcuk N. 1993. Distribution in Orthoptera in relation to the Anatolian Diagonal in Turkey. Articulata. 8:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chokchaichamnankit P, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Chulalaksananukul W. 2008. Chromosomal Mapping of 18S-25S and 5S Ribosomal Genes on 15 Species of Fagaceae from Northern Thailand. Silvae Genetica. 57(1):5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’emerico S, Bıanco P, Medaglı P, Schırone B. 1995. Karyotype Analysis in Quercus ssp. Silvae Genetica. 44:2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’emerico S, Pacıolla C, Tomması F. 2000. Contribution to the karyomorphology of some species of the Genus Quercus. Silvae Genetica. 49:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PH. 1971. Distribution patterns in Anatolia with particular reference to endemism. In: Davis PH, Harper PC, Hedge IC, editors. Plant life of South West Asia. Edinburgh: Botanical Society of Edinburgh; p. 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grimm GW. 2010. The oaks of western Eurasia: traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers. Taxon. 59(2):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts R, Frodin DG. 1998. World checklist and bibliography of Fagales (Betulaceae, Corylaceae, Fagaceae and Ticodenraceae). Great Britain: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
   Google Scholar
• Hedge IC, Yaltırık F. 1982. Quercus L. In: Davis PH, edtior. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 7. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; p. 659–683.
   Google Scholar
• Kargioglu M, Serteser A, Senkul C, Konuk M. 2011. Bioclimatic Characteristic of oak species Quercus macranthera subsp. syspirensis and Quercus petraea subsp. pinnatiloba in Turkey. J Environ Biol. 32(1):127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurokawa Y, Yonezawa Y. 2004. Karyotype analysis of fifteen species of Quercus L. (Fagaceae) in Japan. Chromosome Sci. 8(4):209.
   Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandbdberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52:201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Doyle JJ, Nixon KC. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 12:333–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Zhou Z, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. Int J Plant Sci. 162:1361–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller CH. 1952. Ecological control of hybridization in Quercus: a factor in the mechanism of evolution. Evolution. 6:147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SH, Manos PS. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon. 57:434–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohrı D, Ahuja MR. 1990. Giemsa C-Banded Karyotype in Quercus L. (Oak). Silvae Genetica. 39:5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit RJ, Bodénès C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 2003a. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist. 161:151–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro TLoureiro J, Santos C, Morais-Cecílio L. 2011. Evolution of rDNA FISH patterns in the Fagaceae. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 7: 1113 –1122
   Google Scholar
• Rushton BS. 1993. Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Annales des Sciences Forestières. 50:18.
   Google Scholar
• Simeone MC, Piredda R, Papini A, Vessella F, Schirone B. 2013. Application of plastid and nuclear markers to DNA barcoding of Euro-Mediterranean oaks (Quercus, Fagaceae): problems, prospects and phylogenetic implications. Bot J Linnean Soc. 172:478–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Uslu E, Bakış Y. 2012. Geographic distribution of Turkish Oaks. Dendrobiology. 67:41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaltirik F. 1984. Türkiye meşeleri teşhis kılavuzu. İstanbul: Yenilik Basımevi.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A. 2017. Cytotaxonomic study of Quercus L. species from Section Quercus in Turkey. Caryologia. 70(2):141–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarco CR. 1986. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 35(3):526–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoldos V, Pape D, Brown SC, Panaud O, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1998. Genome size and base composition of seven Quercus species: inter- and intra- population variation. Genome. 41:162–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar