Publication Cover
Caryologia
International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics
Volume 71, 2018 - Issue 3
600
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Genome size in some taxa of Crepis L. (Asteraceae) from Turkey

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 217-223 | Received 12 Feb 2018, Accepted 26 Mar 2018, Published online: 27 Jun 2018

References

  • Albach DC, Greilhuber J. 2004. Genome size variation and evolution in Veronica. Ann Bot. 94:897–911.
  • Babcock EB. 1947a. The genus Crepis, part one: the taxonomy, phylogeny, distribution and evolution of Crepis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Babcock EB. 1947b. The genus Crepis, part two: systematic treatment. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Bancheva S, Greilhuber J. 2006. Genome size in Bulgarian Centaurea s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 257:95–117.
  • Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Genome size evolution in plants. In: Gregory T, editor. The evolution of the genome. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2011. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot. 107:467–590.
  • Bennett MD, Smith JB. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:227–274.
  • Bennett MD, Smith JB, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1982. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 216:179–199.
  • Bremer K. 1994. Asteraceae, cladistics and classification. Portland (OR): Timber Press.
  • Cerbah M, Coulaud J, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1999. Evolutionary DNA variation in the genus Hypochaeris. Heredity. 82:261–266.
  • Dimitrova D, Ebert I, Greilhuber J, Kozhuharov S. 1999. Karyotype constancy and genome size variation in Bulgarian Crepis foetida s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 217:245–257.
  • Dimitrova D, Greilhuber J. 2000. Karyotype and DNA-content evolution in ten species of Crepis (Asteraceae) distributed in Bulgaria. Bot J Linn Soc. 132:281–297.
  • Doležel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. 2003. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry. 51A:127–128.
  • Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R. 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot. 82:17–26.
  • Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2:2233–2244.
  • Durrant A, Jones TWA. 1971. Reversion of induced changes in amount of nuclear DNA in Linum. Heredity. 27:431–439.
  • Dušková E, Kolár F, Sklenář P, Rauchova J, Kubešová M, Fér T, Suda J, Marhold K. 2010. Genome size correlates with growth form, habitat and phylogeny in the Andean genus Lasiocephalus (Asteraceae). Preslia. 82:127–148.
  • Ekim T. 2012. Crepis L. In: Guner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babac MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarli Bitkiler). Istanbul: Nezahat Gokyigit Botanik Bahcesi ve Flora Arastirmalari Dernegi Yayini; p. 150–154.
  • Enke N. 2009. Contributions towards a revised infrageneric classification of Crepis (Cichorieae, Compositae). Willdenowia. 39:229–245.
  • Enke N, Fuchs J, Gemeinholzer B. 2011. Shrinking genomes? Evidence from genome size variation in Crepis (Compositae). Plant Biol. 13:185–193.
  • Enke N, Gemeinholzer B. 2008. Babcock revisited: new insights into generic delimitation and character evolution in Crepis L. (Compositae: Cichorieae) from ITS and matK sequence data. Taxon. 57:756–768.
  • Enke N, Kunze R, Pustahija F, Glöckner G, Zimmermann J, Oberländer J, Kamari G, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2015. Genome size shifts: karyotype evolution in Crepis section Neglectoides (Asteraceae). Plant Biol. 17:775–786.
  • Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Jakovljević I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vigo J, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2013. New data on genome size in 128 Asteraceae species and subspecies, with first assessments for 39 genera, three tribes and two subfamilies. Plant Biol. 147:1219–1227.
  • Garcia S, Inceer H, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2005. Genome size variation in some representatives of the genus Tripleurospermum. Biol Plantarum. 49:381–387.
  • Greilhuber J. 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot. 82:27–35.
  • Inceer H, Aksu Kalmuk N, Imamoglu KV, Duman O, Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, Arslan G. 2016. Micromorphological, anatomical and cytogenetical studies in endemic Crepis macropus Boiss. & Heldr. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Acta Bot Croat. 75:173–178.
  • Jaume P, Garcia S, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2009. Changes in genome size in a fragmented distribution area: the case of Artemisia crithmifolia L. (Asteraceae, Anthemideae). Caryologia. 62(2):152–160.
  • Jones RN, Brown LM. 1976. Chromosome evolution and DNA variation in Crepis. Heredity. 36:91–104.
  • Lamond JM. 1975. Crepis L. In: Davis PH, editor Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: University Press; p. 814–841.
  • Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2007. Genome size and its uses: the impact of flow cytometry. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J, editors. Flow cytometry with plant cells. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; p. 153–176.
  • Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of C-DNA values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 82:85–94.
  • Loureiro J, Trávníček P, Rauchová J, Urfus T, Vít P, Štech P, Castro S, Suda J. 2010. The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants. Preslia. 82:3–21.
  • Lysak MA, Dolezel J. 1998. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in Sesleria (Poaceae). Caryologia. 51:123–132.
  • Otto FJ. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Darzynkiewickz Z, Crissman HA, editors. Methods in cell biology. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 105–110.
  • Rayburn AL, Auger JA. 1990. Genome size variation in Zea mays ssp. mays adapted to different altitudes. Theor Appl Genet. 79:470–474.
  • Šmarda P, Bureš P. 2010. Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia. 82:41–61.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. Am J Bot. 90:1596–1603.
  • Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Rosenbaumová R, Peckert T, Krahulec F. 2007. Genome size variation and species relationships in Hieracium sub-genus Pilosella (Asteraceae) as inferred by flow cytometry. Ann Bot. 100:1323–1335.
  • Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiová R. 2003. Nuclear DNA amount in Macaronesian angiosperms. Ann Bot. 92(1):153–164.
  • Suda J, Kyncl T, Jarolímová V. 2005. Genome size variation in Macaronesian angiosperms: forty percent of the Canarian endemic flora completed. Plant Syst Evol. 252(3–4):215–238.
  • Torrell M, Vallès J. 2001. Genome size in 21 Artemisia L. species (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications. Genome. 44:231–238.
  • Trávníček P, Kirschner J, Chudáčková H, Rooks F, Štěpánek J. 2013. Substantial genome size variation in Taraxacum stenocephalum (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Folia Geobot. 48:271–284.
  • Vallès J, Canela MÁ, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vitales D, Garnatje T. 2013. Genome size variation and evolution in the family Asteraceae. Caryologia. 66:221–235.
  • Vallès J, Malik S, Gomez M, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2017. Contribution to knowledge about nuclear DNA amounts in the family Asteraceae: first assessments in one genus and 12 species, with chromosome counts for three taxa. Bot Serb. 41:213–219.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.