Genome size in some taxa of Crepis L. (Asteraceae) from Turkey

References

• Albach DC, Greilhuber J. 2004. Genome size variation and evolution in Veronica. Ann Bot. 94:897–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock EB. 1947a. The genus Crepis, part one: the taxonomy, phylogeny, distribution and evolution of Crepis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock EB. 1947b. The genus Crepis, part two: systematic treatment. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bancheva S, Greilhuber J. 2006. Genome size in Bulgarian Centaurea s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 257:95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Genome size evolution in plants. In: Gregory T, editor. The evolution of the genome. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2011. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot. 107:467–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Smith JB. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:227–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MD, Smith JB, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1982. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 216:179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer K. 1994. Asteraceae, cladistics and classification. Portland (OR): Timber Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerbah M, Coulaud J, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1999. Evolutionary DNA variation in the genus Hypochaeris. Heredity. 82:261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova D, Ebert I, Greilhuber J, Kozhuharov S. 1999. Karyotype constancy and genome size variation in Bulgarian Crepis foetida s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 217:245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova D, Greilhuber J. 2000. Karyotype and DNA-content evolution in ten species of Crepis (Asteraceae) distributed in Bulgaria. Bot J Linn Soc. 132:281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. 2003. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry. 51A:127–128.
   Google Scholar
• Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R. 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot. 82:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2:2233–2244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant A, Jones TWA. 1971. Reversion of induced changes in amount of nuclear DNA in Linum. Heredity. 27:431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dušková E, Kolár F, Sklenář P, Rauchova J, Kubešová M, Fér T, Suda J, Marhold K. 2010. Genome size correlates with growth form, habitat and phylogeny in the Andean genus Lasiocephalus (Asteraceae). Preslia. 82:127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekim T. 2012. Crepis L. In: Guner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babac MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarli Bitkiler). Istanbul: Nezahat Gokyigit Botanik Bahcesi ve Flora Arastirmalari Dernegi Yayini; p. 150–154.
   Google Scholar
• Enke N. 2009. Contributions towards a revised infrageneric classification of Crepis (Cichorieae, Compositae). Willdenowia. 39:229–245.
   Google Scholar
• Enke N, Fuchs J, Gemeinholzer B. 2011. Shrinking genomes? Evidence from genome size variation in Crepis (Compositae). Plant Biol. 13:185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enke N, Gemeinholzer B. 2008. Babcock revisited: new insights into generic delimitation and character evolution in Crepis L. (Compositae: Cichorieae) from ITS and matK sequence data. Taxon. 57:756–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enke N, Kunze R, Pustahija F, Glöckner G, Zimmermann J, Oberländer J, Kamari G, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2015. Genome size shifts: karyotype evolution in Crepis section Neglectoides (Asteraceae). Plant Biol. 17:775–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Jakovljević I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vigo J, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2013. New data on genome size in 128 Asteraceae species and subspecies, with first assessments for 39 genera, three tribes and two subfamilies. Plant Biol. 147:1219–1227.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Inceer H, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2005. Genome size variation in some representatives of the genus Tripleurospermum. Biol Plantarum. 49:381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot. 82:27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inceer H, Aksu Kalmuk N, Imamoglu KV, Duman O, Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, Arslan G. 2016. Micromorphological, anatomical and cytogenetical studies in endemic Crepis macropus Boiss. & Heldr. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Acta Bot Croat. 75:173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaume P, Garcia S, Garnatje T, Vallès J. 2009. Changes in genome size in a fragmented distribution area: the case of Artemisia crithmifolia L. (Asteraceae, Anthemideae). Caryologia. 62(2):152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RN, Brown LM. 1976. Chromosome evolution and DNA variation in Crepis. Heredity. 36:91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamond JM. 1975. Crepis L. In: Davis PH, editor Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: University Press; p. 814–841.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2007. Genome size and its uses: the impact of flow cytometry. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J, editors. Flow cytometry with plant cells. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; p. 153–176.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of C-DNA values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 82:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro J, Trávníček P, Rauchová J, Urfus T, Vít P, Štech P, Castro S, Suda J. 2010. The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants. Preslia. 82:3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysak MA, Dolezel J. 1998. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in Sesleria (Poaceae). Caryologia. 51:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto FJ. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Darzynkiewickz Z, Crissman HA, editors. Methods in cell biology. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Rayburn AL, Auger JA. 1990. Genome size variation in Zea mays ssp. mays adapted to different altitudes. Theor Appl Genet. 79:470–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šmarda P, Bureš P. 2010. Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia. 82:41–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. Am J Bot. 90:1596–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Rosenbaumová R, Peckert T, Krahulec F. 2007. Genome size variation and species relationships in Hieracium sub-genus Pilosella (Asteraceae) as inferred by flow cytometry. Ann Bot. 100:1323–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiová R. 2003. Nuclear DNA amount in Macaronesian angiosperms. Ann Bot. 92(1):153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda J, Kyncl T, Jarolímová V. 2005. Genome size variation in Macaronesian angiosperms: forty percent of the Canarian endemic flora completed. Plant Syst Evol. 252(3–4):215–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrell M, Vallès J. 2001. Genome size in 21 Artemisia L. species (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications. Genome. 44:231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trávníček P, Kirschner J, Chudáčková H, Rooks F, Štěpánek J. 2013. Substantial genome size variation in Taraxacum stenocephalum (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Folia Geobot. 48:271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallès J, Canela MÁ, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Sánchez-Jiménez I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vitales D, Garnatje T. 2013. Genome size variation and evolution in the family Asteraceae. Caryologia. 66:221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallès J, Malik S, Gomez M, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2017. Contribution to knowledge about nuclear DNA amounts in the family Asteraceae: first assessments in one genus and 12 species, with chromosome counts for three taxa. Bot Serb. 41:213–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar