The Power of Why: Connecting Curriculum to Students' Lives

References

• Afflerbach, P. (2012). Understanding and using reading assessment K-12. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K. (1980). Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11(2), 91–115. doi:10.1525/aeq.198011.2.05x1874b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, R., & Ayers, W. (2011). Teaching the taboo. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrollment introductory physics course: A case study. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/PhysicalSciences/Simon_Bates_Ross_Galloway.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Broatch, J., & Lohr, S. (2012). Multidimensional assessment of value added by teachers to real-world outcomes. Journal of Educational and Behaioral Statistics, 37(2), 256–277.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(13), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. (2004). Teaching them to read (6th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. (2008). Supporting learning with technology. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2006). The Feurerstein instrumental enrichment program. Jerusalem, Israel: ICELP Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., & Day, S. B. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction to new conceptualizations of transfer and learning [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Available at www.aecforg/-/media/Pubs/Topics/Education/Other/DoubleJeopardyHowThirdGradeReadingSkillsandPoverty/
   Google Scholar
• Herndon, J. (1968). The way it spozed to be. New York, NY: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Y. (2011). The pedagogy of confidence: Inspiring high intellectual performance in urban schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D., Johnson, B., Farenga, S. J., & Ness, D. (2005). Trivializing teacher education: The accreditation squeeze. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M., Kleinsasser, R., & Roe, M. F. (2014). Cautionary tales: Teaching, accountability, and assessment. The Educational Forum, 78(3).
   Google Scholar
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter. Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin-Loucks, D. (2006). The academic achievement gap. Available at www.thewilliamsinstitute.org
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality and the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Hong, Z., & Huang, T. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 25–42. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma'ayan, H. D. (2012). Reading girls: The lives and literacies of adolescents. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. (2010). The highly engaged classroom. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, J., & Hamann, E. (2004). Meeting the needs of adolescent English language learners for literacy development and content area learning, Part 1: Focus on motivation and engagement. Providence, RI: The Education Alliance at Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation's report card: Grade 12 reading and mathematics 2009 national and pilot state results (NCES 2011-455). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics, and science, Vol. 1. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. (2009). Why school? Reclaiming education for all of us. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J. (1997). The role of curriculum in teacher development. In S. N. Friel & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 247–254). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2010). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. D. (2008). Spectacular things happen along the way: Lessons from an urban classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology, 18(2), 158–176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. (2002). Reading don't fix no Chevies: Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, ME: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spielhagen, F. R. (2011). The algebra solution to mathematics reform (completing the equation). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teacher for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An International Journal, 22, 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. D., & Novak, B. (2011). Teaching literacy for love and wisdom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziori, E., & Dienes, Z. (2008). How does prior knowledge affect implicit and explicit concept learning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6(4), 601–624. doi:10.1080/1747021070125537417.
   Google Scholar