Science Trade Books and Buddies: Involving 3rd-Graders in Informational Texts

References

• Allington, R. L. (2002). What I've learned about effective reading instruction from a decade of studying exemplary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 740–747. doi:10.2307/20440246
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2012). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. A. (2013). Elementary children's literature: Infancy through age 13 (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barksdale, M. A., Watson, C., & Park, E. S. (2007). Pen pal letter exchanges: Taking first steps toward developing cultural understandings. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 58–68. doi:10.1598/RT.61.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, S. T., Harper, L. J., & Picciotti, J. (2011). Peaceful pen pals: A school-home-university service learning project. Childhood Education, 87(4), 244–252.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, J., Scharff, L. V., & Moses, L. E. (2002). The influence of illustrations on children's book preferences and comprehension. Reading Pyschology, 23(4), 323–339. doi:10.1080/713775287
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, N. (2011). Meeting the reading challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 474–485. doi:10.1598/RT.64.7.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L., Ehrenworth, M., & Lehman, C. (2012). Pathways to the Common Core. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2011). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (5th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, P. J., Werderich, D. E., Nelson, P. A., & Fuhler, C. J. (2009). Male call: Fifth-grade boys' reading preferences. The Reading Teacher, 63(3), 180–188. doi:10.1598/RT.63.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Center for Reading Research. (n.d.). Instructional materials for teachers. Retrieved from www.fcrr.org
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, E. S., & Truesdell, K. S. (2006). “I can read to whoever wants to hear me read”: Buddy readers speak out with confidence. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(5), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L., & Wortman, R. (2008). Comprehension strategies nonfiction kit A. Malborough, MA: Sundance.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Coddington, C. (2009). Reading motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 503–525). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, M., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2008). R⁵ in your classroom: A guide to differentiating independent reading time and developing avid readers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, M., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2010). Guiding students through expository text. The Reading Teacher, 64(3), 191–195. doi:10.1598/RT.64.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labbo, L., & Teale, W. (1990). Cross-age reading: A strategy for helping poor readers. The Reading Teacher, 43(6), 362–369. doi:10.2307/20200409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, R. M., Sabis-Burns, D., & Anderson-Brown, S. (2008). Book buddies: Kindergartners and fifth graders explore books together. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 36(3), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2010). “The seesaw is a machine that goes up and down”: Young children's narrative responses to science-related informational text. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 412–444. doi:10.1080/10409281003701994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, K. A. (2006). Children's choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(81), 81–104. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, L. M., & Smith, J. K. (1990). The effects of group size on interactive storybook reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(3), 213–231. doi:10.2307/748003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, B. (2008). The information text gap: The mismatch between non-narrative text types in basal readers and 2009 NAEP recommended guidelines. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(2), 201–219. doi:10.1080/10862960802411927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/the-standards
   Google Scholar
• Pachtman, A. B., & Wilson, K. A. (2006). What do the kids think? The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 680–684. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & McMahon, S. I. (1994). Book club: An alternative framework for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 48(2), 102–116. doi:10.2307/20201379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., & Newman, T. H. (2010). Scaffolded silent reading: Improving the practice of silent reading practice in classrooms. In E. H. Hiebert & D. R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers (pp. 129–150). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. M. (2009). Using children's literature to teach standard-based science concepts in the early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 415–422. doi:10.1007/s100643-009-0304-5
   Google Scholar
• Stovall, A. (2008). Twenty in a year! Discovering a prince in a library of frogs. The English Journal, 98(2), 52–56. doi:10.2307/40503383
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, C. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Theurer, J. L., & Schmidt, K. B. (2008). Coaching reading buddies for success. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 261–264. doi:10.1598/RT/62.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Paris, S. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children's motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662–673. doi:10.2307/20201530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. (2001). Improving comprehension through think-aloud strategies: Modeling what good readers do. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. M., Hall, K. W., Hedrick, W. B., Lamkin, M., & Abendroth, J. (2013). Developing an observation instrument to support authentic independent reading time during school in a data-driven world. Journal of Language and Literacy Education [Online], 9(2), 24–49.
   Google Scholar