Science Teacher Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning

REFERENCES

• Abell, S. 1999. What's inquiry? Stories from the field. Australian Science Teachers Journal 1: 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1998. Blueprints for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., and J. Piazza. 1996. Changing beliefs: Teaching and learning mathematics in constructivist pre-service classrooms. Action in Teacher Education 2: 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. 2002. Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education 1: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. 1991. Challenge: A focus for improving teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, L., and S. Abell. 1999. Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2: 121–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, D., D. Gabel, D. Herron, and L. Jones. 1997. Chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education 10: 850–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R., E. Buchwald, S. Crissman, D. Heil, P. Kuerbis, C. Matsumoto, and J. McInerney. 1989. Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Colorado Springs, CO: The National Center for Improving Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E., T. Koballa, and A. Collette. 1998. Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 6(4): 284–90.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. 2000. Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(9): 916–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2005. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Uppper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C., and A. Lumpe. 1996. Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education 7: 247–66.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., and E. Wright. 1989. A case study of high school teachers’ decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26(6): 467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. 1991. Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education 86: 693–705.
   Google Scholar
• Gejda, L., and D. LaRocco. 2006. Inquiry-based instruction in secondary science classrooms: A survey of teacher practice. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Northeast Educational Research Association Conference, Kerhonkson, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, R. 1999. Science education: consensus versus critique. Teaching in High Education 4(4): 501–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, L. 1998. Getting science right. American School Board Journal 185(1): 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. 2006. Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics 106(3): 150.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, O., and R. Vanosdall. 2002. The death of science? Phi Delta Kappan 83(8): 601–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K., L. Shumow, and S. Lietz. 2001. Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education 85: 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. 1998. Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., and C. Matsumoto. 1999. Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science & Mathematics 99(5): 258–72.
   Google Scholar
• Louden, C. 1997. Teaching strategies and student achievement in high school block scheduled biology classes. Dissertation Abstracts International 58(12
   Google Scholar
• Love, C. 1994. Teaching strategies to facilitate learning. Ellensburg, WA: Home Economics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. 1999. Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: The extended inquiry observational rubric. Science Educator 8(1): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, M., and E. Stevens. 1999. Science teachers’ attitudes about inquiry-based science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2003. What is the influence of the NSES?: Reviewing the evidence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., and E. DeGroot. 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(1): 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiff, R. 2002. If inquiry is so great, why isn't everyone doing it? Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association of the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Sapsford, R. 1999. Survey research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skamp, K., and A. Mueller. 2001. Student teachers’ conceptions about effective primary science teaching: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education 23(4): 331–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza Barros, S.de, and M. Elia. 1997. Physics teacher's attitudes: How do they affect the reality of the classroom and models for change? In Connecting research in physics education with teacher education, ed. A. Tiberghien, E. L. Jossem, and J. Barojas, Section D2. Vienna: International Commission on Physics Education Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., and K. Callahan. 2000. Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: 401–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staver, J. 1998. Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(5): 501–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, L., R. Bybee, and J. Powell. 2000. Teaching secondary school science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• VonGlassersfeld, E. 1995. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar