How Can Student Success Support Teacher Self-Efficacy and Retention?

REFERENCES

• Affholder, L.P. 2003. Differentiated instruction in inclusive elementary classrooms. Unpublished EdD thesis, University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. 2004. What do you know about student motivation and engagement? Paper presented November 29 at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for research in education, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. 1992. Classroom: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (3): 262–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, L.H., and Midgley, C. 1997. Motivation and middle school students. In What current research says to the middle level practitioner, ed. J.L. Irvin, 41–48. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R., eds. 2001. Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, S.A., S.J. Beebe, and S.A. Redmond. 2008. Interpersonal communication: Relating to others. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P.J., and D. William. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S. 1976. Human conditions and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S., and D.R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., P.L. Grossman, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff. 2008. Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. NBER Working Paper 14022. Urban Institute: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. J., H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J.H. Wyckoff. 2005. “Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students.” American Economic Review Proceedings 95 (2): 166–71.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 2006. History of research on classroom management. In Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues, ed. C.M. Evertson and C.S. Weinstein, 17–43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, C., C. Fasca, J. Heinze, M. Honey, D. Light, E. Mandinach, and D. Wexler 2005. Linking data and learning: The Grow Network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 10 (3): 241–267.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. 2005. Looking at how students reason. Educational Leadership 63 (3): 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., H.F. Ladd, and J.L. Vigdor. 2007. How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? NBER Working Paper 12828. National Bureau for Economics Research.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for School Networking. 2004. Vision to know and do: The power of data as a tool in educational decision making. Washington, DC: Consortium for School Networking.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and N. Richardson. 2009. Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership 66 (5): 46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Data Quality Campaign. 2009. DQC brings together education leaders to urge states to use data systems for continuous improvement. DQC Newsletter 3 (7). http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/DQCNewsletterApr09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DeCastro-Ambrosetti, D., and G. Cho. 2005. Do parents value education? Teachers’ perceptions of minority parents. Multicultural Education 13: 44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Denzine, G. M., J. B. Cooney, and R. McKenzie. 2005. Confirmatory factor analysis of the teacher efficacy scale for prospective teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (4): 689–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deplanty, J., R. Coulter-Kern, and K. Duchane. 2007. Perception of parent involvement in academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 100 (61): 361–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreikurs, R., B. Grunwald, and F. Pepper. 1982. Maintaining sanity in the classroom. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Emberger, M. 2007. Helping teachers improve classroom assessments. Principal Leadership (High School Ed.) 7 (9): 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 1995. The encouraging teacher. In Human relations development, 5th ed., ed. G.M. Gazda, F. Asbury, M. Blazer, W. Childers, and R. Wallers, 261–69. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, J. 2012. How you get to know your students. Educational Leadership 69 (5): 88–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, W., and C.M. Williams. 2010. The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Education Psychology 30 (1): 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., and M. Chen. 2001. Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 13 (1): 122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucetta, L., and P. Pedota. 2008. Alternative teacher certification: A new model for high needs schools. Long Island Education Review 8 (1): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Feistritzer, C.E. 2008. Building a quality teaching force: Lessons learned from alternate routes. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W.A. 2009. Accountability nudges districts into changes in culture. Phi Delta Kappan 90 (9): 670–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K.W., and L.T. Rose. 2001. Webs of skill: How students learn. Educational Leadership 59 (3): 6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, M.L. 2007. Developing an action plan: Two Rivers Public Charter School focuses on instruction. In Data wise in action: Stories of schools using data to improve teaching and learning, ed. K.P. Boudett and J.L. Steele, 107–24. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. 2000. Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giacometti-Myers, K.S. 2005. Factors effecting job satisfaction and retention of beginning teachers. http://openlibrary.org/books/0L15577681M.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M.F., and K.S. Louis. 2009. Linking parent and community involvement with student achievement: Comparing principal and teacher perceptions of stakeholder influence. American Journal of Education 116 (1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F.R. 1999. Brain and learning research: Implications for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Education 119 (4): 682–88.
   Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W.S., and M. Slowiaczek. 1994. Parents’ involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development 64: 237–52.
   Google Scholar
• Guercio, R. 2011. Back to the basics of classroom management. Education Digest 76 (5): 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Guild, P.B. 2001. Diversity, learning style and culture. New Horizons for Learning. http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/styles.guild.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R. 2012. Mastery learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, vol. 88, ed. N.M. Seel, 2097–2100. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R., and L.A. Jung. 2011. Response-to-intervention and mastery learning: Tracing roots and seeking common ground. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 84(6): 249–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. 2002. Differentiated instruction: Effective classroom practices report. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, CAST, U.S. Office of Special Education Programs. http://www.cast.org/ncac/classroompractice/cpractice02.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., R. Halveerson, S. Jackson, E. Mandinach, J. Supovitz, and J. Wayman. 2009. Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making, NCEE 2009–4067. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http//ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/dddm_pg_092909.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, P., and B. Gimbert. 2011. Falling flat: Certification as an insufficient indicator of teacher quality. Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification 6 (2): 31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., J.F. Kain, and Rivkin. 2004. “Why public schools lose teachers.” Journal of Human Resources 39 (2): 326–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S.M., and L.J. Heflin. 2011. Increasing secondary teachers’ behavior-specific praise using a video self-modeling and visual performance feedback intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 13 (2): 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. 2007. Examining the relationship between teacher quality as an organizational property of schools and students’ academic growth rates. Education Administration Quarterly 43 (4): 339–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R.K. 2001. Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Paper presented January 26 at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, College Station, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and J.M. Harackiewicz. 2000. Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research 70: 151–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N.E., and S.A. Craft. 2003. Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K., J.M. Walker, H.M. Sandler, and D. Whetsel. 2005. Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal 106: 105–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, A.W. 2000. Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented April 24–28 at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W.K., and C.J. Tarter. 2011. Positive psychology and educational administration: An optimistic research agenda. Education Administration Quarterly 47 (3): 427–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D.C., M.E. Wechsler, and H.J. Hough. 2008. Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record 110 (1): 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, D. 2010. Coherent instructional improvement and PLCs. Is it possible to do both? Phi Delta Kappan 91 (6): 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. 2007a. American educational history: School society, and the common good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. 2007b. “The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis.” Urban Education 42 (1): 82–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.M., and The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. 2004. Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. 2011. Understanding Common Core State Standards. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, K.A., J.A. Marsh, G.S. Ikemoto, H. Darilek, and H. Barney. 2006. Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education 112 (4): 496–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., J.A. Hess, and A. Trees. 2003. Sustaining the desire to learn: Dimensions of perceived instructional face work related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication 67 (4): 357–81.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M.S., J.A. Swinnerton, M.A. Copland, and J. Monpas-Huber. 2006. Data-informed leadership in education. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, M.A., and S. Smith. 2005. Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 10 (3): 333–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 2009. From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Education Researcher 35 (7): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Laible, D.J., G. Carlo, and S.C. Roesch. 2004. Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviors. Journal of Adolescence 27 (6): 703–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Brown, D. 2004. Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education 32 (3): 34–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M.A. 2003. School-family relations in context parent teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education 38 (1): 77–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. 2011. Changing course: Reflections of second-career teachers. Current Issues in Education 14 (20): 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., and N.K. Bowen. 2006. Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research 43 (2): 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M.R., J.H. Corpus, and S.S. Iyengar. 2005. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 (2): 184–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A., and G.P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57: 705–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E.B., M. Honey, D. Light, C. Heinze, and L. Rivas. 2005. Creating an evaluation framework for data-driven decision-making. Paper presented June 20–26 at the National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, L., and K. Bucher. 2006. Classroom management: Models, applications, and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McAdamis, S. 2001. Teachers tailor their instruction to meet a variety of student needs. Journal of Staff Development 22 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J.D., and L.R. Ketterlin-Geller. 2004. Rethinking instructional delivery for diverse student populations. Intervention in School and Clinic 40 (2): 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., and G. Wiggins. 2013. Essential questions: Opening doorways to student understanding. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Mojavezi, A., and M.P. Tamiz. 2012. The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 (3): 483–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2001. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research 66 (4): 543–78. http://valdosta.edu/∼whuitt/psy702/files/selfeff.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2002. Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., and D.H. Schunk. 2001. Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In Perception, ed. R. Riding and S. Rayner, 239–66. London: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pedota, P. 2007. Strategies for effective classroom management in the secondary setting. The Clearing House 80 (40): 163–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, M. 2000. Learning to think, thinking to learn: Models and strategies to develop a classroom culture of thinking. Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W.J. 2011. Transformative in action: An inside look at applying the process. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, R.W., J.S. Eccles, and A.J. Sameroff. 2000. School as contexts of early adolescent academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research. The Elementary School Journal 100 (5): 443–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, T. V., and M.K. Savage. 2010. Successful classroom management and discipline: Teaching self-control and responsibility, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H. 1991. Goal setting and self-evaluation: A social cognitive perspective on self-regulation. In Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 88, ed. M.L. Maehr and P.R. Pintrich, 85–113. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H., and J.L. Meece. 2005. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M.F. 2004. An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review 16 (2): 153–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer, T.R. 1999. No two are quite alike. Educational Leadership 57 (1): 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. 2001. How the brain learns, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Souto-Manning, M., and K.J. Swick. 2006. Teacher's beliefs about parent and family involvement: Rethinking our family involvement paradigm. Early Childhood Education Journal 34 (2): 187–93.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. 2004. New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan 86 (1): 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronge, J.H. 2007. Qualities of effective teachers, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J.A., and V. Klein. 2003. Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systems actually use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. 2003. Deciding to teach them all. Education Leadership 61 (2): 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A. 2000. Reconcilable differences. Educational Leadership 58 (1): 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A. 2001a. Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom. Understanding Our Gifted 14 (1): 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A. 2001b. How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A. 2004. Differentiation in diverse settings. School Administrator 61 (7): 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A.W. Hoy. 2001. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17: 783–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye, B.B., and L. O’Brien. 2002. Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession? Phi Delta Kappan 84 (1): 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J.C. 2005. Involving teachers in data-driven decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 10 (3): 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J.C., and S. Stringfield. 2006. Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education 112 (4): 549–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K., R., and J. Brophy. 2014. Motivating students to learn, 4th ed. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, C.R.H., T.L. Good, and M. McCaslin. 2008. Comprehensive school reform instructional practices throughout a school year: The role of subject matter, grade level, and time of year. Teachers College Record 110 (11): 2361–2388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., A. Datnow, and V. Park. 2008. Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 19 (3): 239–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P. 2001. Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J. 2000. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation, ed. M.R. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar