Theoretically Speaking: An Examination of Four Theories and How They Support Writing in the Classroom

References

• Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1986. The problem of speech genres. In Speech genres and other late essays, edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist and translated by V. McGee, 60–101. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., and S. J. Ceci. 1994. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review 101 (4): 568–586.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., and G. W. Evans. 2000. Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development 9 (1): 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., and P. A. Morris. 1998. The ecology of developmental processes. In Handbook of Child Psychology (5th edition, Volume 1), edited by R. M. Lerner, 993–1028. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G., and P. D. Pearson. 2012. Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 55: 580–586. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00069
   Google Scholar
• Diab, N. M. 2011. Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing 16: 274–292. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, M. 2013. Remediating remediation: From basic writing to writing across the curriculum. CEA Forum 42 (2): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., and J. R. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2000. Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In Handbook on reading research, volume III, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr, 195–208. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., K. R. Harris, and T. Santangelo. 2015. Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal 115 (4): 498–522.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, M. F., and S. Watts-Taffe. 2013. For the love of words: Fostering word consciousness in young readers. The Reading Teacher 62 (3): 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., and S. L. Klauda. 2014. Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly 49 (4): 387–416.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., S. Graham, B. Friedlander, and L. Laud. 2013. Bring powerful writing strategies into your classroom! Why and how. The Reading Teacher 66 (7): 538–542.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., S. Graham, and L. H. Mason. 2003. Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children 35 (7): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, T. S., L. Feng, L. J. Kuo, and E. M. McTigue. 2016. Discovering the literacy gap: A systematic review of reading and writing theories in research. Cogent Education 3 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1228284
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, T. S., and S. D. Matthews. 2017. Picture books aren't just for kids! Modeling text structures through nonfiction mentor books. Voices from the Middle 24 (4): 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2003. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19 (2): 139–158. doi:10.1080/10573560308222
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., and G. Valiante. 2006. Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald, 158–170. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, K. 2012. What is literacy? A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education 8 (1): 50–71. http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/What-is-Literacy_KPerry.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. 2006. A sociocultural theory of writing. In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald, 54–66. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E., and D. N. Morgan. 2014. Using mentor texts to teach writing in science and social studies. The Reading Teacher 68 (2): 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., R. R. Norman, N. K. Duke, P. Morsink, N. M. Martin, and J. A. Knight. 2013. Diagrams, timelines, and tables – oh, my! Fostering graphical literacy. The Reading Teacher 67 (1): 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., A. G. Harbaugh, R. K. Shankland, K. A.Wolbers, and A. M. Lawrence. 2013. Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading & Writing 26 (1): 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1980. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. L., A. D. Franks, L.-J. Kuo, E. McTigue, and J. Serrano. 2015. Both theory and practice: Science literacy instruction and theories of reading. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9661-2
   Google Scholar