Student Perceptions of a Summer Robotics Camp Experience

References

• Binns, I. C., D. Polly, J. Conrad, and B. Algozzine. 2016. Student perceptions of a summer ventures in science and mathematics camp experience. School Science and Mathematics 116 (8):420–429. doi:10.1111/ssm.12196.
   Google Scholar
• Banning, J., and J. E. Folkestad. 2012. STEM education related dissertation abstracts: A bounded qualitative meta-study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21:730–741. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9361-9.
   Google Scholar
• Barger, M., and N. Boyette. 2015. Robotics camps provide a stem-ulating experience. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers 90 (7):42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, R. R., S. M. Glynn, and J. M. Kittleson. 2011. Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education 95:1049–1065. doi:10.1002/sce.20462.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, D. 2009. Developing a scale to measure students' attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education 31:2185–2203. doi:10.1080/09500690802189799.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. 2014a. Career interest questionnaire [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS. doi:10.1037/t33611-000.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. 2014b. Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior 34:173–186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. B., and S. E. Hardin. 2013. Making STEM fun: How to organize a STEM camp. Teaching Exceptional Children 45 (4):60–67. doi:10.1177/004005991304500408.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, D. L., A. Eckhoff, C. O. Stewart, S. Chappell, and S. Hathcock. 2014. The examination of a pullout STEM program for urban elementary students. Research in Science Education 44:483–506. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9387-5.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M., A. Unfried, E. N. Wiebe, J. Corn, L. W. Townsend, and T. L. Collins. 2013. Student attitudes toward STEM: The development of upper elementary school and middle/high school student surveys. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1978. Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education 62:509–515. doi:10.1002/sce.3730620411.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1981. Test of science-related attitudes. Victoria, AU: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., and W. L. Butts. 1982. Relationship between perceived levels of classroom individualization and science-related attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 19:143–154. doi:10.1002/tea.3660190206.
   Google Scholar
• Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. 2012a. Middle and high school STEM-student survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. 2012b. Upper elementary school STEM-student survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., P. Brickman, N. Armstrong, and G. Taasoobshirazi. 2011. Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:1159–1176. doi:10.1002/tea.20442.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, K., Y. Ouyang, L. Scinski, B. Olszewski, and T. Bielefeldt. 2011. Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: Professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 11:47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., R. Bodin, J. W. Elliott, B. Ibrahim, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, T. W. Chen, and M. A. de Miranda. 2014. Connecting the STEM dots: Measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 24:107–20. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9241-0.
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., and E. S. Lander. 2012. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Executive Report). Washington, D.C.: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., E. S. Lander, and H. Varmus. 2010. Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America's future (Executive Report). Washington, D.C.: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/2a--Prepare_and_Inspire--PCAST.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kager, E. 2015. Effects of participation in a STEM camp on STEM attitudes and anticipated career choices of middle school girls: A mixed methods study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses: Global (PQDTGlobal)
   Google Scholar
• Kier, M., M. Blanchard, J. Osborne, and J. Albert. 2014. The development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education 44:461–481. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, M., and K. Skamp. 2008. Engaging students in science across the primary secondary interface: Listening to the students' voice. Research in Science Education 38:501–527. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9063-8.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. P. 2010. Students' attitudes toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEM-based programs. The Journal of Technology Studies 36 (1):24–34. doi:10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.4.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. P., and C. Stein. 2000. So that's what pi is for and other educational epiphanies from hands-on robotics. In Robots for kids: Exploring new technologies for learning experiences, Eds A. Druin, and J. Hendler, 219–243. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., C. Jackson, M. Miller, B. Walcott, D. L. Little, L. Speler, W. Schooler, and D. C. Schroeder. 2014. Developing middle school students' interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: See blue STEM camp. School Science & Mathematics 114 (6):291–301. doi:10.1111/ssm.12079.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13158/successful-k-12-stem-education-identifying-effective-approaches-in-science
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2013. Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13509/monitoring-progress-toward-successful-k-12-stem-education-a-nation
   Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council. 2011. The federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education portfolio (Pub. L. No. 111–358). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, G., B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, and V. I. Adamchuk. 2010. Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42:391–408. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782557.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, G., B. Barker, M. Toland, N. Grandgenett, and V. I. Adamchuk. 2009. Measuring the impact of robotics and geospatial technologies on youth science, technology, engineering, and mathematics attitudes. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, ed. C. Fulford, and G. Siemens, 3331–3340. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• OCED. 2012. Programme for International Student Assessment: Results from PISA 2012, United States. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. 2005. Robotics-driven activities: Can they improve middle school science learning. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 25:73–84. doi:10.1177/0270467604271244.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C., and M. Portsmore. 2004. Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education 5:17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sha, L., C. Schunn, and M. Bathgate. 2015. Measuring choice to participate in optional science learning experiences during early adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52:686–709. doi:10.1002/tea.21210.
   Google Scholar
• Shrigley, R. L. 1983. Book review: Test of science-related attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20:87–89. doi:10.1002/tea.3660200109.
   Google Scholar
• STEM Education Coalition. 2016. 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016-Annual-Report-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). 2010. Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for America's Future. Retrieved from: https://nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/2a--Prepare_and_Inspire--PCAST.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler-Wood, T., G. Knezek, and R. Christensen. 2010. Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 18:341–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ucgul, M., and K. Cagiltay. 2014. Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps. International Journal of Technology & Design Education 24:203–222. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9253-9.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 2014. Science, technology, engineering, and math: Education for global leadership. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D., and D. Fortus. (2011). Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (2):199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D., and D. Fortus. 2012. Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49:1057–1095. doi:10.1002/tea.21049.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T. M. 2012. Engaging elementary students in summer STEM camp. Texas Science Teacher 41 (1):6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. C., Y. Ma, L. Prejean, M. J. Ford, and G. Lai. 2008. Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40:201–16. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T. T., M. Boecking, E. P. Tiger, A. Gomez, A. Guillen, A. Arreguin, and J. Stone. 2014. Group tasks, activities, dynamics, and interactions in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research 15 (1):39–45.
   Google Scholar