Navigating the Middle School Transition in a Non-Western Culture: Exploring the Interplay of Perceived Academic Performance, Time Management, and the Mediating Role of Academic Engagement

References

• Abbasi, M. P., Z. Irani, L. Razmjoiy, and F. Bonyadi. 2015. Role of procrastination and motivational self-regulation in predicting students’ behavioral engagement. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 8 (5):295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., A. Batool, and A. Choudhry. 2019. Path relationship of time management and academic achievement of students in distance learning institutions. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning 5 (2):191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Akos, P., and J. P. Galassi. 2004. Middle and high school transitions as viewed by students, parents, and teachers. Professional School Counseling 7 (4):212–21. doi: 10.5330/prsc.7.4.65867177168134l2.
   Google Scholar
• Askari, M. R., B. Makvandi, and A. Neisi. 2020. The prediction of academic performance based on academic engagement, academic Self- efficacy, the achievement goals and perception of school atmosphere in gifted students. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals 9 (36):127–49. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2020.44149.2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, E. P., L. J. Hilliard, M. Batanova, K. St. John-White, C. Villanueva, and M. Marie. 2018. Investigating the environmental and individual factors associated with academic engagement during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 47 (10):2147–61. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0883-1.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B., and A. Tesser. 1991. Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (3):405–10. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R., G. Kuh, and S. Klein. 2006. Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education 47 (1):1–32. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2013. Self-Determination Theory: An Approach to Human Motivation and Personality. University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Dotterer, A. M., and K. Lowe. 2011. Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 40 (12):1649–60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., C. Midgley, A. Wigfield, C. M. Buchanan, D. Reuman, C. Flanagan, and D. M. Iver. 1993. Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. The American Psychologist 48 (2):90–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and R. W. Roeser. 2009. Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development, ed. R. M. Lerner and L. Steinberg, 3rd ed., 404–34. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001013.
   Google Scholar
• Felner, R. D., A. Favazza, M. Shim, S. Brand, K. Gu, and N. Noonan. 2001. Whole-school improvement and restructuring as prevention and promotion: Lessons from STEP and the project on high-performance learning communities. Journal of School Psychology 39 (2):177–202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00058-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, T. W., E. A. Youngstrom, J. J. Glutting, and M. W. Watkins. 2007. ADHD and achievement: Meta-analysis of the child, adolescent, and adult literatures and a concomitant study with college students. Journal of Learning Disabilities 40 (1):49–65. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400010401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74 (1):59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, X. 2019. A survey on self-efficacy of English majors: Exploring its correlation with time management and strategy use. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9 (12):1624–9. doi: 10.17507/tpls.0912.20.
   Google Scholar
• Häfner, A., A. Stock, and V. Oberst. 2015. Decreasing students’ stress through time management training: An intervention study. European Journal of Psychology of Education 30 (1):81–94. doi: 10.1007/s10212-014-0229-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, L., and P. A. Bishop. 2021. The evolving middle school concept: This we (still) believe. Current Issues in Middle Level Education 25 (2):2. doi: 10.20429/cimle.2021.250202.
   Google Scholar
• Izawa, C. 2000. Total time and efficient time management: In search of optimal learning and retention via study-test-rest presentation programs. The American Journal of Psychology 113 (2):221–48. doi: 10.2307/1423729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, Z., and S. Abdizarin. 2021. Prediction of academic adjustment based on academic identity, academic buoyancy and school engagement among students. مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی 18 (44):122–03. doi: 10.22111/jeps.2022.6672.
   Google Scholar
• Khojasteh, S. 2021. The effectiveness of e-learning through the shad program on students motivation for progress and time management during coronavirus disease. Journal of Technology and Scholarship in Education 1 (2):45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., E. Kim, and I. Lee. 2021. Influence of self-esteem of middle school students for mental care on academic achievement: Based on the mediation effect of GRIT and academic enthusiasm. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (13):7025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, X. 2022. Perceived parental warmth, emotional awareness, and positive adjustment profiles in Chinese and Italian early adolescents: A person‐centered approach. Journal of Adolescence 94 (2):206–23. doi: 10.1002/jad.12018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, X. 2023. Does peer acceptance promote active academic engagement in early adolescence? A robust investigation based on three independent studies. Personality and Individual Differences 203:112012. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.112012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. 2014. The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research 107 (3):177–85. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.807491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Y. Cui, and W. Zhou. 2018. Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 46 (3):517–28. doi: 10.2224/sbp.7054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., J. Dang, X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and J. Guo. 2014. Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: The effect of parental behavior and self-control. Computers in Human Behavior 41:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, J., T. Heffernan, and S. Muncer. 2003. Higher education students’ beliefs about the causes of examination failure: A network approach. Social Psychology of Education 6 (2):159–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1023289908438.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., F. Rijmen, C. MacCann, and R. Roberts. 2009. The assessment of time management in middle-school students. Personality and Individual Differences 47 (3):174–9. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, K. D. 2019. Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance. Online Learning 4 (1):23. doi: 10.24059/olj.v4i1.1908.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. H. 1991. Cultural differences and the management of engineering in US-Japanese joint ventures. Technology Management: The New International Language 474–5. IEEE.doi: 10.1109/PICMET.1991.183695.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., and G. A. D. Liem. 2010. Academic personal bests (PBs), engagement, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences 20 (3):265–70. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., W. M. Schaufeli, and M. Leiter. 2001. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1):397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead, G., and R. Griffin. 2003. Organizational behavior, translated by M. Alvani and G. H. Memarzadeh. Tehran: Morvarid Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Napoles, M. A., Jepril, A. B. A, and Hannah, K. T. 2023. The role of time management to the academic performance of the college students during pandemic. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 10 (2):7731–41. doi: 10.18535/ijsshi/v10i02.05.
   Google Scholar
• Noftle, E. E., and R. W. Robins. 2007. Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (1):116–30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L. B., and S. E. Taylor. 1999. From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (2):250–60. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Qalavandi, H., J. Amani Saribeglu, M. T. Gholami, and P. Akbari Sureh. 2014. School culture and academic alienation; The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Cultural Strategy Quarterly 6 (24):99–116. https://www.jsfc.ir/article_15141_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Razali, S. N. A. M., M. S. Rusiman, W. S. Gan, and N. Arbin. 2018. The impact of time management on ­students’ academic achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 995 (1):12042. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012042.
   Google Scholar
• Rihan, P., and D. Deshpande. 2022. Activity based module for training engineering undergraduates in time management. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. doi: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.40638.
   Google Scholar
• Sansgiry, S. S., A. A. Kawatkar, A. P. Dutta, and M. J. Bhosle. 2004. Predictors of academic performance at two universities: The effects of academic progression. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 68 (4):103. doi: 10.5688/aj6804103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 1994. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, E. H., and J. Wang. 2017. Social support and student engagement in middle school: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology 63:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Sepahvandi, M., S. Sabzian, Y. Geravand, S. Beiranvand, and F. Pirjavid. 2016. Investigating the effectiveness of teaching metacognitive techniques on the motivation of progress and academic performance of female students in Isfahan city. New Educational Approaches 11 (23):63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., J. R. Pitzer, and J. S. Steele. 2016. Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Developmental Psychology 52 (12):2099–117. doi: 10.1037/dev0000232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovacek, S., V. Miu, K. Soto, and H. Ye. 2019. Supporting stem in higher education. International Journal of Education and Practice 7 (4):438–49. doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2019.74.438.449.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, J. G., N. Campione-Barr, and A. Metzger. 2006. Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1):255–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. L.Jr. 1994. Implementation of a national monitoring program. Journal of Environmental Management 42 (1):1–29. doi: 10.1006/jema.1994.1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeger, H., and A. Ziegler. 2008. Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning 3 (3):207–30. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanum, S., and S. Bigatti. 2009. Academic course engagement during one semester forecasts college success: Engaged students are more likely to earn a degree, do it faster, and do it better. Journal of College Student Development 50 (1):120–32. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travers, C. J., D. Morisano, and E. A. Locke. 2015. Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: A qualitative study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (2):224–41. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizoso, C., C. Rodríguez, and O. Arias-Gundín. 2018. Coping, academic engagement and performance in university students. Higher Education Research & Development 37 (7):1515–29. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1504006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vofouri, J. 2017. The effect of training studying techniques (planning and time management, concentration and memory) on academic achievement and achievement motivation among Iranian students in Tajikistan. Journal of School Psychology 6 (2):146–63. (Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., and J. A. Fredricks. 2014. The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development 85 (2):722–37. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., and J. S. Eccles. 2012. Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence 22 (1):31–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00742.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wößmann, L., V. Freundl, E. Grewenig, P. Lergetporer, L. Zierow, and K. Werner. 2020. Bildung in der Coronakrise: Wie haben die Schulkinder Die Zeit der Schulschließungen Verbracht, und welche Bildungsmaßnahmen Befürworten die Deutschen? Ifo Schnelldienst 73:25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Z. Y., and G. A. D. Liem. 2022. Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review 34 (1):107–38. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar