Development of Improved Lattice Fragmentation and Diffusion Model for Coal Pyrolysis, Part 2: Effect of Intra-Porous Diffusion on the Volatile Yields

REFERENCES

• Anthony, D.B., Howard, J.B., Hottel, H.C., and Meissner, H.P. 1975. Rapid devolatilization of pulverized coal. Proc. Combust. Inst., 15, 1303.
   Google Scholar
• Benfell, K.E. 2001. Assessment of char morphology in high pressure pyrolysis and combustion. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geology, University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and He, R. 2011. Fragmentation and diffusion model for coal pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 90(1), 72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Ma, L. and He, R. 2014. Development of improved lattice fragmentation and diffusion model for coal pyrolysis, Part 1. Steady-state intraporous gas diffusivity. Combust. Sci. Technol., 186(6), 747–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, X. and He, R. 2011. Modeling changes of fractal pore structures in coal pyrolysis. Fuel, 90(2), 499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloke, M., and Lester, E. 1994. Characterization of coals for combustion using petrographic analysis: A review. Fuel, 73(3), 315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, M., Araujo, A.D., Da Silva, H.F., and Andrade J.S., Jr. 2003. Scaling behavior of diffusion and reaction processes in percolating porous media. Phys. Rev. E, 67(6), 061406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koranyi, A. 1989. The relationship between specific reactivity and the pore structure of coal chars during gasification. Carbon, 27(1), 55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, Y., Aharony, A., and Alexander, S. 1983. Anomalous diffusion on percolating clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett., 50(1), 77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genetti, D.B. 1999. An advanced model of coal devolatilization based on chemical structure. M.S. thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, D., Patrick, J.W. and Walker, A. 1976. Pore structure development during coal carbonization. 1. Behaviour of single coals. Fuel, 55(4), 297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, R., Xu, X., Chen, C., Fan, H., and Zhang, B. 1998. Evolution of pore fractal dimensions for burning porous chars. Fuel, 77(12), 1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfelder, J.O., Curtiss, C.F., and Bird, R.B. 1954. Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, 26. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A.J., and Thompson, A.H. 1985. Fractal sandstone pores: Implications for conductivity and pore formation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(12), 1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J.W., Hall, P., and Wernett, P.C. 1995. Pore structure of the Argonne premium coals. Energy Fuels, 9(2), 324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., Song, C. and Subramani, V. 2009. Hydrogen and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies, Wiley-AIChE, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Melia, P.F., and Bowman, C.T. 1983. A three zone model for coal particle swelling. Combust. Sci. Technol., 31(3–4), 195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niksa, S., and Kerstein, A.R. 1991. FLASHCHAIN theory for rapid coal devolatilization kinetics. 1. Formulation. Energy Fuels, 5(5), 647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, M.S. 1985. Softening coal pyrolysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, M.S., Peters, W.A., and Howard, J.B. 1989. An experimental and modeling study of softening coal pyrolysis. AIChE J., 35(5), 775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, C., and Azevedo, J. 2000. Modeling the evolution of particle morphology during coal devolatilization. Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), 2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, G.A. 1983. Coal pyrolysis I. Pore evolution theory. Combust. Flame, 53(1), 83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, P.K., Miura, S., Hudgins, R.R., and Silveston, P.L. 1983. Pore development during carbonization of coals. Fuel, 62(6), 645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.L., Smoot, L.D., Fletcher, T.H., and Pugmire, R.J. 1994. The Structure and Reaction Processes of Coal, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.R., Hamblen, D.G., and Carangelo, R.M. 1982. Applications of Fourier transform IR spectroscopy in fuel science. In Coal and Coal Products: Analytical Characterization Techniques, E. L. Fuller ( Ed.). ACS Symp. Series 205, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p. 77.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.R., Hamblen, D.G., Carangelo, R.M., Serio, M.A., and Deshpande, G.V. 1988. General model of coal devolatilization. Energy Fuels, 2(4), 405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.R., Serio, M.A., and Suuberg, E.M. 1992. Coal pyrolysis: Experiments, kinetic rates and mechanisms. Prog. Energy Combust., 18(2), 133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strugała, A. 2002. Changes of porosity during carbonization of bituminous coals: Effects due to pores with radii less than 2500 nm. Fuel, 81(9), 1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomeczek, J., and Gil, S. 2003. Volatiles release and porosity evolution during high pressure coal pyrolysis. Fuel, 82(3), 285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C., and Scaroni, A.W. 1987. The structural changes of bituminous coal particles during the initial stages of pulverized-coal combustion. Fuel, 66(2), 200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and He, R. 2007. Comparison of fractal properties of porous structures during coal devolatilization. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., He, R., and Chen, Y. 2008. Evolution of porous fractal properties during coal devolatilization. Fuel, 87(6), 878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Lucas, J.A., and Wall, T.F. 2007. Formation of the structure of chars during devolatilization of pulverized coal and its thermoproperties: A review. Prog. Energy Combust., 33(2), 135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J.L., Strezov, V., Lucas, J., Liu, G.S., and Wall, T. 2002. A mechanistic study on char structure evolution during coal devolatilization—experiments and model predictions. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29(1), 467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar