Algebraic Closure of Scalar Dissipation Rate for Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Combustion

REFERENCES

• Bilger, R.W. 2004. Some aspects of scalar dissipation. Flow Turbul. Combust., 72(2–4), 93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boger, M., Veynante, D., Boughanem, H., and Trouvé, A. 1998. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 27, 917.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, R., and Dutoya, D. 1978. On the scales of the fluctuations in turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 17, 235.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, R. 1990. Turbulent premixed combustion: Further discussions on scales of fluctuations. Combust. Flame, 80, 304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K.N.C. 1980. Turbulent flows with premixed reactants. In P.A. Libby and F.A. Williams (Eds.), Turbulent Reacting Flows, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelburg, New York, pp. 115–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, K.N.C., and Swaminathan, N. 2011. Fundamentals and challenges. In N. Swaminathan and K.N.C. Bray (Eds.), Turbulent Premixed Flame, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2007. A priori analysis of the curvature and propagation terms of the flame surface density transport equation for large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 19, 105101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2009a. Effects of Lewis number on scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. Phys. Fluids, 21, 035110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2009b. Effects of Lewis number on turbulent scalar transport and its modeling in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 156, 1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2009c. Physical insight and modelling for Lewis number effects on turbulent heat and mass transport in turbulent premixed flames. Numer. Heat Transfer, A, 55(8), 762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2011. Effects of Lewis number on flame surface density transport in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 158, 1768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2013. Turbulent Reynolds number dependence of flame surface density transport in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes simulations. Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Klein, M. 2008. A priori direct numerical simulation assessment of algebraic flame surface density models for turbulent premixed flames in the context of large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 20, 085108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Lipatnikov, A. 2013a. Conditional velocity statistics for high and low Damköhler number turbulent premixed combustion in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes simulations. Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Lipatnikov, A.N. 2013b. Effects of Lewis number on the statistics of conditional fluid velocity in turbulent premixed combustion in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes simulations. Phys. Fluids, 25, 045101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2007a. Influence of Damköhler number on turbulence-scalar interaction in premixed flames, Part I: Physical insight. Phys. Fluids, 19, 045103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2007b. Influence of Damköhler number on turbulence-scalar interaction in premixed flames, Part II: Model development. Phys. Fluids., 19, 045104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2010. Effects of Lewis number on scalar dissipation transport and its modelling implications for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol., 182, 1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2011. Effects of Lewis number on scalar variance transport in premixed flames. Flow Turbul. Combust., 87, 261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2013. Reynolds number effects on scalar dissipation rate transport and its modelling in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol., 185, 676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Champion, M., Mura, A., and Swaminathan, N. 2011a. Scalar dissipation rate approach to reaction rate closure. In N. Swaminathan and K.N.C. Bray ( Eds.), Turbulent Premixed Flame, 1st edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 76–102.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Hartung, G., Katragadda, M., and Kaminski, C.F. 2011d. A numerical comparison of 2D and 3D density-weighted displacement speed statistics and implications for laser based measurements of flame displacement speed. Combust. Flame, 158, 1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Katragadda, M., and Cant, R.S. 2011b. Effects of Lewis number on turbulent kinetic energy transport in turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids, 23, 075109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Katragadda, M., and Cant, R.S. 2011c. Statistics and modelling of turbulent kinetic energy transport in different regimes of premixed combustion. Flow Turbul. Combust., 87, 205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Klein, M., and Swaminathan, N. 2009. Effects of Lewis number on reactive scalar gradient alignment with local strain rate in turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, 1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Rogerson, J.W., and Swaminathan, N. 2008. A priori assessment of closures for scalar dissipation rate transport in turbulent premixed flames using direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids, 20, 045106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Rogerson, J.W., and Swaminathan, N. 2010. The scalar gradient alignment statistics of flame kernels and its modelling implications for turbulent premixed combustion. Flow Turbul. Combust., 85(1), 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlette, F., Meneveau, C., and Veynante, D. 2002a. A power-law flame wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion. Part I: Nondynamic formulation and initial tests. Combust. Flame, 131, 159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlette, F., Meneveau, C., and Veynante, D. 2002b. A power-law flame wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion. Part II: Dynamic formulation. Combust. Flame, 131, 181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.H., Choudhary, A., De Supinski, D., Hawkes, E.R., Klasky, S., Liao, W.K., Ma, K.L., Mellor-Crummey, J., Podhorski, N., Sankaran, R., Shende, S., and Yoo, C.S. 2009. Terascale direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using S3D. Comput. Sci. Discov., 2(1), 015001.
   Google Scholar
• Clavin, P., and Williams, F.A. 1982. Effects of molecular diffusion and thermal expansion on the structure and dynamics of turbulent premixed flames in turbulent flows of large scale and small intensity. J. Fluid Mech., 128, 251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunstan, T., Minamoto, Y., Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2013. Scalar dissipation rate modelling for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girimaji, S.S., and Zhou, Y. 1996. Analysis and modeling of subgrid scalar mixing using numerical data. Phys. Fluids, 8(5), 1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grout, R.W. 2007. An age-extended progress variable for conditioning reaction rates. Phys. Fluids, 19, 105107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I., and Huh, K.H. 2008. Roles of displacement speed on evolution of flame surface density for different turbulent intensities and Lewis numbers for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 152, 194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I., and Huh, K.H. 2009. Effects of the Karlovitz number on the evolution of the flame surface density in turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K.W., and Cant, R.S. 1999. DNS of turbulent flame kernels. In C. Liu, L. Sakell, and T. Beautner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second AFOSR Conference on DNS and LES, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Knikker, R., Veynante, D., and Meneveau, C. 2004. A dynamic flame surface density model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids, 16, 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolla, H., Rogerson, J., Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2009. Prediction of turbulent flame speed using scalar dissipation rate. Combust. Sci. Technol., 181, 518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langella, I., Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2013. Large eddy simulations of premixed combustion using SDR approach. Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean. Combustion Symposium, Izmir, Turkey, September 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, T., and Borghi, R. 1994. New model of premixed wrinkled flame propagation based on a scalar dissipation equation. Combust. Flame, 96(4), 443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., and Borghi, R. 2003. Towards an extended scalar dissipation equation for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 133, 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., Robin, V., Champion, M., and Hasegawa, T. 2009. Small-scale features of velocity and scalar fields of turbulent premixed flames. Flow Turbul. Combust., 82, 339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., Tsuboi, K., and Hasegawa, T. 2008. Modelling of the correlation between velocity and reactive scalar gradients in turbulent premixed flames based on DNS data. Combust. Theor. Model., 12, 671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and Lele, S.K. 1992. Boundary conditions for direct simulation of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys., 101, 104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 2000. Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, R., and Sreenivasan, K.R. 1990. Quantitative three dimensional imaging and structure of passive scalar fields in fully turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech., 216, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, H., and Abraham, J. 2012. Two-dimensional direct numerical simulation evaluation of the flame surface density model for flames developing from an ignition kernel in lean methane/air mixtures under engine conditions. Phys. Fluids, 24, 105108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogallo, R.S. 1981. Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. NASA Technical Memorandum 91416.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, C.J., and Trouvé, A. 1993. Direct simulations of premixed turbulent flames with nonunity Lewis numbers. Combust. Flame, 94, 41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivamoggi, B.K. 1995. Multi-fractal aspects of the fine-scale structure of temperature fluctuations in isotropic turbulence. Physica A, 221, 460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivashinsky, G.I. 1983. Instabilities, pattern formation and turbulence in flames. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 15, 179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations—I: The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Rev., 91, 99.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, K.R. 1991. Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, K.R., Ramshankar, R., and Meneveau, C. 1989. Mixing, entrainment and fractal dimensions of surfaces in turbulent flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 421, 79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and Bray, K.N.C. 2005. Effect of dilatation on scalar dissipation in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 143, 549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and Grout, R. 2006. Interaction of turbulence and scalar fields in premixed flames. Phys. Fluids, 18, 045102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouvé, A., and Poinsot, T. 1994. The evolution equation for the flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion. J. Fluid Mech., 278, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., and Vervisch, L. 2002. Turbulent combustion modelling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 28, 193–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A.A. 1990. Minimal storage time advancement schemes for spectral methods. NASA Report No. MS 202 A–1.
   Google Scholar