Effects of Reaction Progress Variable Definition on the Flame Surface Density Transport Statistics and Closure for Different Combustion Regimes

References

• Arias, P.G., Chaudhuri, S., Uranakara, H.A., and Im, H.G. 2016. Direct numerical simulations of statistically stationary turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Sci. Technol., 188, 1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boger, M., Veynante, D., Boughanem, H., and Trouvé, A. 1998. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 27, 917.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M.P., Chaos, M., Ju, Y., Dryer, F.L., and Klippenstein, S.J. 2012. Comprehensive H2-O2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion. Int. J. Chem. Kin., 44, 444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, S., Veynante, D., Lacas, F., Maistret, E., Darabhia, N., and Poinsot, T. 1990. Coherent flamelet model: applications and recent extensions, In Larrouturou, B.E. (Ed.), Recent Advances in Combustion Modelling, World Scientific, Singapore, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Candel, S.M., and Poinsot, T.J. 1990. Flame stretch and the balance equation for the flame area. Combust. Sci. Technol., 70, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant, R.S., and Bray, K.N.C. 1989. Strained laminar flamelet calculations of premixed turbulent combustion in a closed vessel. Proc. Combust. Inst., 22, 791.
   Google Scholar
• Cant, R.S., Pope, S.B., and Bray, K.N.C. 1990. Modelling of flamelet surface to volume ratio in turbulent premixed combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 27, 809.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2005. Effects of strain rate and curvature on surface density function transport in turbulent premixed flames in the thin reaction zones regime. Phys. Fluids, 17, 65108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2006. Statistical behaviour and modelling of flame normal vector in turbulent premixed flames. Numer. Heat Trans. A, 50, 623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2007. A priori analysis of the curvature and propagation terms of the flame surface density transport equation for large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 19, 105101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2009a. Physical insight and modelling for Lewis number effects on turbulent heat and mass transport in turbulent premixed flames. Numer. Heat Trans. A, 55, 8, 762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2009b. Effects of Lewis number on turbulent scalar transport and its modelling in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 156, 1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2011. Effects of Lewis number on flame surface density transport in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 158, 1768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R.S. 2013. Turbulent Reynolds number dependence of flame surface density transport in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulations. Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Hawkes, E.R., Chen, J.H., and Cant, R.S. 2008. Effects of strain rate and curvature on surface density function transport in turbulent premixed CH4-air and H2-air flames: a comparative study. Combust. Flame, 154, 259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Klein, M. 2008a. A-priori direct numerical simulation assessment of algebraic flame surface density models for turbulent premixed flames in the context of large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 20, 085108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Klein, M. 2008b. Influence of Lewis number on the surface density function transport in the thin reaction zones regime for turbulent premixed flames. Phys. Fluids, 20, 065102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Klein, M., Alwazzan, D., and Im, H.G. 2018. Surface density function statistics in hydrogen-air flames for different turbulent premixed combustion regimes. Combust. Sci. Technol. doi:10.1080/00102202.2018.1480015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2007. Influence of Damköhler number on turbulence-scalar interaction in premixed flames, Part I: physical insight. Phys. Fluids, 19, 045103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlette, F., Meneveau, C., and Veynante, D. 2002. A power law wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion, Part I: non dynamic formulation and initial tests. Combust. Flame, 131, 159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, O., Benkenida, A., and Angelberger, C. 2003. 3D modeling of mixing, ignition and combustion, phenomena in highly stratified gasoline engines. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP, 58, 1, 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D., and Poinsot, T. 2000. A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids A, 12, 1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duclos, J.M., Veynante, D., and Poinsot, T. 1993. A comparison of flamelet models for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 95, 101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, E.R., and Cant, R.S. 2001a. Implications of a flame surface density approach to large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame, 126, 1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, E.R., and Cant, R.S. 2001b. Physical and numerical realizability requirements for flame surface density approaches to large-eddy and Reynolds averaged simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Theor. Model, 5, 699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Perez, F.E., Yuen, F.T.C., Groth, C.P.T., and Gülder, Ö.L. 2011. LES of a laboratory-scale turbulent premixed Bunsen flame using FSD, PCM-FPI and thickened flame models. Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 1365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I., and Huh, K.Y. 2008. Roles of displacement speed on evolution of flame surface density for different turbulent intensities and Lewis numbers in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 152, 194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, H.G., and Chen, J.H. 2002. Preferential diffusion effects on the burning rate of interacting turbulent premixed hydrogen-air flames. Combust. Flame, 126, 246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katragadda, M., Malkeson, S.P., and Chakraborty, N. 2011. Modelling of the tangential strain rate term of the flame surface density transport equation in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulation. Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppeler, R., Tangermann, E., Allaudin, U., and Pfitzner, M. 2014. LES of low to high turbulent combustion in an elevated pressure environment. Flow Turb. Combust., 92, 767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M., Chakraborty, N., and Pfitzner, M. 2016. Analysis of the combined modelling of subgrid transport and filtered flame propagation for premixed turbulent combustion. Flow Turb. Combust., 96, 921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M., Kasten, C., Chakraborty, N., and Im, H.G. 2018. Turbulent scalar fluxes in hydrogen-air premixed flames at low and high Karlovitz numbers. Combust. Theor. Modell. doi:10.1080/13647830.2018.1468034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knikker, R., Veynante, D., and Meneveau, C. 2002. A priori testing of a similarity model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.C., and Kong, Y.H. 2008. Diesel combustion modelling using LES turbulence model with detailed chemistry. Combust. Theor. Model, 12, 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R.P., and Vaos, E.M. 1999. Modelling of premixed turbulent flames with second moment methods. Combust. Flame, 116, 461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, T., Stein, T.O., Chakraborty, N., and Kempf, A.M. 2013. A posteriori testing of algebraic flame surface density models for LES. Combust. Theor. Modell., 17, 431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, T., Stein, T.O., Chakraborty, N., and Kempf, A.M. 2014. A-posteriori testing of the flame surface density transport equation for LES. Combust. Theory Modell., 18, 32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneveau, C., and Poinsot, T. 1991. Stretching and quenching of flamelets in premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame, 86, 311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou, V., Chakraborty, N., Klein, M., and Im, H.G. 2018. Statistics of scalar flux transport of major species in different premixed turbulent combustion regimes for turbulent H2-air flames. Proc. Turb. Heat and Mass Trans. 2018, 10th −13th July, Rio de Jeneiro, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Passot, T., and Pouquet, A. 1987. Compressible turbulence with a perfect gas law: a numerical. approach. J. Fluid Mech, 181, 441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge Monograph on Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, H., and Abraham, J. 2012. Two-dimensional direct numerical simulation evaluation of the flame-surface density model for flames developing from an ignition kernel in lean methane/air mixtures under engine conditions. Phys. Fluids, 24, 105108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogallo, R.S. 1981. Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. NASA Technical Memorandum 81315. NASA Ames Research Center, California.
   Google Scholar
• Sabelnikov, V., Lipatnikov, A.N., Chakraborty, N., Nishiki, S., and Hasagawa, T. 2017. A balance equation for the mean rate of product creation in premixed turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 36, 1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellmann, J., Lai, J., Chakraborty, N., and Kempf, A.M. 2017. Flame surface density based modelling of head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 36, 1817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermorel, O., Richard, S., Colin, O., Angelberger, C., Benkenida, A., and Veynante, D. 2009. Towards the understanding of cyclic variability in a spark ignited engine using multicycle LES. Combust. Flame, 156, 525–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., Piana, J., Duclos, J.M., and Martel, C. 1996. Experimental analysis of flame surface density models for premixed turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 26, 413.
   Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., Trouvé, A., Bray, K.N.C., and Mantel, T. 1997. Gradient and counter-gradient scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 26, 413.
   Google Scholar
• Wacks, D.H., Chakraborty, N., Klein, M., Arias, P.G., and Im, H.G. 2016. Flow topologies in different regimes of premixed turbulent combustion: a direct numerical simulation analysis. Phys. Rev. F, 1, 083401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, P.K., Girimaji, S.S., and Pope, S.B. 1990. Straining and scalar dissipation on material surfaces in turbulence: implications for flamelets. Combust. Flame, 79, 340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, C.S., Wang, Y., Trouve, A., and Im, H.G. 2005. Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counterflow flames. Combust. Theor. Modell., 9, 617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar