Micromixing Models for PDF Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Flames

References

• Beguier, C., Dekeyser, I., and Launder, B.E. 1978. Ratio of scalar and velocity dissipation time scales in shear-flow turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 21, 307–310. doi:10.1063/1.862228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K., Champion, M., Libby, P.A., and Swaminathan, N. 2011. Scalar dissipation and mean reaction rates in premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame. 158, 2017–2022. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, S.M., Brewster, B.S., and Smoot, L.D. 1999. PDF modeling of lean premixed combustion using in situ tabulated chemistry. Combust. Flame. 119, 233–252. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00057-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, R.R., Wang, H., and Pope, S.B. 2007. The effect of mixing models in PDF calculations of piloted jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 1543–1550. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., Rogerson, J.W., and Swaminathan, N. 2008. A priori assessment of closures for scalar dissipation rate transport in turbulent premixed flames using direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids, 20, 045106 (15 pp.)-045106 (15 pp.).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2007. Influence of the Damkohler number on turbulence-scalar interaction in premixed flames. II. Model development. Phys. Fluids, 19, 045103 (10 pp.)-045103(10 pp.).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2011. Effects of Lewis number on scalar variance transport in premixed flames. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 87, 261–292. doi:10.1007/s10494-010-9305-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.D., Chen, S.Y., and Kraichnan, R.H. 1989. Probability-distribution of a stochastically advected scalar field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2657–2660. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.H., Choudhary, A., DE SUPINSKI, B., Devries, M., Hawkes, E.R., Klasky, S., Liao, W.K., Ma, K.L., Mellor-Crummey, J., Podhorszki, N., Sankaran, R., Shende, S., and Yoo, C.S. 2009. Terascale direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using S3D. Comput. Sci. Discov., 2, 015001 (31 pp.)-015001 (31 pp.).
   Google Scholar
• Curl, R.L. 1963. Dispersed phase mixing .1. Theory and effects in simple reactors. Aiche J. 9, 175–181. doi:10.1002/aic.690090207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C. 1979. Relaxation of initial probability density functions in the turbulent convection of scalar fields. Phys. Fluids. 22, 20–30. doi:10.1063/1.862431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., and O’brien, E.E. 1974. An approach to the autoignition of a turbulent mixture. Acta Astronaut. 1, 1239–1266. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(74)90050-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, M.C., and Haworth, D.C. 2007. Advanced gasoline engine development using optical diagnostics and numerical modeling. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 99–124. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M.J., Masri, A.R., and Bilger, R.W. 2007. A new piloted premixed jet burner to study strong finite-rate chemistry effects. Combust. Flame. 151, 46–60. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M.J., Masri, A.R., Bilger, R.W., and Barlow, R.S. 2010. Finite rate chemistry effects in highly sheared turbulent premixed flames. Flow Turbul. Combust. 85, 621–648. doi:10.1007/s10494-010-9280-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R., M., Cha, C., and Trouillet, P. 2002. Lagrangian PDF Mixing Models for Reacting Flows. Stanford. Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, S., Salehi, F., Cleary, M.J., and Masri, A.R. 2017. MMC-LES simulations of turbulent piloted flames with varying levels of inlet inhomogeneity. Proc. Combustion Inst. 36, 1759–1766. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, W., Raman, V., and Chen, Z. 2016. LES/PDF modeling of autoignition in a lifted turbulent flame: analysis of flame sensitivity to differential diffusion and scalar mixing time-scale. Combust. Flame. 171, 69–86. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, E.R., Chatakonda, O., Kolla, H., Kerstein, A.R., and Chen, J.H. 2012. A petascale direct numerical simulation study of the modelling of flame wrinkling for large-eddy simulations in intense turbulence. Combust. Flame. 159, 2690–2703. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, E.R., Sankaran, R., Sutherland, J.C., and Chen, J.H. 2007. Scalar mixing in direct numerical simulations of temporally evolving plane jet flames with skeletal CO/H2 kinetics. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 1633–1640. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, D.C. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36, 168–259. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S., Zhu, J., and Anand, M.S. 2006. Large-eddy simulations as a design tool for gas turbine combustion systems. Aiaa J. 44, 674–686. doi:10.2514/1.15390
   Google Scholar
• Janicka, J., Kolbe, W., and Kollmann, W. 1979. Closure of the transport-equation for the probability density-function of turbulent scalar fields. J. Non-Equilibrium Thermodyn. 4, 47–66. doi:10.1515/jnet.1979.4.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kha, K.Q.N., Robin, V., Mura, A., and Champion, M. 2016. Implications of laminar flame finite thickness on the structure of turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech. 787, 116–147. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., and Kim, Y. 2017. Multi-environment probability density function approach for turbulent partially-premixed methane/air flame with inhomogeneous inlets. Combust. Flame. 182, 190–205. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolla, H. 2010. Scalar dissipation rate based flamelet modelling of turbulent premixed flames. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolla, H., Rogerson, J.W., Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N. 2009. Scalar dissipation rate modeling and its valiation. Combust. Sci. Technol. 181, 518–535. doi:10.1080/00102200802612419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisman, A., Tang, J.C.K., Hawkes, E.R., Lignell, D.O., and Chen, J.H. 2014. A DNS evaluation of mixing models for transported PDF modelling of turbulent nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame. 161, 2085–2106. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuron, M., Hawkes, E.R., Ren, Z., Tang, J.C.K., Zhou, H., Chen, J.H., and Lu, T. 2017a. Performance of transported PDF mixing models in a turbulent premixed flame. Proc. Combustion Inst. 36, 1987–1995. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuron, M., Ren, Z., Hawkes, E.R., Zhou, H., Kolla, H., Chen, J.H., and Lu, T. 2017b. A mixing timescale model for TPDF simulations of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame. 177, 171–183. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Zhao, Z.W., Kazakov, A., and Dryer, F.L. 2004. An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 36, 566–575. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R.P., Louloudi, S.A., and Vaos, E.M. 2000. Joint scalar probability density function modeling of pollutant formation in piloted turbulent jet diffusion flames with comprehensive chemistry. Proc. Combustion Inst. 28, 149–156. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80206-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R.P., and Vaos, E.M. 2000. Modeling of mixing processes in non-isothermal and combusting flows. Adv. Turbul, VIII, 493–496.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R.P., and Vaos, E.M. 2006. Transported PDF modeling of high-Reynolds-number premixed turbulent flames. Combust. Flame. 145, 495–511. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, T.F., Yoo, C.S., Chen, J.H., and Law, C.K. 2010. Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of a turbulent lifted hydrogen jet flame in heated coflow: a chemical explosive mode analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 652, 45–64. doi:10.1017/S002211201000039X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Yoo, C.S., Richardson, E.S., Chen, J.H., Law, C.K., and Lu, T. 2012. Chemical explosive mode analysis for a turbulent lifted ethylene jet flame in highly-heated coflow. Combust. Flame. 159, 265–274. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel, T., and Borghi, R. 1994. A new model of premixed wrinkled flame propagation based on a scalar dissipation equation. Combust. Flame. 96, 443–457. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(94)90110-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, A.R., Cao, R., Pope, S.B., and Goldin, G.M. 2004. PDF calculations of turbulent lifted flames of H-2/N-2 fuel issuing into a vitiated co-flow. Combust. Theor. Model. 8, 1–22. doi:10.1088/1364-7830/8/1/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares, S., Prasad, V.N., Magnotti, G., Barlow, R.S., and Masri, A.R. 2015. Stabilization of piloted turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets. Proc. Combustion Inst. 35, 1477–1484. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merci, B., Roekaerts, D., Naud, B., and Pope, S.B. 2006. Comparative study of micromixing models in transported scalar PDF simulations of turbulent nonpremixed bluff body flames. Combust. Flame. 146, 109–130. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitarai, S., Riley, J.J., and Kosaly, G. 2005. Testing of mixing models for Monte Carlo probability density function simulations. Phys. Fluids, 17. doi:10.1063/1.1863319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C.D. 2001. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11, 119–192. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1991. Mapping closures for turbulent mixing and reaction. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 255–270. doi:10.1007/BF00271466
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 2013a. A model for turbulent mixing based on shadow-position conditioning. Phys. Fluids, 25. doi:10.1063/1.4818981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 2013b. Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion. Proc. Combustion Inst. 34, 1–31. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B., and Anand, M.S. 1985. Flamelet and distributed combustion in premixed turbulent flames. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 20, 403–410. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(85)80527-0
   Google Scholar
• Popov, P.P., and Pope, S.B. 2014. Large eddy simulation/probability density function simulations of bluff body stabilized flames. Combust. Flame. 161, 3100–3133. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, V., Fox, R.O., and Harvey, A.D. 2004. Hybrid finite-volume/transported PDF simulations of a partially premixed methane-air flame. Combust. Flame. 136, 327–350. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, V., and Pitsch, H. 2007. A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry. Proc. Combustion Inst. 31, 1711–1719. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Z.Y., and Pope, S.B. 2004. An investigation of the performance of turbulent mixing models. Combust. Flame. 136, 208–216. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Z.Y., Subramaniam, S., and Pope, S.B. 2002. Implementation of the EMST mixing model [Online]. Available: http://tcg.mae.cornell.edu/emst
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E.S., and Chen, J.H. 2012. Application of PDF mixing models to premixed flames with differential diffusion. Combust. Flame. 159, 2398–2414. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E.S., Sankaran, R., Grout, R.W., and Chen, J.H. 2010. Numerical analysis of reaction-diffusion effects on species mixing rates in turbulent premixed methane-air combustion. Combust. Flame. 157, 506–515. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowinski, D.H., and Pope, S.B. 2011. PDF calculations of piloted premixed jet flames. Combust. Theor. Model. 15, 245–266. doi:10.1080/13647830.2010.535568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowinski, D.H., and Pope, S.B. 2013. Computational study of lean premixed turbulent flames using RANS-PDF and LES-PDF methods. Combust. Theor. Model. 17, 610–656. doi:10.1080/13647830.2013.789929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel’nikov, V., and Soulard, O. 2006. White in time scalar advection model as a tool for solving joint composition PDF equations. Flow Turbul. Combust. 77, 333–357. doi:10.1007/s10494-006-9049-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponfeldner, T., Boxx, I., Beyrau, F., Hardalupas, Y., Meier, W., and Taylor, A.M.K.P. 2015. On the alignment of fluid-dynamic principal strain-rates with the 3D flamelet-normal in a premixed turbulent V-flame. Proc. Combustion Inst. 35, 1269–1276. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoellinger, M., and Heinz, S. 2010. Evaluation of scalar mixing and time scale models in PDF simulations of a turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Flame. 157, 1671–1685. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., and Pope, S.B. 1998. A mixing model for turbulent reactive flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees. Combust. Flame. 115, 487–514. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., and Pope, S.B. 1999. Comparison of mixing model performance for nonpremixed turbulent reactive flow. Combust. Flame. 117, 732–754. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00135-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and Bilger, R.W. 2001. Scalar dissipation, diffusion and dilatation in turbulent H-2-air premixed flames with complex chemistry. Combust. Theor. Model. 5, 429–446. doi:10.1088/1364-7830/5/3/310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and Bray, K.N.C. 2005. Effect of dilatation on scalar dissipation in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame. 143, 549–565. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and Bray, K.N.C. 2011. Turbulent Premixed Flames, Cambridge University Press, New York
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Q., Xu, J., and Pope, S.B. 2000. Probability density function calculations of local extinction and no production in piloted-jet turbulent methane/air flames. Proc. Combustion Inst. 28, 133–139. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80204-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taut, C., Correa, C., Deutschmann, O., Warnatz, J., Einecke, S., Schulz, C., and Wolfrum, J. 2000. Three-dimensional modeling with Monte Carlo-probability density function methods and laser diagnostics of the combustion in a two-stroke engine. Proc. Combustion Inst. 28, 1153–1159. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80325-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirunagari, R.R., and Pope, S.B. 2016a. An investigation of turbulent premixed counterflow flames using large-eddy simulations and probability density function methods. Combust. Flame. 166, 229–242. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirunagari, R.R., and Pope, S.B. 2016b. LES/PDF for premixed combustion in the DNS limit. Combust. Theor. Model. 20, 834–865. doi:10.1080/13647830.2016.1188991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirunagari, R.R., and Pope, S.B. 2017. Characterization of extinction/reignition events in turbulent premixed counterflow flames using strain-rate analysis. Proc. Combustion Inst. 36, 1919–1927. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valino, L., and Dopazo, C. 1991. A binomial langevin model for turbulent mixing. Phys. Fluids a-Fluid Dyn. 3, 3034–3037. doi:10.1063/1.857847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., and Vervisch, L. 2002. Turbulent combustion modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 28, 193–266. doi:10.1016/S0360-1285(01)00017-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villermaux, J., and Devillon, J.C. 1972. Représentation de la coalescence et de la redispersion des domaines de ségrégation dans un fluide par un modèle d’interaction phénoménologique. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering, Amsterdam. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and Zhang, P. 2017. A unified view of pilot stabilized turbulent jet flames for model assessment across different combustion regimes. Proc. Combustion Inst. 36, 1693–1703. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Zhou, H., Ren, Z., and Law, C.K. 2018. Transported PDF simulation of turbulent CH4/H2 flames under MILD conditions with particle-level sensitivity analysis. Proc. Combustion Inst. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.167
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and Pope, S.B. 2000. PDF calculations of turbulent nonpremixed flames with local extinction. Combust. Flame. 123, 281–307. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00155-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Wang, H., Pope, S.B., and Chen, J.H. 2013. Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H2 temporally evolving jet flame. Proc. Combustion Inst. 34, 1241–1249. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.Z., Kung, E.H., and Haworth, D.C. 2005. A PDF method for multidimensional modeling of HCCI engine combustion: effects of turbulence/chemistry interactions on ignition timing and emissions. Proc. Combustion Inst. 30, 2763–2771. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.-Y., Bhagatwala, A., Chen, J.H., Haworth, D.C., and Pope, S.B. 2016. An a priori DNS study of the shadow-position mixing model. Combust. Flame. 165, 223–245. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.-Y., and Haworth, D.C. 2014. Transported PDF modeling of pulverized coal jet flames. Combust. Flame. 161, 1866–1882. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Li, S., Ren, Z., and Rowinski, D.H. 2017. Investigation of mixing model performance in transported PDF calculations of turbulent lean premixed jet flames through Lagrangian statistics and sensitivity analysis. Combust. Flame. 181, 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Ren, Z., Kuron, M., Lu, T., and Chen, J.H. 2018a. Investigation of reactive scalar mixing in transported PDF simulations of turbulent premixed methane-air Bunsen flames. Combust. Flame. under review.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou, H., Yang, T., Ren, Z., and Rowinski, D.H. 2018b. LES/PDF simulations of a near-limit turbulent lean premixed flame. Combust. Flame. under review.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar