Algorithmic Aspects of the LES-PBE-PDF Method for Modeling Soot Particle Size Distributions in Turbulent Flames

References

• Akridis, P. 2016. Coupled CFD-population balance modelling of soot formation in laminar and turbulent flames. Ph.D. thesis. Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Akridis, P., and Rigopoulos, S., 2015. Modelling of soot formation in a turbulent diffusion flame using a comprehensive CFD-PBE model with full chemistry. Proceedings of the European Combustion Meeting, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Attili, A., Bisetti, F., Mueller, M.E., and Pitsch, H. 2014. Formation, growth, and transport of soot in a three-dimensional turbulent non-premixed jet flame. Combust. Flame, 161, 1849–1865. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisetti, F., Blanquart, G., Mueller, M.E., and Pitsch, H. 2012. On the formation and early evolution of soot in turbulent non-premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 159, 317–335. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Veroli, G.Y., and Rigopoulos, S. 2009. A study of turbulence-chemistry interaction in reactive precipitation via a population balance-transported PDF method, In Hanjalić, K., Nagano, Y., and Jakirlić, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, Begell House, Inc., Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Di Veroli, G.Y., and Rigopoulos, S. 2010. Modeling of turbulent precipitation: A transported population balance-PDF method. AIChE J., 56, 878–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Veroli, G.Y., and Rigopoulos, S. 2011. Modeling of aerosol formation in a turbulent jet with the transported population balance equation-probability density function approach. Phys. Fluids, 23, 043305. doi:10.1063/1.3576913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R.O. 2012. Large-eddy-simulation tools for multiphase flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 44, 47–76. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., and O'Brien, E.E. 1993. A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluid A Fluid Dynam., 5, 1282–1284. doi:10.1063/1.858617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, E., Adams, N., and Sagaut, P. 2009. Large Eddy Simulation for Compressible Flows, Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hairer, E., Nørsett, S.P., and Wanner, G. 1993. Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems. Volume 8 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Haworth, D. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36, 168–259. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulburt, H.M., and Katz, S. 1964. Some problems in particle technology: A statistical mechanical formulation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 19, 555–574. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(64)85047-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W.P. 2002. The joint scalar probability density function method, In Launder, B.E., and Sandham, N. (Eds.), Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transitional Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Chapter 20, pp. 582–625.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W.P., and Navarro-Martinez, S. 2007. Large eddy simulation of autoignition with a subgrid probability density function method. Combust. Flame, 150, 170–187. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W.P., and Prasad, V.N. 2010. Large eddy simulation of the Sandia flame series (D-F) using the Eulerian stochastic field method. Combust. Flame, 157, 1621–1636. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee, R.J., Rupley, F.M., Meeks, E., and Miller, J.A. 1996. CHEMKIN-III: A FORTRAN Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas-Phase Chemical and Plasma Kinetics, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M., Sadiki, A., and Janicka, J. 2003. A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 186, 652–665. doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00090-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, M., Geigle, K.P., Meier, W., Crosland, B.M., Thomson, K.A., and Smallwood, G.J. 2011. Sooting turbulent jet flame: characterization and quantitative soot measurements. Appl. Phys. B, 104, 409–425. doi:10.1007/s00340-011-4373-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, H., Hassanaly, M., Raman, V., Mueller, M.E., and Geigle, K.P. 2016. Large-eddy simulation of soot formation in a model gas turbine combustor. J. Eng. Gas. Turb. Power, 139, 031503. doi:10.1115/1.4034448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, B. 1993. A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms, In Vreugdenhil, C.B., and Koren, B. (Eds.), Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems, Vieweg Verlag, Volume 45 of Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, pp. 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenburg, A., Bilger, R., and Kent, J.H. 2000. Modeling soot formation in turbulent methane-air jet diffusion flames. Combust. Flame, 121, 24–40. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00146-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, T.S. 1967. Distribution functions in the statistical theory of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 10, 969–975. doi:10.1063/1.1762249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., and Pope, S.B. 2007. A particle formulation for treating differential diffusion in filtered density function methods. J. Comput. Phys., 226, 947–993. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M.E., and Pitsch, H. 2011. Large eddy simulation subfilter modeling of soot-turbulence interactions. Phys. Fluids, 23, 115104. doi:10.1063/1.3657826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M.E., and Pitsch, H. 2012. LES model for sooting turbulent nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame, 159, 2166–2180. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuber, G., Garcia, C.E., Kronenburg, A., Williams, B.A.O., Beyrau, F., Stein, O.T., and Cleary, M.J. 2019. Joint experimental and numerical study of silica particulate synthesis in a turbulent reacting jet. Proc. Combust. Inst., 37, 1213–1220. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.074
   Google Scholar
• Neuber, G., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T., and Cleary, M.J. 2017. MMC-LES modelling of droplet nucleation and growth in turbulent jets. Chem. Eng. Sci., 167, 204–218. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patankar, S.V. 1980. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pavliotis, G.A. 2014. Stochastic Processes and Applications, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C.D., and Moin, P. 2004. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech., 504, 73–97. doi:10.1017/S0022112004008213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H. 2006. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 38, 453–482. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H., Riesmeier, E., and Peters, N. 2000. Unsteady flamelet modeling of soot formation in turbulent diffusion flames. Combust. Sci. Technol., 158, 389–406. doi:10.1080/00102200008947342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H., and Steiner, H. 2000. Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia flame D). Phys. Fluids, 12, 2541–2554. doi:10.1063/1.1288493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 11, 119–192. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1991. Computations of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 23, 591–612. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80307-3
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 2010. Self-conditioned fields for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech., 652, 139–169. doi:10.1017/S0022112009994174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, V.N. 2011. Large eddy simulation of partially premixed turbulent combustion. Ph.D. thesis. Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Qamar, N.H., Alwahabi, Z.T., Chan, Q.N., Nathan, G.J., Roekaerts, D., and King, K.D. 2009. Soot volume fraction in a piloted turbulent jet non-premixed flame of natural gas. Combust. Flame, 156, 1339–1347. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qamar, S., Ashfaq, A., Warnecke, G., Angelov, I., Elsner, M.P., and Seidel-Morgenstern, A. 2007. Adaptive high-resolution schemes for multidimensional population balances in crystallization processes. Comput. Chem. Eng., 31, 1296–1311. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qamar, S., Elsner, M.P., Angelov, I.A., Warnecke, G., and Seidel-Morgenstern, A. 2006. A comparative study of high resolution schemes for solving population balances in crystallization. Comput. Chem. Eng., 30, 1119–1131. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, V., and Fox, R.O. 2016. Modeling of fine-particle formation in turbulent flames. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 48, 159–190. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigopoulos, S. 2007. PDF method for population balance in turbulent reactive flow. Chem. Eng. Sci., 62, 6865–6878. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2007.05.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigopoulos, S. 2010. Population balance modelling of polydispersed particles in reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36, 412–443. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, P., Franzelli, B., Vicquelin, R., Gicquel, O., and Darabiha, N. 2018. Coupling an LES approach and a soot sectional model for the study of sooting turbulent non-premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 190, 477–499. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel’nikov, V., and Soulard, O. 2005. Rapidly decorrelating velocity-field model as a tool for solving one-point Fokker-Planck equations for probability density functions of turbulent reactive scalars. Phys. Rev. E, 72, 016301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.016301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagaut, P. 2006. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: An Introduction. 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Schiener, M.A., and Lindstedt, R.P. 2018. Joint-scalar transported PDF modelling of soot in a turbulent non-premixed natural gas flame. Combust. Theor. Model., 22(6), 1134–1175. doi:10.1080/13647830.2018.1472391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiener, M.A., and Lindstedt, R.P. 2019. Transported probability density function based modelling of soot particle size distributions in non-premixed turbulent jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 37, 1049–1056. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.088
   Google Scholar
• Sewerin, F., and Rigopoulos, S. 2017a. An explicit adaptive grid approach for the numerical solution of the population balance equation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 168, 250–270. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewerin, F., and Rigopoulos, S. 2017b. An LES-PBE-PDF approach for modeling particle formation in turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids, 29, 105105. doi:10.1063/1.5001343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewerin, F., and Rigopoulos, S. 2018. An LES-PBE-PDF approach for predicting the soot particle size distribution in turbulent flames. Combust. Flame, 189, 62–76. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulard, O., and Sabelnikov, V.A. 2006. Eulerian Monte Carlo method for the joint velocity and mass-fraction probability density function in turbulent reactive gas flows. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, 42, 753–762. doi:10.1007/s10573-006-0111-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenin, D., Behrendt, F., Maas, U., Przywara, B., and Warnatz, J. 1996. Development of a parallel direct simulation code to investigate reactive flows. Comput. Fluids, 25, 485–496. doi:10.1016/0045-7930(96)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiño, L. 1998. A field Monte Carlo formulation for calculating the probability density function of a single scalar in a turbulent flow. Flow Turbul. Combust., 60, 157–172. doi:10.1023/A:1009968902446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo, S., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T., and Cleary, M.J. 2017. Multiple mapping conditioning for silica nanoparticle nucleation in turbulent flows. Proc. Combust. Inst., 36, 1089–1097. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar