A Comparison of Finite-Rate Kinetics and Flamelet-Generated Manifold Using a Multiscale Modeling Framework for Turbulent Premixed Combustion

References

• Aspden, A.J., Day, M.S., and Bell, J.B. 2011. Turbulence-flame interactions in lean premixed hydrogen: transition to the distributed burning regime. J. Fluid Mech., 680, 287–320. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balarac, G., Pitsch, H., and Raman, V. 2008. Development of a dynamic model for the subfilter scalar variance using the concept of optimal estimators. Phys. Fluids, 20(3), 035114. doi:10.1063/1.2896287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., Kwa, L., Lau, A., Missaghi, M., and Chin, S. 1988. Laminar flamelet modeling of recirculating premixed methane and propane-air combustion. Combust. Flame, 71(2), 109–122. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(88)90001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and Maas, U. 2007. The extension of the ILDM concept to reaction–diffusion manifolds. Combust. Theory Model., 11(6), 839–862. doi:10.1080/13647830701242531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D., and Poinsot, T. 2000. A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids, 12(7), 1843–1863. doi:10.1063/1.870436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A.W., and Riley, J.J. 1994. A subgrid model for equilibrium chemistry in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids, 6(8), 2868–2870. doi:10.1063/1.868111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goey, L., Plessing, T., Hermanns, R., and Peters, N. 2005. Analysis of the flame thickness of turbulent flamelets in the thin reaction zones regime. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(1), 859–866. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, P., Vervisch, L., Payet, S., and Hauguel, R. 2005. DNS of a premixed turbulent V flame and LES of a ducted flame using a FSD-PDF subgrid scale closure with FPI-tabulated chemistry. Combust. Flame, 143(4), 566–586. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., Masri, A., Bilger, R., Barlow, R., and Wang, G.-H. 2009. The compositional structure of highly turbulent piloted premixed flames issuing into a hot coflow. Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), 1779–1786. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2008.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M.J., Masri, M.J., and Bilger, R.W. 2007. A new piloted premixed jet burner to study strong finite rate chemistry effects. Combust. Flame, 151(1–2), 46–60. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedina, E., and Fureby, C. 2011. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for an axisymmetric dump combustor. J. Turbul., 12, 1–20. doi:10.1080/14685248.2011.582586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fureby, C. 2009. Large eddy simulation modelling of combustion for propulsion applications. Philos. Trans. A, 367(1899), 2957–2969. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0271
   Google Scholar
• Fureby, C. 2012. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for a swirl stabilized flame. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(4), 041503. doi:10.1115/1.4004718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fureby, C., and Möller, S.-I. 1995. Large eddy simulation of reacting flows applied to bluff body stabilized flames. AIAA J., 33(12), 2339–2347. doi:10.2514/3.12989
   Google Scholar
• Fureby, C., Zettervall, N., Kim, S., and Menon, S. 2015. Large eddy simulation of a simplified lean premixed gas turbine combustor. TSFP-9, P-33. Presented at the 9th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Melbourne, Australia..
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Chakraborty, N., and Klein, M. 2015. Assessment of the performances of sub-grid scalar flux models for premixed flames with different global Lewis numbers: a direct numerical simulation analysis. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 52, 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Génin, F., and Menon, S. 2010. Studies of shock/turbulent shear layer interaction using large-eddy simulation. Comput. Fluids, 39(5), 800–819. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H. 1991. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A, 3(7), 1760–1765. doi:10.1063/1.857955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, G., Doan, N.A.K., Swaminathan, N., Yenerdag, B., Minamoto, Y., and Tanahashi, M. 2018. Assessment of SGS closure for isochoric combustion of hydrogen-air mixture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43(16), 8105–8115. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel, O., Darabiha, N., and Thévenin, D. 2000. Laminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), 1901–1908. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80594-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, G.M., and Menon, S. 1998. A comparison of scalar PDF turbulent combustion models. Combust. Flame, 113(3), 442–453. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00237-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Juez, E.D., Kerstein, A.R., Ranjan, R., and Menon, S. 2017. Advances and challenges in modeling high-speed turbulent combustion in propulsion systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 60, 26–67. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, D.G., Moffat, H.K., and Speth, R.L. 2014. Cantera: an object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. http://www.cantera.org.Version2.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Granet, V., Menon, S., Vermorel, O., Staffelbach, G., Poinsot, T., and Roux, A. 2013. Large-eddy simulation of a swirled lean premixed gas turbine combustor: a comparison of two compressible codes. In AIAA Paper, pp. 2013–2171. Presented at the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Grinstein, F., and Fureby, C. 2005. LES studies of the flow in a swirl gas combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(2), 1791–1798. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.082
   Google Scholar
• Held, T., and Mongia, H. 1998. Application of a partially premixed laminar flamelet model to a low emissions gas turbine combustor. In ASME International Gas Turbine combustor. ASME paper 98-GT-217, pp. V003T06A010. Presented at ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hura, H.S., Joshi, N.D., Mongia, H.C., and Tonouchi, J. 1998. Dry low emissions premixer CCD modeling and validation. ASME paper 98-GT-444, pp. V003T06A040. Presented at International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ihme, M., Cha, C.M., and Pitsch, H. 2005. Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(1), 793–800. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.260
   Google Scholar
• Kerstein, A.R. 1989. Linear-eddy modeling of turbulent transport. II: application to shear layer mixing. Combust. Flame, 75(3–4), 397–413. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(89)90051-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W.W., and Menon, S. 1999. An unsteady incompressible Navier-Stokes solver for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 31(6), 983–1017. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19991130)31:6<983::AID-FLD908>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, -W.-W., Menon, S., and Mongia, H.C. 1999. Large-eddy simulation of a gas turbine combustor flow. Combust. Sci. Technol., 143(1–6), 25–62. doi:10.1080/00102209908924192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, E., Kim, S., and Pitsch, H. 2010. An analysis of premixed flamelet models for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Phys. Fluids, 22(11), 115109. doi:10.1063/1.3490043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraichnan, R.H. 1970. Diffusion by a random velocity field. Phys. Fluids, 13(1), 22–31. doi:10.1063/1.1692799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and Tamaru, T. 1997. Computation of turbulent reacting flow in a jet assisted ram combustor. Comp. Fluids, 26(2), 117–133. doi:10.1016/S0045-7930(96)00033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langella, I., Chen, Z., Swaminathan, N., and Sadasivuni, S. 2018. Large-eddy simulation of reacting flows in industrial gas turbine combustor. J. Propul. Power, 34(5), 1269–1284. doi:10.2514/1.B36842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langella, I., and Swaminathan, N. 2016. Unstrained and strained flamelets for LES of premixed combustion. Combust. Theory Model., 20(3), 410–440. doi:10.1080/13647830.2016.1140230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z.S., Li, B., Sun, Z.W., Bai, X.S., and Alden, M. 2010. Turbulence and combustion interactions: high resolution local flame front structure visualization using simultaneous single-shot PLIF imaging of CH, OH and CH2O in a piloted premixed jet flame. Combust. Flame, 157(6), 1087–1096. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodier, G., Vervisch, L., Moureau, V., and Domingo, P. 2011. Composition-space premixed flamelet solution with differential diffusion for in-situ flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Flame, 158(10), 2009–2016. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, T., Gao, Y., Kempf, A.M., and Chakraborty, N. 2014. Validation and implementation of algebraic LES modelling of scalar dissipation rate for reaction rate closure in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame, 161(12), 3134–3153. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and Pope, S.B. 1992. Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combust. Flame, 88(3–4), 239–264. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour, M.S., Peters, N., and Chen, Y.C. 1998. Investigation of local flame structures and statistics in partially premixed turbulent jet flames using simultaneous CH LIF/Rayleigh laser technique. Proc. Combust. Inst., 27, 767–773. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80471-2
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S., and Kerstein, A.R. 2011. The linear-eddy model. Turbul. Combust. Model., 95, 175–222.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S., McMurtry, P., and Kerstein, A.R. 1993. A linear eddy mixing model for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Galperin, B., and Orszag, S., Eds. LES of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 287–314.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., Bastiaans, R., Van Oijen, J., and De Goey, L. 2015. Analysis of a filtered flamelet approach for coarse DNS of premixed turbulent combustion. Fuel, 144, 388–399. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oevermann, M. 2000. Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a scramjet using flamelet modeling. Aerospace Sci. Tech., 4(7), 463–480. doi:10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01070-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, N., and Menon, S. 2008. Simulation of spray-turbulence-flame interactions in a lean direct injection combustor. Combust. Flame, 153(1–2), 228–257. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1991. Reducing mechanisms. In: Smooke M.D. (eds) Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 384. Springer, pp. 48–67.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C.D., and Moin, P. 1998. A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar. Phys. Fluids, 10(12), 3041–3044. doi:10.1063/1.869832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C.D., and Moin, P. 2004. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech., 504, 73–97. doi:10.1017/S0022112004008213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H. 2006. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 38, 453–482. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D. 2005. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2nd ed. Edwards, Inc. Philadelphia, PA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T.J., and Lele, S.K. 1992. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 101(1), 104–129.
   Google Scholar
• Poludnenko, A.Y., and Oran, E.S. 2011. The interaction of high-speed turbulence with flames: global properties and internal flame structure. Combust. Flame, 157(5), 995–1011. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proch, F., and Kempf, A.M. 2014. Numerical analysis of the Cambridge stratified flame series using artificial thickened flame LES with tabulated premixed flame chemistry. Combust. Flame, 161(10), 2627–2646. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, R., and Menon, S. 2017. Numerical investigation of structural and statistical features of premixed flame under intense turbulence. In
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan, R., Muralidharan, B., Nagaoka, Y., and Menon, S. 2016. Subgrid-scale modeling of reaction-diffusion and scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol., 188(9), 1496–1537. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1198336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittler, A., Proch, F., and Kempf, A.M. 2015. LES of the Sydney piloted spray flame series with the PFGM/ATF approach and different sub-filter models. Combust. Flame, 162(4), 1575–1598. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghafian, A., Terrapon, V.E., and Pitsch, H. 2015. An efficient flamelet-based combustion model for compressible flows. Combust. Flame, 162(3), 652–667. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran, R., Hawkes, E.R., Chen, J.H., Lu, T., and Law, C.K. 2007. Structure of a spatially developing turbulent lean methane–air Bunsen flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), 1291–1298. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran, V., and Menon, S. 2005. Subgrid combustion modeling of 3-D premixed flames in the thin-reaction-zone regime. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(1), 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.023
   Google Scholar
• Savard, B., Bobbitt, B., and Blanquart, G. 2015. Structure of a high Karlovitz n-C7H16 premixed turbulent flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(2), 1377–1384. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.133
   Google Scholar
• Savre, J., Carlsson, H., and Bai, X.S. 2013. Turbulent methane/air premixed flame structure at high Karlovitz numbers. Flow Turbul. Combust., 90(2), 325–341. doi:10.1007/s10494-012-9426-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M., and Menon, S. 1997. One-dimensional simulations of freely propagating turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol., 128, 99–130. doi:10.1080/00102209708935706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S., Ranjan, R., and Menon, S. 2015. Flame dynamics during combustion instability in a high-pressure, shear-coaxial injector combustor. Flow Turbul. Combust., 94(1), 237–262. doi:10.1007/s10494-014-9569-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., Bilger, R., and Cuenot, B. 2001. Relationship between turbulent scalar flux and conditional dilatation in premixed flames with complex chemistry. Combust. Flame, 126(4), 1764–1779. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00283-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouve, A., and Poinsot, T. 1994. The evolution equation for the flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion. J. Fluid Mech., 278, 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0022112094003599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oijen, J., Bastiaans, R., and De Goey, L. 2007. Low-dimensional manifolds in direct numerical simulations of premixed turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), 1377–1384. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.076
   Google Scholar
• Van Oijen, J., and Goey, L.D. 2000. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Sci. Technol., 161(1), 113–137. doi:10.1080/00102200008935814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., Trouvé, A., Bray, K., and Mantel, T. 1997. Gradient and counter-gradient scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech., 332, 263–293. doi:10.1017/S0022112096004065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreman, A., Van Oijen, J., De Goey, L., and Bastiaans, R. 2009. Subgrid scale modeling in large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion using premixed flamelet chemistry. Flow Turbul. Combust., 82(4), 511–535. doi:10.1007/s10494-008-9159-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, C., Boersma, B.J., and Moin, P. 2000. An evaluation of the assumed beta probability density function subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed, turbulent combustion with heat release. Phys. Fluids, 12(10), 2522–2529. doi:10.1063/1.1287911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Hawkes, E.R., Chen, J.H., Zhou, B., Li, Z., and Aldén, M. 2017. Direct numerical simulations of a high Karlovitz number laboratory premixed jet flame–an analysis of flame stretch and flame thickening. J. Fluid Mech., 815, 511–536. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F., and Gülder, Ö.L. 2009. Investigation of dynamics of lean turbulent premixed flames by Rayleigh imaging. AIAA J., 47(4), 2964–2973. doi:10.2514/1.43255
   Google Scholar