References
- Barlow, R. S., J. H. Frank, A. N. Karpetis, and J.-Y. Chen. 2005. Piloted methane/air jet flames: Transport effects and aspects of scalar structure. Combust. Flame 143 (4):433–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2005.08.017.
- British Petroleum Company. 2019. BP statistical review of world energy 2019. British Petroleum Company.
- Bu, C., B. Leckner, X. Chen, A. Gómez-Barea, D. Liu, and D. Pallarès. 2015. Devolatilization of a single fuel particle in a fluidized bed under oxy-combustion conditions. Part B: Modeling and comparison with measurements. Combust. Flame 162 (3):809–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2014.08.011.
- Bu, C., D. Liu, X. Chen, D. Pallarès, and A. Gómez-Barea. 2014. Ignition behavior of single coal particle in a fluidized bed under O2/CO2 and O2/N2 atmospheres: A combination of visual image and particle temperature. Appl. Energy 115:301–08. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2013.10.040.
- Bui, M., C. S. Adjiman, A. Bardow, E. J. Anthony, A. Boston, S. Brown, P. S. Fennell, S. Fuss, A. Galindo, L. A. Hackett, et al. 2018. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 11 (5):1062–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342a.
- Chen, L., S. Z. Yong, and A. F. Ghoniem. 2012. Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal: Characterization, fundamentals, stabilization and CFD modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.003.
- Di Renzo, M., A. Coclite, M. D. de Tullio, P. De Palma, and G. Pascazio. 2015. LES of the Sandia flame D using an FPV combustion model. Energy Procedia 82:402–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2015.11.824.
- Duan, Y., L. Duan, J. Wang, and E. J. Anthony. 2019. Observation of simultaneously low CO, NO x and SO 2 emission during oxy-coal combustion in a pressurized fluidized bed. Fuel 242:374–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.048.
- Echekki, T., and E. Mastorakos. 2011. Turbulent combustion modeling. Springer Netherlands.
- Ge, Y., M. J. Cleary, and A. Y. Klimenko. 2013. A comparative study of Sandia flame series (D–F) using sparse-Lagrangian MMC modelling. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (1):1325–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2012.06.059.
- Goodwin, D. G., R. L. Speth, H. K. Moffat, and B. W. Weber. 2018. Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. https://www.cantera.org
- Gopan, A., B. M. Kumfer, and R. L. Axelbaum. 2015. Effect of operating pressure and fuel moisture on net plant efficiency of a staged, pressurized oxy-combustion power plant. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 39:390–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.05.014.
- Hong, J., G. Chaudhry, J. G. Brisson, R. Field, M. Gazzino, and A. F. Ghoniem. 2009. Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor. Energy 34 (9):1332–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2009.05.015.
- Hu, L., Q. Wang, M. Delichatsios, F. Tang, X. Zhang, and S. Lu. 2013. Flame height and lift-off of turbulent buoyant jet diffusion flames in a reduced pressure atmosphere. Fuel 109:234–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2012.12.050.
- Ihme, M., and H. Pitsch. 2008. Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model: 2. Application in LES of Sandia flames D and E. Combust. Flame 155 (1–2):90–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2008.04.015.
- Jaravel, T., E. Riber, B. Cuenot, and P. Pepiot. 2018. Prediction of flame structure and pollutant formation of Sandia flame D using Large Eddy Simulation with direct integration of chemical kinetics. Combust. Flame 188:180–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2017.08.028.
- Jasak, H. 2009. OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 1 (2):89–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0011.
- Jones, W. P., and V. N. Prasad. 2010. Large Eddy Simulation of the Sandia flame series (D–F) using the Eulerian stochastic field method. Combust. Flame 157 (9):1621–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2010.05.010.
- Knappstein, R., G. Kuenne, A. Ketelheun, J. Köser, L. Becker, S. Heuer, M. Schiemann, V. Scherer, A. Dreizler, A. Sadiki, et al. 2016. Devolatilization and volatiles reaction of individual coal particles in the context of FGM tabulated chemistry. Combust. Flame 169:72–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2016.04.014.
- Lasek, J., K. Głód, M. Janusz, K. Kazalski, and J. Zuwała. 2012. Pressurized Oxy-fuel Combustion: A study of selected parameters. Energy & Fuels 26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201677f.
- Liang, X., Q. Wang, Z. Luo, E. Eddings, T. Ring, S. Li, J. Lin, S. Xue, L. Han, and G. Xie. 2019. Experimental and numerical investigation on sulfur transformation in pressurized oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal. Appl. Energy 253:113542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2019.113542.
- Liu, Y., K. Wan, L. Li, Z. Wang, and K. Cen. 2018. Verification and validation of a low-mach-number Large-Eddy Simulation code against manufactured solutions and experimental results. Energies 11 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040921.
- Ma, L., and D. Roekaerts. 2016. Modeling of spray jet flame under MILD condition with non-adiabatic FGM and a new conditional droplet injection model. Combust. Flame 165:402–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.025.
- Ma, L., X. Huang, and D. Roekaerts. 2017. Large Eddy Simulation of CO2 diluted oxy-fuel spray flames. Fuel 201:165–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2017.02.050.
- Miranda, F. C., P. J. Coelho, F. Di Mare, and J. Janicka. 2019. Study of turbulence-radiation interactions in large-eddy simulation of scaled Sandia flame D. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 228:47–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JQSRT.2019.02.010.
- Molina, A., and C. R. Shaddix. 2007. Ignition and devolatilization of pulverized bituminous coal particles during oxygen/carbon dioxide coal combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2):1905–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2006.08.102.
- Most, J. M., P. Mandin, J. Chen, P. Joulain, D. Durox, and A. Carlos Fernande-Pello. 1996. Influence of gravity and pressure on pool fire-type diffusion flames. Symp. Combust. 26 (1):1311–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80349-3.
- Müller, H., F. Ferraro, and M. Pfitzner. 2013. Implementation of a Steady Laminar Flamelet Model for non-premixed combustion in LES and RANS simulations. In: 8th Int. Open-FOAM Work. Jeju, South Korea.
- Pecquery, F., V. Moureau, G. Lartigue, L. Vervisch, and A. Roux. 2014. Modelling nitrogen oxide emissions in turbulent flames with air dilution: Application to LES of a non-premixed jet-flame. Combust. Flame 161 (2):496–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2013.09.018.
- Pera, C., J. Réveillon, L. Vervisch, and P. Domingo. 2006. Modeling subgrid scale mixture fraction variance in LES of evaporating spray. Combust. Flame 146 (4):635–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2006.07.003.
- Peters, N., and P. Luc Vervisch. 2001. Turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 125 (3):1222–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00233-4.
- Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S. M., Y. Mao, and Y. Zhang. 2018. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Sandia methane-air flame by using a biofuel. Renew. Energy 128:313–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.05.079.
- Seepana, S., and S. Jayanti. 2012. Flame structure investigations of oxy-fuel combustion. Fuel 93:52–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2011.07.033.
- Sheikhi, M. R. H., T. G. Drozda, P. Givi, F. A. Jaberi, and S. B. Pope. 2005. Large eddy simulation of a turbulent nonpremixed piloted methane jet flame (Sandia Flame D). Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (1):549–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2004.08.028.
- Smith, G. P., D. M.Golden, M.Frenklach, N. W.Moriarty, B.Eiteneer, M.Goldenberg, C. T.Bowman, R. K.Hanson, S.Song, W. C.Gardiner, et al. 2000. GRI-Mech 3.0. http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/version30/text30.html
- Soundararajan, R., and T. Gundersen. 2013. Coal based power plants using oxy-combustion for CO 2 capture: Pressurized coal combustion to reduce capture penalty. Appl. Therm. Eng. 61 (1):115–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.04.010.
- Tufano, G. L., O. T. Stein, A. Kronenburg, G. Gentile, A. Stagni, A. Frassoldati, T. Faravelli, A. M. Kempf, M. Vascellari, and C. Hasse. 2019. Fully-resolved simulations of coal particle combustion using a detailed multi-step approach for heterogeneous kinetics. Fuel 240:75–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.11.139.
- Vascellari, M., G. L. Tufano, O. T. Stein, A. Kronenburg, A. M. Kempf, A. Scholtissek, and C. Hasse. 2017. A flamelet/progress variable approach for modeling coal particle ignition. Fuel 201:29–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2016.09.005.
- Vascellari, M., H. Xu, and C. Hasse. 2013. Flamelet modeling of coal particle ignition. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2):2445–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2012.06.152.
- Wan, K., L. Vervisch, J. Xia, P. Domingo, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, and K. Cen. 2019. Alkali metal emissions in an early-stage pulverized-coal flame: DNS analysis of reacting layers and chemistry tabulation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (3):2791–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2018.06.119.
- Wen, X., K. Luo, Y. Luo, H. I. Kassem, H. Jin, and J. Fan. 2016. Large eddy simulation of a semi-industrial scale coal furnace using non-adiabatic three-stream flamelet/progress variable model. Appl. Energy 183:1086–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.09.034.
- Wen, X., X.-S. Bai, K. Luo, H. Wang, Y. Luo, and J. Fan. 2018. A generalized flamelet tabulation method for partially premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 198:54–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2018.08.021.
- Wu, Y., D. Liu, J. Ma, and X. Chen. 2017. Three-dimensional Eulerian–Eulerian simulation of coal combustion under air atmosphere in a circulating fluidized bed combustor. Energy & Fuels 31 (8):7952–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01084.