REDIM-PFDF Sub-grid Scale Combustion Modeling for Turbulent Partially-premixed Flame: Assessment of Combustion Modes

References

• Barlow, R., S. Meares, G. Magnotti, H. Cutcher, and A. Masri. 2015. Local extinction and near-field structure in piloted turbulent ch4/air jet flames with inhomogeneous inlets. Combust. Flame 162 (10):3516–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaya, R., A. De, and R. Yadav. 2014. Large eddy simulation of mild combustion using pdf-based turbulence–chemistry interaction models. Combust. Sci. Technol 186 (9):1138–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.916702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger, R. W., S. H. Stårner, and R. J. Kee. 1990. On reduced mechanisms for methane for air combustion in nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame 80 (2):135–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(90)90122-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branley, N., and W. Jones. 2001. Large eddy simulation of a turbulent non-premixed flame. Combust. Flame 127 (1–2):1914–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00298-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and U. Maas. 2007. The extension of the ildm concept to reaction–diffusion manifolds. Combust. Theory. Modelling 11 (6):839–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830701242531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and U. Maas. 2009. Problem adapted reduced models based on reaction–diffusion manifolds (REDIMs). Proc. Combust. Inst 32 (1):561–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., A. Neagos, and U. Maas. 2013. On transient behavior of non-premixed counter- flow diffusion flames within the redim based model reduction concept. Proc. Combust. Inst 34 (1):197–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. W., and J. J. Riley. 1998. Subgrid-scale modeling for turbulent reacting flows. Combust. Flame 112 (4):593–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00173-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dec, J. E. 2009. Advanced compression-ignition engines—understanding the in-cylinder processes. Proc. Combust. Inst 32 (2):2727–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donini, A., R. Bastiaans, J. van Oijen, and L. De Goey. 2015. Differential diffusion effects inclusion with flamelet generated manifold for the modeling of stratified premixed cooled flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 35 (1):831–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, M., and D. Haworth. 2007. Advanced gasoline engine development using optical diagnostics and numerical modeling. Proc. Combust. Inst 31 (1):99–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, B. 2019. Accounting for complex chemistry in the simulations of future turbulent combustion systems. In Aiaa scitech 2019 forum, 0995.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, J., A. M. Kempf, A. Kronenburg, and R. Ram. 2009. A simple model for the filtered density function for passive scalar combustion les. Combust. Theory Modelling 13 (4):559–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830802632200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. O., and A. Varma. 2003. Computational models for turbulent reacting flows. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, S., F. Salehi, M. Cleary, and A. Masri. 2017. MMC-les simulations of turbulent piloted flames with varying levels of inlet inhomogeneity. Proc. Combust. Inst 36 (2):1759–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel, L. Y., G. Staffelbach, and T. Poinsot. 2012. Large eddy simulations of gaseous flames in gas turbine combustion chambers. Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci 38 (6):782–817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel, O., N. Darabiha, and D. Thévenin. 2000. Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ildm with differential diffusion. Proc. Combust. Inst 28 (2):1901–08. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80594-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiberti, T., M. Juddoo, D. Lacoste, M. Dunn, W. L. Roberts, and A. Masri. 2017. Fuel effects on the stability of turbulent flames with compositionally inhomogeneous inlets. Proc. Combust. Inst 36 (2):1777–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiberti, T. F., H. Cutcher, W. L. Roberts, and A. R. Masri. 2016. Influence of pilot flame parameters on the stability of turbulent jet flames. Energ. Fuels 31 (3):2128–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, D. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci 36 (2):168–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., and Y. Kim. 2017. Multi-environment probability density function approach for turbulent partially-premixed methane/air flame with inhomogeneous inlets. Combust. Flame 182:190–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M., and N. Chakraborty. 2019. A-priori analysis of an alternative wrinkling factor definition for flame surface density based large eddy simulation modelling of turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol 191 (1):95–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2018.1452394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinheinz, K., T. Kubis, P. Trisjono, M. Bode, and H. Pitsch. 2017. Computational study of flame characteristics of a turbulent piloted jet burner with inhomogeneous inlets. Proc. Combust. Inst 36 (2):1747–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, E., and H. Pitsch. 2009. A general flamelet transformation useful for distinguishing between premixed and non-premixed modes of combustion. Combust. Flame 156 (3):678–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenne, G., A. Ketelheun, and J. Janicka. 2011. Les modeling of premixed combustion using a thickened flame approach coupled with fgm tabulated chemistry. Combust. Flame 158 (9):1750–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipatnikov, A. N. 2017. Stratified turbulent flames: Recent advances in understanding the influence of mixture inhomogeneities on premixed combustion and modeling challenges. Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci 62:87–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and S. B. Pope. 1992. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combust. Flame 88 (3–4):239–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares, S., and A. R. Masri. 2014. A modified piloted burner for stabilizing turbulent flames of inhomogeneous mixtures. Combust. Flame 161 (2):484–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares, S., V. Prasad, G. Magnotti, R. Barlow, and A. Masri. 2015. Stabilization of piloted turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets. Proc. Combust. Inst 35 (2):1477–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambully, S., P. Domingo, V. Moureau, and L. Vervisch. 2014. A filtered-laminar-flame pdf sub-grid scale closure for LES of premixed turbulent flames. Part I: Formalism and application to a bluff-body burner with differential diffusion. Combust. Flame 161 (7):1756–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neagos, A., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2014. Study of extinction limits of diluted hydrogen-air counter-flow diffusion flames with the redim method. Combust. Sci. Technol 186 (10–11):1502–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.935125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P.-D., L. Vervisch, V. Subramanian, and P. Domingo. 2010. Multidimensional flamelet-generated manifolds for partially premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 157 (1):43–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbricht, C., O. Stein, J. Janicka, J. Van Oijen, S. Wysocki, and A. Kempf. 2012. Les of lifted flames in a gas turbine model combustor using top-hat filtered pfgm chemistry. Fuel 96:100–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B. A., M. E. Mueller, and A. R. Masri. 2017. A two mixture fraction flamelet model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets. Proc. Combust. Inst 36 (2):1767–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H. 2006. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech 38 (1):453–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proch, F., and A. M. Kempf. 2014. Numerical analysis of the cambridge stratified flame series using artificial thickened flame les with tabulated premixed flame chemistry. Combust. Flame 161 (10):2627–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechelmann, D., S. Kato, and T. Fujimori. 2002. Effect of presumed pdf selection on the numerical result for turbulent diffusion flames. JSME. Int. J. Ser. B Fluids Therm. Eng 45 (1):108–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.45.108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieth, M., J.-Y. Chen, S. Menon, and A. M. Kempf. 2019. A hybrid flamelet finite-rate chemistry approach for efficient les with a transported FDF. Combust. Flame 199:183–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. A., P. M. Allison, and J. F. Driscoll. 2015. Flame index and its statistical properties measured to understand partially premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 162 (7):2808–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacomano Filho, F. L., G. Kuenne, M. Chrigui, A. Sadiki, and J. Janicka. 2017. A consistent artificially thickened flame approach for spray combustion using les and the FGM chemistry reduction method: Validation in lean partially pre-vaporized flames. Combust. Flame 184:68–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. P., D. M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, and M. Goldenberg, … others. (1999). Gri-mech version 3.0. http://www. me. berkeley. edu/gri_mech.2011.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhilber, G., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2017. Redim reduced modeling of flame-wall- interactions: Quenching of a premixed methane/air flame at a cold inert wall. Proc. Combust. Inst 36 (1):655–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassacker, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. Redim reduced modeling of flame quenching at a cold wall–the influence of detailed transport models and detailed mechanisms. Combust. Sci. Technol 191 (2):208–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2018.1440216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, V., P. Domingo, and L. Vervisch. 2010. Large eddy simulation of forced ignition of an annular bluff-body burner. Combust. Flame 157 (3):579–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oijen, J., A. Donini, R. Bastiaans, J. Ten Thije Boonkkamp, and L. De Goey. 2016. State- of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds. Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci 57:30–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., J. Fröhlich, U. Maas, Z.-X. He, and C.-J. Wang. 2016. A detailed comparison of two sub-grid scale combustion models via large eddy simulation of the PRECCINSTA gas turbine model combustor. Combust. Flame 164:329–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., T.-Z. Hou, C.-J. Wang, G. Steinhilber, and U. Maas. 2018. Large eddy simulations of the darmstadt turbulent stratified flames with redim reduced kinetics. Flow. Turbul. Combust 101 (1):219–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-018-9899-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., F. Zieker, R. Schießl, N. Platova, J. Fröhlich, and U. Maas. 2013. Large eddy simulations and experimental studies of turbulent premixed combustion near extinction. Proc. Combust. Inst 34 (1):1269–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, X., X.-S. Bai, K. Luo, H. Wang, Y. Luo, and J. Fan. 2018. A generalized flamelet tabulation method for partially premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 198:54–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita, H., M. Shimada, and T. Takeno (1996). A numerical study on flame stability at the transition point of jet diffusion flames. In Symposium (international) on combustion, (Vol.26, pp. 27–34).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. Coupling of simplified chemistry with mixing processes in pdf simulations of turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 37 (2):2183–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., F. Minuzzi, and U. Maas. 2018. Numerical simulation of turbulent flames based on a hybrid rans/transported-pdf method and redim method. Eurasian. Chem-Technol. J 20 (1):23–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., T. Ye, G. Wang, P. Tang, and M. Liu. 2017. Large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed swirling flames using dynamic thickened flame with tabulated detailed chemistry. Flow. Turbul. Combust 98 (3):841–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-016-9791-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirwes, T., F. Zhang, P. Habisreuther, M. Hansinger, H. Bockhorn, M. Pfitzner, and D. Trimis. 2019. Quasi-DNS dataset of a piloted flame with inhomogeneous inlet conditions. Flow. Turbul. Combust 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar