Effects of Fuel Lewis Number on the Near-wall Dynamics for Statistically Planar Turbulent Premixed Flames Impinging on Inert Cold Walls

References

• Ahmed, U., N. A. K. Doan, J. Lai, M. Klein, N. Chakraborty, and N. Swaminathan. 2018. Multiscale analysis of head-on quenching premixed turbulent flames. Phys. Fluids 30:105102. doi:10.1063/1.5047061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, U., A. L. Pillai, N. Chakraborty, and R. Kurose. 2019. Statistical behaviour of turbulent kinetic energy transport in boundary layer flashback of hydrogen-rich premixed combustion. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4:103201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.103201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, U., R. Prosser, and A. J. Revell. 2014. Towards the development of an evolution equation for flame turbulence interaction in premixed turbulent combustion. Flow Turbul. Combust. 93:637–63. doi:10.1007/s10494-014-9557-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaalan, T. M., and C. J. Rutland. 1998. Turbulence, scalar transport, and reaction rates in flame-wall interaction. Proc. Combust. Inst. 27 (1):793. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80474-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelor, G. K., and A. A. Townsend. 1948. Decay of turbulence in final period. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A194:527–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bejan, A. 2013. Convective heat transfer. 4th ed. New York, USA: Willey Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Boger, M., D. Veynante, H. Boughanem, and A. Trouvé. 1998. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for Large Eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 27:917–25. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80489-X.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C. 1980. Turbulent flows with premixed reactants. In Turbulent reacting flows, ed. P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams, 115–83. Berlin Heidelburg, New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneaux, G., T. Poinsot, and J. H. Ferziger. 1997. Premixed flame-wall interaction in a turbulent channel flow: Budget for the flame surface density evolution equation and modelling. J. Fluid. Mech. 349:191–219. doi:10.1017/S0022112097006769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, S. M., and T. J. Poinsot. 1990. Flame stretch and the balance equation for the flame area. Combust. Sci. Technol. 70 (1–3):1–15. doi:10.1080/00102209008951608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., D. Alwazzan, M. Klein, and R. S. Cant. 2019. On the validity of Damköhler’s first hypothesis in turbulent Bunsen burner flames: A computational analysis. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2):2231–39. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.07.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and R. S. Cant. 2005. Influence of Lewis Number on curvature effects in turbulent premixed flame propagation in the thin reaction zones regime. Phys. Fluids 17 (10):105105. doi:10.1063/1.2084231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and R. S. Cant. 2006. Influence of Lewis Number on strain rate effects in turbulent premixed flame propagation in the thin reaction zones regime. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 49 (13–14):2158–72. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and R. S. Cant. 2009. Effects of Lewis number on scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. Phys. Fluids 21 (3):035110. doi:10.1063/1.3097007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and R. S. Cant. 2011. Effects of Lewis number on flame surface density transport in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 158 (9):1768–87. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., M. Champion, A. Mura, and N. Swaminathan. 2011. Scalar dissipation rate approach to reaction rate closure. In Turbulent premixed flame, ed. N. Swaminathan and K. N. C. Bray, 76–102. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and M. Klein. 2008. Influence of Lewis number on the surface density function transport in the thin reaction zones regime for turbulent premixed flames. Phys. Fluids 20:065102. doi:10.1063/1.2919129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., M. Klein, and N. Swaminathan. 2009. Effects of Lewis number on reactive scalar gradient alignment with local strain rate in turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (1):1409–17. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., I. Konstantinou, and A. Lipatnikov. 2016. Effects of Lewis number on vorticity and enstrophy transport in turbulent premixed flames. Phys. Fluids 28 (1):015109. doi:10.1063/1.4939795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and N. Swaminathan. 2007. Influence of Damköhler number on turbulence-scalar interaction in premixed flames, Part I: Physical insight. Phys. Fluids 19:045103. doi:10.1063/1.2714070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., and L. Cifuentes. 2016. The physics of scalar gradients in turbulent premixed combustion and its relevance to modeling. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188 (9):1376–97. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1197919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., L. Cifuentes, D. Alwazzan, and N. Chakraborty. 2018. Influence of the Lewis number on effective strain rates in weakly turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol. 190 (4):591–614. doi:10.1080/00102202.2017.1398744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., L. Cifuentes, and N. Chakraborty. 2017. Vorticity budgets in premixed combusting turbulent flows at different Lewis numbers”. Phys. Fluids 29 (4):045106. doi:10.1063/1.4981219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., L. Cifuentes, J. Martin, and C. Jimenez. 2015. Strain rates normal to approaching isoscalar surfaces in a turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Flame 162:1729–36. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, A., J. H. Chen, D. Valiev, and C. K. Law. 2012. Direct numerical simulation of premixed flame boundary layer flashback in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 709:516–42. doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, A., R. Sankaran, E. R. Hawkes, and J. H. Chen. 2010. Turbulent flame-wall interaction: A direct numerical simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 658:5–32. doi:10.1017/S0022112010001278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I., and K. Y. Huh. 2008. Roles of displacement speed on evolution of flame surface density for different turbulent intensities and Lewis numbers in turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 152 (1–2):194–205. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, D. C., and T. J. Poinsot. 1992. Numerical simulations of Lewis number effects in turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech. 244:405–36. doi:10.1017/S0022112092003124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. M., S. R. Vosen, and R. Greif. 1986. Heat transfer during laminar flame quenching. Proc. Combust. Inst. 21:1853–60. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80420-X.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosinsky, J. 1986. A survey of recent studies on flame extinction. Prog. Energy Combust Sci. 12:81–116. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(86)90014-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. W., and R. S. Cant. 1999. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flame kernels. In Recent advances in DNS and LES, ed. D. Knight and L. Sakell, 191–202. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., and H. Pitsch. 2007. Scalar gradient and small-scale structure in turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 19 (11):115104. doi:10.1063/1.2784943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann, W., and J. H. Chen. 1998. Pocket formation and the flame surface density equation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 27:927–34. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80490-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J., D. Alwazzan, and N. Chakraborty. 2017a. Turbulent scalar flux transport in head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames in the context of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes simulations. J. Turb. 188:11.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J., and N. Chakraborty. 2016a. Effects of Lewis Number on head on quenching of turbulent premixed flame: A direct numerical simulation analysis. Flow Turbul. Combust. 96 (2):279–308. doi:10.1007/s10494-015-9629-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., and N. Chakraborty. 2016b. Statistical behaviour of scalar dissipation rate for head on quenching of turbulent premixed flames: A direct numerical simulation analysis. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188:250–76. doi:10.1080/00102202.2015.1102903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., and N. Chakraborty. 2016c. A-priori direct numerical simulation modelling of scalar dissipation rate transport in head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188:1440–71. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1195823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., and N. Chakraborty. 2016d. Modelling of progress variable variance transport in head on quenching of turbulent premixed flames: A direct numerical simulation analysis. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188:1925–50. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1211868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., N. Chakraborty, and A. Lipatnikov. 2017d. Vorticity and enstrophy transport in head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames. Europ. J. Mech.- B/Fluids 65:384–97. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2016.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., N. Chakraborty, P. Zhao, and L. Wang. 2019. Heat flux and flow topology statistics in oblique and head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames by isothermal inert walls. Combust. Sci. Technol. 191 (2):353–81. doi:10.1080/00102202.2018.1467897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., M. Klein, and N. Chakraborty. 2017b. Assessment of algebraic Flame Surface Density closures in the context of Large Eddy Simulations of head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 189 (11):1966–91. doi:10.1080/00102202.2017.1347161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., M. Klein, and N. Chakraborty. 2018. Direct Numerical Simulation of head-on quenching of statistically planar turbulent premixed methane-air flames using a detailed chemical mechanism. Flow Turbul. Combust 101 (4):1073–91. doi:10.1007/s10494-018-9907-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., A. Moody, and N. Chakraborty. 2017c. Turbulent kinetic energy transport in head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames in the context of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes simulations. Fuel 199:456–77. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M., C. Jainski, M. Euler, B. Bhm, and A. Dreizler. 2014. Transient flame wall interactions: Experimental analysis using spectroscopic temperature and co concentration measurements. Combust. Flame 161:2371–86. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and S. K. Lele. 1992. Boundary conditions for direct simulation of compressible viscous flows. J. Comp. Phys. 101 (1):104–29. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and D. Veynante. 2005. Theoretical and numerical combustion. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, USA: R.T. Edwards Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T. J., D. C. Haworth, and G. Bruneaux. 1993. Direct simulation and modelling of flame- wall interaction for premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 95 (1–2):118–32. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(93)90056-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, P., and M. Baum. 1997. Analysis of wall heat fluxes, reaction mechanisms, and unburnt hydrocarbons during the head-on quenching of a laminar methane flame. Combust. Flame 108 (3):327–48. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(96)00144-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogallo, R. S. 1981. Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. California: NASA Technical Memorandum 81315, NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, C., and A. Trouvé. 1993. Direct Simulations of premixed turbulent flames with nonunity Lewis numbers. Combust. Flame 94 (1–2):41–57. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(93)90018-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellmann, J., J. Lai, N. Chakraborty, and A. M. Kempf. 2017. Flame Surface Density based modelling of head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36:1817–25. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouvé, A., and T. Poinsot. 1994. The evolution equation for flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 278:1–31. doi:10.1017/S0022112094003599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosen, S. R., R. Greif, and C. Westbrook. 1984. Unsteady heat transfer in laminar flame quenching. Proc. Combust. Inst. 20:76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. 1990. Minimal storage time-advancement schemes for spectral methods. California, USA: NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, C. S., Y. Wang, A. Trouvé, and H. G. Im. 2005. Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counter flow flames. Combust. Theor. Model. 9:617–46. doi:10.1080/13647830500307378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., L. Wang, and N. Chakraborty. 2018a. Analysis of the flame-wall interaction in premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 848:193–218. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., L. Wang, and N. Chakraborty. 2018b. Strain rate and flame orientation statistics in the near-wall region for turbulent flame-wall interaction. Combust. Theor. Model. 22 (5):921–38. doi:10.1080/13647830.2018.1465598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., L. Wang, and N. Chakraborty. 2019. Vectorial structure of the near-wall premixed flame. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (6):063203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.063203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar