Characterization of a Novel Elliptical Air-port Inverse Jet Flame

References

• Blevins, L. G., R. A. Fletcher, B. A. Benner Jr, E. B. Steel, and G. W. Mulholland. 2002. The existence of young soot in the exhaust of inverse diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 29:2325–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., and A. Entwistle. 1961. Determination of the emissivity, for total radiation, of small diameter Platinum-10% Rhodium wires in the temperature range 600-1450 C. Br. J. Appl. Phys 12:708.
   Google Scholar
• Claramunt, K., R. Consul, D. Carbonell, and C. Pérez-Segarra. 2006. Analysis of the laminar flamelet concept for nonpremixed laminar flames. Combust. Flame 145:845–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dally, B., D. Fletcher, and A. Masri. 1998. Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff-body jets and flames. Combust. Theory Modell 2:193–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L., C. Cheung, and C. Leung. 2007. Heat transfer characteristics of an impinging inverse diffusion flame jet–part I: Free flame structure. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50:5108–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaz, A. M., and W. L. Roberts. 2014. Experimental characterization of methane inverse diffusion flame. Combust. Sci. Technol 186:1249–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiti, N., A. A. Bentebbiche, and S. Hanchi. 2013. Numerical study of multi-fuel jet inverse diffusion flame. Am. J. Mech. Eng 1:76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gollahalli, S. 1997. Jet flames from non-circular burners. Sadhana 22 (3):369–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gollahalli, S., T. Khanna, and N. Prabhu. 1992. Diffusion flames of gas jets issued from circular and elliptic nozzles. Combust. Sci. Technol 86:267–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmark, E., and F. Grinstein. 1999. Flow control with non-circular jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech 31:239–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra 2019b. Numerical characterization of circular and elliptical central port inverse jet diffusion flame. In National Conference on IC Engines and Combustion, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra: Springer, 623–31. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-5996-9_49.
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra. 2020. Entrainment studies in inverse jet flame port burner. Combust. Flame 216:338–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra. 2020a. Dynamic flame stability diagnosis of inverse jet flame using CH* chemiluminescence. Fuel 285:119277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra(2020b) Experimental Characterization of Circumferentially Arranged Fuel Port Inverse Jet Diffusion Flame Burner, Combust. Sci. and Technol, 192:12, 2306–2325
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra(2020c) Static Flame Stability of Circumferentially Arranged Fuel Port Inverse Jet Non-Premixed Flame Burner, Combust. Sci. Technol ,192:8, 1493–1519
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C.-M., and E. Gutmark. 1987. Vortex induction and mass entrainment in a small-aspect-ratio elliptic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 179:383–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Q. Wang, M. Delichatsios, F. Tang, X. Zhang, and S. Lu. 2013. Flame height and lift-off of turbulent buoyant jet diffusion flames in a reduced pressure atmosphere. Fuel 109:234–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyogun, C., and M. Birouk. 2008. Effect of fuel nozzle geometry on the stability of a turbulent jet methane flame. Combust. Sci. Technol 180 (12):2186–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jejurkar, S. Y., and D. Mishra. 2011. Flame stability studies in a hydrogen–air premixed flame annular micro combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36:7326–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, A., and S. Gollahalli. 2001. Effects of jet Reynolds number on the performance of axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric gas burner flames. J. Energy Resour. Technol 123:167–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapusta, Ł. J., C. Shuang, M. Aldén, and Z. Li. 2020. Structures of inverse jet flames stabilized on a coaxial burner. Energy 193:116757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashkousha, O., M. Kamal, A. Abdulaziz, and M. Nosier. 2015. Inverse diffusion and partially premixed flames with elliptical/swirling-and cross-flows. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A 229:44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and F. Williams. 1997. Extinction of diffusion flames with nonunity Lewis numbers. J. Eng. Math 31:101–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and Y. Yoon. 2007. Flame residence time and strain rate in turbulent hydrogen non-premixed jet flames with coaxial air. Proc. Combust. Inst 31:1609–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleberg, B., D. Christ, I. S. Ertesvåg, K. E. Rian, and R. Kneer. 2013. Numerical simulation with an extinction database for use with the eddy dissipation concept for turbulent combustion. Flow, Turbul. Combust 91:319–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh, S., and D. P. Mishra. 2010. Flame structure of LPG-air inverse diffusion flame in a backstep burner. Fuel 89:2145–48. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh, S., and D. P. Mishra. 2011. Study of the turbulent inverse diffusion flame in recessed backstep and coaxial burners. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 47:274–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh, S., and D. P. Mishra. 2015. Dynamic sensing of blowout in turbulent CNG inverse jet flame. Combust. Flame 162:3046–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, P., and T. J. Leweke. 2005. Elliptic instability of a co-rotating vortex pair. J. Fluid Mech. 533:125–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T., C. Leung, and C. Cheung. 2007. Experimental investigation on the heat transfer of an impinging inverse diffusion flame. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50:3366–75. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu, N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 9,62–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent combustion. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitsch, H., and N. Peters. 1998. A consistent flamelet formulation for non-premixed combustion considering differential diffusion effects. Combust. Flame 114:26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabee, B. A. 2018. The effect of inverse diffusion flame burner-diameter on flame characteristics and emissions. Energy 160:1201–07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaddix, C. R., T. C. Williams, L. G. Blevins, and R. W. Schefer. 2005. Flame structure of steady and pulsed sooting inverse jet diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 30:1501–08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobiesiak, A., and J. C. Wenzell. 2005. Characteristics and structure of inverse flames of natural gas. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30:743–49. doi:10.10164/j.proci.2004.08.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze, L., C. Cheung, and C. Leung. 2006. Appearance, temperature, and NO x emission of two inverse diffusion flames with different port design. Combust. Flame 144 (1):237–48. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., F. Tang, Z. Zhou, H. Liu, and A. Palacios. 2017. Flame height of axisymmetric gaseous fuel jets restricted by parallel sidewalls: Experiments and theoretical analysis. Appl.Energy 208:1519–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Z. Chen, Z. Guo, C. Zheng, and D. Xue. 2018. Numerical investigation on the three-dimensional flow characteristics of unsteady subsonic elliptic jet. Comput. Fluids 160:78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar