Coupling the Multiple Mapping Conditioning Mixing Model with Reaction-diffusion Databases in LES of Methane/air Flames

References

• Barlow, R., and J. Frank. 1998. Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 27:1087–95.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, R., and J. Frank. Piloted CH4/Air Flames C,D,E, and F - Release 2.1. Report, Sandia National Laboratories, June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., L. Kwa, A. Lau, M. Missaghi, and S. Chin. 1988. Laminar flamelet modeling of recirculating premixed methane and propane-air combustion. Combust. Flame 71:109–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda, P., C. Yu, U. Maas, and M. Pfitzner. 2020. Validation of an Eulerian stochastic fields solver coupled with reaction-diffusion manifolds on LES of methane/air non-premixed flames. Flow Turbul. Combust (Nov). doi:10.1007/s10494-020-00235-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda, P., M. Hansinger, and M. Pfitzner. 2021. Chemistry computation without a subgrid PDF model in LES of turbulent non-premixed flames showing moderate local extinction. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38:2655–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and U. Maas. 2007. The extension of the ILDM concept to reaction-diffusion manifolds. Combust. Theory Model. 11:839–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, M., and A. Klimenko. 2009. A generalised multiple mapping conditioning approach for turbulent combustion. Flow Turbul. Combust. 4:477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, M., and A. Klimenko. 2011. A detailed quantitative analysis of sparse- Lagrangian filtered density function simulations in constant and variable density reacting jet flows. Phys. Fluids 23:115102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, M., A. Klimenko, J. Janicka, and M. Pfitzner. 2009. A sparse-Lagrangian multiple mapping conditioning model for turbulent diffusion flames. Flow Turbul. Combust. 32:1499–507.
   Google Scholar
• Colucci, P., F. Jaberi, P. Givi, and S. Pope. 1998. Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids 10:499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contino, F., H. Jeanmart, T. Lucchini, and G. D’Errico. 2011. Coupling of in situ adaptive tabulation and dynamic adaptive chemistry: An effective method for solving combustion in engine simulations. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33:3057–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., Y. Ge, M. Pfitzner, and M. Cleary. 2021. A fully consistent hybrid les/rans conditional transported Pdf method for non-premixed reacting flows. Combust. Sci. Technol. 193:379–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Lopez, S., F. Salehi, M. Cleary, A. Masri, G. Neuber, O. Stein, A. Kronenburg, A. Varna, E. Hawkes, B. Sundaram, et al. 2018. A stochastic multiple mapping conditioning computational model in OpenFOAM for turbulent combustion. Comput. Fluids 172:410–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganter, S., C. Strassacker, G. Kuenne, T. Meier, A. Heinrich, U. Maas, and J. Janicka. 2018. Laminar near-wall combustion: Analysis of tabulated chemistry simulations by means of detailed kinetics. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 70:259–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., and E. O’Brien. 1993. A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids 5:1282–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, C. 2009. Stochastic methods. 4 ed. Berlin, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, Y., M. Cleary, and A. Klimenko. 2011. Sparse-Lagrangian FDF simulations of Sandia Flame E with density coupling. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33:1401–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Y., M. Cleary, and A. Klimenko. 2013. A comparative study of Sandia flame series (D-F) using sparse-Lagrangian MMC modelling. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34:1325–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel, L., P. Givi, F. Jaberi, and S. Pope. 2002. Velocity filtered density function for large eddy simulations of turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 1196:14.
   Google Scholar
• Gicquel, O., N. Darabiha, and D. Thévenin. 2000. Laminar premixed hydrogen/air counter- flow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 28:1901–08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutheil, E., and H. Bockhorn. 1987. The effect of more dimensional PDFs on the turbulent reaction rate in turbulent reacting flows at moderate damköhler numbers. Phys. Chem.Hydrody. 9:525–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hairer, E., S. Nørsett, and G. Warner. 1996. Solving ordinary differential equations II: stiff and differential-algebraic problems. 2 ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hansinger, M., T. Zirwes, J. Zips, M. Pfitzner, F. Zhang, P. Habisreuther, and H. Bockhorn. 2020. The Eulerian stochastic fields method applied to large eddy simulations of a piloted flame with inhomogeneous inlet. Flow Turbul. Combust. 105:837–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, D. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36:168–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., S. Ganter, G. Kuenne, C. Jainski, A. Dreizler, and J. Janicka. 2018. 3D numerical simulation of a laminar experimental SWQ burner with tabulated chemistry. Flow Turbul. Combust. 100:535–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Z., F. Salehi, S. Galindo-Lopez, M. Cleary, and A. Masri. 2019b. Sparse MMC-LES of a Sydney swirl flame. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37:2191–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Z., S. Galindo-Lopez, M. J. Cleary, and A. R. Masri On the validation of the TDAC method for a stochastic turbulent combustion model in OpenFOAM. In 12th Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion, 2019a.
   Google Scholar
• Ihme, M., and H. Pitsch. 2008. Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model 2. Application in LES of Sandia flames D and E. Combust. Flame 155:90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa, R., B. Ahmadi-Befrui, K. Beshay, and A. Gosman. 1991. Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comput. Phys. 93:388–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaberi, F., P. Colucci, S. James, P. Givi, and S. Pope. 1999. Filtered mass density function for large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows. J. Fluid Mech. 401:85–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaishree, J., and D. Haworth. 2012. Comparisons of Lagrangian and Eulerian PDF methods in simulations of non-premixed turbulent jet flames with moderate-to-strong turbulence-chemistry interactions. Combust. Theory Model 16 (1):435–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicka, J., W. Kolbe, and W. Kollmann. 1979. Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar fields. J. Non-Equil. Thermody. 4:47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W., and V. Prasad. 2010. Large eddy simulation of the Sandia flame series (D-F) using the Eulerian stochastic field method. Combust. Flame 157:1621–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemenov, K., H. Wang, and S. Pope. 2012. Modelling effects of subgrid-scale mixture fraction variance in LES of a piloted diffusion flame. Combust. Theory Model. 16:611–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimenko, A., and S. Pope. 2003. The modelling of turbulent reactive flows based on multiple mapping conditioning. Phys. Fluids 15:1907–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessani, B., and M. Papalexandris. 2006. Time-accurate calculation of variable density flows with strong temperature gradients and combustion. J. Comput. Phys. 212:218–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, T., and C. Law. 2005. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30:1333–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and S. Pope. 1992. Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combust. Flame 88:239–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minuzzi, F., C. Yu, and U. Maas. 2019. Simulation of methane/air non-premixed turbulent flames based on REDIM simplified chemistry. Flow Turbul. Combust. 103:963–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möbus, H., P. Gerlinger, and D. Brüggemann. 2001. Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian Monte Carlo PDF methods for turbulent diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 124:519–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradoglu, M., S. Pope, and D. Caughey. 2001. The hybrid method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flows: Consistency conditions and correct algorithms. J. Comput. Phys. 172:841–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustata, R., L. Valiño, C. Jimenez, W. Jones, and S. Bondi. 2006. A probability density function Eulerian Monte Carlo field method for large eddy simulations: Applications to a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia D). Combust. Flame 145:88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuber, G., F. Fuest, J. Kirchmann, A. Kronenburg, O. T. Stein, S. Galindo-Lopez, M. J. Cleary, R. S. Barlow, B. Coriton, J. H. Frank, et al. 2019. Sparse-Lagrangian MMC modelling of the sandia DME flame series. Combust. Flame 208:110–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoud, F., and F. Ducros. 1999. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow Turbul. Combust. 62:183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1984. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 10:319–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C., and P. Monin. 2004. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non- premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 504:73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S. 1981. A Monte Carlo method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flow. Combust. Sci. Tech. 25:159–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11:119–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S., 1990. Computations of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges. 23rd Symp. Int. Combust. Proc. 23:591–612.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S. 2004. Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys. 6:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, V., and H. Pitsch. 2007. A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31:1711–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel’nikov, V., and O. Soulard. 2005. Rapidly decorrelating velocity-field model as a tool for solving one-point Fokker-Planck equations for probability density functions of turbulent reactive scalars. Phys. Rev. E 72:16301–163022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., A. Dreizler, and J. Janika. 2003. Flow field measurements of stable and locally extinguishing hydrocarbon-fuelled jet flames. Combust. Flame 135:185–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, E., S. De, and M. Cleary. 2021. LES of a lifted methanol spray flame series using the sparse-Lagrangian MMC. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38:3399–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhi, M., T. Drozda, P. Givi, and S. Pope. 2003. Velocity-scalar filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 15:2321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoraka, Y., S. Galindo-Lopez, M. Cleary, A. Masri, F. Salehi, and A. Klimenko. 2021. Modelling of a turbulent premixed flame series using a new MMC-LES model with a shadow position reference variable. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38:3057–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrotriya, P., P. Wang, L. Jiang, and M. Murugesan. 2020 June. REDIM-PFDF sub-grid scale combustion modeling for turbulent partially-premixed flame: assessment of combustion modes. Combust. Sci. Tech 1782391. doi:10.1080/00102202.2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., D. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C. Bowman, R. Hanson, S. Song, W. Gardiner, et al. GRI-Mech—An Optimized Detailed Chemical Reaction Mechanism for Methane Combustion. Report GRI-95/0058, Nov 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, K. 1991. Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:539–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C., and F. Bisetti, 2014. Comparison of ODE solver for chemical kinetics and reactive CFD applications. AIAA Paper 2014–822.
   Google Scholar
• Strassacker, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. REDIM reduced modeling of flame quenching at a cold wall – the influence of detailed transport models and detailed mechanisms. Combust. Sci. Technol. 191:208–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassacker, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2021. Comparative analysis of reaction-diffusion manifold based reduced models for head-on- and side-wall-quenching flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38:1025–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, C., A. Kronenburg, O. Stein, G. Kuenne, J. Janicka, R. Barlow, and D. Geyer. 2018. Multiple mapping conditioning coupled with an artificially thickened flame model for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 196:325–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, C., A. Kronenburg, O. Stein, R. Barlow, and D. Geyer. 2019. Modeling stratified flames with and without shear using multiple mapping conditioning. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37:2317–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, C., A. Kronenburg, O. Stein, S. Galindo-Lopez, and M. Cleary. 2021. Mixing time scale models for multiple mapping conditioning with two reference variables. Flow Turbul. Combust. 106:1143–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., and S. B. Pope. 1998. A mixing model for turbulent reactive flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees. Combust. Flame 115:487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram, B., and A. Klimenko. 2017. A PDF approach to thin premixed flamelets using multiple mapping conditioning. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36:1937–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W., 1893. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 36:507–31.
   Google Scholar
• Valiño, L. 1998. A field Monte Carlo formulation for calculating the probability density function of a single scalar in a turbulent flow. Flow Turbul. Combust. 60:157–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiño, L., R. Mustata, and K. Lataief. 2016. Consistent behavior of Eulerian Monte Carlo fields at low Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 96:503–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oijen, J., F. Lammers, and L. De Goey. 2001. Modelling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Flame 127:2124–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villermaux, J., and J. Devillon, 1972 Representation de la coalescence et de la redispersion des domains de segregation dans un fluide per modele d’interaction phenomenologique. Proc. of the Second International Symposia on Chemical Reaction Engineering, B1.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, S., O. Stein, A. Kronenburg, and M. Cleary. 2017. Assessment of mixing time scales for a sparse particle method. Combust. Flame 179:280–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreman, A., B. Albrecht, J. van Oijen, L. De Goey, and R. Bastiaans. 2008. Premixed and nonpremixed generated manifolds in large-eddy simulation of Sandia flame D and F. Combust. Flame 153:394–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and S. Pope. 2000. PDF calculations of turbulent nonpremixed flames with local extinction. Combust. Flame 123:281–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., P. Breda, F. Minuzzi, M. Pfitzner, and U. Maas. 2021a. A novel model for incorporation of differential diffusion effects in PDF simulations of non-premixed turbulent flames based on reaction-diffusion manifolds (REDIM). Phys. Fluids 33:025110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., P. Breda, M. Pfitzner, and U. Maas. 2021b. Coupling of mixing models with manifold based simplified chemistry in PDF modeling of turbulent reacting flows. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38:2645–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., and U. Maas Numerical Study of turbulent reacting flows with local extinction and re-ignition effects based on a statistical method and REDIM reduced reaction kinetics. In 28. Deutscher Flammentag, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. Coupling of simplified chemistry with mixing processes in PDF simulations of turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37:2183–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., M. J. Cleary, O. T. Stein, and A. Kronenburg. 2019. A two-phase MMC-LES model for pyrolysing solid particles in a turbulent flame. Combust. Flame 209:322–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar