Reaction-Diffusion Manifolds (REDIM) Method for Ignition by Hot Gas and Spark Ignition Processes in Counterflow Flame Configurations

References

• Alvarez, C. E. C., G. E. Couto, V. R. Roso, A. B. Thiriet, and R. M. Valle. 2018. A review of prechamber ignition systems as lean combustion technology for SI engines. Appl. Therm. Eng. 128:107–20. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzinger, M.-S., R. Schießl, and U. Maas. 2017. A versatile coupled progress variable/REDIM model for auto-ignition and combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 360 (3):3613–21. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.073.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, S. 2018. Physics of turbulent jet ignition: Mechanisms and dynamics of ultra-lean combustion. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M. P. 2011. Gas turbine engineering handbook. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and U. Maas. 2007. The extension of the ILDM concept to reaction–diffusion manifolds. Combust. Theory Modelling 110 (6):839–62. doi:10.1080/13647830701242531.
   Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., and U. Maas. 2009. Investigation of the hierarchical structure of kinetic models in ignition problems. Zeitschrift für physikalische chemie 2230 (4–5):461–79. doi:10.1524/zpch.2009.6039.
   Google Scholar
• Bykov, V., A. Neagos, A. Klimenko, and U. Maas. 2015. Hierarchical structure of slow manifolds of reacting flows. Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 2290 (6):833–56. doi:10.1515/zpch-2014-0599.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., E. Mastorakos, and R. Cant. 2007. Effects of turbulence on spark ignition in inhomogeneous mixtures: A direct numerical simulation (DNS) study. Combustion Science and Technology 1790 (1–2):293–317. doi:10.1080/00102200600809555.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, C., and A. Richardson. 2000. Nonpremixed combustion in turbulent mixing layers part 1: Flame characteristics. Combustion and Flame 1220 (3):253–70. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00125-5.
   Google Scholar
• Dahms, R., C. Felsch, O. Röhl, and N. Peters. 2011. Detailed chemistry flamelet modeling of mixed-mode combustion in spark-assisted HCCI engines. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 330 (2):3023–30. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Darabiha, N., S. Candel, and F. Marble. 1986. The effect of strain rate on a premixed laminar flame. Combustion and Flame 640 (2):203–17. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(86)90057-X.
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, P., and L. Vervisch. 1996. Triple flames and partially premixed combustion in autoignition of non-premixed turbulent mixtures. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 26. 233–40. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., D. Markus, A. Ghorbani, and U. Maas. 2017a. Pdf simulations of the ignition of hydrogen/air, ethylene/air and propane/air mixtures by hot transient jets. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 2310 (10):1773–96. doi:10.1515/zpch-2016-0904.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., D. Markus, and U. Maas. 2017b. Numerical investigation of the ignition of diethyl ether/air and propane/air mixtures by hot jets. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 49:832–38. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2017.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganter, S., C. Straßacker, G. Kuenne, T. Meier, A. Heinrich, U. Maas, and J. Janicka. 2018. Laminar near-wall combustion: Analysis of tabulated chemistry simulations by means of detailed kinetics. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 70:259–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., G. Steinhilber, D. Markus, and U. Maas. 2014. Numerical investigation of ignition in a transient turbulent jet by means of a PDF method. Combustion Science and Technology 1860 (10–11):1582–96. doi:10.1080/00102202.2014.936762.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., G. Steinhilber, D. Markus, and U. Maas. 2015. Ignition by transient hot turbulent jets: An investigation of ignition mechanisms by means of a PDF/REDIM method. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 350 (2):2191–98. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.104.
   Google Scholar
• Giampaolo, T. 2020. Gas turbine handbook: Principles and practice. CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Gicquel, O., N. Darabiha, and D. Thévenin. 2000. Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 280 (2):1901–08. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80594-9.
   Google Scholar
• Givi, P., W.-H. Jou, and R. W. Metcalfe. 1988. Flame extinction in a temporally developing mixing layer. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 21. 1251–61. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Göktolga, M. U., J. A. van Oijen, and L. P. H. de Goey. 2017. Modeling MILD combustion using a novel multistage FGM method. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 360 (3):4269–77. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Golda, P., A. Blattmann, A. Neagos, V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2020. Implementation problems of manifolds-based model reduction and their generic solution. Combust. Theory Modelling 240 (3):377–406. doi:10.1080/13647830.2019.1682198.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G., Z. Ren, H. Forkel, L. Lu, V. Tangirala, and H. Karim. 2012. Modeling CO with flamelet-generated manifolds: Part 1—Flamelet configuration. In Turbo Expo: Power for land, sea, and air, Vol. 44687. 1141–51. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Goussis, D. A., and U. Maas. 2011. Model reduction for combustion chemistry. In Turbulent combustion modeling, 193–220. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Granier, J. J., and M. L. Pantoya. 2004. Laser ignition of nanocomposite thermites. Combustion and Flame 1380 (4):373–83. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, H., O. J. Teerling, and J. A. van Oijen. 2021. Effect of progress variable definition on the mass burning rate of premixed laminar flames predicted by the flamelet generated manifold method. Combust. Theory Modelling 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. B. 2018. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, R., and D. Thévenin. 2002. Autoignition of turbulent non-premixed flames investigated using direct numerical simulations. Combustion and Flame 1280 (1–2):22–37. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00330-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, E., X. Li, X. Meng, Y. Chen, Y. Cheng, Y. Xie, and Z. Huang. 2015. Laminar flame speeds and ignition delay times of methane–air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures. Fuel 158:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iegorov, R., P. A. Strizhak, and M. Y. Chernetskiy The review of ignition and combustion processes for water-coal fuels. In EPJ Web of Conferences, volume 110, 1024. EDP Sciences, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. J., S. S. Shy, M. T. Nguyen, S. Y. Huang, D. W. Yu, et al. 2018. Spark ignition probability and minimum ignition energy transition of the lean iso-octane/air mixture in premixed turbulent combustion. Combustion and Flame 187:87–95. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W. P., and A. Tyliszczak. 2010. Large eddy simulation of spark ignition in a gas turbine combustor. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 850 (3):711–34. doi:10.1007/s10494-010-9289-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. O., M. B. Luong, J. H. Chen, and C. S. Yoo. 2015. A DNS study of the ignition of lean PRF/air mixtures with temperature inhomogeneities under high pressure and intermediate temperature. Combustion and Flame 1620 (3):717–26. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutz, T., and C. Law. 1996. Ignition in nonpremixed counterflowing hydrogen versus heated air: Computational study with detailed chemistry. Combustion and Flame 1040 (1–2):157–75. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(95)00121-2.
   Google Scholar
• Løvås, T. 2009. Automatic generation of skeletal mechanisms for ignition combustion based on level of importance analysis. Combustion and Flame 1560 (7):1348–58. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.03.009.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U. 1998. Efficient calculation of intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds for the simplification of chemical kinetics. Comput Vis Sci 10 (2):69–81. doi:10.1007/s007910050007.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and S. B. Pope. 1992. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combustion and Flame 880 (3–4):239–64. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-M.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and A. S. Tomlin. 2013. Time-scale splitting-based mechanism reduction. In Cleaner combustion, 467–84. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and J. Warnatz. 1988. Ignition processes in hydrogen- oxygen mixtures. Combustion and Flame 740 (1):53–69. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(88)90086-7.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U., and J. Warnatz. 1989. Ignition processes in carbon-monoxide-hydrogen-oxygen mixtures. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 22. 1695–704. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Malé, Q., G. Staffelbach, O. Vermorel, A. Misdariis, F. Ravet, and T. Poinsot. 2019. Large eddy simulation of pre-chamber ignition in an internal combustion engine. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 1030 (2):465–83. doi:10.1007/s10494-019-00026-y.
   Google Scholar
• Mastorakos, E. 2009. Ignition of turbulent non-premixed flames. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 350 (1):57–97.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, J.-B., O. Colin, and D. Veynante. 2008. Modeling ignition and chemical structure of partially premixed turbulent flames using tabulated chemistry. Combustion and Flame 1520 (1–2):80–99. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Milovanovic, N., and R. Chen. 2001. A review of experimental and simulation studies on controlled auto-ignition combustion.
   Google Scholar
• Naegelin, D. W., and L. G. Dodge. 1991. Ignition study in a gas turbine combustor. Combustion Science and Technology 800 (4–6):165–84. doi:10.1080/00102209108951784.
   Google Scholar
• Oijen, J. V., and L. D. Goey. 2000. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combustion Science and Technology 1610 (1):113–37. doi:10.1080/00102200008935814.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1984. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 100 (3):319–39. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(84)90114-X.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 110 (2):119–92. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4.
   Google Scholar
• Reitz, R. D., and G. Duraisamy. 2015. Review of high efficiency and clean reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) combustion in internal combustion engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 46:12–71. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2014.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E., and E. Mastorakos. 2007. Numerical Investigation of forced ignition in laminar counterflow non-premixed methane-air flames. Combustion Science and Technology 1790 (1–2):21–37. doi:10.1080/00102200600805892.
   Google Scholar
• Sadanandan, R., D. Markus, R. Schießl, U. Maas, J. Olofsson, H. Seyfried, M. Richter, and M. Aldén. 2007. Detailed investigation of ignition by hot gas jets. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 310 (1):719–26. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.027.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., and J. Warnatz. 1991. Numerical investigation of time-dependent properties and extinction of strained methane- and propane-air flamelets. Combustion and Flame 850 (3–4):285–99. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(91)90134-W.
   Google Scholar
• Starikovskaia, S. M. 2006. Plasma assisted ignition and combustion. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 390 (16):R265. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/16/R01.
   Google Scholar
• Strassacker, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. Parametrization and projection strategies for manifold based reduced kinetic models. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 370 (1):763–70. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.186.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C., C. Sung, C. K. Law, et al. 1996. Response of counterflow premixed and diffusion flames to strain rate variations at reduced and elevated pressures. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 26. 1111–20. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, C., J. Liu, and C. Law. 1996. On the scalar structure of nonequidiffusive premixed flames in counterflow. Combustion and Flame 1060 (1–2):168–83. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(95)00249-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., M. Hassanaly, V. Raman, B. A. Sforzo, S. Wei, and J. M. Seitzman Simulation of gas turbine ignition using large eddy simulation approach. In ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. F. 1985. The internal-combustion engine in theory and practice: Combustion, fuels, materials, design, Vol. 2. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulson, E., H. J. Schock, and W. P. Attard. 2010. A review of pre-chamber initiated jet ignition combustion systems.
   Google Scholar
• Turányi, T., and A. S. Tomlin. 2014. Analysis of kinetic reaction mechanisms, Vol. 20. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• UCSD. 2014. Chemical-kinetic mechanisms for combustion applications, san diego mechanism web page, mechanical and aerospace engineering (Combustion research).
   Google Scholar
• Van Oijen, J., A. Donini, R. Bastiaans, J. Ten Thije Boonkkamp, and L. De Goey. 2016. State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 57:30–74. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, T., C. Olm, T. Nagy, I. G. Zsély, É. Valkó, R. Pálvölgyi, H. J. Curran, and T. Turányi. 2016. Development of a joint hydrogen and syngas combustion mechanism based on an optimization approach. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 480 (8):407–22. doi:10.1002/kin.21006.
   Google Scholar
• Vasavan, A., P. de Goey, and J. van Oijen. 2020. A novel method to automate FGM progress variable with application to igniting combustion systems. Combust. Theory Modelling 240 (2):221–44. doi:10.1080/13647830.2019.1673902.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and C. Rutland. 2007. Direct numerical simulation of ignition in turbulent n-heptane liquid-fuel spray jets. Combustion and Flame 1490 (4):353–65. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.03.005.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., L. Dressler, A. Dreizler, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, and C. Hasse. 2021. Flamelet LES of turbulent premixed/stratified flames with H2 addition. Combustion and Flame 230:111428. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., C. Yu, and R. Schießl Experimental and simulation studies on the influence of hydrogen addition on the lean flammability limits of methane/air mixtures. In 27th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., J. Lane, N. Cernansky, D. Miller, A. Fridman, and A. Y. Starikovskiy. 2011. Plasma-assisted ignition below self-ignition threshold in methane, ethane, propane and butane-air mixtures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 330 (2):3219–24. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., P. Breda, M. Pfitzner, and U. Maas. 2021. Coupling of mixing models with manifold based simplified chemistry in PDF modeling of turbulent reacting flows. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 380 (2):2645–53. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.132.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., V. Bykov, and U. Maas. 2019. Coupling of simplified chemistry with mixing processes in PDF simulations of turbulent flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 370 (2):2183–90. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.126.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., X. Li, C. Wu, A. Neagos, and U. Maas. 2020a. Automatic construction of REDIM reduced chemistry with a detailed transport and its application to CH4 counterflow flames. Energy & Fuels 340 (12):16572–84. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02539.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., F. Minuzzi, and U. Maas. 2020b. REDIM reduced chemistry for the simulation of counterflow diffusion flames with oscillating strain rates. Combust. Theory Modelling 240 (4):682–704. doi:10.1080/13647830.2020.1739336.
   Google Scholar