Influence of chemically active additives on kinetics of acetylene self-decomposition and following soot formation

References

• Agafonov, G. L., P. A. Vlasov, V. N. Smirnov, A. M. Tereza, A. A. Garmash, and V. V. Shumova. 2019. An experimental and simulation study of the effect of acetone and propane additives on soot formation in acetylene pyrolysis behind reflected shock waves. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1147:012044.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, J., H. Bockhorn, and M. Frenklach. 2000. Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed Chemistry and Physics: Laminar Premixed flames of C2 hydrocarbons. Comb. Flame. 121:122–36. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00135-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensabath, T., H. Monnier, and P.-A. Glaude. 2016. Detailed kinetic modeling of the formation of toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) coming from pyrolysis in low-pressure gas carburizing conditions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 122:342–54. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2016.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthelot, M., and H. L. le Chatelier. 1899. Sur la vitesse de detonation de l’acetylene. C.R. Acad. Sci. 129:427–34.
   Google Scholar
• Claude, G. M. A., and G. A. Hess, 1900. Apparatus for storing and distributing acetylene gas. USA patent N664383.
   Google Scholar
• Colket, M. B. 1988. The pyrolysis of acetylene and vinylacetylene in a single-pulse shock tube. Proc. Combust. Inst. 21:851–54. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80317-5.
   Google Scholar
• Colket, M. B., D. J. Seery, and H. B. Palmer. 1989. The pyrolysis of acetylene initiated by acetone. Comb. Flame. 75:343. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(89)90048-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRECK modeling group. 2020, Version 2003. Accessed 12 January 2022 http://creckmodeling.chem.polimi.it/menu-kinetics/menu-kinetics-detailed-mechanisms
   Google Scholar
• Cuoci, A., A. Frassoldati, T. Faravelli, and E. Ranzi. 2013. Numerical modeling of laminar flames with detailed kinetics based on the operator-splitting method. Energy Fuels. 27 (12):7730–53. doi:10.1021/ef4016334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuoci, A., A. Frassoldati, T. Faravelli, and E. Ranzi. 2015. OpenSMOKE++: An object-oriented framework for the numerical modeling of reactive systems with detailed kinetic mechanisms. Comp. Phys. Commun. 192:237–64. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagle, R., V. Dagle, M. Bearden, J. Holladay, T. Krause, and S. Ahmed. 2017. R&D opportunities for development of natural gas conversion technologies for co-production of hydrogen and value-added solid carbon products”. Technical Report. PNNL-26726, ANL-17/11.
   Google Scholar
• Davydova, E. S., I. N. Atamanyuk, A. S. Ilyukhin, E. I. Shkolnikov, and A. Z. Zhuk. 2016. Nitrogen-doped carbonaceous catalysts for gas-diffusion cathodes for alkaline aluminum-air batteries. J. Power Sources. 306:329–36. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh, D. K., D. H. Lee, Y.-H. Song, S. Jo, K.-T. Kim, M. Iqbal, and H. Kangb. 2019. Efficient methane-to-acetylene conversion using low-current arcs. RSC Adv. 9:32403–13. doi:10.1039/C9RA05964D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakon, A., A. Eremin, E. Mikheyeva, B. Shu, M. Fikri, and C. Schulz. 2018. Soot formation in shock-wave-induced pyrolysis of acetylene and benzene with H2, O2, and CH4 addition. Comb. Flame. 198:158–68. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, R. P., V. T. Amorebieta, and A. J. Colussi. 1989. Radical sensitization of acetylene pyrolysis. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 21:947–58. doi:10.1002/kin.550211006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A. V., A. V. Eremin, and V. E. Fortov. 2010. Formation of a detonation wave in the thermal decomposition of acetylene. JETP Lett 92:97–101. doi:10.1134/S0021364010140055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A. V., A. V. Eremin, and V. E. Fortov. 2014. Detonation wave of condensation. In Physics of shock waves, combustion, explosion, detonation and nonequilibrium processes Levin, V.A., Fomin, N.A., and Fortov, V.E. Minsk: ITMO named after Lykov, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. 109–125 ISBN-978-985-6456-91-9.
   Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A., A. Eremin, V. Fortov, H. Jander, A. Makeich, and H. G. Wagner. 2009. Detonation wave driven by condensation of supersaturated carbon vapor. Phys. Rev. E. 79:035303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.035303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A., A. Eremin, H. Jander, and H. G. Wagner. 2011. Carbon condensation wave in C3O2 and C2H2 initiated by a shock wave. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (1):525–32. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.103.
   Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A. V., A. V. Eremin, A. A. Makeich, and V. E. Fortov. 2008. Formation of a detonation-like condensation wave. JETP Lett. 87 (9):470–73. doi:10.1134/S0021364008090038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelianov, A. V., A. V. Eremin, E. Y. Mikheyeva, and V. E. Fortov. 2020. On the possibility of promoting a detonation condensation wave in acetylene with methane additions. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 490 (1):1–3. doi:10.1134/S0012501620010017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelyanov, A. V., A. V. Eremin, and V. E. Fortov. 2021. Chemical condensation wave initiating oxygen-free combustion and detonation. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 15:299–306. doi:10.1134/S1990793121020160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eremin, A. V. 2012. Formation of carbon nanoparticles from the gas phase in shock wave pyrolysis processes. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38 (1):1–40. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eremin, A. 2019. Detonation wave of condensation in acetylene. In Advances in chemistry research, ed. J. C. Taylor, 163–98. New York: Nova science publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eremin, A., and E. Mikheyeva. 2019. The role of methyl radical in soot formation. Combust. Sci. Technol. 191 (12):2226–42. doi:10.1080/00102202.2018.1551892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eremin, A., E. Mikheyeva, and I. Selyakov. 2018. Influence of methane addition on soot formation in pyrolysis of acetylene. Comb. Flame. 193:83–91. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovastov, S. V., D. I. Baklanov, V. V. Golub, and V. V. Volodin. 2008. Inhibition of spontaneous decomposition of acetylene by hydrocarbon and hydrogen. Combust. Sci. Technol. 180 (10–11):1972–86. doi:10.1080/00102200802261951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovastov, S. V., and G. Y. Bivol. 2016. Non-monotonous influence of admixtures of propane-butane mixture or hydrogen on induction periods of anoxic decomposition of acetylene. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188:1365–70. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1177032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovastov, S., V. Golub, and A. Mikushkin. 2014. Stability of acetylene–propane–butane and acetylene–hydrogen gas mixtures subjected to shock wave action. Fuel. 126:213–18. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub, V. V., E. V. Gurentsov, A. V. Emelianov, A. V. Eremin, and V. E. Fortov. 2015. Energy gain of the detonation pyrolysis of acetylene. High Temp. 53:363–69. doi:10.1134/S0018151X15030062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, D. H., and R. V. Peters. 2013. New-formula acetylene cool for heat treatment. Gear Technol. 9:90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Holmen, A., O. A. Rokstad, and A. Solbakken. 1976. High-temperature pyrolysis of hydrocarbons. 1. Methane to acetylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 15:439–44. doi:10.1021/i260059a017.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. Y., W. Lee, H. G. Kang, and S. H. Chung. 1998. Synergistic effect of ethylene–propane mixture on soot formation in laminar diffusion flames. Comb. Flame. 114 (3–4):370–80. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00295-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, M. R., and D. J. Arp. 1987. Quantification and removal of some contaminating gases from acetylene used to study gas-utilizing enzymes and microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:298–303. doi:10.1128/aem.53.2.298-303.1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B. A. 1969. Fizika vzryva atsetilena. Moscow: Khimiya.
   Google Scholar
• Knorre, V. G., and A. G. Lyakhov. 1978. Detonation temperature of acetylene. Сombust. Explo. Shock Wave. 14 (2):263–64. doi:10.1007/BF00788394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorre, V. G., D. Tanke, T. H. Thienel, and H. G. Wagner. 1996. Soot formation in the pyrolysis of benzene/acetylene and acetylene/hydrogen mixtures at high carbon concentrations. Proc. Combust. Inst. 26:2303–10. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80058-0.
   Google Scholar
• Marinov, N. M., W. J. Pitz, C. K. Westbrook, A. M. Vincitore, M. J. Castaldi, S. M. Senkan, and C. F. Melius. 1998. Aromatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in a laminar premixed n-butane flame. Comb. Flame. 114 (1–2):192–213. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00275-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, A. L., A. V. Gorbunov, A. A. Galinovskii, V. V. Savchin, and A. V. Lozhechnik. 2008. Production of commercial hydrogen and acetylene from propane-butane and liquid hydrocarbons in an electric-arc plasma reactor. J. Eng. Phys. Them. 81:652–58. doi:10.1007/s10891-008-0083-7.
   Google Scholar
• Naik, C., K. Puduppakkam, A. Modak, E. Meeks, Y. Wang, Q. Feng, and T. Tsotsis. 2011. Detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for surrogates of alternative jet fuels. Comb. Flame. 158:434–45. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norinaga, K., and O. Deutschmann. 2007. Detailed kinetic modeling of gas-phase reactions in the chemical vapor deposition of carbon from light hydrocarbons. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (11):3547–57. doi:10.1021/ie061207p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norinaga, K., O. Deutschmann, N. Saegusa, and J. I. Hayashi. 2009. Analysis of pyrolysis products from light hydrocarbons and kinetic modeling for growth of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with detailed chemistry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 86:148–60. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Y. Wang, S. H. Chung, and S. M. Sarathy. 2017. Compositional effects on PAH and soot formation in counterflow diffusion flames of gasoline surrogate fuels. Comb. Flame. 178:46–60. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, E. 1956. The velocity of detonation of compressed acetylene. Disc. Faraday Soc. 22:157–61. doi:10.1039/df9562200157.
   Google Scholar
• Saggese, C., N. E. Sánchez, A. Frassoldati, A. Cuoci, T. Faravelli, M. U. Alzueta, and E. Ranzi. 2014. Kinetic modeling study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and soot formation in acetylene pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 28 (2):1489–501. doi:10.1021/ef402048q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, C., H. Wang, N. Atef, Z. Wang, B. Chen, M. Almalki, Y. Zhang, C. Cao, J. Yang, and S. M. Sarathy. 2019. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pyrolysis of gasoline surrogates (n-heptane/iso-octane/toluene). Proc. Combust. Inst. 37:993–1001. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtertser, A. A., V. Y. Ulianitsky, I. S. Batraev, and D. K. Rybin. 2018. Production of nanoscale detonation carbon using a pulse gas-detonation device. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (5):395–97. doi:10.1134/S1063785018050139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavinskaya, N. A., U. Riedel, S. B. Dworkin, and M. J. Thomson. 2012. Detailed numerical modeling of PAH formation and growth in non-premixed ethylene and ethane flames. Comb. Flame 159:979–95. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzawa, T. W., and W. C. Gardiner. 1979. Thermal decomposition of acetylene. Proc. Comb. Inst. 17 (1):563–73. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(79)80057-0.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, H., H. Y. Wang, W. Ren, and K. C. Lin. 2019. Kinetic mechanism for modeling the temperature effect on PAH formation in pyrolysis of acetylene. Fuel. 255:115796. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaskin, M. S., P. V. Belov, I. A. Lipatova, A. V. Grigorenko, E. I. Shkolnikov, A. I. Kurbatova, and V. E. Fortov. 2021a. Influence of CH4, H2, Ar and carbon admixtures and reactor shape on porous structure of soot forming in acetylene decomposition. High Temp. 60. (to be published).
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskin, M. S., V. M. Zaichenko, P. V. Belov, A. V. Grigorenko, A. I. Kurbatova, A. V. Eremin, and V. E. Fortov. 2021b. Decomposition of acetylene into hydrogen and carbon: Experiments with internal combustion engines and experiments with a flow reactor. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 55 (2):315–24. doi:10.1134/S0040579521020135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and M. Frenklach. 1997. A detailed kinetic modeling study of aromatics formation in laminar premixed acetylene and ethylene flames. Comb. Flame. 110:173–221. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00068-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., A. Raj, and S. H. Chung. 2015. Soot modeling of counterflow diffusion flames of ethylene-based binary mixture fuels. Comb. Flame. 162 (3):586–96. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. H., H. J. Singh, and R. D. Kern. 1987. Pyrolysis of acetylene behind reflected shock waves. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 19:975–96. doi:10.1002/kin.550191104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., F. Yan, W. Dai, M. Zhou, S. H. Chung, and Y. Wang. 2020. Synergistic effects on soot formation in counterflow diffusion flames of acetylene-based binary mixture fuels. Comb. Flame. 216:24–28. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. S., S. M. Lee, and S. H. Chung. 2005. Effect of mixing methane, ethane, propane, and propene on the synergistic effect of PAH and soot formation in ethylene-base counterflow diffusion flames. Proc. Comb. Inst. 30:1417–24. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa, Y., H. Kawada, and M. Kurokawa. 1979. A shock-tube study on the process of soot formation from acetylene pyrolysis. Proc. Comb. Inst. 17 (1):1375–13. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(79)80129-0.
   Google Scholar