On the evolution of the scalar flux through a planar premixed turbulent flame brush

References

• Anand, M. S., and S. B. Pope. 1987. Calculations of premixed turbulent flames by PDF methods. Combust. Flame 67 (2):127. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(87)90146-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspden, A. J., M. S. Day, and J. B. Bell. 2011. Turbulence-flame interactions in lean premixed hydrogen: Transition to the distributed burning regime. J. Fluid Mech 680:287. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailly, P., M. Champion, and D. Garréton. 1997. Counter-gradient diffusion in a confined turbulent premixed flame. Phys. Fluids 9 (3):766. doi:10.1063/1.869231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailly, P., D. Garréton, O. Simonin, P. Bruel, M. Champion, B. Deshaies, S. Duplantier, and S. Sanquer. 1996. Counter-gradient diffusion in a confined turbulent premixed flame. Proc. Combust. Inst 26 (1):923. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80303-1.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, R. 1984. Mise au point sur la structure des flammes turbulentes. J. Chim. Phys 81:361. doi:10.1051/jcp/1984810361.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, R. 1985. On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames. In Recent Advances in the Aerospace Science, ed. C. Casci, 117–38. Plenum Publishing (Springer), Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, R. 1988. Turbulent combustion modelling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 14 (4):245. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(88)90015-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, R., and D. Escudié. 1984. Assessment of a theoretical model of turbulent combustion by comparison with a simple experiment. Combust. Flame 56 (2):149. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(84)90034-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C. 1979. The interaction between turbulence and combustion. Symp. (Int.) Combust 17 (1):223. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(79)80024-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C. 1995. Turbulent transport in flames. Proc. Royal Soc. London A 451:231.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C., M. Champion, and P. A. Libby. 2000. Premixed flames in stagnating turbulence. Part IV: A new theory for Reynolds stresses and Reynolds fluxes applied to impinging flows. Combust. Flame 120 (1–2):1. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00080-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C., M. Champion, and P. A. Libby. 2001. Premixed flames in stagnating turbulence. Part V: Evaluation of models for the chemical source term. Combust. Flame 127:2040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C., M. Champion, P. A. Libby, and N. Swaminathan. 2006. Finite rate chemistry and presumed PDF models for premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 146 (4):665. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C., and P. A. Libby. 1994. Recent developments in the BML model of premixed turbulent combustion. In Turbulent Reacting Flows, ed. P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams, 115–47. Academic Press, New-York.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, K. N. C., P. A. Libby, G. J. Masuya, and J. B. Moss. 1981. Turbulence production in premixed turbulent flames. Combust. Sci. Technol 25 (3–4):127. doi:10.1080/00102208108547512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray K.N.C., and Moss, J.B. 1977. A unified statistical model of the premixed turbulent flame, Acta Astron. 4(3–4):29110.1016/0094-5765(77)90053-4
   Google Scholar
• Candel, S. M., and T. J. Poinsot. 1990. Flame stretch and the balance equation for the flame area. Combust. Sci. Technol 70 (1–3):1. doi:10.1080/00102209008951608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant, R. S., and E. Mastorakos. 2008. An introduction to turbulent reacting flows. Imperial College Press (London).
   Google Scholar
• Catlin, C. A., and R. P. Lindstedt. 1991. Premixed turbulent burning velocities derived from mixing controlled reaction models with cold front quenching. Combust. Flame 85 (3–4):427. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(91)90145-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvellec, C. 1998. Etude numérique et analytique des caractéristiques propagatives d’une zone de combustion se développant au sein d’un écoulement turbulent prémélangé modélisé par une approche de type flamelette. PhD Thesis, University of Poitiers (France).
   Google Scholar
• Deardoff, J. W. 1972. Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux. J. Geophys. Res 77 (30):5900. doi:10.1029/JC077i030p05900.
   Google Scholar
• Djenidi, L., and R. A. Antonia. 2009. Momentum and heat transport in a three-dimensional transitional wake of a heated square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech 640:109. doi:10.1017/S0022112009991285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, P., and K. N. C. Bray. 2000. Laminar flamelet expressions for pressure fluctuation terms in second moment models of premixed turbulent combustion. Combustion and Flame 121 (4):555. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00177-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dop, H. V., and G. Verver. 2001. Countergradient transport revisited. J. Atmos. Sci 58 (15):2240. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2240:CTR>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C. 1994. Recent developments in PDF methods. In Turbulent Reacting Flows, ed. P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams, 375–474. Academic Press (New-York.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. F. 2008. Turbulent premixed combustion: Flamelet structure and its effect on turbulent burning velocities. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 34 (1):91. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitor, M. V., A. M. K. P. Taylor, and J. H. Whitelaw. 1987. The interaction of turbulence and pressure gradients in a baffle-stabilized premixed flame. J. Fluid Mech 181 (–1):387. doi:10.1017/S0022112087002143.
   Google Scholar
• Im, Y. H., K. Y. Huh, S. Nishiki, and T. Hasegawa. 2004. Zone conditional assessment of flame- generated turbulence with DNS database of a turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Flame 137 (4):478. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalt, P. A. M., Y. C. Chen, and R. W. Bilger. 2002. Experimental investigation of turbulent scalar flux in premixed stagnation type flames. Combust. Flame 129 (4):401. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00354-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerstein, A. R., W. T. Ashurst, and F. A. Williams. 1988. Field equation for interface propagation in an unsteady homogeneous flow field. Phys. Rev. A 37 (7):2728. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.37.2728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kha, K. N. Q., V. Robin, A. Mura, and M. Champion. 2016. Implications of laminar flame finite thickness on the structure of turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech 787:116. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimenko, A., and R. Bilger. 1999. Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 25 (6):595. doi:10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00006-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, P. A. 1985. Theory of normal premixed turbulent flames revisited. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 11 (1):83. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(85)90014-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, P. A., and K. N. C. Bray. 1981. Counter gradient diffusion in premixed turbulent flames. AIAA J. 19 (2):205. doi:10.2514/3.50941.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R. P., and E. M. Vaos. 1999. Modeling of premixed turbulent flames with second moment methods. Combust. Flame 116 (4):461. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00058-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R. P., and E. M. Vaos. 2006. Transported pdf modeling of high-reynolds-number premixed turbulent flames. Combust. Flame 145 (3):495. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipatnikov, A. N. 2008. Conditionally averaged balance equations for modeling premixed turbulent combustion in flamelet regime. Combust. Flame 152 (4):529. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipatnikov, A. N., and J. Chomiak. 2010. Effects of premixed flames on turbulence and turbulent scalar transport. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 36 (1):1. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel, T., and R. Borghi. 1994. A new model of premixed wrinkled flame propagation based on a scalar dissipation equation. Combust. Flame 96 (4):443. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(94)90110-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., and R. Borghi. 2003. Towards an extended scalar dissipation equation for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 133 (1–2):193. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00565-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., and M. Champion. 2009. Relevance of the Bray number in the small-scale modeling of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame 156 (3):729. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A., F. Galzin, and R. Borghi. 2003. A unified PDF-flamelet model for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol 175 (9):1573. doi:10.1080/00102200302368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. D. 1977. Lectures on nonlinear-differential-equation models in biology. Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiki, S. 2003. DNS and modelling of turbulent premixed combustion. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nagoya (Japan).
   Google Scholar
• Nishiki, S., T. Hasegawa, R. Borghi, and R. Himeno. 2002. Modeling of flame-generated turbulence based on direct numerical simulation databases. Proc. Combust. Inst 29 (2):2017. doi:10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80246-2.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiki, S., T. Hasegawa, R. Borghi, and R. Himeno. 2006. Modelling of turbulent scalar flux in turbulent premixed flames based on DNS databases. Combust. Theory Modell 10 (1):39. doi:10.1080/13647830500307477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher, S. J., and J. A. Sethian. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys 79 (1):12. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paranthoën, P., G. Godard, F. Weiss, and M. Gonzalez. 2004. Counter gradient diffusion vs counter diffusion temperature profile. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 47 (4):819. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1986. Laminar flamelets concepts in turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst 21 (1):1231. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80355-2.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1999. The turbulent burning velocity for large scale and small scale turbulence. J. Fluid Mech 384:107. doi:10.1017/S0022112098004212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poludnenko, A. Y., and E. S. Oran. 2010. The interaction of high-speed turbulence with flames: Global properties and internal flame structure. Combustion and Flame 157 (5):995. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 11 (2):119. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B. 1987. Turbulent premixed flames. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 19 (1):237. doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.001321.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B. 1988. The evolution of surface in turbulence. Int. J. Eng. Sci 26 (5):445. doi:10.1016/0020-7225(88)90004-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B., and M. S. Anand. 1984. Flamelet and distributed combustion in premixed turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 20 (1):403. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(85)80527-0.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, V., M. Champion, and A. Mura. 2008. A second-order model for turbulent reactive flows with variable equivalence ratio. Combustion Science and Technology 180 (10–11):1707. doi:10.1080/00102200802258080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, V., A. Mura, and M. Champion. 2011. Direct and indirect thermal expansion effects in turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid. Mech 689:149. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, V., A. Mura, M. Champion, and T. Hasegawa. 2008. A new analysis of the modeling of pressure fluctuations effects on premixed turbulent flames and its validation based on DNS data. Combust. Sci. Technol 180 (5):996. doi:10.1080/00102200801894042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, V., A. Mura, M. Champion, and T. Hasegawa. 2010. Modelling the effects of thermal expansion on scalar fluxes in turbulent flames. Combust. Sci. Technol 182 (4–6):449. doi:10.1080/00102200903462896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutland, C. J., and R. S. Cant 1994. Turbulent transport in premixed flames. In Proceedings of the Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research. NASA Ames/Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sabelnikov, V. A., C. Corvellec, and P. Bruel. 1998. Analysis of the influence of cold front quenching on the turbulent burning velocity associated with an Eddy-Break-Up model. Combust. Flame 113 (4):492. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00234-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelnikov, V. A., and A. N. Lipatnikov. 2013. Transition from pulled to pushed premixed turbulent flames due to countergradient transport. Combust. Theory Modell 17 (6):1154. doi:10.1080/13647830.2013.852692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelnikov, V. A., and A. N. Lipatnikov. 2015. Transition from pulled to pushed fronts in premixed turbulent combustion: Theoretical and numerical study. Combust. Flame 162 (7):2893. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelnikov, V. A., and A. N. Lipatnikov. 2017. Recent advances in understanding of thermal expansion effects in premixed turbulent flames. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech 49 (1):91. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060104.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, I. G., J. B. Moss, and K. N. C. Bray. 1982. Turbulent transport in confined premixed flame. Proc. Combust. Inst 20 (1):423. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80214-2.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and K. N. C. Bray. 2005. Effect of dilatation on scalar dissipation in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame 143 (4):569. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N., and K. N. C. Bray. 2011. Fundamentals and challenges. In Turbulent premixed flames, ed. N. Swaminathan and Bray K.N.C, 1–40. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, S., and R. S. Cant. 2002. Scalar transport modeling in large-eddy simulation of turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst 29 (2):2097. doi:10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80255-3.
   Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., J. Piana, J. M. Duclos, and C. Martel. 1996. Experimental analysis of flame surface density models for premixed turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst 26 (1):413. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80243-8.
   Google Scholar
• Veynante, D., A. Trouve, K. N. C. Bray, and T. Mantel. 1997. Gradient and counter-gradient scalar transport in turbulent premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech 332:263. doi:10.1017/S0022112096004065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, H. G. 1993. The development of a new flame area combustion model using conditional averaging. Thermo-Fluids Section Report TF/9307. Imperial College (United Kingdom).
   Google Scholar
• Weller, H. G., C. J. Marooney, and A. D. Gosman. 1991. A new spectral method for calculation of the time-varying area of a laminar flame in homogeneous turbulence. Symposium (International) on Combustion 23 (1):629. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80310-3.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. A. 1976. Criteria for existence of wrinkled laminar flame structure of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame 26:269. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(76)90077-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. A. 1985. Combustion Theory. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., and C. J. Rutland. 1995. Premixed flame effects on turbulence and pressure-related terms. Combustion and Flame 102 (4):447. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(95)00036-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimont, V. L., and F. Biagoli. 2002. Gradient, counter-gradient transport and their transition in turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Theory Modell 6 (1):79. doi:10.1088/1364-7830/6/1/305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar