Modelling the Effect of Grassland Fuel Bed Structure on the Headfire Rate of Spread

References

• Alen, R., E. Kuoppala, and P. Oesch. 1996. Formation of the main degradation compound groups from wood and its components during pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 36:137–48. doi:10.1016/0165-2370(96)00932-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. R., M. G. Cruz, P. M. Fernandes, L. McCaw, J. A. Vega, R. A. Bradstock, L. Fogarty, J. Gould, G. McCarthy, J. B. Marsden-Smedley, et al. 2015. A generic, empirical - based model for predicting rate of fire spread in shrublands. Int. J. Wildland Fire 24:443–60. doi:10.1071/WF14130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, A., R. Linn, A. Jonko, C. Hoffman, J. Hyman, F. Pimont, C. Sieg, and R. Middleton. 2021. Effect of fuel spatial distribution on wildland fire behaviour. Int. J. Wlidland Fire 30:179–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, S., and P.J. Pagni 1985. Spatial variation of soot volume fractions in pool fire diffusion flame. First Symposium on Fire Safety Science. London
   Google Scholar
• Branca, C., A. Albano, and C. Di Blasi. 2005. Critical evaluation of global mechanisms of wood devolatilization. Thermochim Acta 429:133–41. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2005.02.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgan, R.E. 1987. Concepts and interpreted examples in advanced fuel modeling. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-238.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, M., G. Sullivan, L. Andrew, J. Gould, S. Hurley, J. Richard, and M. P. Plucinski. 2018. Got to burn to learn: The effect of fuel load on grassland fire behaviour and its management implications. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27:727–41. doi:10.1071/WF18082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M. G., A. L. Sullivan, R. J. Hurley, M. P. Plucinski, and J. S. Gould 2017. The effect of fuel load and structure on grassland fire behaviour and fire danger. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Land and Water, Client Report No EP178976.
   Google Scholar
• Di Blasi, C. 1998. Comparison of semi-global mechanisms for primary pyrolysis of lignocellulosic fuels. J. Ana. Appl. Pyrolysis 47:43–64. doi:10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00079-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Blasi, C., C. Branca, A. Santoro, and H. Gonzalez. 2001. Pyrolytic behavior and products of some wood varieties. Combust. Flame 47:165–77. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00191-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, J.-L., and D. Morvan. 2005. Numerical study of a crown fire spreading toward a fuel break using a multiphase physical model. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14:141–51. doi:10.1071/WF04028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grishin, A. M. 1996. Mathematical modeling of forest fires and new methods of figthing them. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gronli, M. G. 1996. A theoretical and experimental study of thermal degradation of biomas. Doctoral Thesis, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dept. of Thermal Energy and Hydropower, 7034 Trondheim, Norway p.342.
   Google Scholar
• Incropera, F. P., and D. P. Dewitt. 1985. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfert, 4th ed., 846. New York: John Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, C. R., C. R. Shaddix, and K. C. Smyth. 1996. Computations of enhanced soot production in time-varying CH4/Air diffusion flame. Combust. Flame 106:392–404. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(95)00258-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, D. R., and J. H. Honnery. 1990. A soot formation rate map for a laminar ethylene diffusion flame. Combust. Flame 79:287–98. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(90)90140-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, E., P. J. Pagni, J. Woycheese, S. Stephens, D. Weise, and J. Huff. 2005. A simple physical model for forest fire spread rate. Proc. Fire Saf. Sci. 8:851–62. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-851.
   Google Scholar
• Larini, M., F. Giraud, B. Porterie, and J. C. Loraud. 1998. A multiphase formulation for fire propagation in heterogeneous combustible media. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 41:881–97. doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00173-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, R. R., and P. Cunningham. 2005. Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere-fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. J. Geophys. Res. 110:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, R., J. Winterkamp, J. Colman, C. Edminster, and J. Bailey. 2005. Modeling interactions between fire and atmosphere in discrete element fuel beds. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14:37–48. doi:10.1071/WF04043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, B. F., and B. H. Hjertager 1977. On mathematical modelling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symposium (International) on Combustion 16:719–29. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, E., J.L. Dupuy, F. Pimont, M. Guijarro, C. Hernando, and R. Linn. 2012. Fuel bulk density and fuel moisture content effects on fire rate of spread: A comparison between FIRETEC model predictions and experimental results in shrub fuels. J. Fire Sci. 30:277–99. doi:10.1177/0734904111434286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, W., J. J. Charney, M. A. Jenkins, P. Cheney, and J. Gould 2005. Numerical simulations of grassland fire behavior from the LANL-FIRETEC and NIST-WFDS models. EastFire Conference, George Masson Univ. 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mell, W., A. Mary, J. Jenkins, and P. C. Gould. 2007. A physics - based approach to modelling grassland fires. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16:1–22. doi:10.1071/WF06002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moinuddin, K. A. M., D. Sutherland, and W. Mell. 2018. Simulation study of grass fire using a physics – based model: Striving towards numerical rigour and the effect of grass height on the rate of spread. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27:800–14. doi:10.1071/WF17126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvan, D. 2007. A numerical study of flame geometry and potential for crown fire initiation for a wildfire propagating through shrub fuel. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16:511–18. doi:10.1071/WF06010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvan, D., and J. L. Dupuy. 2001. Modeling of fire spread through a forest fuel bed using a multiphase formulation. Combust. Flame 127:1981–94. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00302-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvan, D., and J. L. Dupuy. 2004. Modeling the propagation of a wildfire through a Mediterranean shrub using a multiphase formulation. Combust. Flame 138:199–210. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novozhilov, V., B. Moghtaderi, D. F. Fletcher, and J. H. Kent. 1996. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of wood combustion. Fire Saf. J. 27:69–84. doi:10.1016/S0379-7112(96)00022-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagni, P. J., and T. G. Peterson 1973. Flame spread through porous fuel. Proc. of Fourteenth International Symposium on combustion, the combustion Institute pp. 1099–107.
   Google Scholar
• Parson, R., R. Linn, F. Pimont, C. Hoffman, J. Sauer, J. Winteramp, C. Sieg, and W. Jolly. 2017. Numerical investigation of aggregated fuel spatial pattern impacts on fire behavior. Land 43:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Porterie, B., J.L. Consalvi, J.C. Loraud, F. Giroud, and C. Picard. 2007. Dynamics of wildland fires and their impact on structures. Combust. Flame 149:314–28. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porterie, B., D. Morvan, J.C. Loraud, and M. Larini. 2000. Firespread through fuel beds: Modeling of wind - aided fires and induced hydrodynamics. Phys. Fluids 12:1762–82. doi:10.1063/1.870426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermel, R. C. 1972. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels – USA. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT -115.
   Google Scholar
• Séro-Guillaume, O., and J. Margerit. 2002. Modeling forest fires. Part I: A complete set of equations derived by extended irreversible thermodynamics. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 45:1705–22. doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00248-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susott, R. A. 1982. Characterization of the thermal properties of forest fuel by combustible gas analysis. Forest Sci. 2:404–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vanella, M., K. McGrattan, R. McDermott, G. Forney, W. Mell, E. Gissi, and P. Fiorucci. 2021. A multi-fidelity framework for wildland fire behavior simulations over complex terrain. Atmosphere (12):273. doi:10.3390/atmos12020273.
   Google Scholar
• Yakhot, S., and V. Orszag. 1986. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. J Sci Comput 1:3–51. doi:10.1007/BF01061452.
   Google Scholar
• Yakhot, M., and V. Smith. 1992. The renormalization group, the e-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. J Sci Comput 7:35–61. doi:10.1007/BF01060210.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., R. Yan, H. Chen, D. H. Lee, and C. Zheng. 2007. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–88. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., S. Mahalingam, and W. David. 2005. Modeling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral shrub fuel bed. Combust. Flame 143:183–98. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X. Y., and J. C. F. Pereira. 2001. A multidimensional model for simulating vegetation fire spread using a porous media sub-model. Fire Mater. 24:37–43. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(200001/02)24:1<37:AID-FAM718>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar