Numerical Study of Turbulent Swirling Diffusion Flame Under Lean and Rich Conditions Using Turbulence Realizable k-epsilon Model

References

• Akinyemi, O. S., and L. Jiang. 2019. Development and combustion characterization of a novel twin-fluid fuel injector in a swirl-stabilized gas turbine burner operating on straight vegetable oil. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 102:279–90. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouras, F., M. H. Attia, F. Khaldi, and M. Si-Ameur. 2017. Control of methane flame properties by hydrogen fuel addition: Application to power plant combustion chamber. Int. J. Hydrogen EnergyInt. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (13):8932–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boushaki, T., N. Merlo, C. Chauveau, and I. Gökalp 2017. Study of pollutant emissions and dynamics of non-premixed turbulent oxygen enriched flames from a swirl burner. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 36(3): 3959–68. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.046.
   Google Scholar
• Chakchak, S., A. Hidouri, H. Zaidaoui, M. Chrigui, and T. Boushaki. 2021. Experimental and numerical study of swirling diffusion flame provided by a coaxial burner: Effect of inlet velocity ratio. Fluids 6 (4):4–159. doi:10.3390/fluids6040159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakchak, S., H. Zaidaoui, A. Hidouri, G. Godard, and T. Boushaki. 2022. Oxygen enrichment effects on CH4-air turbulent flow characteristics in a coaxial swirl burner. Combustion Science and Technology 1–24. doi:10.1080/00102202.2021.2019237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and V. C. Patel. 1988. Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA J. 26 (6):641–48. doi:10.2514/3.9948.
   Google Scholar
• Degenève, A., R. Vicquelin, C. Mirat, B. Labegorre, P. Jourdaine, J. Caudal, and T. Schuller. 2019. Scaling relations for the length of coaxial oxy-flames with and without swirl. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 37(4): 4563–70. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.032.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J., Y. Tang, J. Li, Y. Ma, W. Chen, and H. Li. 2016. Four kinds of the two-equation turbulence model’s research on flow field simulation performance of DPF’s porous media and swirl-type regeneration burner. Appl. Therm. Eng. 93:397–404. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheraissa, N., F. Bouras, F. Khaldi, A. Hidouri, F. FerhatRehouma, and A. Dogga. 2021. A comparative study of the combustion supplied by multi-fuels: Computational analysis. Energy. Rep. 7:3819–32. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonca, G. 2015. Investigation of the influences of steam injection on the equilibrium combustion products and thermodynamic properties of bio fuels (biodiesels and alcohols). Fuel 144 (3):244–58. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidouri, A., M. Chrigui, T. Boushaki, A. Sadiki, and J. Janicka. 2017. Large eddy simulation of two isothermal and reacting turbulent separated oxy-fuel jets. Fuel 192:108–20. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidouri, A., N. Yahya, T. Boushaki, A. Sadiki, and J. C. Sautet. 2016. Numerical and experimental investigation of turbulent three separated jets. Appl. Therm. Eng. 104:153–61. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., Y. Zhou, and S. Zheng. 2018. Numerical investigation of different effects of carbon dioxide properties and carbon monoxide oxidation on char particle combustion in actual and fictitious O2/CO2 environments. Fuel 217:59–65. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kader, B. A. 1981. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers. International journal of heat and mass transfer 24 (9):1541–44. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanga, M. S., H. J. Jeong, M. M. Farid, and J. Hwang. 2017. Effect of staged combustion on low NOx emission from an industrial-scale fuel oil combustor in South Korea. Fuel 210 (12):282–89. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. Y., S. Choi, H. K. Kim, I. Jeung, J. Koo, and O. C. Kwon. 2016. Combustion properties of gaseous CH4/O2 coaxial jet flames in a single-element combustor. Fuel 184:28–35. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., M. B. Gerdroodbary, M. Sheikholeslami, R. Moradi, A. Shafee, and Z. Li. 2020. Effect of strut angle on performance of hydrogen multi-jets inside the cavity at combustion chamber. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (55):31179–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, B. F., and B. H. Hjertager. 1977. On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. 16th Symposium (international) on combustion 16(1): 719–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri, Z., M. Aouissi, and T. Boushaki. 2016. Detached eddy simulation of high turbulent swirling reacting flow in a premixed model burner. Comb. Sci. Tech. 188 (11–12):1777–98. doi:10.1080/00102202.2016.1211888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri, Z., and T. Boushaki. 2018. Experimental and numerical investigation of turbulent isothermal and reacting flows in a non-premixed swirl burner. Int. J. Heat. Fluid. Flow. 72:200–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlo, N., T. Boushaki, C. Chauveau, S. de Persis, L. Pillier, B. Sarh, and I. Go Kalp. 2013. Experimental study of oxygen enrichment effects on turbulent non-premixed swirling flames. Energy & Fuels 27 (10):6191–97. doi:10.1021/ef400843c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa, O., and Z. Driss. 2017. Numerical investigation of the turbulence models effect on the combustion characteristics in a non-premixed turbulent flame methane-air. Am. J. Energy Res 5:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and D. Veynante. 2005. Theoretical and numerical combustion, 164-169. Pennsylvania, USA: RT Edwards, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, L. C. B. S., J. A. Carvalho Jr, M. A. R. Nascimento, L. O. Rodrigues, F. L. G. Dias, and P. M. Sobrinho. 2014. Numerical modeling of flow through an industrial burner orifice. Appl. Therm. Eng. 67 (1–2):201–13. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, Z., H. Bounaouara, I. Hraiech, M. A. Mergheni, J. C. Sautet, and S. B. Nasrallah. 2017. Combustion with mixed enrichment of oxygen and hydrogen in lean regime. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (13):8870–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, Z., M. A. Mergheni, J. C. Sautet, and S. B. Nasrallah. 2012. Numerical study of turbulent normal diffusion flame ch4-air stabilized by coaxial burner. Therm. Sci. 1:1–20. doi:10.2298/TSCI110609042R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan, C., F. Chen, W. Cai, Y. Qian, L. Yu, and X. Lu. 2019. Principles of non-intrusive diagnostic techniques and their applications for fundamental studies of combustion instabilities in gas turbine combustors: A brief review. Aerospace Sci. Tech. 84:585–603. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salentey, L. 2002.Experimental Study of the Behavior of Burners with Separated Jets Application to Combustion of Natural Gas/Oxygen pure (in French), Ph. D. thesis, Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Rouen, France
   Google Scholar
• Schluckner, C., C. Gaber, M. Landfahrer, M. Demuth, and C. Hochenauer. 2020. Fast and accurate CFD-model for NOx emission prediction during oxy-fuel combustion of natural gas using detailed chemical kinetics. Fuel 264:116841. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, T. H., W. W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang, and J. Zhu. 1995. A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput. fluid. 24 (3):227–38. doi:10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, R., J. Mantzaras, and R. Bombach. 2019. H2 and CO heterogeneous kinetic coupling during combustion of H2/CO/O2/N2 mixtures over rhodium. Combust. Flame. 202:292–302. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., P. Yan, L. Tian, G. Ren, Y. Xu, and Z. Sheng. 2021. Effects of hydrogen multijet and flow rate assignment on the combustion flow characteristics in a jet-Stabilized combustor. ACS. Omega 6 (20):12952–64. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c05007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P. 2016. The model constant a of the eddy dissipation model. Prog. Comput. Fluid Dynamics. Int. J. 16 (2):118. doi:10.1504/PCFD.2016.075154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, E., C. Okafor, A. Kunkuma, K. D. Somarathne, R. Ratthananb, A. Hayakawa, T. Kudo, O. Kurata, N. Iki, and T. Tsujimura. 2020. Control of NOx and other emissions in micro gas turbine combustors fuelled with mixtures of methane and ammonia. Combust. Flame. 211:406–16. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Z. He, P. Qiu, S. Dong, and H. Tan. 2019. Numerical investigations on combustion and emission characteristics of a novel elliptical jet-stabilized model combustor. Energy 170:1082–97. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q., D. Zheng, and Y. Yuan. 2020. Counter-rotating dual-stage swirling combustion characteristics of hydrogen and carbon monoxide at constant fuel flow rate. Int. J. Hydrogen EnergyInt. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (7):4979–90. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar