Surface Density Function and Its Evolution in Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Mixture n-Heptane MILD Combustion

References

• Ahmed, U., A. L. Pillai, N. Chakraborty, and R. Kurose. 2020. Surface density function evolution and the influence of strain rates during turbulent boundary layer flashback of hydrogen-rich premixed combustion. Physics of Fluids 32 (5):055112. doi:10.1063/5.0004850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminian, J., C. Galletti, S. Shahhosseini, and L. Tognotti. 2011. Key modeling issues in prediction of minor species in diluted-preheated combustion conditions. Appl. Therm. Eng. 31 (16):3287–300. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad, H. S. A. M., K. Abo-Amsha, U. Ahmed, and N. Chakraborty. 2021. Comparison of the reactive scalar gradient evolution between homogeneous MILD combustion and premixed turbulent flames. Energies 14 (22):7677. doi:10.3390/en14227677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor, G. K., and A. A. Townsend (1948). Decay of turbulence in the final period. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 194 (1039), 527–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bilger, R. W. 1989. The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion 22 (1):475–88. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(89)80054-2.
   Google Scholar
• Candel, S. M., and T. J. Poinsot. 1990. Flame stretch and the balance equation for the flame area. Combust Sci Technol. 70 (1–3):1–15. doi:10.1080/00102209008951608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant, R. S. (2012). CUED/A-THERMO/TR67 (Tech. Rep). Cambridge University Engineering Department.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaliere, A., and M. de Joannon. 2004. Mild combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 30 (4):329–66. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2004.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., and R. S. Cant. 2005. Effects of strain rate and curvature on surface density function transport in turbulent premixed flames in the thin reaction zones regime. Physics of Fluids 17 (6):065108. doi:10.1063/1.1923047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. H., E. R. Hawkes, R. Sankaran, S. D. Mason, and H. G. Im. 2006. Direct numerical simulation of ignition front propagation in a constant volume with temperature inhomogeneities: I. Fundamental analysis and diagnostics. Combust. Flame 145 (1–2):128–44. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christo, F. C., and B. B. Dally. 2005. Modeling turbulent reacting jets issuing into a hot and diluted coflow. Combust. Flame 142 (1–2):117–29. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dally, B. B., A. N. Karpetis, and R. S. Barlow (2002). Structure of turbulent non- premixed jet flames in a diluted hot coflow. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 29 (1): 1147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dally, B. B., E. Riesmeier, and N. Peters. 2004. Effect of fuel mixture on moderate and intense low oxygen dilution combustion. Combust. Flame 137 (4):418–31. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S., R. Sankaran, and H. G. Im. 2020. Auto-ignitive deflagration speed of methane (CH4) blended dimethyl-ether (DME)/air mixtures at stratified conditions. Combust. Flame 211:377–91. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, N., and N. Swaminathan. 2019a. Analysis of markers for combustion mode and heat release in MILD combustion using DNS data. Combust Sci Technol. 191 (5–6):1059–78. doi:10.1080/00102202.2019.1610746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, N., and N. Swaminathan. 2019b. Autoignition and flame propagation in non- premixed MILD combustion. Combust. Flame 201:234–43. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, N., N. Swaminathan, and Y. Minamoto. 2018. DNS of MILD combustion with mixture fraction variations. Combust. Flame 189:173–89. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.10.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., L. Cifuentes, J. Martin, and C. Jimenez. 2015. Strain rates normal to approaching iso-scalar surfaces in a turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Flame 162 (5):1729–36. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echekki, T., and J. H. Chen. 1996. Unsteady strain rate and curvature effects in turbulent premixed methane-air flames. Combust. Flame 106 (1–2):184–202. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(96)00011-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echekki, T., and J. H. Chen. 1999. Analysis of the contribution of curvature to premixed flame propagation. Combust. Flame 118 (1–2):308–11. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00006-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eswaran, V., and S. B. Pope. 1988. Direct numerical simulations of the turbulent mixing of a passive scalar. Phys. Fluids 31 (3):506–20. doi:10.1063/1.866832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, D. G., H. K. Moffat, I. Schoegl, R. L. Speth, and B. W. Weber (2022). Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. https://www.cantera.org. ( Version 2.6.0)
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R. A. C., J. H. Chen, H. Kolla, R. S. Cant, and W. Kollmann (2015). Three-dimensional topology of turbulent premixed flame interaction. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35 (2): 1341–48.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M., D. Alwazzan, and N. Chakraborty. 2018. A direct numerical simulation analysis of pressure variation in turbulent premixed Bunsen burner flames-Part 1: Scalar gradient and strain rate statistics. Comput Fluids 173:178–88. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., J. Mi, B. B. Dally, F. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Liu, S. Chen, and C. Zheng. 2011. Progress and recent trend in MILD combustion. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54 (2):255–69. doi:10.1007/s11431-010-4257-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., J. C. Hewson, J. H. Chen, and H. Pitsch. 2004. Effects of strain rate on high-pressure nonpremixed n-heptane autoignition in counterflow. Combust. Flame 137 (3):320–39. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkeson, S. P., and N. Chakraborty. 2010. Statistical analysis of displacement speed in turbulent stratified flames: A direct numerical simulation study. Combust Sci Technol. 182 (11–12):1841–83. doi:10.1080/00102202.2010.500993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, A. R. (2021). Challenges for turbulent combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 38 (1): 121–55.
   Google Scholar
• Minamoto, Y., T. D. Dunstan, N. Swaminathan, and R. S. Cant (2013). DNS of EGR-type turbulent flame in MILD condition. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 34 (2): 3231–38.
   Google Scholar
• Minamoto, Y., and N. Swaminathan. 2014. Scalar gradient behaviour in MILD combustion. Combust. Flame 161 (4):1063–75. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minamoto, Y., and N. Swaminathan (2015). Subgrid scale modelling for MILD combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35 (3): 3529–36.
   Google Scholar
• Minamoto, Y., N. Swaminathan, R. S. Cant, and T. Leung. 2014a. Morphological and statistical features of reaction zones in MILD and premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 161 (11):2801–14. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minamoto, Y., N. Swaminathan, R. S. Cant, and T. Leung. 2014b. Reaction zones and their structure in MILD combustion. Combust Sci Technol. 186 (8):1075–96. doi:10.1080/00102202.2014.902814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof, E., M. J. Tummers, E. H. van Veen, and D. J. E. M. Roekaerts. 2011. Role of entrainment in the stabilisation of jet-in-hot-coflow flames. Combust. Flame 158 (8):1553–63. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, İ. B., and N. Peters. 2001. Characteristics of the reaction zone in a combustor operating at mild combustion. Exp. Fluids 30 (6):683–95. doi:10.1007/s003480000248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perpignan, A. A. V., A. Gangoli Rao, and D. J. E. M. Roekaerts. 2018. Flameless combustion and its potential towards gas turbines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 69:28–62. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2018.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent combustion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plessing, T., N. Peters, and J. G. Wünning. 1998. Laser-optical investigation of highly preheated combustion with strong exhaust gas recirculation. Symposium (International) on Combustion 27 (2):3197–204. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80183-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S. B. 1988. The evolution of surfaces in turbulence. Int J Eng Sci 26 (5):445–69. doi:10.1016/0020-7225(88)90004-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogallo, R. S. (1981). Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence (Tech. Rep. No. NASA-TM-81315).
   Google Scholar
• Sankaran, R., E. R. Hawkes, J. H. Chen, T. Lu, and C. K. Law (2007). Structure of a spatially developing turbulent lean methane–air Bunsen flame. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31 (1): 1291–98.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, N. 2019. “Physical Insights on MILD Combustion from DNS.” Front. Mech. Eng. 5. doi:10.3389/fmech.2019.00059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi, S., G. V. Nivarti, and R. S. Cant (2019). Flame self-interactions with increasing turbulence intensity. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 37 (2): 2443–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wünning, J. A., and J. G. Wünning. 1997. Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal no-formation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 23 (1):81–94. doi:10.1016/S0360-1285(97)00006-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., P. R. Medwell, M. J. Evans, and B. B. Dally. 2017. Characteristics of turbulent n-heptane jet flames in a hot and diluted coflow. Combust. Flame 183:330–42. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar