Artificial Neural Networks-Based Ignition Delay Time Prediction for Natural Gas Blends

References

• Abadi, M., A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al. 2016. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Jameel, A. G., V. Van Oudenhoven, A. H. Emwas, and S. M. Sarathy. 2018. Predicting octane number using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and artificial neural networks. Energy & Fuels 32 (5):6309–29. accessed November 8, 2021. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Qasem, M. A., V. C. O. van Oudenhoven, A. A. Pasha, S. N. Pillai, V. M. Reddy, U. Ahmed, S. A. Razzak, E. M. Al-Mutairi, and A. G. Abdul Jameel. 2022. A machine learning model for predicting threshold sooting index (TSI) of fuels containing alcohols and ethers. Fuel 322:123941. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2022.123941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ibrahim, E., and A. Farooq. 2020. Octane prediction from infrared spectroscopic data. Energy & Fuels 34 (1):817–26. doi:10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.9B02816/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/EF9B02816_0008.JPEG.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourque, G., D. Healy, H. Curran, C. Zinner, D. Kalitan, J. de Vries, C. Aul, and E. Petersen. 2010. Ignition and flame speed kinetics of two natural gas blends with high levels of heavier hydrocarbons. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 132 (2). doi:10.1115/1.3124665/408886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, S. M., U. Burke, R. Mc Donagh, O. Mathieu, I. Osorio, C. Keesee, A. Morones, E. L. Petersen, W. Wang, T. A. DeVerter, et al., P. P. Dirrenberger, A. Glaude, F. Battin-Leclerc, H. J. Curran. 2015. An experimental and modeling study of propene oxidation. Part 2: ignition delay time and flame speed measurements. Combust. Flame 162 (2):296–314. doi:10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2014.07.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet, F. 2018. Keras: The python deep learning library. Astrophys. Source Code Libr ascl–1806.
   Google Scholar
• Colket, M. B., and L. J. Spadaccini. 2012. Scramjet fuels autoignition study. J. Propul. Power 17 (2):315–23. doi:10.2514/2.5744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., H. Liu, Q. Wang, Z. Zheng, H. Wang, Z. Yue, Z. Ming, M. Wen, L. Feng, and M. Yao. 2022. Investigation on the ignition delay prediction model of multi-component surrogates based on back propagation (BP) neural network. Combust. Flame 237:111852. doi:10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2021.111852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. F., Y. Zhu, J. Shao, and R. K. Hanson. 2017. Ignition delay time correlations for distillate fuels. Fuel 187:26–32. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2016.09.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electricity in the U.S. - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). n.d. Accessed 2022 23, May. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us.php
   Google Scholar
• El-Sabor Mohamed, A. A., A. B. Sahu, S. Panigrahy, G. Bourque, and H. Curran. 2021. Ignition delay time correlation of C1–C5 natural gas blends for intermediate and high temperature regime. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 143 (12):2021. doi:10.1115/1.4051908/1115042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubank, C. S., M. J. Rabinowitz, W. C. Gardiner, and R. E. Zellner. 1981. Shock-initiated ignition of natural gas—Air mixtures. Symp. Combust 18 (1):1767–74. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80181-6.
   Google Scholar
• Global Electricity Review 2022 | Ember|Global Electricity Review 2022 | Ember. n.d. Accessed 2022 23, May. https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2022/
   Google Scholar
• Healy, D., D. M. Kalitan, C. J. Aul, E. L. Petersen, G. Bourque, and H. J. Curran. 2010. Oxidation of C1−C5 alkane quinternary natural gas mixtures at high pressures. Energy & Fuels 24 (3):1521–28. doi:10.1021/EF9011005/SUPPL_FILE/EF9011005_SI_001.PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kéromnès, A., W. K. Metcalfe, K. A. Heufer, N. Donohoe, A. K. Das, C. J. Sung, J. Herzler, C. Naumann, P. Griebel, O. Mathieu, et al. 2013. An experimental and detailed chemical kinetic modeling study of hydrogen and syngas mixture oxidation at elevated pressures. Combust. Flame 160:995–1011. doi:10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaled, F., and A. Farooq. 2019. On the universality of ignition delay times of distillate fuels at high temperatures: A statistical approach. Combust. Flame 210:145–58. doi:10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2019.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux, N., and C. E. Paillard. 2003. Natural gas ignition delay times behind reflected shock waves: Application to modelling and safety. Shock Waves 13:57–68. doi:10.1007/S00193-003-0188-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshitz, A., K. Scheller, A. Burcat, and G. B. Skinner. 1971. Shock-tube investigation of ignition in methane-oxygen-argon mixtures. Combust. Flame 16:311–21. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(71)80102-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl, M., W. J. Pitz, C. K. Westbrook, and H. J. Curran. 2011. Kinetic modeling of gasoline surrogate components and mixtures under engine conditions. Proc Combust Inst 33:193–200. doi:10.1016/J.PROCI.2010.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, W. K., S. M. Burke, S. S. Ahmed, and H. J. Curran. 2013. A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of C1 − C2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 45:638–75. doi:10.1002/KIN.20802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, and V. Dubourg. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12:2825–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. CHEMKIN-PRO, 15112, Reaction Design, Inc. 2011. San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, B., S. K. Vallabhuni, J. Zheng, S. Agarwal, and R. X. Fernandes. 2020. Experimental and modeling studies on the correlation between auto-ignition delays and the methane number of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Liquefied Biogas (LBG). Front. Mech. Eng 6:47. doi:10.3389/fmech.2020.00047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadaccini, L. J., and M. B. Colket. 1994. Ignition delay characteristics of methane fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 20 (5):431–60. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(94)90011-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speight, J. 2007. Liquid fuels from natural gas. Handb. Altern. Fuel Technol 153.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, H., J. J. Corbett, and J. J. Winebrake. 2015. Natural gas as a marine fuel. Energ. Policy 87:153–67. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallabhuni, S. K., A. D. Lele, V. Patel, A. Lucassen, K. Moshammer, M. AlAbbad, A. Farooq, and R. X. Fernandes. 2018. Autoignition studies of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in a shock tube and a rapid compression machine. Fuel 232:423–30. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.04.168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Lehn, F., B. Brosius, R. Broda, L. Cai, and H. Pitsch. 2020. Using machine learning with target-specific feature sets for structure-property relationship modeling of octane numbers and octane sensitivity. Fuel 281:118772. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2020.118772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Lehn, F., L. Cai, B. Copa Cáceres, and H. Pitsch. 2021. Exploring the fuel structure dependence of laminar burning velocity: A machine learning based group contribution approach. Combust. Flame 232:111525. doi:10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2021.111525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., C. Banyon, U. Burke, G. Kukkadapu, S. W. Wagnon, M. Mehl, H. J. Curran, C. K. Westbrook, and W. J. Pitz. 2019. An experimental and kinetic modeling study of the oxidation of hexane isomers: Developing consistent reaction rate rules for alkanes. Combust. Flame 206:123–37. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar