Calibration of Gypsum Blocks for Measuring Saline Soils Moisture

References

• Acclima. 2010. TDT soil moisture sensor. Fort Collins: Acclima, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Alizade, A. 2005. Advanced drainage, 1st ed., 293. Mashhad, Iran: Publication of Imam Reza University (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, P., S. K. Upadhayaya, J. Aguera, and B. M. Jenkins. 2004. Evaluation of a capacitance-based soil moisture sensor for real-time applications. Transactions of the ASAE 47:1281–87. doi:10.13031/2013.16562.
   Google Scholar
• Ashtiani, S. M., M. Parsinejad, and F. Abbasi. 2012. Effects of urban wastewater in irrigated sorghum on some physical properties of soil. Journal of Soil Investigate (Soil and Water Sciences) 25 (3):243–252 (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Bouyoucos, G. J., and A. H. Mick. 1940. An electrical resistance method for the continuous measurement of soil moisture under field conditions. Bull. 172. Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing. In Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd ed. Madison, WI: SSSA Book Ser.5. SSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Bouyoucos, G. J., and A. H. Mick. 1948. A comparison of electric resistance units for making a continuous measurement of soil moisture under field conditions. Plant Physiology 23 (4):532–43. doi:10.1104/pp.23.4.532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., and M. Dukes. 2012. Soil moisture sensor landscape irrigation controllers: Multi-study results and future implications. Transactions of the ASABE 55 (2):581–90. doi:10.13031/2013.41392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., and M. D. Dukes. 2014. Effect of temperature and salinity on the precision and accuracy of landscape irrigation soil moisture sensor systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, L., Z. Xing, H. W. Rees, F. Meng, J. Monteith, and L. Stevens. 2009. Field performance of nine soil water content sensors on a sandy loam soil in new brunswick, maritime region, Canada. Sensors 9:9398–413. doi:10.3390/s91109398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. O., A. S. Kenneth, and T. Jinglu. 2005.Variability structure of on-the-go soil strength sensor data. Paper No. 051039. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, A. R. 2004. Soil physical quality. Part І. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120:201–14. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evett, S. R. 2008. Neutron moisture meters. Chapter 3 In Field estimation of soil water content: A practical guide to methods, instrumentation, and sensor technology, eds. S. R. Evett, L. K. Heng, P. Moutonnet, and M. L. Nguyen, 39–54. Vienna, Austria: IAEA-TCS-30. International Atomic Energy Agency. .
   Google Scholar
• Evett, S. R., J. A. Tolk, and T. A. Howell. 2006. Soil profile water content determination: Sensor accuracy, axial response, calibration, temperature dependence and precision. Vadose Zone Journal 5 (3):894–907. doi:10.2136/vzj2005.0149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahraman, B., K. Davary, A. Astaraii, M. Majidi Khalil Abad, and S. Tamassoki. 2009. Correction of Gypsum block readings due to salinity effects for soil moisture content measurements. Journal of Water and Soil 23 (1, spring):67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, R. J., and A. Ashcroft. 1980. Phsical properties of soils. Uta, USA: Department soil science. USU, logan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, B. R., and D. Peters. 2008. Soil type affects accuracy of dielectric moisture sensors. California Agriculture 54:43–47. doi:10.3733/ca.v054n03p43.
   Google Scholar
• Hignett, C., and S. R. Evett. 2008. Direct and surrogate measures of soil water content. in field estimation of soil water content: a practical guide to methods, instrumentation, and sensor technology, eds. S. R. Evett, L. K. Heng, P. Mouton Net, and M. L. Nguyen, 1–22. Vienna, Austria, Chapter 1: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, W. R., T. P. A. Ferré, and N. J. Livingston. 2004. The effect of salinity on the accuracy and uncertainly of water content measurement. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, M. T., and D. F. Zoldoske. 2008. Achieving high efficiency in water application via overhead sprinkler irrigation. In Water quality and quantity issues for turf grasses in urban landscapes, ed. J. B. Beard, and M. P. Kenna, 223–42. Ames, IA: CAST Spec. Publ. 27. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kaboosi, K. 2014. The investigation of hysteresis and soil compaction on calibration curve of gypsum block. Russian Agricultural Sciences 40 (5):357–60. doi:10.3103/S1068367414050127.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleners, T. J., R. W. O. Soppe, D. A. Robinson, M. G. Schaap, J. E. Ayars, and T. H. Skaggs. 2004. Calibration of capacitance probe sensors using electric circuit theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:430–39. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.4300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leib, B. G., M. Hattendorf, T. Elliott, and G. Mattews. 2002. Adoption and adaptation of scientific irrigation scheduling: Trends from Washington, USA as of 1998. Agricultural Water Management 55:105–20. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00191-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinauer, B., and R. Green. 2011. Water management technologies. In Turf grass Water Conservation, ed. S. T. Cockerham, and B. Leinauer, 101–12. Publ. 3523. Davis, CA: University of California Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, P. 2009. A review of soil moisture sensors. Florinet Floriculture Newsletter − Moisture Sensors 2005, 12. http://floriculture.osu.edu/archive/apr05/Sensors.html ( accessed September 25, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mazaheri, N. T., N. Katbeh-Bader, S. R. Evett, J. E. Ayars, and T. J. Trout. 2008. Field calibration accuracy and utility of four down-hole water content sensors. Vadose Zone Journal 7 (3):992–1000. doi:10.2136/vzj2008.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikravesh, E., H. Moazed, S. Broomandnasab, and A. A. Naseri. 2013. Effect of irrigation water salinity with constant turbidity on soil moisture characteristic curve. Journal of Water and Soil 27 (4) :763-768 (in Persian). Sept.-Oct. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Qualls, R. J., J. M. Scott, and W. B. DeOreo. 2001. Soil moisture sensors for urban landscape irrigation: Effectiveness and reliability. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:547–59. doi:10.1111/j.1752-688.2001.tb05492.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, J. D., N. A. Manteghi, P. J. Shouse, and W. J. Alves. 1989. Soil electrical conductivity and salinity: New formulations and calibrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53:433–39. doi:10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300020020x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M. S. 1993. Field calibration and monitoring of soil-water content with fiberglass electrical resistance sensors. Soil Science Society American Journal 57:1432–36. doi:10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700060006x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M. S., and M. D. Murdock. 2001. Response of new soil water sensor to variable soil, water content, and temperature. Soil Science Society American Journal 65:28–34. doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.65128x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheinberg, I., E. Bresler, and Y. Klausner. 1971. Studies on Na/Ca montmorillonite systems. I. The swelling pressure. Soil Science 111:214–19. doi:10.1097/00010694-197104000-00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shock, C. C. 2003. Soil water potential measurement by granular matrix sensors. In Encyclopedia of water science, eds. B. A. Stewart, and T. A. Howell, 899–903. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shock, C. C., E. B. G. Feibert, and L. D. Saunders. 2002. Plant population and nitrogen fertilization for subsurface drip-irrigated onions. In Special Report 1038, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Shock, C. C., K. Kimberling, A. Tschida, K. Nelson, L. Jensen, and C. A. Shock. 2003. Soil moisture based irrigation scheduling to improve crops and the environment. In Special Report 1048, 227–34. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station. http://www.cropinfo.net/AnnualReports/2002/Hansen2002.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Spaans, E. J. A., and J. M. Baker. 1992. Calibra S.J. tion of watermark soil moisture sensors for soil matric potential and temperature. Plant and Soil 143:213–17. doi:10.1007/BF00007875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z. J., G. D. Young, R. McFarlane, and B. M. Chambers. 2000. The effect of soil electrical conductivity on moisture determination using time domain- reflectometry in sandy soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 80 (1):13–22. doi:10.4141/S98-089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, B. M., and C. P. Maule. 1998. Temperature calibration of a resistive soil moisture sensor. In Proceedings of 1993 International Winter Meeting sponsored by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago, IL, USA, December 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• White, I., J. H. Knight, S. J. Zegelin, and G. C. Topp. 1994. Comments on ‘Consideration on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content’ by W.R. Whaley. European Journal of Soil Science 45:503–08. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00536.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I., and S. J. Zegelin. 1995. Electric and dielectric methods for monitoring soil-water content. In Handbook of Vadose Zone characterization and monitoring, ed. L. G. Wilson, L. G. Everett, and S. J. Cullen, 343–85. Ann Arbor: Lewis.
   Google Scholar