Effects of Seed Microbial Inoculant on Growth, Yield, and Nutrition of Durum Wheat (Triticum Durum L.)

References

• Accinelli, C., H. K. Abbas, and W. T. Shier. 2018. A bioplastic-based seed coating improves seedling growth and reduces production of coated seed dust. Journal of Crop Improvement 32 (3):318–30. doi:10.1080/15427528.2018.1425792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakmakcı, R., M. F. Dönmez, and Ü. Erdoğan. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties and bacterial counts. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Form 31:189–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colla, G., Y. Rouphael, P. Bonini, and M. Cardarelli. 2015. Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, nutrient uptake, yield and grain quality of winter wheat. International Journal of Plant Productivity 9:171–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsanfar, S., and S. A. Modarres-Sanavy. 2005. Crop protection by seed coating. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 70 (3):225–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erdemci, İ., H. Aktas, and A. Eren. 2019. Quantitative and qualitative response of wheat to Pseudomonas fluorescens rhizobacteria application. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 29(2):476–82. 1018-7081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, B. R. 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica (2012:1–15. doi:10.6064/2012/963401.
   Google Scholar
• Hardoim, P. R., L. S. Van Overbeek, G. Berg, A. M. Pirttilä, S. Compant, A. Campisano, M. Döring, A. Sessitsch. 2015. The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 79 (3):293–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, E., D. Mazaheri, M. R. Chaichi, and K. Khavazi. 2007. Efficiency of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and phosphorus chemical fertilizer on yield and yield components of barley cultivar Karoon Dar Kavir. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 77:111–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hurek, T., B. Reinhold-Hurek, M. Van Montagu, and E. Kellenberger. 1994. Root colonization and systemic spreading of Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in grasses. Journal of Bacteriology 176 (7):1913–23. doi:10.1128/JB.176.7.1913-1923.1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IACC. 1980. Method for the Determination of the Vitreousness of Durum Wheat. International Association of Cereal Chemistry ICC Standard No: 129.
   Google Scholar
• Jetiyanon, K., S. Wittaya-Areekul, and P. Plianbangchang. 2008. Film coating of seeds with bacillus cereus RS87 spores for early plant growth enhancement. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 54 (10):861–67. doi:10.1139/W08-079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacar, B. 1972. Bitki ve Topragın Kimyasal analizi. II. Bitki Analizi, 646. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Basımevi.
   Google Scholar
• Malusá, E., L. Sas-Paszt, and J. Ciesielska. 2012. Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. Journal 2012:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem, S. M., M. Ahmad, Z. A. Zahir, A. Javaid, and M. Ashraf. 2014. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnology Advances 32 (2):429–48. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezarat, S., and A. Gholami. 2009. Screening plant growth promating rhizobacteria for improving seed germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 12 (1):26–32. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2009.26.32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Callaghan, M. 2016. Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: Issues and opportunities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 100 (13):5729–46. doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7590-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, I., Y. Ma, M. Vosátka, H. Freitas, and R. S. Oliveira. 2019. Growth and nutrition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) under water deficit as influenced by microbial inoculation via seed coating. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205 (5):447–59. doi:10.1111/jac.12335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouphael, Y., G. Colla, G. Graziani, A. Ritieni, M. Cardarelli, and S. De Pascale. 2017. Phenolic composition, antioxidant activity and mineral profile in two seed-propagated artichoke cultivars as affected by microbial inoculants and planting time. Chemisty 234:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaharoona, B., G. M. Jamro, Z. A. Zahir, M. Arshad, and K. S. Memon. 2007. Effectiveness of various Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderia caryophylli containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17 (8):1300–07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., D. Shankhdhar, and S. C. Shankhdhar. 2013. Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Plant, Soil and Environment 59 (2):89–94. doi:10.17221/683/2012-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuik. 2017. Accessed January 01, 2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTabloArama.do
   Google Scholar
• Turan, M., M. Gulluce, G. Agar, and F. Sahin. 2010. Evaluation of PGPR strains on wheat yield and quality parameters. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane, Australia, 1 – 6 August 2010. Pp: 140–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vaid, S. K., B. K. Gangwar, A. Sharma, P. C. Srivastava, and M. V. Singh. 2013. Effect of zinc solubilizing bio inoculants on zinc nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Italian Journal of Advance Research 1 (9):805–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W. 2002. Singular value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi environment trial data. Agronomy Journal 94 (5):990–96. 1435-0645. doi:10.2134/agronj2002.0990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi, A., and A. Barzegar. 2014. Effect of azotobacter and pseudomonas bacteria inoculation on wheat yield under field condition. Intl Journal of Agricultural Crop Science 7 (9):616–19.
   Google Scholar