128
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Soil Chemistry following Single-Entry, Dormant Season Prescribed Fires in the Ridge and Valley Province of Virginia, USA

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 2065-2073 | Received 06 Jan 2021, Accepted 16 Mar 2021, Published online: 05 Apr 2021

References

  • Alcañiz, M., L. Outeiro, M. Francos, and X. Úbeda. 2018. Effects of prescribed fires on soil properties: A review. Science of the Total Environment 613:944–57. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.144.
  • Bixby, R. J., S. D. Cooper, R. E. Gresswell, L. E. Brown, D. N. Clifford, and K. A. Dwire. 2015. Fire effects on aquatic ecosystems: An assessment of the current state of the science. Freshwater Science 34 (4):1340–50. doi:10.1086/684073.
  • Bladon, K. D., M. B. Emelko, U. Silins, and M. Stone. 2014. Wildfire and the future of water supply. Environmental Science & Technology 48 (16):8936–43. doi:10.1021/es500130g.
  • Boerner, R. E., T. A. Coates, D. A. Yaussy, and T. A. Waldrop. 2008. Assessing ecosystem restoration alternatives in Eastern deciduous forests: The view from belowground. Restoration Ecology 16 (3):425–34.
  • Boss, C., and K. J. Fredeen. 2004. Concepts, instrumentation and techniques in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Perkin Elmer Corp. doi:10.1201/9780849390395-6.
  • Butnor, J. R., K. H. Johnsen, C. A. Maier, and C. D. Nelson. 2020. Intra-annual variation in soil C, N and nutrients pools after prescribed fire in a Mississippi longleaf pine (Pinus palustris mill.) plantation. Forests 11 (2):181. doi:10.3390/f11020181.
  • Carter, M. C., and C. D. Foster. 2004. Prescribed burning and productivity in southern pine forests: A review. Forest Ecology and Management 191 (1–3):93–109. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.006.
  • Certini, G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia 143 (1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8.
  • Coates, T. A., A. T. Chow, D. L. Hagan, G. G. Wang, J. W. C. Bridges, and J. H. Dozier. 2017. Frequent prescribed fire as a long-term practice in longleaf pine forests does not affect detrital chemical composition. Journal of Environmental Quality 46 (5):1020–1027. doi:10.2134/jeq2017.03.0112.
  • Coates, T. A., D. L. Hagan, W. M. Aust, A. Johnson, J. C. Keen, A. T. Chow, and J. H. Dozier. 2018. Mineral soil chemical properties as influenced by long-term use of prescribed fire with differing frequencies in a southeastern coastal plain pine forest. Forests 9 (12):739. doi:10.3390/f9120739.
  • Coates, T. A., A. Johnson, W. M. Aust, D. L. Hagan, A. T. Chow, and C. Trettin. 2020. Forest composition, fuel loading, and soil chemistry resulting from 50 years of forest management and natural disturbance in two southeastern Coastal Plain watersheds, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 473:118337. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118337.
  • Coates, T. A., V. B. Shelburne, T. A. Waldrop, B. R. Smith, H. S. Hill Jr., and D. M. Simon. 2010. Forest soil response to fuel reduction treatments in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. In Proceedings of the 14th biennial southern silvicultural research conference, ed. J. A. Stanturf, 283–87. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–121 https://www.srs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs121/gtr_srs121_283.pdf.
  • Dukes, C. J., T. A. Coates, D. L. Hagan, W. M. Aust, T. A. Waldrop, and D. M. Simon. 2020. Long-term effects of repeated prescribed fire and fire surrogate treatments on forest soil chemistry in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (USA). Fire 3 (2):20. doi:10.3390/fire3020020.
  • Elliott, K. J., J. D. Knoepp, J. M. Vose, and W. A. Jackson. 2013. Interacting effects of wildfire severity and liming on nutrient cycling in a southern Appalachian wilderness area. Plant and Soil 366 (1–2):165–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42952375.
  • Fairchilds, L. H., and C. Trettin (2006). History and legacy of fire effects in the South Carolina piedmont and coastal regions (Vol. 98). USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs098.pdf.
  • Field, J. P., K. W. Farrish, and E. A. Carter. 2000. Soil and nutrient losses following site preparation burning in a harvested loblolly pine site. Transactions of the ASAE 46 (6):1697. doi:10.13031/2013.15618.
  • Grier, C. C., K. M. Lee, N. M. Nadkarni, G. O. Klok, and P. J. Edgerton. 1989. Productivity of forests of the United States and its relation to soil and site factors and management practices: A review, 51. Portland, Oregon: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-222. doi:10.2737/pnw-gtr-222.
  • Knoepp, J. D., K. J. Elliott, B. D. Clinton, and J. M. Vose. 2009. Effects of prescribed fire in mixed oak forests of the southern Appalachians: Forest floor, soil, and soil solution nitrogen responses. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 136 (3):380–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27751815.
  • Knoepp, J. D., and W. T. Swank. 1993. Site preparation burning to improve Southern Appalachian pine-hardwood stands: Nitrogen responses in soil, soil water, and streams. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23 (10):2263–70. https://www.srs.fs.fed.us/pubs/ja/ja_cjf004.pdf.
  • Knoepp, J. D., J. M. Vose, and W. T. Swank. 2004. Long-term soil responses to site preparation burning in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 50 (4):540–50. https://www.srs.fs.fed.us/pubs/ja/ja_knoepp003.pdf.
  • Kutiel, P., and A. Shaviv. 1992. Effects of soil type, plant composition and leaching on soil nutrients following a simulated forest fire. Forest Ecology and Management 53 (1–4):329–43. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(92)90051-A.
  • Mataix-Solera, J., A. Cerdà, V. Arcenegui, A. Jordán, and L. M. Zavala. 2011. Fire effects on soil aggregation: A review. Earth-Science Reviews 109 (1–2):44–60. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.08.002.
  • McKee, W. H., (1982). Changes in soil fertility following prescribed burning on coastal plain pine sites. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, USA. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/rp/rp_se234.pdf.
  • McLean, E. O. 1982. Chemical and microbiological properties. Methods of Soil Analysis 2:199–224. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12.
  • Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15 (12):1409–16. doi:10.1080/00103628409367568.
  • Neary, D. G., G. G. Ice, and C. R. Jackson. 2009. Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity. Forest Ecology and Management 258 (10):2269–81. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.027.
  • Neary, D. G., K. C. Ryan, and L. F. DeBano. 2005. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on soils and water. Vol. 4: 250. Ogden, UT:: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42 https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr042_4.pdf
  • Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods 5:961–1010. doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34.
  • Pellegrini, A. F., A. Ahlström, S. E. Hobbie, P. B. Reich, L. P. Nieradzik, A. C. Staver, and R. B. Jackson. 2018. Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity. Nature 553 (7687):194–98. doi:10.1038/nature24668.
  • Powers, R. F., D. A. Scott, F. G. Sanchez, R. A. Voldseth, D. Page-Dumroese, J. D. Elioff, and D. M. Stone. 2005. The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: Findings from the first decade of research. Forest Ecology and Management 220 (1–3):31–50. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.003.
  • Rau, B. M., J. C. Chambers, R. R. Blank, and D. W. Johnson. 2008. Prescribed fire, soil, and plants: Burn effects and interactions in the central Great Basin. Rangeland Ecology & Management 61 (2):169–81. doi:10.2111/07-037.1.
  • Rhoades, C. C., J. P. Nunes, U. Silins, and S. H. Doerr. 2019. The influence of wildfire on water quality and watershed processes: New insights and remaining challenges. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28 (10):721–25. doi:10.1071/WFv28n10_FO.
  • Schoch, P., and D. Binkley. 1986. Prescribed burning increased nitrogen availability in a mature loblolly pine stand. Forest Ecology and Management 14 (1):13–22. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(86)90049-6.
  • Schoenholtz, S. H., H. Van Miegroet, and J. A. Burger. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: Challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 138 (1–3):335–56. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00423-0.
  • Stewart, G., and P. J. Edwards. 2006. Concepts about forests and water. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 23 (1):11–19. https://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtown_square/publications/other_publishers/OCR/ne_2006_stuart001.pdf.
  • Taylor, Q. A., and M. G. Midgley. 2018. Prescription side effects: Long-term, high-frequency controlled burning enhances nitrogen availability in an Illinois oak-dominated forest. Forest Ecology and Management 411:82–89. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.041.
  • Thompson, E. G., T. A. Coates, W. M. Aust, T. V. Gundy, and A. Melissa. 2019. Wildfire and prescribed fire effects on Forest Floor properties and erosion potential in the central Appalachian region, USA. Forests 10 (6):493. doi:10.3390/f10060493.
  • Voldseth, R., B. Palik, and J. Elioff (2011). Ten-year results from the long-term soil productivity study in aspen ecosystems of the northern Great Lakes region.Research Paper, NRS-17, Newtown Square, PA, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 20. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/rp/rp_nrs17.pdf.
  • Waldrop, T. A., and S. L. Goodrick (2012). Introduction to prescribed fire in southern ecosystems. Science Update SRS-054. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/su/su_srs054.pdf.
  • Waldrop, T. A., D. A. Yaussy, R. E. Boerner, C. H. Greenberg, and D. M. Simon. 2013. Fuel-reduction treatments for restoration in eastern hardwoods: Impacts on multiple ecosystem components. In Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen, ed. J. M. Guldin, 367–75. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175 https://www.srs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs175.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.