Integrated Nutrient Management in Maize-Cowpea Intercropping System Is an Attractive Option to Improve the Fodder Productivity and Quality

References

• Ahmad, A. A., T. J. Radovich, and N. V. Hue. 2015. Effect of intercropping three legume species on growth and yield of sweet corn (Zea mays) in Hawaii. Journal of Crop Improvement 29 (3):370–78. doi:10.1080/15427528.2015.1041666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis,18th Edn., 684 pp. Gaithersburg, Md.: AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K. L., K. A. Albrecht, J. G. Lauer, and H. Riday. 2008. Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage. Crop Science 48:371–79. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, K. K., A. K. Misra, P. K. Ghosh, and K. M. Hati. 2010. effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean. Soil and Tillage Research 110 (1):115–25. doi:10.1016/j.still.2010.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal, A., G. D. Sharma, N. Kumar, N. K. Sankhyan, R. Katoch, M. C. Rana, and R. S. Chandel. 2020. Impact of different nutrient sources on forage yield, nutritive value and economics of sorghum Sudan grass hybrid-oat cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44 (9):1223–40. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1866603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmardeh, M., A. Ghanbari, B. Syasar, and M. Ramroudi. 2009. Effect of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) with cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on green forage yield and quality evaluation. Asian Journal of Plant Science 8:235–39. doi:10.3923/ajps.2009.235.239.
   Google Scholar
• Diacono, M., and F. Montemurro. 2010. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30:401–22. doi:10.1051/agro/2009040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J. A., R. DeFries, G. P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin, M. T. Coe, G. C. Daily, H. K. Gibbs, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–74. doi:10.1126/science.1111772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. K., A. K. Tripathi, K. K. Bandyopadhyay, and M. C. Manna. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy 31 (1):43–50. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godara, A. S., U. S. Gupta, and R. Singh. 2012. Effect of integrated nutrient management on herbage, dry fodder yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Research 38 (1):59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, M., S. Bhagat, S. Kumar, S. Kour, and V. Gupta. 2019. Production potential and quality of fodder maize (Zea mays) varieties under varying intercropping systems with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Range Management and Agroforestry 40 (2):243–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htet, M. N., N. S. Soomro, and H. Jiang Bo. 2016. Effect of Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) on green forage yield and quality evaluation. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 9 (12):59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M., M. Ayub, A. Tanveer, and M. Yaseen. 2012. Forage quality of maize and legumes as monocultures and mixtures at different seed ratios. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 22:987–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra, V. P., and P. K. Sharma. 2015. Quality of fodder maize in relation to farmyard manure and nitrogen levels. Forage Research 41 (1):63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, B., U. S. Tiwana, A. Singh, and H. Ram. 2014. Productivity and quality of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.)+cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] fodder as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Range Management and Agroforestry 35 (2):263–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., M. Singh, B. S. Meena, H. Ram, C. M. Parihar, S. Kumar, M. R. Yadav, R. K. Meena, U. Kumar, and V. K. Meena. 2017. Zinc management effects on quality and nutrient yield of fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87 (8):1013–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., M. Singh, S. Kumar, R. K. Meena, and R. Kumar. 2021a. Fodder quality and nitrate estimation of oats grown under different nutrient management options. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 74 (4):331–37. doi:10.33785/IJDS.2021.v74i04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., M. Singh, M. Kushwaha, G. Makarana, and M. R. Yadav. 2021b. Integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources influences the nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiencies of fodder oats (Avena sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy 66 (4):466–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., M. Singh, S. Kumar, R. K. Meena, M. R. Yadav, G. Makarana, M. Kushwaha, S. Dutta, R. Kumar, and S. Rajesh. 2022. Productivity and quality enhancement in fodder maize (Zea mays) cultivars through nutrient management strategies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92 (1):126–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., F. Zhang, X. Li, P. Christie, J. Sun, S. Yang, and C. Tang. 2003. Interspecific facilitation of nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and faba bean. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65:61–71. doi:10.1023/A:1021885032241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H., P. Ambus, and E. S. Jensen. 2003. The comparison of nitrogen uses and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65:289–300. doi:10.1023/A:1022612528161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle. 7th revised ed. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parihar, C. M., M. R. Yadav, S. L. Jat, A. K. Singh, B. Kumar, S. Pradhan, D. Chakraborty, M. L. Jat, R. K. Jat, Y. S. Saharawat, et al. 2016. Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research 161:116–28. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, P., V. Satyanarayana, V. Murthy, and K. J. Boote. 2002. Maximizing yields in rice–groundnut cropping sequence through integrated nutrient management. Field Crops Research 75:9–21. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00214-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, R., Y. S. Shivay, D. Kumar, and S. N. Sharma. 2006. Learning by doing exercises in soil fertility (A practical manual for soil fertility). Division of Agronomy, IARI. New Delhi: 68.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, R., V. Mishra, B. Majumdar, K. Laxminarayana, and P. Ghosh. 2010. Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and crop productivity under a maize (Zea mays)–mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping sequence in acidic soils of Northeast India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 41 (18):2187–200. doi:10.1080/00103624.2010.504799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M. K., R. N. Singh, S. P. Singh, M. K. Yadav, and V. K. Singh. 2010. Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of baby corn (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy 55 (2):100–04.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., D. K. Benbi, and G. Verma. 2021. Nutrient management impacts on nutrient use efficiency and energy, carbon, and net ecosystem economic budget of a rice–wheat cropping system in Northwestern India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21 (1):559–77. doi:10.1007/s42729-020-00383-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, M. R., C. M. Parihar, S. L. Jat, A. K. Singh, D. Kumar, V. Pooniya, M. D. Parihar, D. Saveipune, H. Parmar, and M. L. Jat. 2016. Effect of long-term tillage and diversified crop rotations on nutrient uptake, profitability and energetics of maize (Zea mays) in north-western India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86 (6):743–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Z. Cui, X. Chen, X. Ju, J. Shen, Q. Chen, X. Liu, W. Zhang, G. Mi, M. Fan, et al. 2012. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Advances in Agronomy 116:1–40. doi:10.1080/00103624.2010.504799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar