Comparison of Low-Cost Methods for Soil Water Holding Capacity

References

• Basso, A. S., F. E. Miguez, D. A. Laird, R. Horton, and M. Westgate. 2013. Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water‐holding capacity of sandy soils. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 5 (2):132–43. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12026.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtold, M., U. Dettmann, L. Wöhl, W. Durner, A. Piayda, and B. Tiemeyer. 2018. Comparing methods for measuring water retention of peat near permanent wilting point. Soil Science Society of America Journal 82:601–05. doi:10.15488/3849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, J.M. 1963. Forest floor moisture capacity of the new jersey pine barrens. Ecology 44 (3):574–76. doi:10.2307/1932538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadha, J. H., J. M. Capasso, R. Khatiwada, S. Swanson, and C. LaBorde. 2017. Raising soil organic matter content to improve water holding capacity. UF/IFAS 24:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bordoloi, R., B. Das, G. Yam, P. K. Pandey, and O. P. Tripathi. 2019. Modeling of water holding capacity using readily available soil characteristics. Agricultural Research 8 (3):47–55. doi:10.1007/s40003-018-0376-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, D., K. K. Bandyopathyay, and S. Pradhan (Eds.). 2015. Soil-Plant-Water relations under conservation tillage practices for sustainable agriculture. In Compendium, TB-ICN:142/2015, division of agricultural physics, 1–102. New Delhi-110012, India: ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, H. P., T. W. Green, and N. J. McKenzie. 2008. The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal J J 72 (1):41–49. doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C., T. Hernandez, and F. Costa. 1994. Microbial activity in soils under mediterranean environmental conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 26 (9):1185–91. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(94)90142-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., A. K. Singh, S. Kumar, M. C. Manna, P. Jha, R. Bhattacharyya, M. S. Sannagoudar, R. Singh, S. K. Chaudhari, and R. V. Kumar. 2021. Do moisture conservation practices influence stability of soil organic carbon and structure? Catena 199:105127. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.105127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindasamy, P., J. Mowrer, N. Rajan, T. Provin, F. Hons, and M. Bagavathiannan. 2021. Influence of long-term (36 years) tillage practices on soil physical properties in a grain sorghum experiment in Southeast Texas. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 67 (2):234–44. doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1720914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, B. A., and H. Raczkowski. 1921. The relation between the clay content and certain physical properties of a soil. The Journal of Agricultural Science 11 (4):441–49. doi:10.1017/S0021859600004469.
   Google Scholar
• Krull, E. S., J. O. Skjemstad, and J. A. Baldock. 2004. Functions of soil organic matter and the effect on soil properties. Canberra, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting.
   Google Scholar
• Lekshmi, S. S. U., D. N. Singh, and M. S. Baghini. 2014. A critical review of soil moisture measurement. Measurement 54:92–105. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letey, J. 1985. Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Advances in Soil Science 1:277–94. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5046-3_8.
   Google Scholar
• Little, K. M., B. Metelerkamp, and C. W. Smith. 1998. A comparison of three methods of soil water content determination. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 15 (2):80–89. doi:10.1080/02571862.1998.10635121.
   Google Scholar
• Malekian, A., E. Valizadeh, M. Dastoori, S. Samadi, and V. Bayat. 2012. Soil water retention and maize (Zea mays L.) growth as effected by different amounts of pumice. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6:450–54.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, R., J. Seeger, and H. Rupp. 1998. Lysimeter studies in East Germany concerning the influence of set aside of intensively farmed land on the seepage water quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 67 (2–3):161–73. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00115-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, W. C., J. Alves Júnior, P. C. R. Cunha, A. R. Silva, A. W. P. Evangelista, and D. Casaroli. 2015. Lixiviação de nitrato em função de lâminas de irrigação em solos argiloso e arenoso. Irriga 1 (2):47–56. doi:10.15809/irriga.2015v1n2p47.
   Google Scholar
• Motsara, M. R., and R. N. Roy. 2008. Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, W. R., D. L. Osmond, and J. L. Heitman. 2019. A response to “Reanalysis validates soil health indicator sensitivity and correlation with long‐term crop yields“. Soil Science Society of America Journal 83:1842–45. doi:10.2136/sssaj2019.06.0198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vengadaramana, A., and P. T. J. Jashothan. 2012. Effect of organic fertilizers on the water holding capacity of soil in different terrains of Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka. Journal of Natural Product and Plant Resources 2 (4):500–03.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, F. G., A. Zhuravel, F. C. Silva, A. Amaro, M. Ben-Hur, and J. J. Keizer. 2019. The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment. Geoderma 347:194–202. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viji, R., and P. R. Prasanna. 2012. Assessment of water holding capacity of major soil series of Lalgudi, Trichy, India. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 7:393–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, N., and A. Scheuermann. 2009. On the relationship between matric potential and dielectric properties of organic free soils: A sensitive study. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 46 (10):1202–15. doi:10.1139/T09-055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Y. Zhao, H. Liu, W. Xiao, and S. Chen. 2020. Evaluating the water holding capacity of multilayer soil profiles using hydrus-1D and multi-criteria decision analysis. Water 12 (3):773. doi:10.3390/w12030773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar