Shimony–Wolf states and hidden coherences in classical light

References

• E. Wolf, Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light, Cambridge University Press, 2007. An earlier partial account is given in Phys. Lett. A 312 (2003), p. 263.
   Google Scholar
• E. Wolf, A macroscopic theory of interference and diffraction of light from finite sources -- II. Fields with a spectral range of arbitrary width, Proc. R. Soc. A 230 (1955), p. 246.
   Google Scholar
• E. Wolf, Reciprocity inequalities, coherence time and bandwidth in signal analysis and optics, Proc. Phys. Soc. 71 (1958), p. 257.
   Google Scholar
• E. Wolf, Coherence properties of partially polarized electromagnetic radiation, Nuovo Cimento 13 (1959), p. 165.
   Google Scholar
• The formulation we have followed is closely modeled on M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, Chapter 10, 7th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, especially Section. 10.3.
   Google Scholar
• A complete orthonormal set of time functions directly determined by the random process itself can be obtained as eigenfunctions of the integral equation in which the kernel is the random signal’s autocorrelation function M.Kac and J.F.Siegert, An explicit representation of a stationary gaussian process, Ann. Math. Stat. 18 (1947), pp. 438–442 L.Mandel and E.Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Chapter 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• For example, see C. Brosseau, Fundamentals of Polarized Light: A Statistical Optics Approach, Wiley, New York, 1998. E.Wolf, Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Glauber, selected lectures with reprints in Quantum Optics and Electronics, C. DeWitt, ed., Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965. pp. ix--621.
   Google Scholar
• L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Chapters 10--14, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• An important exception is found in the detailed analysis of multiple state sectors, in connection with experiments in the space-polarization domain: K.H. Kagalwala, G. DiGiuseppe, A.F. Abouraddy, and B.E.A Saleh, Bell’s measure in classical optical coherence, Nat. Photonics. 7 (2013), p. 72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• For example, see an analog Poincaré sphere representation for (t;r) off-diagonal ‘polarization’ in X.-F. Qian, et al, Transverse mode ‘polarization’ in optical beams, in Quantum Electronics I, Frontiers in Optics Conference, San Jose, CA, October 20, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A. Shimony, Contextual hidden variables theories and Bell’s inequalities, Br. J. Philos. Sci.. 35 (1984), pp. 25–45. See also A. Shimony, Bell’s theorem, in Stanford Encycl. of Philosophy, 2009. Available at http:/plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969), p. 880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Clauser and A. Shimony, Bell’s theorem -- experimental tests and implications, Rep. Prog. Phys.. 41 (1978), pp. 1881–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics 1 (1964), pp. 195; J.S. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38 (1966), pp. 447–452.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, See Essays 4, 7, 16, and 24.
   Google Scholar
• E. Schr\"{o}dinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31 (1935), pp. 555. His reference to the classic mathematical physics text by Courant and Hilbert is key: Methoden der mathematischen Physik, 2nd ed., p. 134.
   Google Scholar
• R.J.C. Spreeuw, A classical analogy of entanglement, Found. Phys. 28 (1998), pp. 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Ghose and M.K.Samal, EPR type nonlocality in classical electrodynamics, (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0111119.
   Google Scholar
• K.F. Lee and J.E. Thomas, Entanglement with classical fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), p. 097902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.F. Lee, Observation of bipartite correlations using coherent light for optical communication, Opt. Lett. 34 (2009), p. 1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.V.S. Borges, M. Hor-Meyll, J.A.O. Huguenin, and A.Z. Khoury, Bell-like Inequality for the spin-orbit separability of a laser beam, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010), p. 033833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Goldin, D. Francisco, and S. Ledesma, Simulating Bell inequality violations with classical optics encoded qubits, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27 (2010), p. 779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.N. Simon, S. Simon, F. Gori, M. Santarsiero, R. Borghi, N. Mukunda, and R. Simon, Nonquantum entanglement resolves a basic issue in polarization optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010), pp. 023901. See also M. Sanjay Kumarand R. Simon Characterization of Mueller matrices in polarization optics, Opt. Commun. 88 (1992), pp. 464 and A. Aiello and J.P. Woerdman, Role of spatial coherence in polarization tomography, Opt. Lett. 30 (2005), p. 1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gabriel, et al., Entangling different degrees of freedom by quadrature squeezing cylindrically polarized modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011), p. 060502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.F. Qian and J.H. Eberly, Entanglement and classical polarization states, Opt. Lett. 36 (2011), p. 4110. See also T. Set\"{a}l\"{a} , A. Shevchenko , andA. Friberg, Degree of polarization for optical near fields Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002), pp. 016615, and J. Ellis and A. Dogariu, Optical polarimetry of random fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005), p. 203905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gabriel, A. Aiello, S. Berg-Johansen, et al., Tools for detecting entanglement between different degrees of freedom in quadrature squeezed cylindrically polarized modes, Eur. Phys. J. D 66 (2012), p. 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.H. Kagalwala, G. DiGiuseppe, A.F. Abouraddy, and B.E.A. Saleh, Bell’s measure in classical optical coherence, Nat. Photonics 7 (2013), p. 72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Töppel, A. Aiello, C. Marquardt, E. Giacobino, and G. Leuchs, Classical entanglement in polarization metrology, New J. Phys. 16 (2014), p. 073019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Aiello et al, Quantum-like nonseparable structures in optical beams, New J. Phys. 17 (2015), pp. 043024. See also Annemarie Holleczek, et al. Poincaré sphere representation for classical inseparable Bell-like states of the electromagnetic field, (2010), arXiv:1007.2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi Fan Sun, Xinbing Song, Hongwei Qin, et al., Non-local classical optical correlation and implementing analogy of quantum teleportation, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015), p. 9175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.F. Qian, Bethany Little, J.C. Howell, and J.H. Eberly, Shifting the quantum-classical boundary: theory and experiment for statistically classical optical fields, Optica 2 (2015), p. 611.
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Hashemi, M. Mirhosseini, O.S. Magaa, et al., Teleportation via classical entanglement, (2015). arXiv:1504.00697.
   Google Scholar
• S.Berg-Johansen et al., Classically entangled optical beams for high-speed kinematic sensing, (2015), arXiv:1504.00697.
   Google Scholar
• B. Stoklasa, L. Motka, and J. Rehacek et al, Experimental violation of a Bell-like inequality with optical vortex beams, (2015), arXiv:1505.06103.
   Google Scholar
• A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935), p. 777.
   Google Scholar
• The original paper is: E. Schmidt, Zur Theorie der linearen und nichtlinearen Integralgleichungen. 1. Entwicklung willküriger Funktionen nach Systeme vorgeschriebener, Math. Ann. 63 (1907), p. 433. See, for example, A. Ekert and P.L. Knight, Entangled quantum-systems and the Schmidt decomposition, Am. J. Phys. 63 (1995), p. 415. The Schmidt theorem is the analytic function analog of the singular-value decomposition theorem for matrices. For background, see M.V. Fedorov and N.I. Miklin, Schmidt modes and entanglement, Contem. Phys. 55 (2014), p. 94.
   Google Scholar
• N. Gisin, Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states, Phys. Lett. A 154 (1991), p. 201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Freedman and J.F. Clauser, Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972), p. 938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982), p. 91. and A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982), p. 1804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.S. Fry and R.C. Thompson, Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976), pp. 465–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Violation of Bell’s inequality and classical probability in a 2-photon correlation experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), p. 50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-H. Shih and C.O. Alley, New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), p. 2921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.H.Zurek, in response to a pre-publication description of [29] in the Academia Leopldina Workshop Quantum technologies, München, May 9--10, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• F. De Zela, Relationship between the degree of polarization, indistinguishability, and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014), p. 013845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Greenberger and A. Yasin, Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer, Phys. Lett. A 128 (1988), p. 391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mandel, Coherence and indistinguishability, Opt. Lett. 16 (1991), p. 1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Jaeger, M.A. Horne, and A. Shimony, Complementarity of One-particle and Two-particle Interference, Phys. Rev. A 48 (1993), pp. 1023–1027.
   Google Scholar
• G. Jaeger, A. Shimony, and L. Vaidman, Two interferometric complementarities, Phys. Rev. A 51 (1995), pp. 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• B.-G. Englert, Fringe visibility and which-way information: an inequality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), p. 2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lahiri, Wave-particle duality and polarization properties of light in single-photon interference experiments, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011), p. 045803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See A. Al-Qasimi, et al., for a study of the role of two-sector mixed-state entanglement following a higher-sector tracing (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• See X.-F. Qian, M.A. Alonso, and J.H. Eberly, Entanglement constraints in multi-qubit systems, in Quantum Electronics I, Frontiers in Optics Conference, San Jose, CA, October 20, 2015.
   Google Scholar