Precision metrology: from bulk optics towards metasurface optics

References

• Jiang X, Shore P, McKeown PA, et al. Ultra-precision engineering: from physics to manufacturing. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2012;370(1973):3831–3834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown PA. The role of precision engineering in manufacturing of the future CIRP. Ann Manuf Technol. 1987;36(2):495–501.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis JD, Haitjema H, Jiang X, et al. Adv Opt Metrol Instrum. 2020;37(9):OMI1–OMI2.
   Google Scholar
• Groot Pd. A review of selected topics in interferometric optical metrology. Rep Prog Phys. 2019;82:056101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Kim SW, Bosse H, et al. Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Ann. 2015;64(2):773–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocken RJ, Chakraborty N, Brown C. Optical metrology of surfaces. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol. 2005;54(2):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagüe-Fabra JA, Gao W, Archenti A, et al. Scalability of precision design principles for machines and instruments. CIRP Ann. 2021;70(2):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning K. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission: a Clean Planet for all - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. (November 2018), Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Net Zero Review. Interim report. London: HM Treasury; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gao W, Haitjema H, Fang FZ, et al. On-machine and in-process surface metrology for precision manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2019;68(2):843–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X. Precision surface measurement. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2012;370:4089–4114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osten W. (2013). Optical metrology: from the laboratory to the real world. In Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging (pp. JW2B-4). Optical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Majstorovic VD, Durakbasa N, Takaya Y, et al. Advanced manufacturing metrology in context of industry 4.0 model. In V Majstorovic, N Durakbasa (eds.), International Conference on Measurement and Quality Control-Cyber Physical Issue. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• National Metrology Strategy. Available from: http://fmh.hud.ac.uk/engagement/.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu Y, Chen LC, Kim DW, et al. An insight into optical metrology in manufacturing. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32(4):042003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born M, Wolf E, Bhatia A, et al. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (7th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Evans CJ. Interferometry, The International academy for production engineering (eds) CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Millerd JE, Brock NJ, Hayes JB, et al. (2004). Pixelated phase-mask dynamic interferometer, Proc. SPIE: (Vol. 5531), Interferometry XII: Techniques and Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbrough B. In-line roll-to-roll metrology for flexible electronics. Proc. SPIE 9576, Applied Advanced Optical Metrology Solutions, 2015. 957603
   Google Scholar
• Novak E. Advanced defect and metrology solutions. Proc. SPIE 9110, Dimensional Optical Metrology and Inspection for Practical Applications III, 2014. 91100G.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Wang K, Gao F, et al. Fast surface measurement using wavelength scanning interferometry with compensation of environmental noise. Appl Opt. 2010;49(15):2903–2909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhamedsalih H, Jiang X, Gao F. Accelerated surface measurement using wavelength scanning interferometer with compensation of environmental noise. Procedia CIRP. 2013;10:70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gao F, Muhamedsalih H, Jiang X. Surface and thickness measurement of a transparent film using wavelength scanning interferometry. Opt Express. 2012;20(19):21450–21456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARINNA. 2022. Available from: https://www.ibspe.com/measuring-systems/optical-measuring-systems.
   Google Scholar
• Elrawemi M, Blunt L, Muhamedsalih H, et al. Implementation of in process surface metrology for R2R flexible PV barrier films. Int J Autom Technol. 2015;9(3):312–321. doi:10.20965/ijat.2015.p0312.
   Google Scholar
• Guo T, Zhao G, Tang D, et al. High-accuracy simultaneous measurement of surface profile and film thickness using line-field white-light dispersive interferometer. Opt Lasers Eng. 2021;137:106388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Gao F, Jiang X. On-line surface inspection using cylindrical lens–based spectral domain low-coherence interferometry. Appl Opt. 2014;53(24):5510–5516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, PoC 1920∖35, Demonstration of a Single-shot Dispersive Profile Interferometer for fast in-process surface, Royal Academy of Engineering, London UK, May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Martin H. Interferometric apparatus and sample characteristic determining apparatus using DRI apparatus. US Patent 9,945,655, Japan Patent 6,403,682, China ZL 2013 8 0072100. 9. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Martin H, Jiang X. Dispersed reference interferometry. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2013;62(1):551–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning A, Williamson J, Martin H, et al. Improvements to dispersed reference interferometry: beyond the linear approximation. Appl Opt. 2019;58(1):131–136. doi:10.1364/AO.58.000131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European. 2020-FOF-2017: 767589 ProSurf, High Precision Process Chains for the Mass Production of Functional Structured Surfaces.
   Google Scholar
• Luo X, Zhong W, Chang W. A generic control architecture for hybrid micro-machines. Micromachines (Basel). 2018;9(6):305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin H, Kumar P, Henning A, et al. Extended sub-surface imaging in industrial OCT using ‘non-diffracting’ Bessel beams. CIRP Ann. 2020;69(1):493–496. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt JM. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 1999 Jul;5(4):1205–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Z, Ren, H, Zhao, Y, et al. High-resolution optical coherence tomography over a large depth range with an axicon lens. Opt Lett. 2002;27(4):243–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnin J. Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. I. The scalar theory. J Opt Soc Am A: Opt Image Sci Vis. 1987;4(4):651–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman MR, Török P. Computational methods in vectorial imaging. J Mod Opt. 2011 Mar 10;58(5-6):339–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards B, Wolf E. Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1959 Dec 15;253(1274):358–379.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman JW. Introduction to Fourier optics. New York: W.H. Freeman; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gu M. Principles of three dimensional imaging in confocal microscopes. Singapore: World Scientific. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard CJ, Wilson T. Image formation in scanning microscopes with partially coherent source and detector. Opt Acta: Int J Opt. 1978 Apr 1;25(4):315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin M. Inventor. Microscopy apparatus. United States patent US 3,013,467. 1961 Dec 19.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao GQ, Kino GS. A real-time confocal scanning optical microscope. Scanning Imaging Technol. 1987 Aug 3;809:107–113. SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto JG, Farkas D. Biomedical optical imaging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009 Apr 22.
   Google Scholar
• Nayar SK, Nakagawa Y. Shape from focus: an effective approach for rough surfaces. InProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1990 May 13. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Danzl R, Helmli F, Scherer S. Focus variation–a new technology for high resolution optical 3D surface metrology. In the 10th International Conference of the Slovenian Society for Non-destructive Testing; Citeseer; 2009 Sep 1. 84–491.
   Google Scholar
• Krotkov E. Focusing. Int J Comput Vision. 1988 Oct;1(3):223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermudez C, Martinez P, Cadevall C, et al. Active illumination focus variation. In Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection XI; International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2019 Jun 21 (Vol. 11056). p. 110560W.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick R, Marron, J, Moreira, R, et al. Photonic integrated circuit for absolute metrology. In Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation IV (Vol. 11451). SPIE; 2020. p. 466–475.
   Google Scholar
• Martin H, Kumar P, Jiang X. A hybrid photonics based sensor for surface measurement. CIRP Ann. 2014;63(1):549–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong XC. Advanced materials for integrated optical waveguides (Vol. 46). Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 509–543.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Martin H, Jiang X. Towards the development of a hybrid-integrated chip interferometer for online surface profile measurements. Rev Sci Instrum. 2016;87.6:065103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacara D. Optical shop testing. 3rd ed: Hoboken: Wiley; 2007, July.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg WH, Bragg WL. The reflection of X-rays by crystals. Proc R Soc Lond, Contain Pap Math Phys Character. 1913 Jul 1;88(605):428–438.
   Google Scholar
• Yablonovitch E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys Rev Lett. 1987 May 18;58(20):2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Pendry JB, Wiltshire MC. Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science. 2004 Aug 6;305(5685):788–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltshire MCK, Pendry JB, Edwards DJ, et al. "Swiss roll” metameterials-an effective medium with strongly negative permeability. IEE Seminar on Metamaterials for Microwave and (Sub) Millimetre Wave Applications: Photonic Bandgap and Double Negative Designs, Components and Experiments 2003, 2003: 13/1–13/10.
   Google Scholar
• Yu N, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat Mater. 2014 Feb;13(2):139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu N, Genevet P, Kats MA, et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science. 2011 Oct 21;334(6054):333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taflove A, Hagness SC, Piket-May M. Computational electromagnetics: the finite-difference time-domain method. Artech House, Norwood: The Electrical Engineering Handbook; 2005 Jan 1.
   Google Scholar
• Henning A, Townend D, Martin H, et al. Metasurface-based ultracompact instrumentation to support future smart manufacturing. Opt Photonics Adv Dimens Metrol II. 2022 May 20: PC12137. SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Townend D, Chan JHT, Henning AJ, et al. Towards metasurfaces for metrological applications. Presented at the 23rd International Conference on the Metrology and Properties of Surfaces 2022.
   Google Scholar