Is Fairbairn Still at Large?

REFERENCES

• Burton, E. S. (2016). Ronald Fairbairn. Web page of the Institute of Psychoanalysis. In http://psychoanalysis.org.uk/our-authors-and-theorists/ronald-fairbairn ( visited October 15, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, H. (1967). Marital tensions. Clinical studies towards a psychological theory of interaction. London: Karnac, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1929a). The relationship between dissociation and repression. Considered from the point of view of medical psychology. (Unpublished MD thesis.) Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK. First published as “Dissociation and repression.” In E. F. Birtles & D. E. Scharff (Eds.), From instinct to self: Selected papers of W. R. D. Fairbairn, volume II: Application and early contributions (pp. 13–79). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, (First published in 1994.)
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1929b). Impressions on the 1929 International Congress of Psychoanalysis. (Previously unpublished.) In E. F. Birtles & D. E. Scharff (Eds.), From instinct to self: Selected papers of W. R. D. Fairbairn, volume II: Applications and early contributions (pp. 454–461). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, (First published in 1994.)
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1938a). Prolegomena to a psychology of art. British Journal of Psychology, 29(3), 288–303. [ Reprinted in Fairbairn Birtles, E. & Scharff, D. E. (eds.) (1994), pp.381–396.]
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1938b). The ultimate basis for aesthetic experience. British Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 167–181. [ Reprinted in Fairbairn Birtles, E. & Scharff, D. E. (eds.) (1994), pp.397–409.]
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1943). The repression and the return of bad objects (with special reference to the “war neuroses”). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19, 3–4. [ Reprinted in Fairbairn (1952), pp. 59–81.] doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1943.tb00328.x
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object-relationships. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 25, 70–92. [ Reprinted in Fairbairn (1952), pp. 82–136.]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1951). Critical notice of On not being able to paint, by Johanna Field (1950). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 24(1), 69–76. [ Reprinted as “On working in the gap” in Fairbairn Birtles, E. & Scharff, D. E. (eds.) (1994), pp. 417–422.] doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1951.tb00398.x
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Routledge & New York. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1953). Critical notice of Psychoanalytical Explorations in Art, by Ernst Kris (1950). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 26(2), 164–169. [ Reprinted as “Psychoanalysis and art” in Fairbairn Birtles, E. & Scharff, D. E. (eds.) (1994), pp. 423–432.] doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1953.tb00820.x
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1958). On the nature and aims of psycho-analytical treatment. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 374–385. [ Reprinted in D. E. Scharff & E. Fairbairn Birtles (eds.) (1994a), pp. 74–92.]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn Birtles, E., & Scharff, D. E. (eds.). (1994). From instinct to self: Selected papers of W. R. D. Fairbairn. Vol. II: Applications and Early Contributions. Northvale, NJ & London: Jason Aronson. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1921c). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Standard Edition 18. 63–136. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923b). The ego and the Id. Standard Edition 19. 1–66. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein, J. S., & Rinsley, D. B. (eds.). (1994). Fairbairn and the origins of object relations. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1961). Personality structure and human interaction: The developing synthesis of psychodynamic theory. London: Hogarth. [ Reprinted, London, Karnac, 2011.]
   Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1975). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott—(How complete a result does psycho-analytic therapy achieve?). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 2, 145–156. [ Reprinted in International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77: 739–754.]
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. T. (2011). Towards mutual recognition: Relational psychoanalysis and the christian narrative. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (1952). Preface. In W. R. D. Fairbairn. Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. (pp. v). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Aronson. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude. In Klein, (1975), Envy and gratitude & other works 1946–1963. (pp. 176–235). New York, NY: Delta.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M., Heimann, P., Isaacs, S., & Riviere, J. (1952). Developments in psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth. [Reprinted, London: Karnac, 2002.]
   Google Scholar
• Letley, E. (2014). Marion Milner: The life. London: Routledge & New York.
   Google Scholar
• Losso, R., Setton, L. S. de, & Scharff, D. E. (eds.). (2017). The linked self in psychoanalysis: The pioneering work of Enrique Pichon Riviere. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1957). The self as an Agent. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1961). Persons in relation. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard. [ English translation: Phenomenology of perception, C. Smith (Trans.). London: Routledge, 1962.]
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2010). Why read Fairbairn? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 91, 101–108. [Chapter 10]. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00219.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padel, J. (1973). The contribution of W. R. D. Fairbairn (1889–1965) to psychoanalytic theory and practice. Bulletin of the European Psychoanalytical Federation, 2, 13–26. [Chapter 21]
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, F., & Scharff, D. E. (eds.). (2002). Fairbairn and relational theory. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. (2004). Analyst of the imagination: The life and work of Charles Rycroft. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon Rivière, E. (1971a). El proceso grupal. Del psicoanálisis a la psicología social (1). [The group process: From psychoanalysis to social psychology (1)]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon-Rivière, E. (1971b). La psiquiatría, una nueva problemática. Del psicoanálisis a la psicología social (2). [A new problematic for psychiatry: From psychoanalysis to social psychology (2)]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon-Rivière, E. (1979). Teoría del vínculo. [ Theory of the link]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, J. S. (ed.). (1994). The autonomous self: The work of John D. Sutherland. Northvale, NJ & London: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, D. E., & Birtles, E. F. (1997). From instinct to self: The evolution and implications of W. R. D. Fairbairn's theory of object relations. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 1085–1103. [ Chapter 1]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharff, D. E., & Fairbairn Birtles, E. (eds.). (1994). From instinct to self: Selected Papers of W. R. D. Fairbairn. Vol. I: Clinical and theoretical papers. Northvale, NJ & London: Jason Aronson. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, J. S., & Scharff, D. E. (eds.). (2005). The legacy of Fairbairn and Sutherland: Psychotherapeutic applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, N. J., & Scharff, D. E. (eds.). (1998). Fairbairn then and now. Hillsdale NJ/London: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J. (1963). Object-relations theory and the conceptual model of psychoanalysis. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 36, 109–124. [ Reprinted in Scharff, J. S. (ed.) (1994), pp. 3–24.]. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1963.tb01273.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J. D. (1965). W. R. D. Fairbairn—1889—1964. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 46, 245–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutherland, J. D. (1989). Fairbairn's journey into the interior. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Suttie, I. (1935). The origins of love and hate. New York: Routledge. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tubert-Oklander, J. (2009). El ícono y el ídolo: El lugar de Freud en la identidad y la formación psicoanalíticas [The icon and the idol: The place of Freud in psychoanalytic identity and education]. Cuadernos de Psicoanálisis, 42(1–2), 7–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tubert-Oklander, J. (2014). The icon and the idol: The place of Freud and other founding fathers and mothers in psychoanalytic identity and education. In The one and the many: Relational psychoanalysis and group analysis (pp. 113–156). London: Karnac. [ Revised and enlarged English version of Tubert-Oklander (2009).].
   Google Scholar
• Tubert-Oklander, J., & Hernández de Tubert, R. (2004). Operative groups: The Latin-American approach to group analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1967). [1989].Postscript: D. W. W. on D. W. W. [ First published In D. W. Winnicott, C. Winnicott, R. Shepard, & M. Davis (eds.). Psychoanalytic explorations (pp. 569–582). London: Karnac. 1989.]
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W., & Khan, M. M. R. (1953). Review of Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 329–333. [ Reprinted in D. W. Winnicott, Psycho-Analytic Explorations (pp. 413–422). London: Karnac, 1989.]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar