The Government Revenue–Expenditure Nexus in Southeast Europe: A Bootstrap Panel Granger-Causality Approach

References

• Afonso, A., and C. Rault. 2009. “Spend-and-Tax: A Panel Data Investigation for the EU.” Economics Bulletin 29 (4):2542–48. http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2009/Volume29/EB-09-V29-I4-P7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., C. Favero, and F. Giavazzi. 2015. “The Output Effect of Fiscal Consolidation Plans.” Journal of International Economics 96 (Supplement 1):S19–S42. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W., M.C. Wallace, and J.T. Warner. 1986. “Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?” Southern Economic Journal 56:24–31. doi: 10.2307/1059262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghestani, H., and R. McNown. 1994. “Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?” Southern Economic Journal 60:311–22. doi: 10.2307/1059979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajo-Rubio, O., C. Diaz-Roldan, and V. Esteve. 2006. “Is the Budget Deficit Sustainable When Fiscal Policy Is Nonlinear? The Case of Spain.” Journal of Macroeconomics 28 (3):596–608. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2004.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. 1979. “On the Determination of the Public Debt.” Journal of Political Economy 81:940–71. doi: 10.1086/260807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackley, P.R. 1986. “Causality between Revenues and Expenditures and the Size of the Federal Budget.” Public Finance Quarterly 14 (2):139–56. doi:10.1177/109114218601400202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn, H. 1991. “Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustments?” Journal of Monetary Economics 27:333–59. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(91)90013-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bökemeier, B., and A. Stoian. 2018. “Debt Sustainability Issues in Central and East European Countries.” Eastern European Economics 56 (5):438–70. doi:10.1080/00128775.2018.1496456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolat, S. 2014. “The Relationship between Government Revenues and Expenditures: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis on European Countries.” Economic Research Guardian 4 (2):2–17. http://www.ecrg.ro/files/p2014.4%282%296ay1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bolat, S., and M. Belke. 2015. “Fiscal Assessment in the Tax–Spending Nexus: A Tale of Central and Eastern European Countries.” In Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2015, edited by L. Sedmihradská, 20–25. Prague: University of Economics, Prague, Oeconomica Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Brada, J., and A. Kutan. 2002. “Balkan and Mediterranean Candidates for European Union Membership: The Convergence of their Policy with that of the European Central Bank.” Eastern European Economics 40 (4):31–44. doi:10.1080/00128775.2002.11041025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T., and A. Pagan. 1980. “The LM Test and its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics.” Review of Economic Studies 47:239–54. doi: 10.2307/2297111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröthaler, J., and M. Getzner. 2015. “The Tax-Spend Debate and Budgetary Policy in Austria.” International Advances in Economic Research 21 (3):299–315. doi:10.1007/s11294-015-9532-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J.M., and R.W. Wagner. 1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buturac, G., and I. Teodorović. 2012. “The Impacts of the Global Recession on Southeast European Countries.” Eastern European Economics 50 (1):78–97. doi:10.2753/EEE0012-8775500105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campello, M., A.F. Galvao, and T. Juhl. 2015. “Testing for Slope Heterogeneity Bias in Panel Data Models.” Mimeo. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2017.1421545.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T., and G. Chang. 2009. “Revisiting the Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries Based on the Panel Data Approach.” Finance a věr/Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 59 (2):165–72. http://journal.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/1157_chang.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B.S. 1999. “Causality between Taxes and Expenditures: Evidence from Latin American Countries.” Journal of Economics and Finance 23 (2):184–92. doi:10.1007/bf02745952.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1978. “The Limitations of Tax Limitation.” Policy Review 5 (78):7–14. http://www.unz.com/print/PolicyRev-1978q3-00007/?View=PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, C.W.J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relationships by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods”. Econometrica (July):424–38. doi: 10.2307/1912791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, M., and I. Lincoln. 1997. “Tax Then Spend or Spend then Tax? Experience in the UK 1961–1993.” Applied Economics Letters 4 (2):237–39. doi:10.1080/758518502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J.A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 46:1251–71. doi: 10.2307/1913827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M.H. 2004. “On the Causal Relationship between Government Expenditure and Tax Revenue in Pakistan.” Lahore Journal of Economics 9(2):105–18. http://www.lahore‌schoolofeconomics.edu.pk/JOURNAL/vol9-NoII/06%20M.%20Haider%20Hussain.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2018. World Economic Outlook Database, October 2018. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/download.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2019. Republic of Slovenia - Staff Report for the 2018 Article IV Consultation. Country Report No. 19/58. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Izvorski, I., and S. Kahkonen. 2008. “Public Expenditure Policies in Southeast Europe.” World Bank Working Paper 134. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Koczan, Z. 2015. “Fiscal Deficit and Public Debt in the Western Balkans: 15 Years of Economic Transition.” IMF Working Paper 15/172. International Monetary Fund. doi: 10.5089/9781513566399.001.
   Google Scholar
• Konukcu-Önal, D., and A.N. Tosun. 2008. “Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Several Transitional Economies.” Economic Annals 53 (178–179):145–56. doi:10.2298/EKA0879145K.
   Google Scholar
• Kónya, L. 2006. “Exports and Growth: Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries with a Panel Data Approach.” Economic Modelling 23 (6):978–92. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, S., and A. Stiassny. 1998. “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An International Study.” Journal of Policy Modeling 20 (2):163–91. doi:10.1016/S0161-8938(96)00073-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrenzi, G., and C. Milas. 2002. “The Role of Omitted Variables in Identifying a Long-Run Equilibrium Relationship for the Italian Government Growth.” International Tax and Public Finance 9 (4):435–49. doi: 10.1023/A:1016568003489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2001. “Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, and Temporal Causality: Evidence from China.” Applied Economics 33:485–97. doi: 10.1080/00036840122982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likmeta, B. 2014. Albania Govt Claims Spike in Tax Revenue, Accessed March 27, 2019. https://balkaninsight.com/2014/03/04/albania-govt-claims-bump-in-revenue/.
   Google Scholar
• Lledó, V., S. Yoon, X. Fang, S. Mbaye, and Y. Kim. 2017. “Fiscal Rules at a Glance.” Washington,DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Lojanica, N. 2015. “Government Expenditure and Government Revenue: The Causality on the Example of the Republic of Serbia.” In MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth, edited by D.G. Omerzel and S. Laporšek, 79–90. Koper: University of Primorska, Faculty of Management. http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-81-/39.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manage, N., and M.L. Marlow. 1986. “The Causal Relation between Federal Expenditures and Receipts.” Southern Economic Journal 52:617–29. doi: 10.2307/1059261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrara, M., M. Musai, and A. Karsalari. 2011. “The Relationship between Revenue and Expenditure in Oil Exporting Countries.” International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences 2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, A. H., and S.F. Richard. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89:914–27. doi: 10.1086/261013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. 1966. “Principles of Budget Determination.” In Public Finance: Selected Readings, edited by H. Cameron and W. Henderson, 15–27. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mutascu, M. 2015. “A Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis of Government Revenues and Expenditures in the PIIGS Countries.” Economics Bulletin 35 (3):2000–04. http://www.accessecon.com/includes/CountdownloadPDF.aspx?PaperID=EB-15-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutascu, M. 2016. “Government Revenues and Expenditures in the East European Economies: A Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Approach.” Eastern European Economics 54 (6):489–502. doi:10.1080/00128775.2016.1204237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, P.K., and N. Narayan. 2006. “Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries.” Applied Economics 38 (3):285–91. doi:10.1080/00036840500369209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov, M. 2006. “Illustration of Vector Autoregression - VAR with Possibly Integrated Processes: Application to the Budget Revenues, Expenditures and Industrial Output.” CEA Journal of Economics 1 (1):7–17. https://journal.cea.org.mk/index.php/ceajournal/article/view/39/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Owoye, O. 1995. “The Causal Relationship between Taxes and Expenditures in the G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error Correction Models.” Applied Economics Letters 2:19–22. doi: 10.1080/135048595357744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleologou, S.M. 2013. “Asymmetries in the Revenue–Expenditure Nexus: A Tale of Three Countries.” Economic Modelling 30:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, W.K. 1998. “Granger Causality between Government Revenues and Expenditures in Korea.” Journal of Economic Development 23 (1):145–55. http://www.jed.or.kr/full-text/23-1/park.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. 1997. “The Tax-Spend Debate: The Case of Canada.” Applied Economics Letters 4 (6):381–86. doi:10.1080/135048597355357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. 2003. “A Survey of the International Empirical Evidence on the Tax-Spend Debate.” Public Finance Review 31 (3):302–24. doi:10.1177/1091142103031003005.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J.E., B.T. Ewing, and R.J. Cebula. 2002. “Revenue-Expenditure Nexus in a Transition Economy: Evidence from Croatia.” Privredna Kretanja I Ekonomska Politika 12 (93):27–37. https://hrcak.srce.hr/18611.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, A. T., and J. Wiseman. 1979. “Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth.” Public Finance Quarterly 7:3–23. doi: 10.1177/109114217900700101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M.H. 2004. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. doi: 10.17863/CAM.5113.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M.H., A. Ullah, and T. Yamagata. 2008. “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross Section Independence.” Econometrics Journal 11 (1):105–27. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M.H., and T. Yamagata. 2008. “Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (1):50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, R. 1988. “Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenues and Government Expenditure.” Southern Economic Journal 52 (3):617–29. doi:10.2307/1059018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, C., and P. Dimitrios. 2013. “Tax and Spend, Spend and Tax, Fiscal Synchronisation or Institutional Separation? Examining the Case of Greece.” Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy 4 (2):1–17. http://www.rjfp.ro/issues/Volume4_Issue2_Richter_Paparas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. C. 1978. “Idealism in Public Choice Theory.” Journal of Monetary Economics 4 (August):603–16. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(78)90054-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvoukas, G.A. 2011. “The Tax-Spend Debate with an Application to the EU.” Economic Issues 16 (1):65–88. http://www.economicissues.org.uk/Files/2011/111eVamvoukas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, L., and G. Andronova Vincelette. 2019. Fiscal Rules for the Western Balkans: Western Balkans Fiscal Rules Overview Paper. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J., S. Mahdavi, and F. Firoozi. 2011. “The Tax-Spending Nexus: Evidence from a Panel of US State–Local Governments.” Economic Modelling 28 (3):885–90. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1988. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. South East Europe Regular Economic Report No.10: Resilient Growth Amid Rising Risks. World Bank Group. Fall.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2017. Western Balkans - Regular Economic Report No.11: Faster Growth, More Jobs. World Bank Group. Spring.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018. North Macedonia Public Finance Review: Sowing the Seeds of a Sustainable Future, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. 2009. “Tax-Spend or Fiscal Illusion?” Cato Journal 29 (3):469–85. http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2009/11/cj29n3-6.pdf.
   Google Scholar