Agriculture’s Contribution to the Growth of Romanian Bioeconomy: A Regional Approach

References

• Anzaldúa, Gerardo, Ariel Araujo, and John Tarpey 2020. “Briefing Paper: Analysing Market Conditions and Designing Business Models within BE-Rural’ S OIPs.” Bio-based strategies and roadmaps for enhanced rural and regional development in the EU. BE-Rural Project 818478. Accessed January 24, 2021. https://be-rural.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/BE-Rural_D5.1_Market_conditions_business_models.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ayrapetyan, David, and Frans Hermans. 2020. “Introducing A Multiscalar Framework for Biocluster Research: A Meta-analysis.” Sustainability 12 (9): 3890. doi:10.3390/su12093890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babucea, Ana Gabriela. 2007. “Use of Cluster Analysis in Territorial Comparisons [Utilizarea Analizei Cluster În Comparațiile Teritoriale].” Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi University from Târgu Jiu: Economy Series 1:311–16. Accessed April 25, 2021. https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2007-01/57_Babucea%20Ana-Gabriela.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Babucea, Ana-Gabriela, and Irina Răbonțu Cecilia. 2020. “The State of Adopting CRM Software-Solutions as Part of the Enterprises’internal Processes Integration – A Cluster Analysis at the Level of the EU-Member States Just Prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Annals Of’ Constantin Brancusi’ University of Targu-Jiu. Economy Series 20 (5): 115-125.
   Google Scholar
• Bălan, Emilia, Mary, Laura, Mariana Cismaș, and Cristina, Georgiana Zeldea. 2021. “Agricultural Biomass Production: Implications for Economic Growth and Environment in Central and Eastern European Countries.” In Contemporary Issues in Social Science, edited by Simon Grima, Ercan Özen, and Hakan Boz, 263-279. Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, R S., and A. Stephen Lenz. 2021. “Contemporary Issues in Reporting Statistical, Practical, and Clinical Significance in Counseling Research.” Journal of Counseling & Development 99 (2): 227–37. doi:10.1002/jcad.12370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, Petra, Thom Achterbosch, Siemen van Berkum, Hans Dagevos, Jurien Dengerink, Arie, Pieter van Duijn, and Ida Terluin. 2018. Global Implications of the European Food System A Food Systems Approach: A Food Systems Approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Economic Research. Report 2018-051. May 2018. 10.18174/448884.
   Google Scholar
• BI RDA (Bucharest Ilfov Regional Development Agengy) 2020. Strategia Regională de Specializare Inteligentă București-Ilfov 2021 – 2027 [Smart Specialisation Strategy Bucharest-Ilfov (RIS 3 BI)]. Accessed on April 21, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/4qs1zr9
   Google Scholar
• Borychowski, Michal, Sebastian Stepien, Jan Polcyn, Aleksandra Tosovic-Stevanovic, Dragan Calovic, Goran Lalic, and Milena Zuza. 2020. “Socio-Economic Determinants of Small Family Farms’ Resilience in Selected Central and Eastern European Countries.” Sustainability 12 (24): 10362. doi:10.3390/su122410362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco, Stefania, Ozgul Calicioglu, San Juan, Gomez Marta, and Alessandro Flammini. 2018. “Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks.” Sustainability 10 (6): 1698. doi:10.3390/su10061698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butu, Alina, Steliana Rodino, Marian Butu, and Raluca Ion. 2020. “Bioeconomy Related Perspectives for Boosting Agriculture Development in Romania.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 14 (1): 548–58. doi:10.2478/picbe-2020-0051.
   Google Scholar
• Celac, Sergiu, and Angheluta Vadineanu 2018. “Romania’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2030.” Bucuresti: Padeida. Accessed April 20, 2021. http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/rom195029.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Center, RDA (The Center Regional Development Agency) 2021. Strategia de Specializare Inteligentă a Regiunii Centru [Smart Specialization Strategy of Region Center for the Period 2014-2020]. Annex. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/j89iol4
   Google Scholar
• Chivu, Luminita, J V. Andrei, Marian Zaharia, and R-M. Gogonea. 2020. “A Regional Agricultural Efficiency Convergence Assessment in Romania – Appraising Differences and Understanding Potentials.” Land Use Policy 99:104838. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cismaș, Laura, Mariana, Andra Miculescu, and Maria Oţil. 2020. “Human Capital and Impact on Sustained Economic Growth in Romania.” In Essential Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, edited by Idowu, and S., Sitnikov, C. 121–38. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39229-1_9.
   Google Scholar
• Cristea, Mirela, G G. Georgiana Noja, Nicu Marcu, Marian Siminică, and D-M. Ţîrcă. 2020. “Modelling EU Bioeconomy Credentials in the Economic Development Framework: The Role of Intellectual Capital.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 26 (6): 1139–64. doi:10.3846/tede.2020.13159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidescu, Adriana, Anamaria, Simona, Andreea Apostu, Andra, Madalina Pantilie, and Bogdan, Florian Amzuica. 2020. “Romania’s South-Muntenia Region, Towards Sustainable Regional Development. Implications for Regional Development Strategies.” Sustainability 12 (14): 1–46. doi:10.3390/su12145799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaney, Laura Anne, and Maeve Henchion. 2017. “If Opportunity Doesn’t Knock, Build a Door: Reflecting on a Bioeconomy Policy Agenda for Ireland”. The Economic and Social Review 48 (2): 207–29. Summer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, Thomas, Jan Börner, Jan Janosch Förster, and Joachim Von Braun. 2018. “Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010. “A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth”. Communication from the Commission Europe 2020. Bruxelles: 3.3.2010. COM(2010) 2020 final. Accessed April 7, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/730620
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2018. “A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment”. Accessed March 5, 2021. doi:10.2777/478385. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/edace3e3-e189-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
   Google Scholar
• EIBG (European Investment Bank Group). 2020. Agriculture, Bioeconomy, and Rural Development Overview. Accessed April 27, 2021. https://www.eib.org/attachments/thematic/agriculture_bioeconomy_and_rural_development_overview_2020_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EUBA (The European Bioeconomy Alliance). 2018. The Crucial Role of the Bioeconomy in Achieving the Unsustainable Development Goals. Accessed November 11, 2020. https://bioeconomyalliance.eu/sites/default/files/EUBA%20SDGs%20final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (Statistical Office of the European Communities). 2021. EUROSTAT: Private Investments, Jobs and Gross Value Added Related to Circular Economy Sectors. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/b25359l
   Google Scholar
• Ferńndez, Javier. 2002. “The Common Agricultural Policy and EU Enlargement: Implications for Agricultural Production in the Central and East European Countries.” Eastern European Economics 40 (3): 28–50. doi:10.1080/00128775.2002.11041018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follador, Marco, George Philippidis, Juliana Davis, and Britaldo Soares-Filho. 2019. Assessing the Impacts of the EU Bioeconomy on Third Countries, Potential Environmental Impacts in Brazil of EU Biofuel Demand to 2030. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/304776.
   Google Scholar
• Fradj, Nosra Ben, Pierre Alain Jayet, Stelios Rozakis, Eleni Georganta, and Anna Jędrejek. 2020. “Contribution of Agricultural Systems to the Bioeconomy in Poland: Integration of Willow in the Context of a Stylised CAP Diversification.” Land Use Policy 99:104797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaigalis, Vygandas, and Vladislovas Katinas. 2020. “Analysis of the Renewable Energy Implementation and Prediction Prospects in Compliance with the EU Policy: A Case of Lithuania.” Renewable Energy 151:1016–27. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajda, Waldemar, Mantas Svazas, and Valentinas Navickas. 2019. “Bioeconomics Development In The Regions: Lithuanian Clustering Analysis.” Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 9 (2): 346–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarich, Silke. 2017. “Bioeconomy Development in EU Regions – Final Report.” No. February doi: 10.2777/25417.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, Miroslav, Michaela Holecová, Helena Smolová, Ladislav Jeřábek, and Ivo Frébort. 2021 January. “Current State and Future Directions of Bioeconomy in the Czech Republic.” New Biotechnology 61:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2020.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Jakob, Alberto Bezama, and Daniela Thrän. 2020. “Insights from the Sustainability Monitoring Tool Suministro Applied to a Case Study System of Prospective Wood-based Industry Networks in Central Germany.” Sustainability 12 (9): 3896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu, Romeo,Victor, Monica, Laura Zlati, Valentin, Marian Antohi, and Silviu Stanciu. 2020. “Modelling EU Agriculture’s Regional Disparities under the National Accounting System’s Approach. The Impact of the New Economic and Environmental Challenges.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1805347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, Xuejun Ryan. 2015. “Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: A Brief Review.” Accesed April 25, 2021. https://edarxiv.org/j4rdv/download
   Google Scholar
• Kardung, Maximilian, Kutay Cingiz, Ortwin Costenoble, Roel Delahaye, Wim Heijman, Marko Lovri ́c, Myrna van Leeuwen, et al. 2021. “Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators.” Sustainability 13 (1): 413. doi:10.3390/su13010413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, Olli, and Lasse Okkonen. 2012. “Regional Socio-economic Impacts of Decentralised Bioeconomy: A Case of Suutela Wooden Village, Finland.” Environment, Development, and Sustainability 15:245–56. doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9372-6
   Google Scholar
• Lissitsa, Alexej, Supawat Rungsuriyawiboon, and Sergiy Parkhomenko. 2007. “How Far are the Transition Countries from the Economic Standards of the European Union?: Measuring Efficiency and Growth in Agriculture.” Eastern European Economics 45 (3): 51–75. doi:10.2753/EEE0012-8775450303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, John A., Azeem M. Shaikh, and Xu. Yang. 2019. “Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics.” Experimental Economics 22 (4): 773–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou, Efstratios, Christos Karelakis, Konstantinos Galanopoulos, and Konstadinos Mattas. 2019. “The Role of Agriculture as a Development Tool for a Regional Economy.” Agricultural Systems 173 (July): 482–90. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’Barek, Robert, Claudia Parisi, and Tévécia Ronzon. (editors.) 2018. Getting (Some) Numbers Right – Derived Economic Indicators for the Bioeconomy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. JRC113252. 10.2760/2037.
   Google Scholar
• M’barek, Robert, George Philippidis, Cornelia-Madalina Suta, Cristina Vinyes, Arnaldo Caivano, Emanuele Ferrari, Tevecia Ronzon, Lopez, Ana Sanhuan, and Fabien Santini. 2014. “Observing and Analysing the Bioeconomy in the EU–Adapting Data and Tools to New Questions and Challenges.” Bio-based and Applied Economics 3 (1): 83–91. doi:10.13128/BAE-14189.
   Google Scholar
• MADR (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development-Romania). 2015. Strategia de Dezvoltare a Sectorului Agroalimentar Pe Termen Mediu Și Lung [The Strategy for the Medium and Long Term Development of the Agribusiness Sector]. Accesed April 29, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/942413
   Google Scholar
• Map Chart 2021. Make Your Own Custom Map of the World, Europe, United States, UK, and More. https://mapchart.net/. Accessed May 25, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Elyse. 2015. The Bioeconomy a Primer. Washington DC: Transnational Institute and Hands on the Land. Accesed May 4, 2021. https://rb.gy/qadjbs.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, Fionn, and Pierre Legendre. 2014. “Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion?” Journal of Classification 31 (3): 274–95. doi:10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NE RDA (North-East Regional Development Agency). 2020. Strategia Pentru Cercetare Și Inovare Regională Prin Specializare Inteligentă RIS3 NORD-EST [The Regional Smart Specialization Strategy in Romania (RIS3 North-East)]. Accessed on April 20, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/mfnkbio
   Google Scholar
• NIS (National Institute of Statistics – Romania) 2021. B.4 Agriculture. Accessed February 12, 2021. https://rb.gy/yy02y3
   Google Scholar
• Noja, Gratiela, Georgiana, Mirela Cristea, Nicoleta Sirghi, Camelia-Daniela Hațegan, and Paolo D’Anselmi. 2019. “Promoting Good Public Governance and Environmental Support for Sustainable Economic Development.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (24): 4940. doi:10.3390/ijerph16244940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NW RDA (North-West Regional Development Agency). 2020. Strategia de Specializare Inteligentă 2021 – 2027 Regiunea de Dezvoltare Nord-Vest [Intelligent Specialization Strategy for Research and Innovation for the North West Development Region]. Accessed on April 20, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/f17cw2g
   Google Scholar
• Olaru, Gabriela, Daniela. 2006. “Enterprise’s Performance Measured by Intermediary Balance of Administration.” Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 2 (8): 1–43. Accesed November 15, 2021. http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/820062/43.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Panait, Ioana, and Catalin, Marian Cucu. 2020. “The Evolution of Romanian Agribusiness in the Context of Sustainable Development of Agriculture.” Sciendo 1083–97. doi: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0102.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, Christina-Ioanna, Efstratios Loizou, Katerina Melfou, and Fotios Chatzitheodoridis. 2021. “The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis.” Energies 14 (20): 6823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pașnicu, Daniela, Mihaela Ghența, and Aniela Matei. 2019. “Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe.” Amfiteatru Economic 21 (50): 9–23. doi:10.24818/EA/2019/50/9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra, Petrescu Madalina, Dacinia Crina, and Hossein Azadi. 2020. “A Social Perspective on Soil Function and Quality Improvement: Romanian Farmers’ Perception.” Geoderma 380:114573. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prăvălie, Remus, Igor Sîrodoev, Cristina Patriche, Bogdan Roșca, Adrian Piticar, Georgeta Bandoc, Lucian Sfîcă, Adrian Tişcovschi, Monica Dumitraşcu, Carmen Chifiriuc, Valentina Mănoiu and Ştefan Iordache. 2020. “The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Productivity in Romania. A Country-scale Assessment Based on the Relationship between Climatic Water Balance and Maize Yields in Recent Decades.” Agricultural Systems 179:102767. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RDA – SW Oltenia (Regional Development Agency - South-West Oltenia). 2021. Strategia Regională Pentru Specializare Inteligentă RIS3 Sud-Vest Oltenia 2021-2027 [The Regional Innovation Strategy for Intelligent Specialization of the South-West Oltenia Region]. Accessed on April 23, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/76zjjpn
   Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, Karen, Michael Kull, Elin Slätmo, and Mari Woien Meijer. 2021. “Bioeconomy–A Driver for Regional Development in the Nordic Countries.” New Biotechnology 60:130–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RG (The Romanian Government). 2014. “Hotărârea Nr. 929 Din 21 Octombrie 2014 Privind Aprobarea Strategiei Naţionale de Cercetare, Dezvoltare Şi Inovare 2014-2020 [DECISION No. 929 of October 21, 2014 on the Approval of the National Strategy for Research, Development and Innovation 2014-2020].” Accessed 15 April, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/0frdw5j
   Google Scholar
• Rodino, Steliana, Alina Butu, Vili Dragomir, and Marian Butu. 2019. “An Analysis regarding the Biomass Production Sector in Romania-a Bioeconomy Point of View.” Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 19:497–502.
   Google Scholar
• Ronzon, Tévécia, and Robert M’Barek. 2018. “Socio-economic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition.” Sustainability 10 (6): 1745. doi:10.3390/su10061745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzon, Tévécia, Stephan Piotrowski, Robert M’barek, Michael Carus, and Saulius Tamošiūnas 2020. “Data From: Jobs and Wealth in the EU bioeconomy/JRC - Bioeconomics.” (dataset) European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). Accessed February 7, 2021. https://rb.gy/47u3nw
   Google Scholar
• SE RDA (South-East Regional Development Agency). 2021. Strategia Regională de Specializare Inteligentă a Regiunii Sud-Est 2021-2027 (SRSI SE) [The Regional Smart Specialization Strategy (RIS3) for the South-East Region 2021-2027]. Accessed on April 23, 2021. http://rb.gy/qqk8il
   Google Scholar
• SM RDA (South-Muntenia Regional Development Agency). 2020. Strategia Regională de Specializare Inteligentă Sud-Muntenia 2021 – 2027 [The Smart Specialization Strategy of the South - Muntenia Region 2021-2027 (RIS3 South - Muntenia)]. Accessed on April 21, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/81otg7n
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann, Paul, Marc Londo, and Martin Junginger. 2020. “The Circular Bioeconomy: Its Elements and Role in European Bioeconomy Clusters.” Resources, Conservation & Recycling X (6): 100029. doi:10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029.
   Google Scholar
• Tiron-Tudor, Adriana, Cristina, Silvia Nistor, and Cristina, Alexandrina Ştefănescu. 2018. “The Role of Universities in Consolidating Intellectual Capital and Generating New Knowledge for a Sustainable Bio-economy.” Amfiteatru Economic 20 (49): 599–615. doi:10.24818/EA/2018/49/599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töller, Annette Elisabeth, Thomas Vogelpohl, Katrin Beer, and Michael Böcher. 2021. “Is Bioeconomy Policy A Policy Field? A Conceptual Framework and Findings on the European Union and Germany.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 23 (2): 152–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2021. USDA Value-added Ag Definition. Rural Business Development. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://rebrand.ly/a5693
   Google Scholar
• Vásáry, Viktória, and Dorottya Szabó. 2018. “Characteristics of Sustainable Bioeconomy in the CEE Macro-region.” Central European Review of Economics & Finance 27 (5): 5–26. doi:10.24136/ceref.2018.023.
   Google Scholar
• Velten, Sarah, Nicolas W. Jager, and Jens Newig. 2021. “Success of Collaboration for Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study Meta-analysis.” Environment Development and Sustainability doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01261-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W RDA (West Regional Development Agency). 2021. Strategia Regională de Specializare Inteligentă 2021-2027 (RIS3) a Regiunii Vest [The Regional Smart Specialization Strategy 2021-2027 (RIS3) of the West Region]. Accessed on April 26, 2021. http://rb.gy/ixbvx0
   Google Scholar
• Wesseler, Justus. 2015. Agriculture in the Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Wageningen University: Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, Kerstin, and Frans Hermans. 2021. “Deconstructing the Attractiveness of Biocluster Imaginaries.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 23 (2): 227–42. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2021.1891872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woźniak, Ewa, and Tomasz Twardowski. 2018. “The Bioeconomy in Poland within the Context of the European Union.” New Biotechnology 40:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar