Assessing the Performance of National Innovation Systems with a Helix-Based Composite Indicator: Evidence from 24 European Countries

References

• Afzal, M., D. Mansur, S. Siddiqui, and J. Gope. 2018. “A Panel Investigation of the Triple Helix (TH), Quadruple Helix (QH) Relationship in ASEAN-5 Economies.” Journal of Innovation Economics Management 27 (3): 97–122. doi:10.3917/jie.027.0097.
   Google Scholar
• Alnafrah, I., and B. Zeno. 2020. “A New Comparative Model for National Innovation Systems Based on Machine Learning Classification Techniques.” Innovation and Development 10 (1): 45–66. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2018.1564124.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. J., and J. Stejskal. 2019. “Diffusion Efficiency of Innovation among EU Member States: A Data Envelopment Analysis.” Economies 7 (2): 34. doi:10.3390/economies7020034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., and A. Coco. 2004. “A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (Arco).” World Development 32 (4): 629–54. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., M. Denni, and A. Filippetti. 2009. “The Technological Capabilities of Nations: The State of the Art of Synthetic Indicators.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (7): 917–31. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97. doi:10.2307/2297968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., M. F. Arroyabe, and M. Schumann. 2020. “The Role of NPOs and International Actors in the National Innovation System: A Network-based Approach.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 159:120183. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arun, K. 2017. “Knowledge Sharing in Business Organizations: Leadership Role in Knowledge Sharing at Turkish Enterprises.” In Managing Knowledge Resources and Records in Modern Organizations, edited by P. Jain and N. Mnjama, 44–65. Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 2014. “From the Entrepreneurial University to the University for the Entrepreneurial Society.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 39 (3): 313–21. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzat, M., and A. Pyka. 2006. ““Mapping National Innovation Systems in the.”OECD Area.”, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation. 2 1–2: 158–76.10.1504/IJTG.2006.009132.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, R. 2008. “A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 Update.”New York: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies. 1–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, World. 2021. “GNI Per Capita, Atlas Method (Current US$)”. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gnp.pcap.cd?year_high_desc=true.
   Google Scholar
• Barcellos-Paula, L., I. De la Vega, and A. M. Gil-Lafuente. 2021. “The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects.” Mathematics 9 (4): 416. doi:10.3390/math9040416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., and J. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (And Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47. doi:10.2307/2082979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, R. L., K. Osaulenko, and S. Radosevic. 2021. “Technology Upgrading in Emerging Economies: A New Approach to Its Measurement, Results and Relationship to Mainstream Measures.” In The Challenges of Technology and Economic Catch-up in Emerging Economies, edited by J.D. Lee, K. Lee, D. Meer, S. Radosevic, and N. Vonortas, 67–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., and H. Etzkowitz. 2020. “Theorizing the Triple Helix Model: Past, Present, and Future.” Triple Helix 7 (2–3): 189–226. doi:10.1163/21971927-bja10003.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., T. Barth, and D. Campbell. 2012. “The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 1 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., Y. Goletsis, and E. Grigoroudis. 2018. “Composite Innovation Metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix Framework.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 131:4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., E. Grigoroudis, and Y. Goletsis. 2016. “A Multilevel and Multistage Efficiency Evaluation of Innovation Systems: A Multiobjective DEA Approach.” Expert Systems with Applications 62:63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F., and D. Archibugi. 2008. “The Technology Clubs: The Distribution of Knowledge across Nations.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1659–73. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., B. Å. Lundvall, and S. Haneef. 2018. Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., and H. Zo. 2019. “Assessing the Efficiency of National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries.” Science and Public Policy 46 (4): 530–40. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. L. 2010. “The Role of Finance in National Systems of Innovation.” In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, edited by B.Å. Lundvall, 151–72. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. 2002. “Building a National Innovation System through Regional Innovation Systems.” Technovation 22 (8): 485–91. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(01).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo, V., A. Martinelli, A. Nuvolari, and M. Tranchero. 2019. “Only One Way to Skin a Cat? Heterogeneity and Equifinality in European National Innovation Systems.” Research Policy 48 (4): 905–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagnucci, L., and F. Spigarelli. 2020. “The Third Mission of the University: A Systematic Literature Review on Potentials and Constraints.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161:120284. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona-Treviño, L. 2016. “Entrepreneurship in an Open National Innovation System (ONIS): A Proposal for Mexico.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 5 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0049-5.
   Google Scholar
• Cullmann, A., J. Schmidt-Ehmcke, and P. Zloczysti. 2012. “R&D Efficiency and Barriers to Entry: A Two Stage Semi-parametric DEA Approach.” Oxford Economic Papers 64 (1): 176–96. doi:10.1093/oep/gpr015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoyos, R. E., and V. Sarafidis. 2006. “Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-Data Models.” The Stata Journal 6 (4): 482–96. doi:10.1177/1536867X0600600403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiaco, E., A. Hughes, and M. McKelvey. 2012. “Universities as Strategic Actors in the Knowledge Economy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (3): 525–41. doi:10.1093/cje/bes024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2011. “Design of Innovation Policy through Diagnostic Analysis: Identification of Systemic Problems (Or Failures).” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (6): 1725–53. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. Barbero, and J. F. Zofío. 2018. “On the Meaning of Innovation Performance: Is the Synthetic Indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard Flawed?” Research Evaluation 27 (3): 196–211. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikemo, T. A., C. Bambra, K. Joyce, and E. Dahl. 2008. “Welfare State Regimes and Income-related Health Inequalities: A Comparison of 23 European Countries.” The European Journal of Public Health 18 (6): 593–99. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Gibari, S., T. Gómez, and F. Ruiz. 2019. “Building Composite Indicators Using Multicriteria Methods: A Review.” Journal of Business Economics 89 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11573-018-0902-z.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B. R. C. Terra. 2000. “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm.” Research Policy 29 (2): 313–30. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frees, E. W. 1995. “Assessing Cross-Sectional Correlation in Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 69 (2): 393–414. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, A., M. Lisi, I. Andreadis, and J. M. Leite Viegas. 2014. “Political Representation in Bailed-out Southern Europe: Greece and Portugal Compared.” South European Society and Politics 19 (4): 413–33. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.984381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, M. 2003. Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2003/16. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1937. “The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 32 (200): 675–701. doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522.
   Google Scholar
• Galvão, A., C. Mascarenhas, R. G. Rodrigues, C. S. Marques, and C. T. Leal. 2017. “A Quadruple Helix Model of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Stages of Economic Development.” Review of International Business and Strategy 27 (2): 261–82. doi:10.1108/RIBS-01-2017-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2009. “National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 34 (4): 476–501. doi:10.1177/0162243908329187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupp, H., and T. Schubert. 2010. “Review and New Evidence on Composite Innovation Indicators for Evaluating National Performance.” Research Policy 39 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and K. Chen. 2012. “Modeling the Relative Efficiency of National Innovation Systems.” Research Policy 41 (1): 102–15. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, H., S. Radošević, and G. N. Von Tunzelmann. 2006. Estonia, the New EU Economy: Building a Baltic Miracle? Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hasche, N., L. Höglund, and G. Linton. 2020. “Quadruple Helix as a Network of Relationships: Creating Value within a Swedish Regional Innovation System.” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 32 (6): 523–44. doi:10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134.
   Google Scholar
• Hoechle, D. 2007. “Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence.” The Stata Journal 7 (3): 281–312. doi:10.1177/1536867X070070030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B. L., and M. Mascherini. 2009. “Measuring Active Citizenship through the Development of a Composite Indicator.” Social Indicators Research 90 (3): 459–88. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, J. L., C. H. Yang, and C. P. Chen. 2014. “R&D Efficiency and the National Innovation System: An International Comparison Using the Distance Function Approach.” Bulletin of Economic Research 66 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00417.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsak, K., and S. Radošević. 2017. “EU Research and Innovation Policies as Factors of Convergence or Divergence after the Crisis.” Science and Public Policy 44 (2): 274–83. doi:10.1093/scipol/scw063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović, M., J. Rakićević, V. Jeremić, and M. Levi Jakšić. 2020. “How to Measure Triple Helix Performance? A Fresh Approach.” In Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit. THS 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, edited by A. Abu-Tair, A. Lahrech, K. Al Marri, and B. Abu-Hijleh, 245–61. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanović, M., G. Savić, Y. Cai, and M. Levi-Jakšić. 2022. “Towards a Triple Helix Based Efficiency Index of Innovation Systems.” Scientometrics 127 (5): 2577–609. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04304-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M., L.M. de Melo, and M.G. de Matos. 2020. Financing Innovation: BRICS National Systems of Innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, R., and G. Karagiannis. 2020. “Constructing Composite Indicators with Shannon Entropy: The Case of Human Development Index.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 70:100701. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and G. Bassett Jr. 1978. “Regression Quantiles.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 46 (1): 33–50. doi: 10.2307/1913643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontolaimou, A., I. Giotopoulos, and A. Tsakanikas. 2016. “A Typology of European Countries Based on Innovation Efficiency and Technology Gaps: The Role of Early-stage Entrepreneurship.” Economic Modelling 52:477–84. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, T. C. 1947. “Measurement Without Theory.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72. doi:10.2307/1928627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, M., K. Chen, S. Wang, and Y. Shao. 2016. “Measuring Efficiencies of Multi-period and Multi-division Systems Associated with DEA: An Application to OECD Countries’ National Innovation Systems.” Expert Systems with Applications 46:494–510. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuc-Czarnecka, M., S. L. Piano, and A. Saltelli. 2020. “Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator.” Social Indicators Research 149 (3): 775–802. doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02276-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., and B. Y. Kim. 2009. “Both Institutions and Policies Matter but Differently for Different Income Groups of Countries: Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth Revisited.” World Development 37 (3): 533–49. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. L., and N. Von Tunzelmann. 2005. “A Dynamic Analytic Approach to National Innovation Systems: The IC Industry in Taiwan.” Research Policy 34 (4): 425–40. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, Y., Z. Khan, and S. Cozzio. 2018. “Gravitating toward the Quadruple Helix: International Connections for the Enhancement of a Regional Innovation System in Northeast Italy.” R&D Management 48 (1): 44–59. doi:10.1111/radm.12227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1996. “Emergence of a Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations.” Science and Public Policy 23 (5): 279–86. doi:10.1093/spp/23.5.279.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and M. Fritsch. 2006. “Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in Terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics.” Research Policy 35 (10): 1538–53. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and I. Porto-Gomez. 2019. “Measuring the Expected Synergy in Spanish Regional and National Systems of Innovation.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9618-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. L. Smith. 2022. “Triple, Quadruple, and Higher-Order Helices: Historical Phenomena and (Neo-) Evolutionary Models.” Triple Helix 9 (1): 6–31. doi:10.1163/21971927-bja10022.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and G. Zawdie. 2010. “The Triple Helix Perspective of Innovation Systems.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (7): 789–804. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.511142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and S. White. 2001. “Comparing Innovation Systems: A Framework and Application to China’s Transitional Context.” Research Policy 30 (7): 1091–114. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. 2016. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahroum, S., and Y. Al-Saleh. 2013. “Towards a Functional Framework for Measuring National Innovation Efficacy.” Technovation 33 (10–11): 320–32. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruccia, Y., G. Solazzo, P. Del Vecchio, and G. Passiante. 2020. “Evidence from Network Analysis Application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161:120306. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matei, M. M., and A. Aldea. 2012. “Ranking National Innovation Systems according to Their Technical Efficiency.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 62:968–74. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.165
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2016. “From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy.” Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–56. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, V., C. Marques, A.R. Galvão, and V. Braga. 2020. “Innovation and Entrepreneurship as Drivers of Economic Development: Differences in European Economies Based on Quadruple Helix Model.” Competitiveness Review 30 (5): 681–704. doi:10.1108/cr-08-2019-0076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mêgnigbêto, E. 2018. “Measuring Synergy within a Triple Helix Innovation System Using Game Theory: Cases of Some Developed and Emerging Countries.” Triple Helix 5 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1186/s40604-018-0054-8.
   Google Scholar
• Mêgnigbêto, E. 2019. “Synergy within the West African Triple Helix Innovation Systems as Measured with Game Theory.” Journal of Industry-University Collaboration 1 (2): 96–114. doi:10.1108/JIUC-03-2019-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, S. P. D. O., and E. G. Carayannis. 2017. The Quadruple Innovation Helix Nexus: A Smart Growth Model, Quantitative Empirical Validation and Operationalization for OECD Countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, S., and E. Fraser. 2005. “Making ‘Dirty’ Nations Look Clean? the Nation State and the Problem of Selecting and Weighting Indices as Tools for Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability.” Geoforum 36 (5): 625–40. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. . 2017. An Agent-based Model of Heterogeneous Demand. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Nardo, M., M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola. 2005. Tools for Composite Indicators Building. Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nardo, M., M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes-Frigolett, H., A. Pyka, and A. B. Leoneti. 2021. “On the Performance and Strategy of Innovation Systems: A Multicriteria Group Decision Analysis Approach.” Technology in Society 67:101632. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. W. 2014. “Transition from the Triple Helix to N-tuple Helices? an Interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David FJ Campbell.” Scientometrics 99 (1): 203–07. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peprah, A., and A. Adekoya. 2020. “Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Africa.” Business Strategy & Development 3 (3): 388–94. doi:10.1002/bsd2.104.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’este, R. Fini, A. Geuna, R. Grimaldi, A. Hughes, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialization: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–42. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2021. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panels.” Empirical Economics 60 (1): 13–50. doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., and T. Santos Pereira. 2013. “Efficiency of Innovation Systems in Europe: An Institutional Approach to the Diversity of National Profiles.” European Planning Studies 21 (6): 755–79. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.665033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Põder, K., and K. Kerem. 2011. “““social Models” in a European Comparison: Convergence or Divergence?” Eastern European Economics 49 (5): 55–74. doi:10.2753/EEE0012-8775490503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. 2004. “A Two‐tier or Multi‐tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and East European Countries in the Enlarged EU.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (3): 641–66. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00522.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., and E. Yoruk. 2018. “Technology Upgrading of Middle Income Economies: A New Approach and Results.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129:56–75. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., and H. Etzkowitz. 2013. “Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society.” Industry and Higher Education 27 (4): 237–62. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. L., and T. F. Yu. 2001. “Firm Strategy, Innovation and Consumer Demand: A Market Process Approach.” Managerial and Decision Economics 22 (4‐5): 183–99. doi:10.1002/mde.1016.
   Google Scholar
• Samara, E., P. Georgiadis, and I. Bakouros. 2012. “The Impact of Innovation Policies on the Performance of National Innovation Systems: A System Dynamics Analysis.” Technovation 32 (11): 624–38. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. 2014. “Articulating the ‘Three-Missions’ in Spanish Universities.” Research Policy 43 (10): 1760–73. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P., and A. Pyka. 2013. “The Co-evolution of Innovation, Demand and Growth.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22 (5): 461–82. doi:10.1080/10438599.2013.768492.
   Google Scholar
• Soriano, F. H., and F. Mulatero. 2010. “Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1 (4): 289–302. doi:10.1007/s13132-010-0020-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sporer, Z. 2004. “Knowledge-based Economy and Social Capital in Central and East European Countries.” Eastern European Economics 42 (6): 39–71. doi:10.1080/00128775.2004.11041092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, Ø., I. Ivanova, and L. Leydesdorff. 2017. “Decomposing the Triple-Helix Synergy into the Regional Innovation Systems of Norway: Firm Data and Patent Networks.” Quality & Quantity 51 (3): 963–88. 10.1007/s11135-016-0344-z Decomposing the Triple-Helix Synergy into the Regional Innovation Systems of Norway: Firm Data and Patent Networks
   Google Scholar
• Teubal, M., D. Foray, M. Justman, and E. Zuscovitch. 1996. Technological Infrastructure Policy: An International Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tylecote, A. 2007. “The Role of Finance and Corporate Governance in National Systems of Innovation.” Organization Studies 28 (10): 1461–81. doi:10.1177/0170840607075676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, S., P. Akhtar, and G. Zaefarian. 2018. “Dealing with Endogeneity Bias: The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Panel Data.” Industrial Marketing Management 71:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonglimpiyarat, J. 2011. “The Dynamics of Financial Innovation System.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research 22 (1): 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2011.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, D. Ç., and K. Arun. 2019. “Effects of Economic Clusters, FDI and R&D on Innovation: Developing Countries in European Monetary Union Example.” International Journal of Innovation 7 (2): 236–51. doi:10.5585/iji.v7i2.264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. 2015. “The Evolution of South Korea’s Innovation System: Moving Towards the Triple Helix Model?” Scientometrics 104 (1): 265–93. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1541-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., J. Aparicio, L. Ortiz, E. G. Carayannis, and E. Grigoroudis. 2021. “The Productivity of National Innovation Systems in Europe: Catching up or Falling Behind?” Technovation 102:102215. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J., F. Jiménez-Sáez, E. Castro-Martínez, and A. Gutiérrez-Gracia. 2007. “What Indicators Do (Or Do Not) Tell Us about Regional Innovation Systems.” Scientometrics 70 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0106-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar