Child Poverty in Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia: The Role of Poverty Persistence and Social Transfers

References

• Bäckman, O., and T. Ferrarini. 2010. “Combating Child Poverty? A Multilevel Assessment of Family Policy Institutions and Child Poverty in 21 Old and New Welfare States.” Journal of Social Policy 39 (2): 275–96. doi:10.1017/S0047279409990456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, B., and A. Poggi. 2020. “Middle Class, Government Effectiveness and Poverty in the EU: A Dynamic Multilevel Analysis.” Review of Income and Wealth 66 (1): 94–125. doi:10.1111/roiw.12403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, B., and M. Jantti. 1999. “Child Poverty Across Industrialized Nations.” In LIS Working Papers 205. Luxembourg: LIS Cross-National Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J., and H. Kenichi. 2016. “Child Benefits in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Review.” In ILO DWT and Country Office for Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Caminada, K., and K. P. Goudswaard. 2010. “How Well is Social Expenditure Targeted to the Poor?” In Social Security, Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rich and Poorer Countries, edited by P. Saunders and R. Sainsbury, 97–112. Mortsel, Belgium: International Studies on Social Security, volume 16. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. H., and M. Corak. 2008. “Child Poverty and Changes in Child Poverty.” Demography 45 (3): 537–53. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavet, N., L. Tiberti, M. Vladisavljević, J. Žarković-Rakić, A. Anić, G. Kstić, and S. Ranđelović. 2019. “Reduction of Child Poverty in Serbia: Benefit or Employment Strategy.” Economics of Transition & Institutional Change 27 (3): 615–45. doi:10.1111/ecot.12197.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Methodological Guidelines and Description of EU-SILC Target Variables”. Version June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrizi, E., and C. Mussida. 2020. “Assessing Poverty Persistence in Households with Children.” Journal of Economic Inequality 18 (4): 551–69. doi:10.1007/s10888-020-09455-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabos, A. 2013. “Successful Policy Mixes to Tackle Child Poverty: An EU-Wide Comparison.” AIAS, GINI Discussion Paper 76.
   Google Scholar
• Giarda, E., and G. Moroni. 2018. “The Degree of Poverty Persistence and the Role of Regional Disparities in Italy in Comparison with France, Spain and the UK.” Social Indicators Research 136 (1): 163–202. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1547-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick, J., and M. Jantti. 2012. “Child Poverty in Cross-National Perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg Income Study.” Children & Youth Services Review 34 (3): 558–68. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C., R. Marcus, and K. Moore. 2003. “Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Life Course and Intergenerational Poverty Transitions.” World Development 31 (3): 535–54. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00010-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 1981. “The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time–Discrete Data Stochastic Process.” In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with EconometricApplications, edited by C.F. Manski and D. McFadden, 179–95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inchauste, G., and I. Rubil. 2017. “The Distributional Impact of Taxes and Social Spending in Croatia.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8203.
   Google Scholar
• Kump, N., M. Čok, and B. Majcen. 2018. Slovenia 2015–2018. Euromod Country Report. UK: Institute for Economic Research, University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Kump, N., B. Majcen, and M. Čok. 2011. Assessing the Benefits Reform in Slovenia Using a Microsimulation Approach. Institute for Economic Research, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Mussida, C., and D. Sciulli. 2022. “The Dynamics of Poverty in Europe: What Has Changed After the Great Recession?” Journal of Economic Inequality 20 (4): 915–37. doi:10.1007/s10888-022-09527-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketch, S., and A. Skrondal. 2013. “Avoiding Biased Versions of Wooldridge’s Simple Solution to the Initial Conditions Problem.” Economics Letters 120 (2): 346–49. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, P., M. Ledić, I. Rubil, and S. Žrinščak. 2017. Child Poverty and Household Coping Strategies in Croatia. Zagreb: EIZG and ADRIS.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, I., and S. Bezeredi. 2017. Euromod Country Report: Croatia 2013–2016. Essex: Institute for Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, I., and M. Pezer. 2019. “About Child Benefit.” Institute of Public Finance newsletter 118.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, W., and H. Zagel. 2022. “Family Policy Research in Europe.” In In Social Policy In Changing European Societies, edited by K. Nelson R. Nieuwenhuis, M. Yerkes, 34–49. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, P., and W. Adema. 2007. “What Works Best in Reducing Child Poverty: A Benefit or Work Strategy?” In Social, Employment and Migration Woking Papers No 51. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. 2005. “Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1002/jae.770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žarković Rakić, J., A. Aleksić Mirić, L. Lebedinski, and M. Vladisavljević. 2017. “Welfare State and Social Enterprise in Transition: Evidence from Serbia.” International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (6): 2423–48. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9844-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar