Marshallian Sources of Relatedness and Their Effects on Firm Survival and Subsequent Success in China

References

• Arellano, M., and Bover, O. 1995. Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68:29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, E., Hortacsu, A., and Syverson, C. 2014. Vertical integration and input flows. American Economic Review 104:1120–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, C., and Henderson, V. 2006. Are Chinese cities too small? Review of Economic Studies 73:549–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. 1991. New-firm survival and the technical regime. Review of Economics and Statistics 72:441–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., and Okubo, T. 2006. Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: Spatial selection and sorting. Journal of Economic Geography 6:323–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., and Bond, S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87:115–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39:61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2011. Technological relatedness and regional branching. In Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation, ed. H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, and D. Kogler, 64–81. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Iammarino, S. 2009. Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography 85:289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Minondo, A., and Navarro, M. 2012. Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science 91:241–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6:273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, L., Van Viesebroeck, J., and Schott, P. 2012. Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics 2:339–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, D., and Winter, S. 2009. A general interindustry relatedness index. Management Science 55:1570–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buenstorf, G., and Klepper, S. 2010. Why does entry cluster geographically? Evidence from the US tire industry. Journal of Urban Economics 68:103–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, R. 1998. Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature 36:1947–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMA. 2007. China mergers and acquisitions yearbook. Zhongguo qi ye bing gou nian jian. Beijing: Renmin you dian chu ban she.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D., and Roux, S. 2012. The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica 80:2543–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauth, W. 2010. The mysteries of the trade: Interindustry spillovers in cities Working Paper 15. Nuremberg, Germany: Institute for Employment Research. http://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2010/dp1510.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, G., Glaeser, E. L., and Kerr, W. R. 2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review 100:1195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J., and Rigby, D. L. 2007. Exploring evolutionary economic geographies. Journal of Economic Geography 7:549–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Cefis, E., and Stam, E. 2015. Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Regional Studies 49:10–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41:685–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., and Singer, B. 1984. A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52:271–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A., and Hausmann, R. 2007. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317:482–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, 2016a. Urban agglomeration, selection and the impact of policy distortions on firm productivity in China. Working Paper. Beijing: School of Economics, Peking University.
   Google Scholar
• Howell. 2016b. Impacts of protectionism on selection and agglomeration in Chinese state-led clusters. Working Paper. Beijing: School of Economics, Peking University.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A., He, C., Rudai, Y., and Fan, C. 2016a. Agglomeration, (un)-related variety and new firm survival in China: Do local subsidies matter? Papers in Regional Science, doi:  10.1111/pirs.12269.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A., He, C., Rudai, Y., and Fan, C.. 2016b. Technological relatedness and asymmetrical firm productivity gains under market reforms in China. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 9:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., Xu, Z., and Yashiro, N. 2015. Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence. China Economic Review 33:50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., Rawski, T., Wang, L., and Zheng, Y. 2000. Ownership, productivity change, and financial performance in Chinese industries. Journal of Comparative Economics 28:786–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 2007. Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science 53:616–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S.. 2010. The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics 67:15–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P., and Venables, A. 1996. Integration, specialization and adjustment. European Economic Review 40:959–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Liu, X., and Wang, Y. 2015. A model of China’s state capitalism. Working Paper. Hong Kong: School of Economics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2061521.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and Zhu, L. 2014. Sources of relatedness between industries and revealed comparative advantage: Evidence from China. Working Paper. Hong Kong:  School of Economics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/249bdc81268543db9e223585f4d53e5a/sources-of-relatedness-between-industries-and-revealed-comparative-advantage.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C., and Zhang, X. 2011. Cluster-based industrialization in China: Financing and performance. Journal of International Economics 84:112–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., and Tao, Z. 2009. Trends and determinants of China’s industrial agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics 65:167–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87: 237–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F. M. H., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2012. The impact of aging and technological relatedness on agglomeration externalities: A survival analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 12:485–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olley, G. S., and Pakes, A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica 64:1263–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G. 2011. ‘New’ new economic geography firm heterogeneity and agglomeration economies. Journal of Economic Geography 11:231–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D., and Brown, M. 2015. Who benefits from agglomeration? Regional Studies 49:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., and Audia, P. 2000. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology 106:424–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T., and Sorenson, O. 2003. The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy 32:229–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18:509–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tybout, J. 2000. Manufacturing firms in developing countries: How well do they do, and why? Journal of Economic Literature 38:11–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar