Regional Branching and Key Enabling Technologies: Evidence from European Patent Data

References

• Arellano, M., and Bond, S. R. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97. doi:10.2307/2297968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and Bover, O. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman, M., and Lööf, H. 2015. The geography of innovation and entrepreneurship: Introduction to the special issue. Annals of Regional Science 55 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1007/s00168-015-0713-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T., and Swedberg, R. 2012. Schumpeter’s theory of economic development: 100 years of development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22 (5): 917–33. doi:10.1007/s00191-012-0297-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belotti, F., Hughes, G., and Piano Mortari, A. 2016. Spatial panel data models using Stata. CEIS Working Paper 373. Rome: University of Rome Tor Vergata.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P. 2012. Knowledge, diversity and entrepreneurship: A spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24 (7–8): 641–60. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.617786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R. W., and Bond, S. R. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–43. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., and Rossi-Lamastra, C. 2013. University specialization and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics 41 (4): 837–63. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9509-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.. 2014. Constructing regional advantage and smart specialisation: Comparison of two european policy concepts. Scienze Regionali 13 (1): 51–68. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001004.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P., and Kogler, D. F. 2015. Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (1): 223–50. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Giannelle, C. 2014. Regional branching and smart specialisation policy. S3 Policy Brief Series 06/2014. Seville: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G., and Balland, P.-A. P.-A. 2014. Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy 43 (1): 107–14. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Minondo, A., and Navarro, M. 2013. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography 89 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1111/ecge.2013.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (3): 273–302. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K.. 2011a. Technological relatedness and regional branching. In Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation and innovation, ed. H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, and D. F. Kogler, 64–81. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K.. 2011b. Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In The handbook on regional innovation and growth, ed. P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, and F. Todtling, 187–97. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., and Martin, R. 2007. Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 537–48. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and Peri, G. 2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review 47 (4): 687–710. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. 2010. General purpose technologies. In Handbook of the economics of innovation, Vol. 2, ed. B. H. Hall, and N. Rosenberg, 761–91. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Burbidge, J. B., Magee, L., and Robb, A. L. 1988. Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (401): 123–27. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K.. 2010. Microeconometrics using Stata. Revised version. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., and Los, B. 2015. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies 49 (5): 767–81. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.940305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., and Quatraro, F. 2014. The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy 43 (10): 1681–96. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2013. Towards DUI regional innovation systems. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 13.21. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, Urban and Regional Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. 2014a. Matlab software for spatial panels. International Regional Science Review 37 (3): 389–405. doi:10.1177/0160017612452429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P.. 2014b. Spatial econometrics. From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2015. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies 49 (5): 752–66. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.806793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Preparing for our future: Developing a common strategy for key enabling technologies in the EU. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament COM (2009)-512. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012a. A European strategy for key enabling technologies—A bridge to growth and jobs. Final communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2012)-341. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012b. Feasibility study for an EU monitoring mechanism on key enabling technologies. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012c. A European strategy for key enabling technologies—A bridge to growth and jobs. Communication adopted on June 26, 2012. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013a. High-level expert group on key enabling technologies: Status implementation report. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013b. REDI: The regional entrepreneurship and development index—Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final report. Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. The digital agenda toolbox. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. 2009. Understanding ‘smart specialisation’. In The question of R&D specialisation: Perspectives and policy implications JRC-IPTS, ed. D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, and R. Van Bavel, 14–27. Seville, Spain: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D.. 2015. Smart specialisation opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., and Hall, B. H. 2009. Smart specialisation—The concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., and Boschma, R. A. 2007. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 635–49. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Izquierdo, L., and Zeppini, P. 2012. Branching innovation, recombinant innovation and endogenous technological transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4 (4): 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Tödtling, F., and Höglinger, C. 2015. Variety in knowledge sourcing, geography and innovation: Evidence from the ICT sector in Austria. Papers in Regional Science 94 (1): 25֪–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.-L. A.-L., and Hausmann, R. 2007. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317 (5837): 482–87. doi:10.1126/science.1144581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B. Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36 (5): 680–93. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalapouti, K., and Varsakelis, N. C. 2015. Intra and inter: Regional knowledge spillovers in European Union. Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (5): 760–81. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9356-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., and Tucker, I. 2013. Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies 21 (9): 1374–91. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.755832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., Brown, J. P., and Florax, R. J. G. M. R. J. 2010. A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: Theory, small sample performance and an application. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40 (4): 241–52. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Sage, J. P., and Pace, R. K. 2009. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., and Verspagen, B. 2002. Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 104 (4): 531–45. doi:10.1111/sjoe.2002.104.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and Ortega-Argilés, R. 2015. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/ecge.2011.87.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., and Frey, B. S. 2002. Entrepreneurship as recombinant growth. Small Business Economics 19 (2): 69–80. doi:10.1023/A:1016261420372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattinson, M., Messaoudi, A., Avigdor, G., Gauders, N., and Brighton, R. 2015. Analysis of smart specialisation strategies in nanotechnologies, advanced manufacturing and process technologies. Final report, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/analysis_of_RIS3_in_NMP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F. 2009. The diffusion of regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from Italian patent data. Regional Studies 43 (10): 1333–48. doi:10.1080/00343400802195162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F.. 2010. Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth: Manufacturing evidence from Italian regions. Research Policy 39 (10): 1289–302. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F.. 2016. Co-evolutionary patterns in regional knowledge bases and economic structure: Evidence from European regions. Regional Studies 50 (3): 513–39. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.927952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. 2015. Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies 49 (11): 1922–37. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.854878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 1987. The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered. Research Policy 16 (2–4): 101–30. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90026-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörvik, J., Rakhmatullin, R., and Palazuelos Martínez, M. 2014. Preliminary report on KETs priorities declared by regions in the context of their work on research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). JRC Technical Report 2013. Seville, Spain: European Commission. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC84659/preliminary%20report%20on%20kets_js.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. 2014. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography 90 (4): 403–27. doi:10.1111/ecge.2014.90.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J. 2008. Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68 (3–4): 565–80. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzani, A., Montobbio, F., Montresor, S., and Tarasconi, G. 2014. The patenting activity of the top IRI scoreboard companies: An introductory note. JRC Technical Report 2014. Seville, Spain: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. 2015. The two faces of R&D and human capital: Evidence from Western European regions. Papers in Regional Science 94 (3): 525–51. doi:10.1111/pirs.v94.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 331–60. doi:10.1162/003355398555595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windmeijer, F. 2002. ExpEnd, a Gauss programme for non-linear GMM estimation of exponential models with endogenous regressors for cross section and panel data. Working Paper. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar