2,637
Views
106
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Institutional Thickness Revisited

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Amin, A., and Thrift, N. 1994. Living in the global. In Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, ed. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Amin, A., and Thrift, N.. 1995. Institutional issues for the European regions: From markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association. Economy and Society 24 (1): 41–66. doi:10.1080/03085149500000002.
  • Asheim, B. 2000. Industrial districts: The contributions of Marshall and beyond. In The Oxford handbook of economic geography, ed. G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler, 413–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bathelt, H., and Glückler, J. 2011. The relational economy: Geographies of knowing and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bathelt, H., and Glückler, J.. 2014. Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 340–63. doi:10.1177/0309132513507823.
  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., and Boxenbaum, E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 65–107. doi:10.1080/19416520903053598.
  • Beer, A., and Lester, L. 2015. Institutional thickness and institutional effectiveness: Developing regional indices for policy and practice in Australia. Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 204-27. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1013150.
  • Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2011. The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 295–307. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq053.
  • Campbell, J. L. 2006. What’s new? General patterns of planned macro-institutional change. In Innovation, science, and institutional change, ed. J. Hage and M. Meeus, 505–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chaminade, C., and Plechero, M. 2015. Do regions make a difference? Regional innovation systems and global innovation networks in the ICT industry. European Planning Studies 23 (2): 215–37. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861806.
  • Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-C., Dicken, P., and Henderson, J. 2004. Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4): 468–84. doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x.
  • Cooke, P. 2001. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–74. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.945.
  • Coulson, A., and Ferrario, C. 2007. ‘Institutional thickness’: Local governance and economic development in Birmingham, England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (3): 591–615. doi:10.1111/ijur.2007.31.issue-3.
  • Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2012. The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (5): 1055–85. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs020.
  • Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028.
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., and Pike, A. 2015. Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 257–72. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu036.
  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., and Yeung, H. W.-C. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks 1 (2): 89–112. doi:10.1111/glob.2001.1.issue-2.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60. doi:10.2307/2095101.
  • Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., and Hwang, H. 2006. Introduction. In Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change, ed. G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, and H. Hwang, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ersoy, A. 2011. Assessment of institutional thickness in the Turkish context. African Journal of Business Management 5 (30): 12206–11.
  • Escobal, J. A., and Ponce, C. 2011. Access to public infrastructure, institutional thickness and pro‐poor growth in rural Peru. Journal of International Development 23 (3): 358–79. doi:10.1002/jid.1775.
  • Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2011. Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth. Progress in Human Geography 35 (1): 58–80. doi:10.1177/0309132510372005.
  • Faulconbridge, J. R. 2007. Exploring the role of professional associations in collective learning in London and New York’s advertising and law professional service firm clusters. Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 965–84. doi:10.1068/a38190.
  • Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
  • Fuller, C. 2005. Corporate repeat investment and regional institutional capacity: The case of after-care services in Wales. European Urban and Regional Studies 12 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1177/0969776405048497.
  • Gao, X., Guo, X., Sylvan, K. J., and Guan, J. 2010. The Chinese innovation system during economic transition: A scale-independent view. Journal of Informetrics 4 (4): 618–28. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.001.
  • Gertler, M., and Wolfe, D. A. 2002. Innovation and social learning: An introduction. In Innovation and social learning: Institutional adaptation in an era of technological change, ed. M. Gertler and D. A. Wolfe, 1–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gertler, M. S. 2004. Manufacturing culture: The institutional geography of industrial practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gertler, M. S.. 2010. Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies 44 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00343400903389979.
  • Gibbs, D. C., Jonas, A. E., Reimer, S., and Spooner, D. J. 2001. Governance, institutional capacity and partnerships in local economic development: Theoretical issues and empirical evidence from the Humber sub‐region. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (1): 103–19. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00008.
  • Glasmeier, A. 1994. Flexible districts, flexible regions? The institutional and cultural limits to districts in an era of globalization and technological paradigm shifts. In Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, ed. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 118–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goedhuys, M., and Srholec, M. 2015. Technological capabilities, institutions and firm productivity: A multilevel study. European Journal of Development Research 27 (1): 122–39. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2014.32.
  • Grabher, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr Area. In The embedded firm, ed. G. Grabher, 255–77. London: Routledge.
  • Hall, P. A., and Thelen, K. 2009. Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn020.
  • Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., and Marques, P. 2014. Advancing evolutionary economic geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies 48 (7): 1295–307. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.889815.
  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., and Yeung, H. W.-C. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 436–64. doi:10.1080/09692290210150842.
  • Henry, N., and Pinch, S. 2001. Neo-Marshallian nodes, institutional thickness, and Britain’s ‘motor sport valley’: Thick or thin? Environment and Planning A 33 (7): 1169–83. doi:10.1068/a32184.
  • Hess, M. 2004. ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography 28 (2): 165–86. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph479oa.
  • Hitt, M. A., Li, D., and Xu, K. 2016. International strategy: From local to global and beyond. Journal of World Business 51 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.016.
  • Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2016. Regional industrial path development in different types of regions: A conceptual analysis. In Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategy, ed. D. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, and A. Rodríguez-Pose, 66–84. London: Routledge.
  • Jessop, B. 2001. Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A 33 (7): 1213–35. doi:10.1068/a32183.
  • Jones, A., and Clark., J. 2000. Of vines and policy vignettes: Sectoral evolution and institutional thickness in the Languedoc. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25 (3): 333–57. doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2000.00333.x.
  • MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1): 227–45. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr009.
  • MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., and McMaster, R. 2009. Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography 85 (2): 129–50. doi:10.1111/ecge.2009.85.issue-2.
  • MacLeod, G. 2001. Beyond soft institutionalism: Accumulation, regulation, and their geographical fixes. Environment and Planning A 33 (7): 1145–67. doi:10.1068/a32194.
  • Macleod, G., and Goodwin, M. 1999. Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography 23 (4): 503–27. doi:10.1191/030913299669861026.
  • Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K. 2010. A theory of gradual institutional change. In Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power, ed. J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, R. 2000. Institutional approaches in economic geography. In A companion to economic geography, ed. E. Sheppard and T. J. Barnes, 77–96. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Martin, R., Moodysson, J., and Zukauskaite, E. 2011. Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2 (4): 550–68. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0067-2.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
  • Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. 2007. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 603–18. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm020.
  • Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., and Hwang, H. 2006. World society and the proliferation of formal organization. In Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change, ed. G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, and H. Hwang, 25–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., and Zukauskaite, E. 2016. Policy learning and smart specialization: Balancing policy change and continuity for new regional industrial paths. Science and Public Policy, doi:10.1093/scipol/scw071.
  • Neuman, M. 2007. Multi-scalar large institutional networks in regional planning. Planning Theory & Practice 8 (3): 319–44. doi:10.1080/14649350701514645.
  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., and Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (5): 920–36. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377.
  • Pike, A., Birch, K., Cumbers, A., MacKinnon, D., and McMasters, R. 2009. A geographical political economy of evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography 85 (2): 175–82. doi:10.1111/ecge.2009.85.issue-2.
  • Pike, A., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Dawley, S., and McMaster, R. 2016. Doing evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography 92 (2): 123–44. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1108830.
  • Raco, M. 1999. Competition, collaboration and the new industrial districts: Examining the institutional turn in local economic development. Urban Studies 36 (5–6): 951–68. doi:10.1080/0042098993295.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies 47 (7): 1034–47. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Cataldo, M. 2015. Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 15 (4): 673–706. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu023.
  • Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage Publications.
  • Sotarauta, M. 2016. An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C. doi:10.1177/0263774X16664906.
  • Sotarauta, M., and Mustikkamäki, N. 2015. Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C 33 (2): 342–57. doi:10.1068/c12297r.
  • Srholec, M. 2010. A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Regional Studies 44 (9): 1207–20. doi:10.1080/00343400903365094.
  • Storper, M. 1997. The regional world. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Sydow, J., and Staber, U. 2002. The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies 36 (3): 215–27. doi:10.1080/00343400220122034.
  • Tödtling, F., Lengauer, L., and Höglinger, C. 2011. Knowledge sourcing and innovation in ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ regional innovation systems-comparing ICT firms in two Austrian regions. European Planning Studies 19 (7): 1245–76. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.573135.
  • Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–19. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018.
  • Trippl, M., and Otto, A. 2009. How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A 41 (5): 1217–33. doi:10.1068/a4129.
  • Weber, M. 1968. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wei, Y. D., Li, W., and Wang, C. 2007. Restructuring industrial districts, scaling up regional development: A study of the Wenzhou model, China. Economic Geography 83 (4): 421–44. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00381.x.
  • Whitley, R. 1998. Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: The limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems. Review of International Political Economy 5 (3): 445–81. doi:10.1080/096922998347480.
  • Whitley, R.. 1999. Firms, institutions, and management control: The comparative analysis of coordination and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (5): 507–24. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00030-5.
  • Whitley, R.. 2000. The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: Business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies. Organization Studies 21 (5): 855–86. doi:10.1177/0170840600215002.
  • Whitley, R.. 2005. How national are business systems? The role of states and complementary institutions in standardizing systems of economic coordination and control at the national level. In Changing capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization, ed. G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen, 190–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Yeung, H. W.-C. 2005. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00150.x.
  • Yeung, H. W.-C.. 2009. Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies 43 (3): 325–51. doi:10.1080/00343400902777059.
  • Yeung, H. W.-C.. 2014. Governing the market in a globalizing era: Developmental states, global production networks, and inter-firm dynamics in East Asia. Review of International Political Economy 21 (1): 70–101. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.756415.
  • Yeung, H. W.-C., and Coe, N. M. 2015. Towards a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography 91 (1): 29–58. doi:10.1111/ecge.12063.
  • Zukauskaite, E. 2015. Organizational change within medical research in Sweden: On the role of the individuals and institutions. Environment and Planning C 33 (5): 1190–206. doi:10.1177/0263774X15612339.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.