Struggling for the Moral Market: Economic Knowledge, Diverse Markets, and Market Borders

References

• Amin, A. 2009. Locating the social economy. In The social economy: International perspectives on economic solidarity, ed. A. Amin, 3–21. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, J., Berndt, C., Boeckler, M., and Werner, M. 2013. Dis/articulating producers, markets, and regions: New directions in critical studies of commodity chains. Environment and Planning A 45 (11): 2544–52. doi:10.1068/a46297.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, L., and Symons, T. 2013. A technical guide to developing social impact bonds. London: Social Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T., and Sheppard, E. 2010. ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1177/0309132509343728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2002. The anti-political economy. Economy and Society 31 (2): 268–84. doi:10.1080/03085140220123162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2009. The social order of markets. Theory and Society 38 (3): 245–69. doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, C. 2015. Behavioural economics, experimentalism and the marketization of development. Economy and Society 44 (4): 567–91. doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1043794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, C., and Boeckler, M. 2009. Geographies of circulation and exchange: Constructions of markets. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4): 535–51. doi:10.1177/0309132509104805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Performative regional (dis-)integration: Transnational markets, mobile commodities and bordered north-south differences. Environment and Planning A 43 (5): 1057–78. doi:10.1068/a4381.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Geographies of marketization. In The new companion to economic geography, ed. T. Barnes, J. Peck, and E. Sheppard, 199–212. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2017. Economic, experiments, evidence: Poor behavior and the development of market subjects. In Assembling neoliberalism: Expertise, practices, subjects, ed. V. Higgins and W. Larner, 283–302. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, C., and Wirth, M. 2018. Market, metrics, morals: The social impact bond as an emerging social policy instrument. Geoforum 90: 27–35. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and Siemiatycki, M. 2016. Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketization: The entangling of state and markets. Progress in Human Geography 40 (2): 177–98. doi:10.1177/0309132515570512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. 2009. Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society 38 (3): 369–98. doi:10.1080/03085140903020580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, L., Law, J., and Mendonca, L. 2012. From potential to action: Bringing social impact bonds to the US. McKinsey&Co. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/social%20sector/our%20insights/from%20potential%20to%20action%20bringing%20social%20impact%20bonds%20to%20the%20us/from%20potential%20to%20action%20bringing%20social%20impact%20bonds%20to%20the%20us.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In The laws of the markets, ed. M. Callon, 1–57. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2007. What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, ed. D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M. 2003. Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (3): 1211–54. doi:10.2307/3312889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. 2014. From Marx to market and back again: Performing the economy. Geoforum 57: 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyde, P., and Karnani, A. 2015. Improving private sector impact on poverty alleviation: A cost-based taxonomy. California Management Review 57 (2): 20–35. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. 2018. Open-display and the “re-agencing” of the American economy: Lessons from a “pico-geography” of grocery stores in the USA, 1922–1932. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space (Online First) doi:10.1177/0308518X18763165.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. 2017. Between perfection and damnation: The emerging geography of markets. Progress in Human Geography (Online First) doi:10.1177/0309132517729769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. 2013. Social impact bonds in big society: A bird’s eye view. Nonprofit Quarterly, July 5. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2013/05/07/social-impact-bonds-in-big-society-a-bird-s-eye-view.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, A., Helbitz, A., Khare, R., Lotan, R., Newman, J., Crosby Sims, G., and Zaroulis, A. 2016. Social impact bonds. The early years. London: Social Finance. http://socialfinance.org/content/uploads/2016/07/SIBs-Early-Years_Social-Finance_2016_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. 2003. Callonistics: A disentanglement. Economy and Society 32 (3): 478–84. doi:10.1080/03085140303128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault—Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, ed. H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–26. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., and Creighton, L. A. 2013. Dual process theories. In The Oxford handbook of social cognition, ed. D. Carlston, 282–312. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2008. Diverse economies: Performative practices for `other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–32. doi:10.1177/0309132508090821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 2004. The markets are back! Progress in Human Geography 28 (4): 421–23. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph495xx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guala, F. 2005. The methodology of experimental economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2016. Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography 42 (3): 371–94. doi:10.1177/0309132516681388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höchstädter, A. K., and Scheck, B. 2015. What’s in a name?: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 132 (2): 449–75. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2327-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Pykett, J., and Whitehead, M. 2013. Changing behaviours: On the rise of the psychological state. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and Whitehead, M. 2018. ‘Politics done like science’: Critical perspectives on psychological governance and the experimental state. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (2): 313–30. doi:10.1177/0263775817748330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2002. Daniel Kahneman—Prize Lecture: Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Science. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman-lecture.html.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kear, M. 2017. The marketsite: A new conceptualization of market spatiality. Economic Geography 94 (3): 299–320. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1312337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and Leaver, A. 2012. Remaking retirement investors. Journal of Cultural Economy 5 (4): 473–88. doi:10.1080/17530350.2012.691893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2003. Is re-modernization occurring—And if so, how to prove it? A commentary on Ulrich Beck. Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2): 35–48. doi:10.1177/0263276403020002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A. 2009. Material markets: How economic agents are constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., and Milligan, K. 2012. Roundtable on impact investing. Stanford Social Innovation Review 10 (1): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2002. Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society 31 (2): 218–33. doi:10.1080/03085140220123135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., and Sparke, M. 2016. The new Washington consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode 48 (3): 724–49. doi:10.1111/anti.v48.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2014. Economentality: How the future entered government. Critical Inquiry 40 (4): 479–507. doi:10.1086/676417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muellerleile, C. 2013. Turning financial markets inside out: Polanyi, performativity and disembeddedness. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1625–42. doi:10.1068/a45610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2016. New social contracts: How innovation in welfare will address changing needs and make use of new tools. Nesta, January. https://www.nesta.org.uk/documents/776/new_social_contracts.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. 2007. An introduction to market devices. In Market devices, ed. F. Muniesa, Y. Millo, and M. Callon, 1–12. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Narain, S., Schmidt, J., Geglio, A., Gelfand, S., and Pease, M. 2012. Collaborating to harmonize standardized metrics for impact investors. Chicago: National Community Investment Fund (NCIF)/Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Social impact investment: Building the evidence base. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A., and Collier, S. J. 2005. Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, ed. A. Ong and S. J. Collier, 3–21. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ouma, S., Boeckler, M., and Lindner, P. 2013. Extending the margins of marketization: Frontier regions and the making of agro-export markets in northern Ghana. Geoforum 48: 225–35. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2011. Global policy models, globalizing poverty management: International convergence or fast-policy integration? Geography Compass 5 (4): 165–81. doi:10.1111/geco.2011.5.issue-4.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. For Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1545–68. doi:10.1068/a45236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and Theodore, N. 2007. Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography 31 (6): 731–72. doi:10.1177/0309132507083505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and Tickell, A. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34 (3): 380–404. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, J., McEwan, C., Laurie, N., and Stenning, A. 2009. Economic geography under postcolonial scrutiny. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (2): 137–42. doi:10.1111/tran.2009.34.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pykett, J. 2012. The new maternal state: The gendered politics of governing through behaviour change. Antipode 44 (1): 217–38. doi:10.1111/anti.2012.44.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pykett, J., Jupp, E., and Smith, F. M. 2017. Introduction: Governing with feeling. In Emotional states. Sites and spaces of affective governance, ed. E. Jupp, J. Pykett, and F. M. Smith, 1–17. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rangan, V. K., and Chase, L. A. 2015. The payoff of pay-for-success. Stanford Social Innovation Review 13 (4): 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2000. Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (9): 1395–411. doi:10.1177/00027640021955955.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, E. 2017. The geographies of social finance: Poverty regulation through the “invisible heart” of markets. Progress in Human Geography (Online First) doi:10.1177/0309132517739142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, K. K. 2007. Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality, and post-colonial capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2011. Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 319–31. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C., and Wright, S. 2015. Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology 56 (3): 421–44. doi:10.1086/681534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Impact Investment Taskforce. 2014. Impact investment: The invisible heart of markets. Report of the Social Impact Investment Taskforce established under the UK’s presidency of the G8. http://www.socialimpactinvestment.org/reports/Impact%20Investment%20Report%20FINAL%5B3%5D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Strassheim, H., Jung, A., and Korinek, R. 2015. Reframing expertise: The rise of behavioural insights and interventions in public policy. In Moments of valuation: Exploring sites of dissonance, ed. A. B. Antal, M. Hutter, and D. Stark, 249–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157): 1124–31. doi:10.1126/science.185.4148.340-a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S., and Prouse, C. 2018. The new gold standard: The rise of randomized control trials and experimental development. Economic Geography 94 (2): 166–87. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1392235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. C. 2002. Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, M. 2018. Nudging subjects at risk: Social impact bonds between financialization and compassion. Unpublished manuscript (on file with authors).
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S., and Payne, M. 2006. Not so NEET? A critique of the use of “NEET” in setting targets for interventions with young people. Journal of Youth Studies 9 (3): 329–44. doi:10.1080/13676260600805671.
   Google Scholar