Expanding Analyses of Path Creation: Interconnections between Territory and Technology

References

• Aarset, B., and Jakobsen, S. E. 2015. Path dependency, institutionalization and co-evolution: The missing diffusion of the blue revolution in Norwegian aquaculture. Journal of Rural Studies 41 (October): 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., and Jakobsen, S.-E. 2016. Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy 45 (4): 844–56. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afewerki, S., Karlsen, A., and MacKinnon, D. 2019. Configuring floating production networks: A case study of a new offshore wind technology across two oil and gas economies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norwegian Journal of Geography 73 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1080/00291951.2018.1494209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, A. D., Bugge, M., Capasso, M., Jolly, S., Klitkou, A., Sotarauta, M., Steen, M., and Suvinen, N. 2019. Green growth in Nordic regions. NIFU Working Paper 7. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333981148_Green_growth_in_Nordic_regions_Eight_case_studies.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins and Oslo Economics. 2016. Kvalitetssikring (KS1) av KVU om demonstrasjon av fullskala fangst, transport og lagring av CO₂ [Quality Assurance (QS1) of Concept Study (CS) on demonstration of full-scale capture, transportation and storage of CO₂]. Oslo, Norway: Atkins and Oslo Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins and Oslo Economics. 2018. Kvalitetssikring (KS2) av demonstrasjon av fullskala fangst, transport og lagring av CO₂. Rapport fase 1 og 2. [Quality Assurance (QA2) of demonstration of full-scale capture, transportation and storage of CO₂. Report phase 1 and 2]. Oslo, Norway: Atkins and Oslo Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, F., and Fuenfschilling, L. 2019. Local initiatives and global regimes—Multi-scalar transition dynamics in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 216 (April): 172–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchicci, L. 2009. Innovating for sustainability. Green entrepreneurship in personal mobility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandèn, B., and Truffer, B. 2015. Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (2015): 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., and Rickne, A. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 407–29. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., and Truffer, B. 2020. Geographies of transition—From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A commentary on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34 (March): 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., and Truffer, B. 2017. Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy 46 (7): 1284–98. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2014. Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy 43 (1): 138–55. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2016. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., and Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2011. The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 295–307. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M. M., and Bloch, C. W. 2016. Between bricolage and breakthroughs—Framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Public Money and Management 36 (4): 281–88. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1162599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and Stankiewicz, R. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (June): 93–118. doi:10.1007/BF01224915.
   Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., and Simmie, J. 2018. New technological path creation and the role of institutions in different geo-political spaces. European Planning Studies 26 (5): 969–87. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1441380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L. 2015. Engaging with changing spatial realities in TIS research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (July): 70–72. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., and Truffer, B. 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41 (6): 968–79. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2012. Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 817–34. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini, C. 2019. Location determinants of green technological entry: Evidence from European regions. Small Business Economics 52 (4): 845–58. doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., and Pike, A. 2015. Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 257–72. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economics Norway. 2017. Nøkkeltall Vestlandet 2017 [Key figures western Norway 2017]. Samfunnsøkonomisk Analyse AS [Economics Norway]. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/576280dd6b8f5b9b197512ef/t/5954efa1e6f2e14cc6dcd545/1498738615716/R68-2017+N%C3%B8kkeltall+for+Vestlandet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2012. Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 791–816. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., and Jakobsen, S. E. 2017. Industrial renewal: Narratives in play in the development of green technologies in the Norwegian salmon farming industry. Geographical Journal 183 (2): 140–51. doi:10.1111/geoj.12194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 1–40. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global CCS Institute. 2018. The global status of CCS 2018. Melbourne, Australia: Global CCS Institute. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., and Trippl, M. 2018. Unrelated knowledge combinations: Unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 257–74. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and Hansen, T. 2019. Green industrial path development in different types of regions. European Planning Studies 27 (11): 2163–83. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1648385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and Sotarauta, M. 2019. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., and Rusten, G. 2016. The challenges of greening energy: Policy/industry dissonance at the Mongstad refinery, Norway. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (2): 340–55. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies 53 (11): 1636–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., and Smits, R. E. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–32. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmen, A. K. T., and Fosse, J. K. 2017. Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies 25 (3): 498–515. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1276159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2018. Global EV outlook 2018. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/gevo2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., and Normann, R. 2018. Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., and Ridgeway, C. L. 2006. Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 53–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Gaede, J., Meadowcroft, J., and Watson, J. 2016. The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102 (January): 250–60. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyllingstad, N., and Rypestøl, J. O. 2019. Towards a more sustainable process industry: A single case study of restructuring within the Eyde process industry cluster. Norwegian Journal of Geography 73 (1): 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, X., Ye, Z., Xu, Z., Husar Holmes, M., and Henry Lambright, W. 2012. Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technological innovation system in China: Structure, function evaluation and policy implication. Energy Policy 50 (2012): 635–46. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovio, R., and Kivimaa, P. 2012. Comparing alternative path creation frameworks in the context of emerging biofuel fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 773–90. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., and McMaster, R. 2009. Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography 85 (2): 129–50. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., and Cumbers, A. 2019a. Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography 95 (2): 113–35. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M.-P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., and Normann, H. E. 2019b. Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning 130 (May): 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritime Battery Forum. 2019. Ship register reaches 300 vessel mark! https://maritimebatteryforum.com/news/ship-register-reaches-300-vessel-mark.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., and Truffer, B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41 (6): 955–67. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Suter, M., and Ingold, K. 2016. Socio-technical transitions and policy change—Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18 (March): 215–37. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and Truffer, B. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Wirth, S., and Truffer, B. 2016. Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy—A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy 45 (1): 330–44. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., Schreiber, A., and Müller, T. E. 2012. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy and Environmental Science 5 (6): 7281–305. doi:10.1039/c2ee03403d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusson, N., Kern, F., Watson, J., Arapostathis, S., Chalmers, H., Ghaleigh, N., Heptonstall, P., Pearson, P., Rossati, D., and Russell, S. 2012. A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (5): 903–18. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, H., Martin, R., and Zukauskaite, E. 2019. The multiple roles of demand in new regional industrial path development: A conceptual analysis. EPA: Economy and Space 51 (8): 1741–57. doi:10.1177/0308518X19863438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. Roepke lecture in economic geography—Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock‐in to evolution. Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matti, C., Consoli, D., and Uyarra, E. 2017. Multi level policy mixes and industry emergence: The case of wind energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 661–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenonEconomics. 2019. Fra elektrifisering til eksportevenetyr? [From electrification to export adventure?] Oslo, Norway: Menon Economics. https://www.menon.no/wp-content/uploads/2019-29-Fullelektrifisering-av-norsk-%C3%B8konomi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. 2016. Mulighetsstudie av fullskala CO2-håndtering i Norge [Opportunity study for full scale Carbon Capture and Storage in Norway]. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/departementene/oed/pdf/mulighetsstudien.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., and Trippl, M. 2017. Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors and modes of change in Scania’s games industry. European Planning Studies 25 (3): 481–97, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2016.1212815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2019. Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in West Sweden. European Planning Studies 27 (11): 2144–62. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R. 2018. The role of multilevel dynamics and agency in regional industry renewal. PhD diss., University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Normann, H. E. 2017. Policy networks in energy transitions: The cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in Norway. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118 (May): 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, J. C. M., Martins, F. G., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., and Simoes, M. 2011. Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 89 (9): 1446–60. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt, K., Negro, S. O., Rogge, K. S., and Hekkert, M. P. 2016. Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: The case of offshore wind in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 106 (May): 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., Sternberg, R., and Carpenter, J. 2014. New technological path creation: Evidence from the British and German wind energy industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24 (4): 875–904. doi:10.1007/s00191-014-0354-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøtun, S. G. 2018. A ferry making waves: A demonstration project ‘doing’ institutional work in a greening maritime industry. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 73 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1080/00291951.2018.1526208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøtun, S. G., and Njøs, R. 2019. Green reorientation of clusters and the role of policy: ‘The normative’ and ‘the neutral’ route. European Planning Studies 27 (12): 2411–30. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1630370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., Rossiter, W., and McDonald-Junor, D. 2017. Adaptive capability and path creation in the post-industrial city: The case of Nottingham’s biotechnology sector. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10 (3): 491–508. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2016. Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–22. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., Bach, H., Bjørgum, Ø., Hansen, T., and Kenzhegaliyeva, A. 2019. Greening the fleet: A technological innovation system (TIS) analysis of hydrogen, battery electric, liquefied biogas, and biodiesel in the maritime sector. SINTEF report 0093. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and Hansen, G. H. 2018. Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography 94 (2): 188–210. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størset, S. Ø., Tangen, G., Berstad, D., Eliasson, P., Hoff, K. A., Langørgen, Ø., Munkejord, S. T., Roussanaly, S., and Torsæter, M. 2019. Profiting from CCS innovations: A study to measure potential value creation from CCS research and development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 83 (April): 208–15. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størset, S. Ø., Tangen, G., Wolfgang, O., and Sand, G. 2018. Industrielle muligheter og arbeidsplasser ved CO2-håndtering i Norge [Industrial opportunities and work places connected to CO2 handling in Norway]. SINTEF Report 00450. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Summit Power 2017. Clean air—clean industry—clean growth. How carbon capture will boost the UK economy. Report. October http://www.ccsassociation.org/news-and-events/reports-and-publications/clean-air-clean-industry-clean-growth/.
   Google Scholar
• Suurs, R. A. A., Hekkert, M. P., Kieboom, S., and Smits, R. E. H. M. 2010. Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel. Energy Policy 38 (1): 419–31. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2018. Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1779–95. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., and Rypestøl, J. O. 2020. Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum 111 (May): 189–97. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A. 2017. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2011. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication–A synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Alphen, K., van Ruijven, J., Kasa, S., Hekkert, M., and Turkenburg, W. 2009. The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy 37 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., and Plechero, M. 2017. Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography 93 (4): 325–45. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar